I think debaters like Boris_Sh who forfeits the first round then go are just rankings boosters. Seriously, they exist so much. As much as it is convenient for point farming, it discourages actual discussion.
I am genuinely convinced that only some truths can be changed and remain true. I am convinced that truth stays objective unless it is human construct, which it isn't.
I would enjoy a sandwich with toasted bread, lettuce, cheese, ham, and mayo. It seems pretty omnivorous. I am not a vegan either but I admit eating veggies is definitely healthy.
Well, Pro is talking about vegan diets, which means anything that is a meal and contain no meat is counted. Also, if you are using that argument it is up to no good because, no semantics, and this no changing the pragmatic sense the instigator created.
However, when the perception is not even close to reaching the truth, not even the most innovative and new, Truth cannot be defined. At then, the most admitted perception will be Truth. Truth is a human construct and humans define it. You won't know what dogs or toads are talking about unless you have a linguist with a voice recorder strapped on his neck. Truth is exclusive to human language and humans define it.
Because that is a double negative, it means I know something, which is truism consider if I know nothing, I won't even be writing this comment because I don't know how to operate a computer nor use English if so.
OK. we just witnessed two grown adults making something that could have minor negative effects on our health, to something essential for humanity, to something detrimental to humanity, bla bla bla.
What's funny is that in Chinese sources they think the US is spreading lies. Your logic means jail for China. I am not advocating that, but I think many of your points are flawed. US media isn't any better than China's.
Thank you for not being a religious conservative. I don't want a religious conservative taking this debate because every single of my points will be recycled until it is pure garbage.
Because being a doctor/actor requires no specific amount of creation of heat or cold, K is not involved in this debate, unless you are talking about a specific surgery that Peter Capaldi performed using a substance in a temperature close to absolute zero.
Thank You.
Why did I come here expecting to see a proof of why metamorphic rock is better than igneous rock?
Looks like RM is here.
...
christopher_best
What do ghostbusters have to do with 5G?
Wow, unexpected. Got myself a big opponent here who won both of our debates.
Bump
Seriously these people appear too much. First join the site, then comment, then FF and feed you the win.
Wanna vote?
Thank you :)
Do you want to vote?
bump
I think debaters like Boris_Sh who forfeits the first round then go are just rankings boosters. Seriously, they exist so much. As much as it is convenient for point farming, it discourages actual discussion.
I am genuinely convinced that only some truths can be changed and remain true. I am convinced that truth stays objective unless it is human construct, which it isn't.
Define "Song".
I mean, RM only needed one point to win this debate. I don't even know how Pro stand a chance.
You are Pinkfreud? You don't sound like him at all.
I am starting to believe you are an alt of Oro since you debate so much like him.
"Sandwiches still have only 1 piece of bread. "
Sorry for making that error. What I was to convey is that "Hot Dogs still have only 1 piece of bread".
As a Student, I agree with Con. Too much homework will eventually lead to sadness and depression because pressure, and that's not good.
I would enjoy a sandwich with toasted bread, lettuce, cheese, ham, and mayo. It seems pretty omnivorous. I am not a vegan either but I admit eating veggies is definitely healthy.
I speculate that you aren't vegan?
Well, Pro is talking about vegan diets, which means anything that is a meal and contain no meat is counted. Also, if you are using that argument it is up to no good because, no semantics, and this no changing the pragmatic sense the instigator created.
I mean, I am super evident in that veganism is the optimal diet in ane environmental sense, but for humans alone and only for eating? nope.
That is why it is worth a debate. If it hints that truth is subjective directly to the debater then this debate will be an unfair one: Truism.
However, when the perception is not even close to reaching the truth, not even the most innovative and new, Truth cannot be defined. At then, the most admitted perception will be Truth. Truth is a human construct and humans define it. You won't know what dogs or toads are talking about unless you have a linguist with a voice recorder strapped on his neck. Truth is exclusive to human language and humans define it.
Ok, I think I lost this debate. You guys can feel free to vote Fauxlaw.
Don't forfeit.
Oh nvm thanks I guess :>
How is my vote still there??
What I mean is that it is OK to exist but it is mot to be made fair.
I might not win this debate(The likelyhood is small) but I am certainly trying.
No, It is not fair. Changing the word to "fair" would not be fair for me. Blue shell is useful in places different than being fair.
Bump
"If a singular argument by sourcing is flawed, it should not be awarded. See my vote"
Why did you vote Pro instead of tie it?
I don't know if you are playing dumb or you are mocking me, but what you are saying is essentially 2x2= -4.
Yes, thank you.
"You don’t know nothing."
Because that is a double negative, it means I know something, which is truism consider if I know nothing, I won't even be writing this comment because I don't know how to operate a computer nor use English if so.
OK. we just witnessed two grown adults making something that could have minor negative effects on our health, to something essential for humanity, to something detrimental to humanity, bla bla bla.
Wow. Advertisement. Very cool thank you.
You are completely winning. Using the terms "I can't yet" is still containing "I can't".
What's funny is that in Chinese sources they think the US is spreading lies. Your logic means jail for China. I am not advocating that, but I think many of your points are flawed. US media isn't any better than China's.
What is Blarggh? I am confused. Is this some type of technology that China needs?
Here is a re-active RM, which accepts everything he could think of.
Thank you for not being a religious conservative. I don't want a religious conservative taking this debate because every single of my points will be recycled until it is pure garbage.
Is this good, or better than yours?
K is a unit of temperature, Kelvin.
Because being a doctor/actor requires no specific amount of creation of heat or cold, K is not involved in this debate, unless you are talking about a specific surgery that Peter Capaldi performed using a substance in a temperature close to absolute zero.
define "song".
420? That is barely enough for a single paragraph!