When authorities try to ban child marriage by setting a minimum age. The ultra religious in Pakistan reject all attempts to set a minimum age. Does con sound like he may be a fundamentalist.
He is from Pakistan where the latest statistics. Show that 20% of girls marry before 18. Child brides are a major problem in the region. We have somebody from that region where child fucking is so common who comes on this site to defend fucking children.
He could very well find himself in a situation where he is pressured to marry a child bride or where he chooses to and we have the opportunity to intervene to show him how wrong it is.
It's not okay and we are not debating a theory here for fun.
Muhhamed is just a man. He isn't a God in their religion so when con says that it is okay for muhhamed to fuck 9 year olds he is also claiming it is okay for him to do it.
We have pro who defined things in such a way to cause con to lose the debate. We have a voting section where people can actually point t out how morally reprehensible it is but instead what happens is.
"Haha wylted hates pedophiles let me Pwn him by tying the debate"
It's a serious issue. I am not saying it is wrong for him to even make that stance in a debate but in his mind pedophilia is okay. He is a dealer to children and instead of using the vote to maybe get him to question the morality of the whole thing, the voting section instead is used to Pwn me.
You are sick . I would see defending muhhamed if you actually used some sort of stupid logic to convince yourself he was fucking an adult but instead you admit that he fucked a 9 year old and decided that since she was used as a child soldier that it is okay for the most obvious false prophet in history to fuck her. I read the whole thing
Con doesn't deny that muhhamed fucked a 9 year old he instead defends fucking 9 year olds. It takes a sick fuck to vote for that especially after con objectively lost
Con literally tried to redefine accepted terms to make it so muhhamed was not a pedophile. He even tried to redefine adult to mean 9 year olds.
I am reporting koreas vote so he has a second chance to get this right. We don't have to accept a tie just because con gaslight pro into thinking they lost. Also korea did not weigh both sides of the debate so I think it technically qualifies as an invalid vote
Let's not forget that cons description of adult is different than what he agreed to based on the description of th debate where adult is qualified as a FULLLY matured adult.
You don't have to respect their decision to tie, particularly since con doesn't make an argument until round 3 and when he does make an argument the argument is basically that a 9 year old qualifies as an adult so it is okay for a grown man to rape her. I would ask barney to remove your vote so you can recast it and let con know how morally reprehensible raping children is
Rm you should vote on this anyway. Con admits that muhhamed fucked a 9 year old and Is merely stating that maybe the 9 year old reached puberty and that you can be an adult at 9.
So con basically admits that Muhhamed is a pedophile in the debate. It's a forfeit on cons part
having a big penis is completely indefensible. Especially if you are a libtard like me. Not only do I believe in redistribution of wealth but also redistribution of penises. We don't circumcize well endowed men enough. We should be taking an extra inch or 2 off the top
Mharman round 5. It sounds like the background music to a space shooter game. Very mid song. If rms song is shit mharman will win. If TMs song is good and he has only had 1 good song than RM wins.
If Rms song is mid also it comes down to who had the least gay song.
Rm round 4. The song is aboutbsimping and portrays some loser who is a drug addict or alcoholic or other sort of degenerate. I oppose both degeneracy and simping so the round goes to mharman
When authorities try to ban child marriage by setting a minimum age. The ultra religious in Pakistan reject all attempts to set a minimum age. Does con sound like he may be a fundamentalist.
https://www.dw.com/en/why-underage-marriages-are-still-prevalent-in-pakistan/a-63860202
He is from Pakistan where the latest statistics. Show that 20% of girls marry before 18. Child brides are a major problem in the region. We have somebody from that region where child fucking is so common who comes on this site to defend fucking children.
He could very well find himself in a situation where he is pressured to marry a child bride or where he chooses to and we have the opportunity to intervene to show him how wrong it is.
It's not okay and we are not debating a theory here for fun.
Muhhamed is just a man. He isn't a God in their religion so when con says that it is okay for muhhamed to fuck 9 year olds he is also claiming it is okay for him to do it.
We have pro who defined things in such a way to cause con to lose the debate. We have a voting section where people can actually point t out how morally reprehensible it is but instead what happens is.
"Haha wylted hates pedophiles let me Pwn him by tying the debate"
It's a serious issue. I am not saying it is wrong for him to even make that stance in a debate but in his mind pedophilia is okay. He is a dealer to children and instead of using the vote to maybe get him to question the morality of the whole thing, the voting section instead is used to Pwn me.
Pro also legitimately won against the guy as well so there is that
Why are you laughing. This isn't some edge lord debate. Con legitimately believes it is okay for grown men to fuck 9 year olds and you support him
My opinion is yes and I think for ethical reasons. I may do a longer post on why later.
I think you should atleast consider what I say before deciding. And not just instinctively tie it because you don't like me.
Please unban sir lancelot for a 2 week period so this debate actually has somebody who weighs arguments from both sides
You won your fault was in accepting defeat and also not stressing that he agreed to your definitions when accepting th debate.
You are sick . I would see defending muhhamed if you actually used some sort of stupid logic to convince yourself he was fucking an adult but instead you admit that he fucked a 9 year old and decided that since she was used as a child soldier that it is okay for the most obvious false prophet in history to fuck her. I read the whole thing
I am by no means calling those definitions accurate but that's what con agreed to
Definitions provided by pro
Pedophile: a person who is sexually attracted to children.
https://languages.oup.com/google-dictionary-en/
Child: A child is a human being who is not yet an adult.
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/child
Con doesn't deny that muhhamed fucked a 9 year old he instead defends fucking 9 year olds. It takes a sick fuck to vote for that especially after con objectively lost
Con objectively lost this but I guess people are really passionate about defending pedophilia and will overlook it
Con literally tried to redefine accepted terms to make it so muhhamed was not a pedophile. He even tried to redefine adult to mean 9 year olds.
I am reporting koreas vote so he has a second chance to get this right. We don't have to accept a tie just because con gaslight pro into thinking they lost. Also korea did not weigh both sides of the debate so I think it technically qualifies as an invalid vote
Let's not forget that cons description of adult is different than what he agreed to based on the description of th debate where adult is qualified as a FULLLY matured adult.
You don't have to respect their decision to tie, particularly since con doesn't make an argument until round 3 and when he does make an argument the argument is basically that a 9 year old qualifies as an adult so it is okay for a grown man to rape her. I would ask barney to remove your vote so you can recast it and let con know how morally reprehensible raping children is
Rm you should vote on this anyway. Con admits that muhhamed fucked a 9 year old and Is merely stating that maybe the 9 year old reached puberty and that you can be an adult at 9.
So con basically admits that Muhhamed is a pedophile in the debate. It's a forfeit on cons part
Okay I am done lol. This is terrible music
Best song yet for Cristo in round 4 Cristo wins round 4
Round 3 is a tie.
Round 2; Cristos song actually hurt me to listen to
Mharman takes the round
Round 1 is a tie
It sucks when that happens vutbitis still easier than debating a schizophrenic.
I didn't think about the economic impacts. Perhaps genocide is wrong
I have some statistics myself
it's not painful. it is really easy to wield
I am putting my links in the comments because they may be dead in the debate. they will appear in the same order
1. https://web.archive.org/web/20140825015846/http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/333932
2. https://web.archive.org/web/20140927090538/http://chartsbin.com/view/1454
3. https://web.archive.org/web/20140917082229/http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=3073
4. https://web.archive.org/web/20141102003714/http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/43tabledatadecoverviewpdf#disablemobile
5. https://web.archive.org/web/20140917082229/http://blackdemographics.com/
6. https://web.archive.org/web/20140917024449/http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=2812
7. https://web.archive.org/web/20140917082229/http://www.rense.com/general79/dut.htm
8. https://web.archive.org/web/20140815131307/http://m.medicaldaily.com/what-women-want-penis-size-matters-one-night-stands-not-long-term-relationships-287256
9. https://web.archive.org/web/20140917082229/http://jezebel.com/men-with-bigger-penises-are-more-likely-to-get-cheated-1568859120
10. https://web.archive.org/web/20140917082229/http://healthland.time.com/2011/07/06/penis-size-it-may-be-written-in-the-length-of-his-fingers/
11. https://web.archive.org/web/20131228143150/http://www.kafyeda.co.il/vault/documents/Ratio_04..pdf
having a big penis is completely indefensible. Especially if you are a libtard like me. Not only do I believe in redistribution of wealth but also redistribution of penises. We don't circumcize well endowed men enough. We should be taking an extra inch or 2 off the top
good luck defending penises large enough to drag on the ground and get rug burn
Fist bump to a fellow small penis man.
If you want challenge me to a rated debate on the same subject.
I fixed it
looks like me and grey parrot had the same exact wins for each round
I am just an idiot with bad taste in music who was asked to share his opinion and the chanting reminded me of a few beheading videos I watched.
If fish chaser prefers music that makes his chakras feel good that should be a reasonable vote.
Unfortunately RM had a decent song in round 5.
I am annoyed now that my recommended have likely been altered. I am also annoyed that I had to watch ads for RMs songs but not for mharmans.
I also hate techno and probably leaned towards songs that sound less techno and for that I apologize in advance but RM wins.
Mharman round 5. It sounds like the background music to a space shooter game. Very mid song. If rms song is shit mharman will win. If TMs song is good and he has only had 1 good song than RM wins.
If Rms song is mid also it comes down to who had the least gay song.
Rm round 4. The song is aboutbsimping and portrays some loser who is a drug addict or alcoholic or other sort of degenerate. I oppose both degeneracy and simping so the round goes to mharman
Mharman round 4. This is his first song I actually liked the sound of.
Rm round 3.
This is the first song u actually would consider adding to my Playlist so I have to give RM the point for round 3
Mharman round 3 is a song supporting biden by adapting his slogan of build back better
Rm round 2 sounds like the chants I heard from hamas when thy were raping an killing Israeli children.
I cannot support terrorism so round 2 goes to mharman
Mharman round 2 sounds like a sexy woman making sex noises. Erection officially lost now
RM song 1 sounds like a guy gargling on cock.
Round 1 goes to RM for making me hard
Mharman song 1 feels like a 90s intro to a goosebumps style show
Not a fair topic. Usually you should avoid debating truisms
I might just match energy here and give the same effort to round 2 as he did.
Fine.
I am not about to vote and be accused of bias unless I am the only option to break the tie