Vader

Sorry you don't voted in to get elected. 

unintelligible

Maybe you should, idk, change your philosophy and maybe you will get elected. 

That is precisely what women are doing, working to assume the reigns of power.   Feminism is that changed philosophy. 

Be grateful you can run for president

Grateful to who?  I'm a white man descended from the Pilgrims.  My ancestors were holding elections here before there was an America.  Those ancestors taught me never to be grateful to someone else for a fundamental right: nobody can give me that right or take it away it from me.  One might acknowledge my right or violate my right but nobody else is the source or the keeper of that right and nobody deserves my gratitude for its maintenance.  

I think your central point was that Feminism is irrelevant because women have achieved all the milestones of full enfranchisement.  I disagree and have pointed out one the most obvious missing milestones: Federal power that reflects women's majority in the US.

1) This is a baseless assertion. On the contrary, there are a variety of statistics that motivate the UN itself to treat gender equality for women and girls as a Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) [https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/]. I’m not sure if you’re referring to the situation in the U.S. alone (where the severity is reduced but still existent in some form) but as of now, the notion of women being treated equally to men is not... actually...... well anyway

2) I don’t know whether or not women getting paid less is actually true, but what I do know is that calling for equal pay between men and women depending on field of employment =/= communism lskdjjdjdjdjdk

3) Irrelevant lol, but simply implementing LGBT+ protective laws is not equivalent to or fully sufficient for social equality (assuming LGBTQ+ rights/treatment is what you meant by ‘it’, as in laws making ‘it’ legal)

4) Not even specific to feminism. “It will never happen” will never sound like an actual argument on why Trump ought not to be reelected no matter how many times it’s repeated.

5) No one means this literally unless it comes from an extreme misandrist or feminazi. Even then it’s not fully incorrect to believe they somewhat correlate given the white male dominated, supremacist nature of (Western) history and its lasting effects. 

6) Even disregarding the fact that this is purely irrelevant just as it is false, I find it quite disturbing that you’re so adamant on painting this pitifully misguided image of extremism onto feminism from your biases.

Buddy, I'd permaban you for doing this if I ran the site. Stop whining and advertising other sites here. Do you go to McDonald's to talk about how great KFC is in a public manner?

But still we have not begun to look further into this, and I think it would be best if we first clarify one more thing, that is: a brief and generalized description of what your moral values are. Remember that I did not ask you to give me examples of things that you conclude from your moral values, which is what you have done, but instead to briefly explain the general idea underlying your values. Is it possible for you to do this in a few sentences or less?

Which beliefs? Political? Religious? Be more specific 

It is exceedingly obvious that I did not change the topic you silly person. All of my posts to you were aimed at the same topic, that being the one you chose in post 36. As it is said in the OP I do not wish to choose the topic but I wish instead for others to choose the topic.

You chose the topic of 'moral values', did you not? There is not a single post of mine to you that strayed from that topic. Not one. This is because I said I would let others choose the topic and that is the topic you chose. However, I need you to tell me how you define your moral values because it is impossible for me to speak about something for which I do not have a definition. You have not done this.

"But I defined my moral values in post 38" I hear you protest. But this is not the case, and if it was then I would already have the definition of your moral values. I do not.

Listen closely to this simple concept:

If I asked you to define the word 'shape' would you say to me "Disipulus, a shape is a triangle, rectangle, hexagon, octagon, etc."? Surely you would not be so unkind as to provide me with such a useless definition! Surely you would instead say "A shape is a figure formed by line segments." or some similar definition that would allow me to recognise in the future whether a thing is a shape.

This is, I think, a simple enough idea.

So now I have asked you to define your moral values because that is the topic that you wish to speak of and it is the one you chose. I need a definition if we are to speak on this topic, yet instead of giving me a definition you have given me a list. This does not help me at all. What choice do I have but to ask again for a definition if I ask for one and do not receive one?

One 5 day ban, 2 ROs