Vader

If this isn't Speed's first official act it is close to it.  How's about the people who have been around here a while show some support and investment in the actual development of this site.  There is nothing cool or useful about raging at a guy at his first day on the job.  Not every emotion felt is worthy of a new forum topic, folks.

Why would I believe you? You could've take the message down but it is still there. I am guessing you disliking your mother is not on tape so if your mother or you don't hold grudges then it is forgotten. That is not even talking about your intentions. Your intent doesn't matter. When someone says this it is probably a showing of dislike to another person but here I am supposed this rare case where you don't actually dislike me but you said it and you haven't asked for it to be taken down.

Why are you talking about treatment when it comes to the HoF? The Hall of Fame is an event congratulating the best of this site through votes. This just so happen people voted for more than another which means they are not equal to another. HoF goes against equality because there was a winner not a draw. 

I accused two users of something and asked them to defend themselves with the question I asked. You answered it thus mounting a defense for them. This logic is sound and I have yet to see you actually challenge it. Let me try and make it even more simple:

A defense against an accusation is a defense. 

Leaderboards do not symbolize inequity. Virt has about 900 forum posts and he is in HoF. leaderboards are only an illusion to class in your weird and wild head

By arguing against inequality you are giving an argument for inequality. Virtuosos is not equal to others comparing forum posts and Virutoso wasn't equal to people when he was voted on in the HoF. I am taking the position you are ignorant or intentionally. Guess feelings comes before reason for you.

What are you even alluding here. I did only a certain amount of times. You did 1.8k times 1.8k > 50

Now if I go down this you have to admit you are being arbitrary or you are inconsistent. For some reason me doing some x amount of times is bad but you doing it less than x amount of time is not bad. The question of course where do you draw the line? I await another feelings that is not well thought through.

I never disliked you, you disliked me because I told you that spamming to 3k is not quality posts.

I show you proof that you hate me then you decide to say no you do without proving anything. Please come back with facts instead of feelings.

 I have even complimented you and have engaged in memes with you, and that is a high praise

Saying this doesn't change that you hate aspects of me which you did make it clear in the link I gave. That is if I agree that you were being geniune when you praised me but are being genuine about a backpedaling of your dislike towards me. 

That proclaimation is a defense because YOU initiated me to respond to it as a defense.

I am convinced you do not know what you talk about. When I ask questions I ask the person to defend themselves. What part of that don't you understand? You basically said here a defense is whenever I say it to be case. How about me saying it is a defense? Please tell me how this wasn't a special pleading fallacy.

It doesn't make sense, that's why I am talking past it

This has got to be a joke. I have clearly demonstrated my side. You didn't say how it was wrong then you say I don't make sense. You have got to be living in a different reality where you value your own personal feelings before having a reasonable conversation. 

If you geniunely think I hate you, please PM me. I do not hate you...

Just cause we disagree does not mean I hate anyone

I do not even hate RM, and he is arguably my biggest rival besides Goldtop.

You have already stated it to be the case from the link I gave. You didn't even acknowledge what you said so why should I believe you now?