Total posts: 15,922
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
@Discipulus_Didicit
@Speedrace
@WaterPhoenix
We will start a game, 4people with 5 rounds
Created:
Posted in:
Edgy ironic Athiests tries to meme god but fails horribly at doing so. Looks like a clown
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
@ILikePie5
@Discipulus_Didicit
this mafia game will certainly enlighten you
Created:
-->
@Imabench
If it comes down to a 1v1 with a candidate close to him in electoral delegates, I think he will slip away. he surely isn't trying to pull in new voters, just solidifying old ones imo
Created:
-->
@Imabench
His support is the same, expect instead of a famous women running, it's 5 random clutter of people dividing the votes. Bernies are very loyal in general to him, so people who stuck with him (plus a few more) are the main voters, the rest are spread out
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bullish
despite me being half shit half good at playing mafia my games are fairly balanced
Created:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Now join Kanye West quotes QF
Created:
-->
@thett3
Well this is a bit awkward
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I would agree. Warren really screwed herself over
Created:
I liked Yang a lot. It looks he will support Bernie. Might as well give Bernie the nomination now at this point
Created:
-->
@Imabench
The meme is now dead
Created:
VTL oromagi
Coded claim + role switch=high probability of scum
Created:
It takes one less vote to lynch me
Created:
Posted in:
1.
Y-3
N-2
2.
Y-4
N-1
3.
Y-4
N-1
4.
Y-2
N-2
5.
A-1
A-1
S-2
R-2
6.
A-3
S-2
7.
C-2
R-2
8.
Y-1
N-3
Created:
Posted in:
1.
Y-3
N-1
2.
Y-3
N-1
3.
Y-3
N-1
4.
Y-1
N-2
5.
S-2
R-2
6.
A-2
S-2
7.
C-2
R-2
8.
Y-1
N-3
Created:
Posted in:
Not to mention having the government deciding what we do with our bodies is an extremely poor attempt at creating a Utopian society that has an authoritarian leader. These leaders fail. Look at Hitler for example. His authoritarian style with his "Utopian society," failed miserably
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
In fact, 26% of couples are doing the once a week and some even two months according to the doctor involvedSo, 26% of the population will hit that 100 mark in 2 years according to your numbers. If they are having sex every 2 months, they hit that mark in under 17 years.
That is an average, and that's only 26% of the population overall. That still isn't enough numbers. And these stats can vary and there isn't strong data correlating to this. You also have to take into account various other things that decrease. Wanted pregnancies and such
Plan B is supposed to be used as a last resort in case the condom is ineffective at performing itself, it should not be used every time sexual intercourse is done upon someone. A condom is there to protect 99% of the timeNot all women use Plan B when they have to, so we can't depend on that.
Then we have to educate them, or they can be idiotic. It is their fault. The options are there for them to proceed by getting Plan B versus an abortion. They need to be mature and do it. If they don't, they deserve to have a baby when options are available. The status quo allows a plan to resolve. It is a human's job to execute it. If they don't, its their fault. The government does not need to get involved
It's mandatory in 24 states and required by lawHave abortions been eliminated from these states? No. Because sex ed isin't 100% effective. It can be used in addition to my policy though.
While don't you just legalize it in every state so more people are educated lol. That fixes this imaginary problem
The government then has to do the followingA) Pay the doctorsB) Upgrade equipmentC) Buy facilitiesD) Direct people to go and do this if it is a LAWI think the doctor payment is what the $1000 fee would cost. Equipment doesn't have to be upgraded, only made more numerous. Facilities could be bought, and when this project ends, they could be sold at a profit, How is bullet point D a problem?
No, you have to pay doctors more than a minimal fee if they are going to perform surgery and they cost a lot. The doctor needs to get paid.
Equipment needs to involve in order for safer practice. Dentists, eye doctors, and others use more evolving equipment to make it safer and more accurate. The same will need to be done with this. It will cost a lot of money and the government can't buy this.
These facilities will sell lower based on the market and the principle of buying property. That is how the economy works. This will be a lose lose
Effective campaigning is key, or else no one will do this, and that will cost money
Equipment needs to involve in order for safer practice. Dentists, eye doctors, and others use more evolving equipment to make it safer and more accurate. The same will need to be done with this. It will cost a lot of money and the government can't buy this.
These facilities will sell lower based on the market and the principle of buying property. That is how the economy works. This will be a lose lose
Effective campaigning is key, or else no one will do this, and that will cost money
Universal health care would be able to solve all of this, and if you simply redirected the funds here to UHC, then this would not be a problem, and could be a policy you can include giving more access to everyoneI'd be fine with adding this policy on to UHC/Medicare for all.
But instead of this policy being required, merge it for UHC
China's military is rapidly growing despite our spending 2x.As of right now, their military spending isn't that high. When it becomes comparable to NATO's military spending, then we can increase our spending. As of right now, we don't need a military 5x the size of China's.
Yet they are very close behind us catching up quicker and quicker. The only way to stop them is to keep spending where we at now, so we can secure our spot
They are competitive with us now within 30 years of time from a modern standpoint. They also have more troops, and near equal in everything. War in China would destroy us, and we need to defend against them, and not expose ourselves as vulnerable. Then if NATO happens to join, it's WWIII, idiotic.If NATO joins, then it would help the US beat China. Also, if this becomes a mandatory policy worldwide, then it would weaken China because they wouldn't reproduce anymore since the Chinese couldn't afford to pay the huge reversal fee that has to be paid ever time before they have a kid. If China's not reproducing anymore, it makes them dependant on labor from other countries that can afford the reversal fee, making them have to abandon communism in order to attract western migrants; the only people who can afford this process. The existing Chinese benefit because they could have as much sex as they want and not get the girl pregnant. At the same time, it forces China to abandon communism if they wish to attract migrants from around the world.
Then here is the problem, Russia and NK joins in, along with Iran. Turkey leaves NATO and joins Russia and then boom, a World War started and we all die. Simple as ABC. Chain reaction
Not only that, but accidents do happen no matter what.After the vasectomy is 2 months old (or the guy ejactulates 20x, whichever is done first, with some guys going further for safety), they could have unprotected sex without even the slightest risk of unwanted pregnancy. The effectiveness rate would be 100%.
Yea but there is that SLIGHT risk that it may happen. Again, that's why Plan B is in effect, so that means that instead of wasting money, you can just buy Plan B
You are forming number without any logic or reasoning.https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-worldwide states that 56 million abortions happen per year worldwide, so I was close. THe cite states:
Wasn't talking about abortion numbers
During 2010–2014, an estimated 56 million induced abortions occurred each year worldwide.Virtually all of these abortions can be eliminated if this policy goes into effect, preventing tens of millions of deaths annually.
What? This would take over 17 years to implement and get fully done, and people can bypass this too, and abortions still exist. Just using the methods in place effectively and being responsible solves this
We would still have abortionsHow so?
Above
Created:
Posted in:
1.
Y-2
N-1
2.
Y-2
N-1
3.
Y-2
N-1
4.
Y-1
N-1
5.
S-2
R-1
6.
A-1
S-2
7.
C-1
R-2
8.
Y-1
N-2
Created:
I guess Eminem really attracts to my Christian mother
Created:
Please stop this mom I really don't want my friends seeing this
Created:
Posted in:
Ongoing
Sign-ups
Speedrace (Civil War)
SupaDudz (Kanye West Quotes)
In the Hopper
On Hold
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
That's how the market works. I don't get how that's bad, just more time for football and less waiting. It is also has good talent as well
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Instead of bombing like Nagaski
Let oromagi live in prosperity
Instead of climbing to lynch for clout that's free
Instead of climbing to lynch for clout that's free
Let oromagi live in prosperity
Instead of hiding in the deep blue sea
Let oromagi live in prosperity
Instead fighting and quarreling for hours to be
Let oromagi live in prosperity
Instead of hiding in the deep blue sea
Let oromagi live in prosperity
Instead fighting and quarreling for hours to be
Let oromagi live in prosperity
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
No more than 3, it can have 3 numbers, not more than 3
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
You are objectively wrong. If you enjoy football, the XFL is no different besides minor tweaks in the rules that make it more interesting to watch overall
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Zaradi
Meant creating, but the question didn't apply because you have one already4. What does "in created one" mean?
Created:
Posted in:
1.
Y-1
Y-1
N-1
2.
Y-1
N-1
3.
Y-1
N-1
4.
Y-0
N-1
5.
S-1
R-1
6.
A-1
S-1
7.
C-1
A-1
S-1
7.
C-1
R-1
8.
8.
Y-0
N-2
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Alec
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/02/07/how-much-sex-should-couples-have/4680968002/ states that the average couple has sex 100x in about 2 years.
No where in your article does it state that. It says some have 12-14x, which is a different scope, and age is usually lower than baseline. In fact, 26% of couples are doing the once a week and some even two months according to the doctor involved
Not all females use Plan B though. Making people take a pill every time they have sex to prevent abortions requires that we know when people are having sex. Mandatory vasectomies on the other hand, is a one time surgery that once it's done, it's done and abortions basically end with it, all with unintended pregnancies hitting 0/year.
Plan B is supposed to be used as a last resort in case the condom is ineffective at performing itself, it should not be used every time sexual intercourse is done upon someone. A condom is there to protect 99% of the time
Sexual education is already mandatory. Unintended pregnancies still occur. It's easier to provide vastectomies to people than to educate the youth on some topic that isin't 100% effective.
It's mandatory in 24 states and required by law
If the supply skyrockets by the government hiring doctors to do this, then the cost would stay at about $1000/vastecomy.
The government then has to do the following
A) Pay the doctors
B) Upgrade equipment
C) Buy facilities
D) Direct people to go and do this if it is a LAW
They waste resources to do this entire project, versus allocating those resources somewhere else, eg; universal health care. Universal health care would be able to solve all of this, and if you simply redirected the funds here to UHC, then this would not be a problem, and could be a policy you can include giving more access to everyone
D) Direct people to go and do this if it is a LAW
They waste resources to do this entire project, versus allocating those resources somewhere else, eg; universal health care. Universal health care would be able to solve all of this, and if you simply redirected the funds here to UHC, then this would not be a problem, and could be a policy you can include giving more access to everyone
The threats that attack the US don't need a military the size of the US's. If we cut our spending by 50%, our military spending would still be like double China's, and we are in NATO, so NATO would help protect us if we get attacked. We shouldn't be spending as much as we currently do on the military anyway, but this is off topic. We would be preventing 40 million annual abortions from this policy. People also can have more sex.
China's military is rapidly growing despite our spending 2x. They are competitive with us now within 30 years of time from a modern standpoint. They also have more troops, and near equal in everything. War in China would destroy us, and we need to defend against them, and not expose ourselves as vulnerable. Then if NATO happens to join, it's WWIII, idiotic.
Also you are not saving lives. You are destroying lives. You are preventing lives from forming by destroying the system of creation. Not only that, but accidents do happen no matter what. You are forming number without any logic or reasoning. We would still have abortions and that number would maybe slightly decrease, but it not drastically change it
Also you are not saving lives. You are destroying lives. You are preventing lives from forming by destroying the system of creation. Not only that, but accidents do happen no matter what. You are forming number without any logic or reasoning. We would still have abortions and that number would maybe slightly decrease, but it not drastically change it
Created:
Posted in:
1. Do you play mafia?
Yes
No
Yes
No
2. Would you be interested in ever playing mafia
Yes
No
If yes, what can other members do to help your interest grow?
3. Do you own a Discord?
Yes
No
No
If yes, what can other members do to help your interest grow?
3. Do you own a Discord?
Yes
No
4. Would you ever be interested in created one
Yes
No
5. How often do you debate?
Yes
No
5. How often do you debate?
All the time
Sometimes
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
6. How active do you consider yourself?
Active
Somewhat Active
Occasional Activity
Rarely
Never
7. Do you consider yourself more centrist or more radical
Radical
Centrist
8. Do you enjoy pop culture?
8. Do you enjoy pop culture?
Yes
No
9. What do you enjoy? (besides debating)
_____________
10. What brought you onto DART?
________________
Created: