WyIted

LOL, I love seeing racists cringe at the thought of a black female president.

Want some cheese with that whine losers?

I already know the numbers, you need to convert the msm establishment cultists.

Under Biden inflation is down

I had another great year, terribly sorry if you're a loser.

Of course, if it wasn't for losers, Trump wouldn't have a base.

Why can't Trump get an American born wife?

There is no free speech for lies and misinformation or alternative realities or conspiracy theories 

Your link was not to a JD Vance speech.

You didn't even see the JD Vance speech Roosevelt listed.  You don't know what you are talking about!

What makes you say that?  Is it just Underdog derangement syndrome?

My grandmother: Illegal immigrants need to be deported!!!

Me: I don't give a rat's ass if you are undocumented or an anchor baby or anything like that.

My grandmother: How DARE you be so offensive by calling people anchor babies!

Me: What's more offensive, calling someone an anchor baby, or separating an anchor baby from their parents?  You statists need to chill.

Do liars have a right to free speech

What separates us if anything on this topic is that I along with most on the left actually do believe in the freedom right wingers love to pretend to care about,

lol, how did your vote on banning people who encourage violence go?

Explain to me how mass deportations, mass incarceration, student loans, and legalizing the sale of AR 15s reduces unwanted pain.  

mass deportations,

mass incarceration

Legalizing the sale of AR 15s

The elite [[Globalists]] or the establishment is how we often refer to the people in charge of the country often unofficially. Another way to refer to them is "The Cathedral".

The Cathedral refers to the media and academia portion of the establishment. They often control the [[The overton Window]] and keep it in a position to help the people they want in power. This was coined by a guy by the pen name Mencius Moldbug. (real name Curtis Yarvin)

This cathedral is often referred to when we talk of "red Pilling" somebody. According to Michael Malice "red PIlling" is defined as;

>The belief that what is presented as fact by the corporate press is a carefully constructed narrative, intentionally designed to keep some very unpleasant people in power.

The media and academia are at the center of modern intellectual society, like the church was the center of society in medieval ages.

It's almost if the cathedral is working in unison. The cathedral is a way to explain how these institutions seem to work in lockstep without attributing it to any sort of conspiracy.

The cathedral has one clear doctrine or perspective , it always agrees with itself. More puzzling is that this doctrine is not static and evolves together but in a very predictable way. (Get the actual quote from "The mystery of the cathedral" paper).  maybe written by Curtis Yarvin (AKA moldbug)

The cult of woke has taken over academia and this becomes a problem because when anything is valued over truth than it harms the ability to determine truth in any matter.

We can see the cult of wokes influence through cancellations, the very narrow threshold politicians are allowed to talk in and the bowing down of corporations to their ideological intolerance

## Problems and misconceptions

It seems that that academia and the media are always on the same page at the same time, which causes the common misconception of a deliberate conspiracy, shadow government, secret society etc.

The concept of the cathedral is an anti-conspiracy in that it explains how these forces work together, without the need for any behind the scenes secret dealings.

Nobody is in charge of the cathedral despite people having varying levels of influence.

Which brings the question. How does the cathedral act in unison with no clear leaders.  This brings us to the 2 methods this is done.

## 1. Ideological intolerance

(look for fundamentalism article in my obsidian)

Tolerant Ideologies will tolerate this force, but when the force captures a majority of thi institution, they do not tolerat the tolerant and push them out.

Once the ideological intolerant have the majority of the institution they will not tolerate divergent thought so slowly begin to push out others until they operate under a type of hive mind.

You now have a system where behaving like you have woke beliefs is selected for. (look at lefty power seeking behavior via virtue signaling)

It seems like so many species evolve into crabs because they are operating under a similar type of environment. So similar environmental pressures (see woke cultists), will result in similar adaptive behavior.

This is why fundamentalism spread so far. Intolerance. The cult of woke acts like a spreading religion in this way. They are a secular intolerant belief system, accept there is no God attached.

Their belief system does obsess over harm avoidance and will engage in the equity fallacy.

The equity fallacy; The false belief that unequal outcomes between groups is solid evidence of systematic discrimination of the less fortunate group.

This then causes the group to search for inequities, without proof assert they are due to discrimination and label anyone who disagrees a bigot, and allows them to shame opposition into silence and then these people are replaced with the cultists and those pretending to be cultists due to self preservation or hierarchy games.

What’s really funny to me is that the Democratic wins because of single women who coincidentally have the biggest mental health issues. Maybe there’s a reason why they’re single. I think we need more research into why single women are Democrats 

And why is that?

Then why do they want to deal with climate change so badly?  The sea levels would rise a lot by 2100 according to the scientists; 40 year old climate change activists with no kids aren't being alive for that

.

Wisconsin Senator Gaylord Nelson, the father of Earth Day said before the first Earth Day in 1970 that “the secretary of the Smithsonian Institute believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”
Not to be outdone, Life Magazine reported that same year that “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
Stanford biologist Paul Ehrlich, the celebrated author of The Climate Bomb, wrote in 1971 that "by the year 2000 the United Kingdom will be simply a small group of impoverished islands, inhabited by some 70 million hungry people … If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000.”
In 1975 Newsweek ran a now-infamous article entitled “The Cooling World,” which cited several climate scientists in concluding that “the central fact is that…the earth’s climate seems to be cooling down…If the climate change is as profound as some of the pessimists fear, the resulting famines could be catastrophic.”
Global famine was a popular prediction in the 70’s.  North Texas State professor Pete Gunter summed up the prevailing sentiment when he wrote in “The Lving Wilderness” that by “by the year 2000...the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”
In 1986, NASA scientist James Hansen testified before Congressthat “global temperatures should be nearly 2 degrees higher in 20 years, ‘which is about the warmest the earth has been in the last 100,000 years.’”
Two years later, Dr. Hansen told an interviewer that in 20 years, the area below his New York City office would be completely changed, most notably that “the West Side Highway [which runs along the Hudson River] will be under water.”

People who donate very little of their income to charity don't care much about others; should their voting rights be taken away?

The real reason you don't want childless people being allowed to vote is because they lean democrat and you want to make it easier for republicans to win elections.  If childless people leaned republican, then you would support their right to vote

But whichever way a group leans shouldn't matter in terms of their right to vote.

Why does the EU have lower obesity rates than the US?

people who choose to not have children should be allowed to vote.