Total posts: 15,922
Posted in:
-->
@Earth
No Senate races in Illinois, but rooting for Rauner as governor
Created:
Posted in:
Huge win for Dems if Cruz loses to a dem.
Also Pritzker for my state is winning, and I don't like him
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
Ok no problem. Just putting it in here to get some attention
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
Debates Quick Link
Forum Quick Link
Leaderboards Quick Link
Then a explanation
Created:
Random Voting Stage
*sigh* *deep breathe*
oh
*Sigh* if you misread it that would be syllagous to misunserstanding it. Unless one somehow is expected to come to a correct understanding, when misreading something?
No, misreading it is you read the words differently what they said in the text. Misunderstanding is where you read the words correctly but interpret them the wrong way
Your the one claiming you misread it. I do not believe that you legitimately thought a vote on the first post of the game, could magically have had a claim that preceded it.
I am not sure what I was thinking. My mind wasn't working. Idk what I was thinking. Maybe I thought it was the second point. I goofed up there, and I apologize. But it is a misread.
I fully get you miss alot of things dudz, in bloodline I was TR'ing you in part because i got that almost right away into the first game playing with you. This is asking for me to accept that you missed way too much.
I guess you may have too
There isnt much of a way you can defend it. Cause you already have and i don't buy it for previously outlined reasons.
Created:
Posted in:
mY pArEnTs DoN't CoNtRoL mE
Dude this was his 3rd in 13 months wtf
Created:
-->
@Buddamoose
Ok ok
No, Supa claimed he thought Aporias vote was to Lynch. As to why he VTL'd aporia, and thus he wanted to see his reasoning.This requires we assume Supa both hasn't picked up on RVS votes not being for lynch, AND thought the first post of a game was for a lynchthis vote for a lynch as opposed to a claim as Supa is saying he did not realize, was, again as Supa stated himself, because he thought I had claimed previous to Aporias vote. Aporias vote was the first of the game...
This was because I misread
His excuse of "I said "where is buddas claim" because I thought he had claimed, wherein he actually links Aporias vote, FROM THE FIRST POST OF THE GAME" and says, "oh I misunderstood "vtl budda for claim" as meaning budda had claimed something, so Aporia was voting him for death.
Ok I did not say misunderstood, I said misread, first off. Second off, I have a tendency of fucking up shit like that if you pay attention to my other DDO Mafias. Idk how I can defend myself against your claim by saying I misread. If you misread my argument, I can insantly read you as scum, but I don't.
On the first post of the game, a post he c/p'd from and responded to twice. To hold Supa as being truthful requires we hold he still doesn't understand the nature of RVS votes(when it has come up in games hes played in, and he specifically has been corrected on this assumption of RVS votes = to lynch. But also that he legitimately thought I had claimed previous to the first post of the game. The first is a stretch, the second is just unbelievable.
RVS=Reason Voting Situation. I asked for this
I'm not sure how your bs detector hasn't been set off by this. Are you really that gullible to believe someone legitimately thought a VTL on the first player post of a game was both to lynch, and for something i had claimed?
Are you the lie detector of DDO? I misread something ok? Big shit. Mafia should not be based off of that
Created:
-->
@warren42
Never have on DP1 or DP2 hombre
Created:
-->
@Buddamoose
That is why I was confused about it because I wasn't sure ok?
And your analogy is so dumb. You literally had no reason for voting me and are just baiting my pure disbelief in the game to reel in my lynch.
Created:
-->
@warren42
I am aggressive because his logic is giving me a migraine. He wants to vote me because I agree with a mafia belief and even though I misread why Aporia VTLed Budda, so then I claimed misread and was just tired. Then he VTLs me for no reason at all and gives no RFD, and I get pissed at his reaction and then uses it to bait me and say I am getting angry for no reason.
He is fucking baiting us into thinking I am scum so he can get his ways. He jumps on Ap wagon, and he started me for my lynch. Then everyone wanted to VTL me again and bet he will now hop on my wagon, watch.... Just watch
Created:
-->
@Buddamoose
Budda, I dealt with your shit throughout mafia, and I dealt with the bullshit reasons. But this is outrageous bro.Ok I misread a claim by Aporia. Big deal. And now you reference the fact that I defend Ap when I susp him. Like I said, with the clarifying, I nulled him but still sus him, and the you go on a tyraid. Clear scum
Created:
-->
@Goldtop
You are a bit stubborn tbh
Created:
-->
@Vaarka
I mean it is just a character name. It doesn't give too much away
Created:
-->
@Vaarka
Yea it is. I mean spelling a name won't effect the game too much.
Created:
-->
@Vaarka
Aporia is experienced from what I heard
Created:
Created:
-->
@Vaarka
He said I can't scum read Aporia and disagree about what he said, then come out and agree with his logic. He made a post in Part 7 where he explains his logic. Ill link it
Created:
-->
@Vaarka
I don't agree with Budda logic with me agreeing with Aporia. I explained why as well
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
Thanks. With a touch of fiction and things, I hope it will turn out good
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Nd24007
Bears vs Vikings moved to Sunday night and they get a Thanksgiving game right after. Big games they need to win in order to secure the division.
If they sweep these games and end up becoming 9-3 on the season beating Lions 2x, Vikings, Giants, Jets, and Bills, they will be the division leaders I just don't see how anyone else in the division compete if that was the scenario
Division Play
Lions: 1-1
Vikings: 1-0-1
Packers: 1-0-1
Bears: 0-1
They win the 3 division games, this means at least
Lions: 1-3
Vikings: 1-3-1
Packers: 1-0-1
Bears: 3-1
Easily the best team in NFC North
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
He's tall, he's handsome, he is number 1
I didn't say a name. but he came in your head didn't he?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Nd24007
Weed is not bad for you at all. it causes 0 deaths and was just a plan by the government to blame Mexicans.
But this is strange acting of you. That's why I thought black tar heroin. I first thought LSD and your first post was you on your 12hour trip, but unless you took some more, it is pretty odd acting
Created:
-->
@Paul
Not really
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ResurgetExFavilla
What are you referring to?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
Here are some things on my top priority list that would be neat to implement and are less generic to a certain degree than stated above. Some things are more creative and stuff
-Mafia Forum instead of it being in games. We have to realized Mafia is a culture and we need to be separated from Games. This allows generic chat for games to be heard and talked about more while making it easier for Mafia to identify games and such
-Clans. Clans would be certain people who are dedicated to a certain section to hold open discussion about a certain topic and have debates based on topics and even hold tourneys. For example
Gaming Clan-host Fortnite, Overwatch, League, Risk, Bo4 tournaments
Sports Clan-best highlight reel, sports debate tournaments
Fashion Clan-fashion debate tournaments, custom outfit tournaments
Art Clan- FanFic Tourney, Painting Contest, Poem Contest
Music Clan- rap battles, rap beat tournament, singing competition, etc.
With these, we could boost forum activity and even get forums to be more active
-Voice Chat Forum. Instead of going to Google Hangouts and Discord to talk, they could go to a "Voice Chat," and talk in there. The voice chat could be used for live debates and things like that
-Verified Check- For someone who has achieved a certain # of medals and such, they will receive a check-mark to their name and be verified posters
-Sub-forum Mods
Created:
Posted in:
I would instate group PMs before instating this feature, but in the future, I would be down
Created:
-->
@Buddamoose
Well I am sorry I am in school and focus on more important things than a mafia forum I should just be damned to hell and get huge dick slap by Satan right now for not comprehending something. Yes it happens to everyone, but I should just die for having a brain fart.(Obviously sarcasm)
And I see you scum because posts don't explain your RVS at all. It is just me talking and you are still VTLing me for no reason. You jump on a wagon with Aroria for no reason to get me lynched. I never talked to you other than my agreement which I stated above. So you basically just hopped on my wagon for no reason, huh?
Created:
-->
@Buddamoose
OK so basically your response is dumb. Am I not allowed to agree with something they say. I agree personally with his views on that situation, but him VTLing for some bullshit is not what I agree with.
For example, if I say, I help special needs people and donate money and help them learn because they are people too, you would agree right?
But then If i say, I hate all fucking black people and they are just satans creatures who need to die, you would disagree with me right?
So your logic is that you should hate special needs people and hate black people because you disagree with one statement made by the person, therefore you should contradict every policy they have. You can hate the person for saying that, but if you agree on that we should help special needs people, you agree with me even though you hate me for saying "I hate blacks."
Do you understand why your logic is flawed?
Created: