Total posts: 15,922
1. Disc
2. LittleCookie08
3. PressF4Respect
4. User_2006
5. Speedrace
6. K_Michael
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Created:
1. Disc
2. LittleCookie08
3. PressF4Respect
4. User_2006
5. Speedrace
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Created:
1. Disc
2. LittleCookie08
3. PressF4Respect
4. User_2006
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Created:
Posted in:
3rd link
Bird at 1:26 is a racist, he says some bad stuff, just as a disclaimer
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
---------------------
1. Disc
2. LittleCookie08
3. PressF4Respect
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
---------------
Created:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Oh god, oh god
Created:
Created:
---------------------
1. Disc
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
---------------
Created:
-->
@Imabench
@Barney
@warren42
Interested?
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
@ILikePie5
@oromagi
@PressF4Respect
@skittlez09
Interested?
Created:
-->
@Lunatic
@Discipulus_Didicit
@Speedrace
@WaterPhoenix
last episodes competitors interested again?
Created:
Supa's Spectacular Game Show is a game show hosted by me! This game show is unique and does not take much time at all...
HOW TO PLAY
A. I will announce the prompt to the contestants, (eg: Spoiler Alert, the true bad guy in Edgame was ___). Each contestant will submit their answers to me via a private PM.
B. Once all answers are submitted, I will put a list of all the submitted answers on the board. From there, you will pick the best, the 2nd best, and the 3rd best answers. YOU DON'T VOTE YOURSELF
C. Once the votes are tallied, I will announce how each vote is judge
A first place vote is worth $2000 dollars, a second place vote is worth $1000, and a third place vote is worth $500 dollars.
The person with the most money wins an extra $1000 dollars, while second receives $250 extra
The Winner is Whoever Receives the most money by the end of the show
That is the basic premise, but there are other parts to the show as well
-----------------
Double Dollars (Vote)=A vote is worth 2x the dollars
Double Winnings= The Winner Receives 2x the dollars
Jackpot= The Winner Gets the Jackpot Prize
No Vote Bankrupt= People who get no votes lose money
Double Winnings= The Winner Receives 2x the dollars
Jackpot= The Winner Gets the Jackpot Prize
No Vote Bankrupt= People who get no votes lose money
One Word Round=Respond to the prompt in one word
Winner Only= The winner gets $3000 dollars, second gets $0
Mystery Wheel= The winner will get a mystery prize, whether that be money, discord role, promo, or anything. Second gets nothing
-------------------
General Rules
- No discussing about votes to other players
- No allying
- 12hrs to submit an answer, 12hrs to vote the money
- Submit on time
- Unless we go on Discord, no NSFW related cards
We can run this game with as many people as we want, but an 18 person setup would be nice. It takes no time and is very easy. If you have a Discord and want to do more NSFW type cards, please state so
---------------------
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
---------------
Created:
Posted in:
When someone says full claim, you give your role as well, it took him maybe a page to do that. I think that's indicator of thinking of a role.
Created:
Posted in:
I am OK with an User lynch at this point. His role becomes useless at this point. I also think his BP claim is still fishy. He was also hesitant to claim his role, which means he could be lying. I have a gut feeling that someone that's a decently experienced player guided him to claim BP to build a noob town cred for him claiming. I think he is a safe lynch candidate for DP1.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
The links to Speedrace's Captain America Civil War Mafia are broken and do not work. You can't access it through a link
Created:
Posted in:
Or maybe my thinking is off, after all TUF did say that I have no clue what I'm doing after 2 years of playing
Created:
Posted in:
Ok maybe dirt isn't pointless, but making a house out of dirt
Created:
Posted in:
Well at this point, User's role is as pointless as dirt. Should we look for another lynch, or pressure with User. We don't have infinite time
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
Hmm interesting. But he would have to be on a team with an experienced player. Why would any of us claim BP in that situation?
Created:
Posted in:
Only someone who is truly new would claim a BP in DP1.
Created:
-->
@User_2006
Sports do as well
Created:
-->
@User_2006
Sports benefit you physically. Art doesn't necessarily benefit you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
I think you are the best candidate for a lynch at the moment. That means I think you are most likely to be scum from the evidence gathered
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
Created:
Posted in:
Let me VTL User
This will bring him to L-1, which good be cause for him to claim. If he doesn't, I think we should lynch him. I am not excited about this lynch, but for DP1, it seems like a logical lynch
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
Forgot to say this but VTL User because his bouncing around is giving me noob Mafia vibes
Very easily could be noob town paranoia as well. Like I said, I am neutral on User. His reads and on and off lead me to believe he is scum, but at the same time, paranoia is a thing for lots of new players who are town, trying to justify reads. But I wouldn't be shocked
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
I claim early as Vanilla because my role serves no overall purpose other than to discuss, and lead with my voice and my vote.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
If it was a normal person, User would have been my VTL, but I do recall myself playing like this in my first mafia games. Random thought process overall with no coherent goal. I give him town leeway cause of that, but I wouldn't be shocked if he flipped scum. I'd like to see how the DP progress however and see his reactions overall
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
Not everyone here is all serious and stuff. It’s ok to be relax
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
This is DArt, and I usually switch off my sense of humor unconsciously because I think debating is supposed to be serious. In fact, I don't know about the rule, and if Pressf's vote is serious, then I will 100% keep my vote on Supadudz.
How is me not instantly getting mad at PF4R RVS link at all to me being scum? There is no real connection at all. Are you trying to skew information to nurture reactions?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
Do you not understand what sarcasm is? Do you take things this literally in IRL
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@User_2006
I wouldn't take his VTL on me too serious. It is a meme in DART to vote me in the beginning, then to remove the vote off me. The meme sadly died for some reason and Press is like the old parent who is always behind in the memes
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Melcharaz
2: religious views.
I think that's a bad reason to block people. Instead of blocking, why not try to talk with them about your views?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@CaptainSceptic
I have tried to show you respect and given you ways out. I have even said how I defend you. Unfortunately, you want to double down on nonsense.You state that Ck sitting out:shows he would have planned to kneel during the ceremony,You don't know that. You don't even know, because you were not there and did not ask him. You are making shit up to defend yourself, and you just don't know. You did not even qualify your answer, you stated it as a fact. As a famous, yet unnamed, orange creature would say "fake news".
Then why would he not play on 9/11. What could be the reason? What's one logical reason he would sit out during 9/1? I am also to make assumptions based on past evidence and using my overall. You can safely assume the reason why something happened is because of a certain reason. The reason is that he was planning to kneel. He wasn't injured when he decided to sit out. Stop with this nonsense
I am, but a 10th of the way through your response, and you already lose credibility.
Nice credibility attack.
You then state in response to the question about why would you highlight CK ad not the others who protested,I don't. Why should it matter. It is egregious for all of them.It does matter. You entire premise is based on conduct that is egregious. You give no reason to highlight CK and he was not even there. Your premise is based on a supposition on why CK did not attend. You have no idea the names of the other players.... because you say it does not matter. Why does it matter for CK?
I am highlighting his overall actions he did during the time-frame. You focus on 9/11 and have that same delusion. You're argument is full of delusion saying I'm focusing on 9/11. I am not listening to this argument anymore because you don't understand and just dismiss it.
Next, you tie yourself in a logical know. You say at one point the anthem is about the brave "men" who fought. If you are defending the rights of the military and their honor why are you sexist about it?
Is this a joke? Sexist
The troop death on the day of 9/11 is a handful. Al horrifically caused by heinous acts. However, there were collectively thousands of fathers, mothers, children, civil servants, public servants killed.
We honor all the people that died in 9/11. We honor those as well when we remember 9/11. What's your point
You misrepresent what the flag is, what 9/11 is, and what the national anthem is for. You draw baseless conclusions about why CK did not show up. Your concern for others that acted in an "egregious manner" is summed up by a "yeah well they were bad."You are focusing on CK, who was not even present and calling him a Fcking idiot. You do not respect his right to protest (if that is what he was doing, but we do not know that because he was not in public and made no comments about why he was not present).In your misplaced cloud of patriotism, you cast an enormous tarp of justification and unqualified censorship, failing to recognize that even when people disagree with you, defending their right to disagree is more important than trying to censor them for not agreeing.The title and your narrative still strongly suggest an individual issue with CK rather than a border issue with the behavior.
I am done arguing with you about this matter. You have only come to hasty generalizations about my topic and have gotten off track of the topic. My generalization is an assumption reasonable to make. This is not a 9/11 argument overall. I did not say CK shouldn't protest, but the way he went about kneeling is disrespectful. You throw that argument out of the window and just tie back to one evidence of 9/11, ignoring all the evidence made. This is about kneeling, not his act during 9/11. You completely twisted my words in a way. I have said it multiple times that I have a problem with the protest, yet you say I have a personal vendetta. This is wrong
Have fun making generalizations about my argument. You clearly don't understand my point
Created: