I don't know about you but ImaBench calls this trolling. He had defined DNA as a kind of fictional antelope and Poop as a slogan that states "People order our patties".
Defining terms before my opponent definitely helps me win, especially when sources don't necessarily help me, i.e semantic debates or its likes.
Also, getting support from one of the best debaters on this site definitely makes me happy :)
You have to prove a resolution too. You have to prove HOW humans originated aside from being from adam and eve, not just prove that your opponent is wrong.
I just revisited this place and found out how Alec could easily win this debate:
1. State that Gerudo Desert is as cold in the night as it is hot in the day
2. Inquire the evidence that Malice creates heat since no concrete evidence is there
3. Inquire if Peach even cheat in Canon
4. Give another criterion for hot women that makes Peach hotter than Zelda, consider there is no proof of mine is better than his.
5. State that Zelda, for 100 years, does not take human form until Ganon is dead and this form, made out of pure magic, could withstand everything, including heat
You have to prove:
1. 2 humans originated humanity, instead of millions of apes.
2. There are 2 humans, and only 2 humans at the beginning
3. God exists and created them
4. They are called Adam and Eve.
5. Because of 1 and 2, thus some theories of the current anthropology and biology that are proven true does not work.
You said yourself BoP is shared. Being passive means you will have a disadvantageous position, even more so when you are debating RM, one of the most experienced debaters out there.
Since Destroy is the antonym for Create, When bombs destroy matter, it generates(creates) heat and energy. Because bombs do, in fact, generate heat and energy, saying that it only destroys would be logically false. I think Crossed could be disproven with this single point.
No, it is meant to be mentally and rhetorically allowed. I am trying to make people believe it is okay to put pineapple on pizza. That aside. I predict RM will accept this but I'd hate to see such a great debater to debate me 4 times in a row and winning them.
I don't know about you but ImaBench calls this trolling. He had defined DNA as a kind of fictional antelope and Poop as a slogan that states "People order our patties".
Defining terms before my opponent definitely helps me win, especially when sources don't necessarily help me, i.e semantic debates or its likes.
Also, getting support from one of the best debaters on this site definitely makes me happy :)
I did it then I lost. Don't tell him.
"Guns stop crime"
Wiser words have never been spoken
Why should zoos be abolished completely? I mean, I am with pro here.
I am finally winning something.
Not with my case though. I have encountered countless veterans and that resulting in me not winning any in the last 2 weeks.
Oh wait that is Oromagi...
Who is that activist flag guy?
Bump
This guy was on DDO right...?
---> #7
You have to prove a resolution too. You have to prove HOW humans originated aside from being from adam and eve, not just prove that your opponent is wrong.
bump
Lincoln, FDR and JFK will prob be top 5, and Trump will be bottom 5 or so.
I am finally winning something
When the topic is very evident, I use your style, which is short description+Source.
I think this is an easy win for you.
Damn, you just roasted a banned debater.
I think this is truism.
Do you know about Zelda?
I try too.
true{
if(opponent==!meeting burdenOfProof)
style=(Oromagi)
else{
if(source=evident)
style=(Trent0405)
else{
style=(RationalMadman)
}}}
I just revisited this place and found out how Alec could easily win this debate:
1. State that Gerudo Desert is as cold in the night as it is hot in the day
2. Inquire the evidence that Malice creates heat since no concrete evidence is there
3. Inquire if Peach even cheat in Canon
4. Give another criterion for hot women that makes Peach hotter than Zelda, consider there is no proof of mine is better than his.
5. State that Zelda, for 100 years, does not take human form until Ganon is dead and this form, made out of pure magic, could withstand everything, including heat
Sadly, Alec did none of those and I won.
You have to prove:
1. 2 humans originated humanity, instead of millions of apes.
2. There are 2 humans, and only 2 humans at the beginning
3. God exists and created them
4. They are called Adam and Eve.
5. Because of 1 and 2, thus some theories of the current anthropology and biology that are proven true does not work.
Dreadnought is impressive at his age.
I am sure, if Oro accepted this, he will 100% win.
*Is tHiS NoOb tRapPIng??? "??:?!??!*
I mean, I am Chinese but I actually agree with Crocodile. Constructed criticism is never bad.
Are you, perhaps, an Alt of Crocodile?
Multi-accounting whilst banned is not allowed on this site.
It means that he is skilled. You, IDK.
Based on his skill level, the only way you'll win is if he doesn't try.
Made me think of my "Con will win the debate" debate while I am Pro. The first actual debate that I have won.
No. I vote objectively. If one makes poor arguments, he loses.
You realize RM is using you as a free win farm, right?
Just what, are you doing?
The easiest way is to implement an AI who fairly judges all the debates, and if voting is mandatory the quality will go down.
You said yourself BoP is shared. Being passive means you will have a disadvantageous position, even more so when you are debating RM, one of the most experienced debaters out there.
Keep this in mind: You could be the first person on the internet to defeat Oro.
Since Destroy is the antonym for Create, When bombs destroy matter, it generates(creates) heat and energy. Because bombs do, in fact, generate heat and energy, saying that it only destroys would be logically false. I think Crossed could be disproven with this single point.
EricT sure is very ambitious.
No, it is meant to be mentally and rhetorically allowed. I am trying to make people believe it is okay to put pineapple on pizza. That aside. I predict RM will accept this but I'd hate to see such a great debater to debate me 4 times in a row and winning them.
Sources for Round 2:
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Kart
[2]https://www.nintendo.com/games/detail/mario-and-sonic-at-the-olympic-games-tokyo-2020-switch/
[3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mario_Bros.
[4]https://www.quora.com/Which-is-better-bravery-or-intelligence
[5]https://www.mariowiki.com/Poltergust_3000
[6]https://www.mariowiki.com/List_of_power-ups
Thank you.
I should have made it 10000 characters...
Nope, Neither Oro nor Danielle was the type you mentioned. They are one of the best ones too.
This looks like something Oro will accept
"Characters per argument
30,000"
How ironic.
"Understood"
Stupid autocorrection
oohh I finally understanding one thing I was doing wrong.
I should have prepared the first round at least, before instigating/accepting any debate.
I think me growing up in China might be an influence, but Communism could be much better than Nazism if the government weren't corrupt in any way.
That said, nope. I don't wanna debate this because I have 3 other ones that I need a lot of effort at least.
I can see why people would create alts just to vote themselves and extract info on the forums, but debating yourself? That's just next level.