"Don't skip rounds especially the first. Don't eat yellow snow, and if a stranger comes into your room and night and says they are the tooth fairy, scream for mamma."
Is the latter part an old saying back in the good old days?
There is evidence of why the Earth is flat, and if the circumstance is that the alien's manipulated our vision, government, schools as well as our planet when our planet is truly flat, then the earth is flat. Of course, it is most likely made-up and false, but under a very unlikely circumstance, it could be plausible.
This is on top of that in the BC era, Flat-Earth view was common.
If both debaters are smart, then the debate wouldn’t be stupid. Especially since both debaters are giving effort. If all Of an organization are geniuses and all of them tries, then no matter what weird thing they do, the organization is not stupid.
"Obviously, another way to look at the matter is that this debate is a colossal waste of time and energy, thus making it stupid."
Well debates about theoretical philosophy are also a waste of time and energy because they aren't practical, but the fact they are having clash of ideas means that every debate is not stupid.
Also, the word "esoteric" would actually make you smart instead of stupid because you know more than I do, and since I have intelligence, you would also have intelligence.
Do you have any idea what debating is? If I have a debate where the opponent must forfeit, then who the hell on the green-and-blue earth would even try to accept this debate?
Like, deleting old content, adding newer relevant content, using newer grammar, etc. I don't want to read a volume of old books with it telling me how women are lesser than men to an extent, or that I couldn't eat certain meat because of how it works instead of what process it undergoes to clean.
I agree with you. We can define News as reality shows. For debating reasons I didn't do this because my opponent may refute that news aren't reality shows, so I used one of her examples to answer.
Sorry. I was trying to enhance my logical abilities by arguing in a position that I do not believe. I forgot what I was trying to do so I put PRO. Then when this comment was posted I realized what I was trying to do.
So glad that DArt is actually a fair arena. Back in DDO, I am either smashing trolls or I am forfeiting to greatest debaters, that wouldn't make me really grow. Here on DArt, I could debate against everybody and I could improve because my levels are similar to the top 100-50 users, and that I could improve.
No, Peter Capaldi does not have a Doctorate on medical studies.
"CON passes the talking feather to PRO."
NO U DIDNT
"Could see this from a mile away"
No you can't, unless you are at least 1,609 meters from a display screen that can connect to internet.
"Don't skip rounds especially the first. Don't eat yellow snow, and if a stranger comes into your room and night and says they are the tooth fairy, scream for mamma."
Is the latter part an old saying back in the good old days?
Are machines inputted of racist information or they will develop so on their own actions?
I think ragnar is busy. Anyways, you will complete 2 full debates that are moderated.
I am Chinese and I strongly disagree. What do you expect, China completely exterminating the virus?
So you:
1. Cannot prove what I ask you to prove and believe that that cannot be proven
2. Are an atheist
3. Can use Sarcasm
Alright, interesting.
The burden of Proof is on you.
There is evidence of why the Earth is flat, and if the circumstance is that the alien's manipulated our vision, government, schools as well as our planet when our planet is truly flat, then the earth is flat. Of course, it is most likely made-up and false, but under a very unlikely circumstance, it could be plausible.
This is on top of that in the BC era, Flat-Earth view was common.
If both debaters are smart, then the debate wouldn’t be stupid. Especially since both debaters are giving effort. If all Of an organization are geniuses and all of them tries, then no matter what weird thing they do, the organization is not stupid.
"Obviously, another way to look at the matter is that this debate is a colossal waste of time and energy, thus making it stupid."
Well debates about theoretical philosophy are also a waste of time and energy because they aren't practical, but the fact they are having clash of ideas means that every debate is not stupid.
Also, the word "esoteric" would actually make you smart instead of stupid because you know more than I do, and since I have intelligence, you would also have intelligence.
In a sense I am not speaking English. I am speaking American.
Do you have any idea what debating is? If I have a debate where the opponent must forfeit, then who the hell on the green-and-blue earth would even try to accept this debate?
Next what? Accepting a debate but my opponent must forfeit all rounds or he loses?
If this were conventional voting, I will get S&G and Conduct lost if so, but knowing good argument is 3 points, so I am still winnin'.
This debate is not stupid. Some intelligence are into it. We may be stupid but at this point we are doing smart things.
Stupid means not intelligent. Me proving that this is intelligent means that this is not stupid.
Bruh this is an encrypted message.
Having the ability to encode and translate into different messages is a smart move.
BOOM Uno Reverse Card
Bruh, you can't even win this debate.
"But voting on the 20 debates that someone makes and then forfeits are fun ;("
Are you talking about Ramdatt? I mean, there is no doubt voting, because forfeiting accounts for at least the loss of conduct points.
Did you come from DDO? Because this is how DDO verifies.
yes . . . I am finally holding a controversial position !
Okie, it is intentional.
100 characters?? That is not enough to unleash my true potential. I usually write 2000 characters in a normal debate on a good day.
This time, I am not being the semantic man I had been. Being pragmatic is rather useful in this debate.
Like, deleting old content, adding newer relevant content, using newer grammar, etc. I don't want to read a volume of old books with it telling me how women are lesser than men to an extent, or that I couldn't eat certain meat because of how it works instead of what process it undergoes to clean.
I know this may seem like an easy win for me, but strong disagreement exists.
I predict that Melcharaz will appear in this comment section, predictably giving source to the other side.
"Spanking is great, I do it all the time! Oh... wait..."
Are you referring to teasing in a relationship or are you referring to abuse? Because the former is OK and the latter is bad.
How do you think we could compare... cat memes?
I agree with you. We can define News as reality shows. For debating reasons I didn't do this because my opponent may refute that news aren't reality shows, so I used one of her examples to answer.
Sorry. I was trying to enhance my logical abilities by arguing in a position that I do not believe. I forgot what I was trying to do so I put PRO. Then when this comment was posted I realized what I was trying to do.
Why does God create meat if he doesn't want humans to consume them?
Oh sure no, because God could have already entered the information in my brain.
I agree with Pro. Kinda expecting something from Con. Wonder why they think spanking is good.
Hey, this is the 2000th debate on the entire site!
Why conduct to Pro?
Although I see Pro is definitely trying his best, I doubt that he can win against Oromagi.
Well yes. I turn pressure into positive energy. To me, finishing an argument on time is more important than finishing my homework.
So glad that DArt is actually a fair arena. Back in DDO, I am either smashing trolls or I am forfeiting to greatest debaters, that wouldn't make me really grow. Here on DArt, I could debate against everybody and I could improve because my levels are similar to the top 100-50 users, and that I could improve.
I hate to turn this into a religious debate, but Why does God create meat if he doesn't want humans to consume them?
I am probably losing 3 points every 7 points.
You failed to refute most of my points because you have failed to be present at the last round. That's a full forfeit for ya.
Oh, so you are going with that method.
How is con not losing ranking points?!
Remember, if you can see this message, it means that I typed on a computer which means that I exist. Being in a simulation doesn't mean I don't exist.
Can you prove that none of us exist?
In an altruistic and objective world, all of us exist. In solipsism, I exist.