Total posts: 5,754
Posted in:
-->
@drlebronski
that's good enough a reason. It will be an issue at Mylo and LYLO
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
did you see covid only put Joe on his ass for 24 hours because of that? Shit it must be doing something, according to the media, covid is almost a death sentence, but Rogan basically has a 24 hour bug after taking the horse pills
Created:
they both have their place.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drlebronski
Whiteface socks at it also, so open to that if you can be active
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
it's a known fact, the best fights happen between people who are similar. Best boxing match, the thriller in manilla, was between 2 black dudes. World War 2, was a bunch of whites fighting each other.
Joe biden is thought incompetent by the right, but leftists actually hate him.
John McCain is thought to be misguided by liberals but right wingers hate him.
Muslims kill each other in the middle east.
Created:
Posted in:
let's lynch whoever is null and would suck at behavioral analysis like evil or lebron
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
People like Luna who are offended by words on Twitter led to Hoe Joe 2020
I don't understand how anybody can vote democrat this election cycle. To reward them for pandering to rioters seems silly.
The talk of eliminating pay for police, and electing a party who literally has to pander to these people to win elections, seems like really fucked up and evil for anyone to vote for that.
Thank God it was Biden though. He may have dementia, and may be bought and paid for by corporations, but at least he is a moderate. Perhaps the last electable moderate democrat.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I never defended Biden at every turn like you do with Trump lol, that's the difference
Liberals are winning, so we have to follow Reagan's principle of never swiping righy
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ludofl3x
people are nuts in Florida. If something happens just contribute it to the maddening affects of the ocean. Ocean's razor, but yes occam's razor makes more sense. The creator of the universe has better shit to do than trolling people into murdering their families.
Created:
-->
@Barney
This exemplifies why the trap of tribal ethics should be avoided. That you like Death23, is your basis for disbelief that they could do something wrong; yet they made threats which included names of family members, description of residence, and more.
I just don't believe this happened. If it did good that he is banned. I have talked to the guy frequently, and I know he isn't capable of it.
Why would he be a model member for so long and then randomly out of the blue start threatening random people. Occam's razor suggests, that shit is highly exaggerated or just made up.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ludofl3x
How did you reach this conclusion? I'm not saying I disagree, I'm just curious how you know it WASN'T what he said it was.
Technically we don't know. That's why solipsysm exists. We can't be sure of anything. However I think an application of ocean's razor would suggest, God was not talking to this guy
Created:
Posted in:
Drlebronski and I can't even show how obvious the alt-to-main-account connection is because that will get our thread shut down as a callout thread.
It seems a bit hypocritical to Complain about accusations happening to you, while you accuse others. I think you both should probably leave each other alone
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
You would probably call that a great philosophical argument for God.
No I would not. I don't pretend like personal revelation is a great argument.
I think the guy you mentioned, probably has some serious psychological conditions.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
When I talked about pushing their beliefs onto others I’m talking about through legislation
Okay, I thought you meant in personal conversation, just bringing it up.
BTW what's a pleb?
It means an ordinary person from the lower classes and comes from the word Plebian. https://www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/plebians.html#:~:text=The%20term%20plebeian%20referred%20to,families%20and%20pay%20their%20taxes.
It used to be used for a bit by carnies to refer to normal people they would get to play games, they did not know were rigged. In the way I am using it, I just mean that most people are idiots and not even worth engaging in debate with. I'd argue the existence of god in the philosophy section, where philosophy minded people can argue better arguments, both for and against the existence of a God.
I forgot that the word has fallen out of favor, and that I should refrain from using it
Created:
-->
@Mesmer
I think the human condition would simply be too prickly for you to adapt industrialization to humans to the parity/better degree necessary than evolving humans past their prickly nature.
We have the same premise. Industrialization can't adapt to human nature. The mainstream solution is to adapt humans through medication as one example and their are other opiates for the masses as well, to suppress their nature. We agree here, I think you misunderstand me. I was criticizing the cure you suggest, which seems worse than the disease. deindustrialization solves for all the same problems, and has the benefit of being more predictable. Post humanism may never happen, and perhaps it won't happen in any way you would predict, and is certainly out of your control
This is absolutely a semantics game lol.
"Extinction" evokes emotions of death and meteors smashing into the planet wiping out life. That's the emotion you're attempting to latch on to. Whilst you're technically correct, you could simply use the word 'evolved' and be as technically correct.
It's similar to how Neanderthals evolved into humans. Yes, Neanderthals technically went extinct, but they evolved into something better. They didn't all die in horrible ways in a life-ending event. Neanderthals that have never existed aren't upset about not being alive.
What you're doing is filtering your human experience (i.e. "preservation instinct") and transposing it onto potential future humans that don't have to exist. These potential future humans won't miss existing if they never existed at all.
No, not the way I intended. Posthumanism would be a very pleasant extinction. Perhaps swapping out tiny pieces of your soul, gladly and overtime. A computer chip to replace your brain, here and there. Kind of like a ship of Thesseuss type thing, to bring us into posthumanism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus
This extinction would not be similar to how neanderthals evolved into humans, because neanderthals died in a more gradual way (if we buy your theory of evolution) . Posthumanism could happen in our lifetime. Me and you, we are transhumanists, but we could also be posthumans in this lifetime, if we have some sort of runaway artificial intelligence explosion. A technological singularity.
So no. The extinction I talk about, would be gradual. It would happen to us, not our children. It would be pleasant, and it would be voluntary. None of those things, means it is a good thing.
You have already died mesmer. The you that was a child, is unrecognizable from the you that exists now. For all intents and purposes, the child that used to be you, is dead. It's sad. I'm sure as a child you were pleasant and adorable. Now that child is dead. It's a sad thing, perhaps you can fool yourself into thinking that child did not die, because remnants exist.
In a posthuman world, yes the death would also be gradual, but no remnants would remain, beyond perhaps the memories. You'll be the new theseus, but none of the old pieces will remain. It's worse for you though. With posthumanism, you aren't swapping out old pieces for new ones. You are swapping out old pieces for different and new pieces. You'll be dead.
I don't think transhumanism and posthumanism can be used interchangeably
I don't want to embarrass you. However, perhaps these terms don't work how you think they do. Transhuman, refers to the state of humans between natural humans and the post humans, theorized to be replacing us. With phones already replacing regions of out brains, it can be said we are already in the transhuman phase of evolution. https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/surprising-ways-smartphones-affect-our-brains-our-lives-ncna947566
transhumanism is just shorthand for this belief in the same philosophy of posthumanism. There is no transhumanists, vs posthumanists. Both transhumanists optimistic about posthumanism and those skeptical of it, would get the same umbrella term of transhumanist.
I'm not sure it's necessary that humans will lose all power over transhumanist advancements.
I want you to read this now. It will only take a few hours. We have lost control of technology. It controls us, not visa versa. Read this now, this is the intellectual opponents of transhumanists, not normies. In fact write to uncle Ted, he responds a lot, but do not write him without reading all of his work. All of it. You seem to acknowledge that we have lost control of technology by suggesting the solution to industrial society is posthumanism, which fixes the problems created by industrial society. Read, understand and respond to your real adversary. These other luddites, are easily swayed anyway.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
A rational person would also rely on evidence to make their case
There are some great philosophical arguments for God, I should not. However you seem to only want to engage with plebs. That is beside the point though.
If a person has a personal experience. Say they witness a murder, but they have no evidence the murder happened, other than their personal experience. Should they still warn you, if the guy wants to be your room mate? Would you then say, well you should rely on evidence the guy murdered somebody, and not have warned me based merely on your personal experiences?
Either situation can lead to your death. I say it's worse that they wouldn't warn you about eternity in hell than it would be to refrain from warning you about the murderer who is going to be your room mate.
Created:
Posted in:
guys, I'm tired. Like constantly lately. This game is going to suck. You thought inactivity was bad these other games. Wait until these noobs who have no power roles and only behavior to go off of, get a chance to post.
The books will be bored, confused and useless at advancing the game. I say we just eliminate one today, and start guiding them on how to use lynch analysis and NK analysis, then work on explaining behavioral tells to the remaining noobs, which pie is one of.
Created:
-->
@Barney
the words are glorifying. If I debate an ideal well, it can be argued I glorified it.
Besides that, there is a difference between opinions David felt were wrong, and ones he felt like were disgusting. He would be quick to ban anyone he felt had disgusting beliefs.
I actually think you might be evil. Why would you go along with David for banning somebody, even if they did argue genocide was a good ideal (not that I have)?
It's basically the same as antinatalist arguments. Arguing genocide is a good thing, is not a call for violence, not unless you think Biden is reading this site for ideals on policy proposals and has a realistic chance of implementing them.
I looked over mgtowdemon's posts. It looks like they stated a bunch of white supremacist ideals and were banned for that. They were banned for coming to a debate site and debating their beliefs with people.
Not personal attacks where they call people nigger. Not calls for violence like "you know we should kill all jews" . They were banned for having wrong think.
Just before the ban on bringer of rain, there was a ban on a long time user for making threats in PM or something that was also unjustified. The name escapes me at the moment something like "death23" or something. I had plenty of interactions with them. I can tell you, that person would never do something like that, and yet they were banned.
My supposed alt, who was literally an SJW who believed your laptop is racist, was banned for being me. This is off the top of my head. I haven't even dug through the ban logs yet to see all the retarded bans.
They've destroyed this site. The reason this place is not like DDO was, is because David did not moderate like airmax did. David moderated with a political bias. We should know that somebody who had an antifa picture in support of the blackblock could not keep bias out of their decisions.
Hell the guy even started taking down threads when people started using them to point out, that he was being evil and promoting an agenda, instead of moderating without bias.
It should be noted that when David was an assistant mod to bsh1, he acted like he would reject the type of moderation bsh1 did. The unfair aspects anyway. However he took bsh1's problems (which were problems due to personal bias that he attempted to hold in check as morally obligated to), and he made them worse by refusing to hold those biases in check, due to moral failings (guy is evil and lied about how he would moderate and did it differently once he lied to get the role)
Created:
-->
@Barney
The only ones I'm spotting in the log are Bringerofrain and Singularity. Both gave incredibly good reasons to believe they were you. Was there someone else?
Noth were me. I'll find the innocent one accused of being me. I can't remember the name right now
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
you are literally going to die np1 if you are town.
If you are not dead now, than you are scum and you will die dp2.
So we probably only have to deal with this drama for this DP anyway, so no need to rush things.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
This game does force Pie to step out his comfort zone by analyzing behavior versus role analysis and then doing wrong theme analysis
This is why I would rather lynch pie than Luna. If we lynch pie now, he can always say he is good at behavioral analysis, and we can't use this game to prove him wrong.
Created:
-->
@Barney
This is untrue. Further, the presumption that the rule violations are all politically motivated is somewhat insulting to liberals and conservatives.David literally tried to spread his SJW worldview by being quick to ban people for wrong think. I can name probably 5 wrong think bans. He pretty much openly states that is the reason for the bans with ban comments like"We will not tolerate racism here"Banning people for being racist. That is problematic in itself, but people should know he is referring g to the beliefs of a person, and he has a pretty loose definition of racism.Us David literally banned a member for being me, who wasn't me. Which is why we should be very hesitant to ban perceived alts. Funny enough the. Guy he banned was an Allie who was so SJW, that he had literally started a debate proclaiming computers were a racist invention or something.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
I was accused of DDoSing, which is illegal.
That's near impossible to prove this far after the fact, and rarely prosecuted. It's not fair to falsely accuse you of anything, but I can't see their being any legal consequences from the false accusations.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
So if you cannot substantiate your explanation and your experiences are worth nothing to anyone else then why do you think you get to push your beliefs into the rest of society?
If somebody believes, you'll burn in hell for eternity, for not believing what they do, it would mean they are a huge piece of shit, for knowing your fate and not attempting to do something about it.
Pushing beliefs, is precisely how a rational and ethical person would act, with that knowledge/belief.
Created:
-->
@Mesmer
Again, you're dealing with humans. I'm talking about POST-humans. I don't care about dumb labels like 'perverting' or whatever. Human brains clearly cause a whole heap of problems that we'd simply be better off without.
They just aren't well adapted to industrial society. Having industrial society adapt to our brains, i stead of forcing humans to fit into an unintelligently created system, would be better.
It's fair to make these criticisms, because you are suggesting a posthuman society, to fix these forms of suffering. If I present a better alternative than you should drop your argument.
Or is there some unspoken reason you would like to see posthumanism?
To me it seems like the cure is worse than the disease. It's not a semantics game. Posthumanism, is human extinction. If we wouldn't be recognizable as humans, it stands to reason..... it's because we aren't. Your solution to psychological suffering, is extinction.
I just have a self preservation instinct I can't shake. I don't want to die. The radical life extension elements of transhumanism are appealing, as is the intelligence explosion that should help those along, but not a fan of the posthuman stuff.
Transhumanism has many elements of religion, and is just a substitute for the most part. It has it's paradise myth, of paradise after an intelligence explosion caused by artificial intelligence. It has it's resurrection myth, of people joining Alcor to be resurrected.
It has it's myth of transcendence, where you can become a posthuman God, if you play your cards right.
It's probably just a cope for death, like religion is. Except this cope is using optimism about technological advances to feel good about having an escape plan for death.
Transhumanism is not a solution you see. It is religion, saying God will save us all. Except this God is an intelligence explosion, most likely caused from advances in artificial intelligence. Your God is quite literally an artificial intelligence, that has not been created yet. One that will remove all suffering from the world, and turn you into a God/posthuman .
As for destroying industrial society, this TradCon reversion doesn't work in the long run. Humans would get sick of the discomfort/restrictions, invent new tools to make them more comfortable, and they'd just ramp right back into where we are now (eventually).This is not a solution. We need another way forward
Do solutions need to be permanent. Can't we just have some well placed revolutions when we are on the verge of creating an industrial society?
Calling that 'human extinction' is just a negative semantics frame-game that totally ignores all the violent destruction humans have inflicted upon the world and themselves. Human nature is such an ugly, gruesome and malicious thing that only sometimes is good
What destruction can they inflict upon themselves that would be worse than extinction?
The second option is the stupid one a lot transhumanists like to espouse currently. This isn't really useful for life; it's just polishing a turd.
It's not something being pushed. It's just acknowledgement that any upgrades you make to humans, will not remove their humanity.
Any more than giving a crocodile the ability to use a gun, would remove it's crocodile nature. It will still seek prey, it would just shoot it, to feed itself.
It isn't something being espoused, like people are hoping for it. The reason transhumanists get more into predicting what advancement will bring, instead of directing it, is because ultimately they know, that once technology starts advancing, we lose control over what happens with it, and how it will be used.
Created:
-->
@Mesmer
I don't see a reason to think people can be psychoanalyzed to this extent through text.
Well, it's fun to try
And this is all besides the point. The ideas and arguments should be addressed.
True.
I'd personally push for a post-human future that has evolved past ability to suffer, so that's where I am. I kinda agree with Ted that transhumanism wouldn't necessarily alleviate suffering, unless it was towards the extreme end of it wherein humans are barely recognizable anymore. I'd want a complete restructuring of the human brain, not just gadgets and augmentation for the human body (the small-minded transhumanist stuff currently pushed). I don't know exactly what he argues, though.
I seen this discussed within certain groups, but you really should read uncle Ted's stuff.
Right now they try to reduce human suffering by giving pills to depressed people or people who do not fit into society. Uncle Ted says we should not be perverting human society by artificially altering everyone's brai. Structure to fit into industrial society. Instead we should destroy industrially society, so humans can be happy like before they ate the fruit in the garden of eden.
See the problem is that you keep thinking in human terms. What necessitates the existence of "presidents" or "tribe leaders" in these post-human worlds? We don't necessarily even need to "talk" about anything in the future -- we could just 'know' or act in 100% accordance to what is logical/correct.
Correct, when humans become extinct and are replaced with post humans, there will be no human problems.
You know these theoretical post humans will come in 2 varieties.
1. Post humans are so radically different than is, they can't be described as human. This is really the same as human extinction.
2. We are still humans no matter what. It would be like giving an aunt super aunt abilities. Now it is just an aunt that can do cool shit.
Either option isn't really good
Created:
Posted in:
I think scum teams make a mistake by leaving GP alive until the endgame. His gut was spot on, and he is like an iceberg, keeping most of his thoughts to himself, but he displays a lot of competence in hunting scum
Created:
Posted in:
- Progressivism
- Free-Utilities
- Free-Healthcare
- Free-Education
- Non-complex immigration
- Pro-Choice
- Increasing Age-of-Majority
- Anti-Mandatory Draft
- Police Abolishment
- De-Militarization of Martial departments
- Against Flat Tax - Tax leans Rich
- Pro-LGBTQIA
- Comprehensive Education including LGBTQIA topics
- Gender-Affirming Healthcare
- Allowing adoption services to all given other prerequisites are met
- Penalty for tangible discrimination against
- Standardizing Official documentation to include LGBTQIA identities
- Atheist
- Anti-Theist
- Separation of Church and State
- Freedom to and from Religion
- Taxing the Church
- Abolishing Religious exemptions that harm individuals
- Naturalist
- The natural world is all there is
- Supernatural is impossible
- souls don't exist
- The mind is an emergent property of the brain
- Moral Subjectivist
- Objective moral truths are impossible
- Sentientism
- Soft-Utilitarianism
- Personal Identities
- Pansexual - Am attracted to people regardless of gender, i.e, no physiological traits I find particularly attractive over another
- Cis-gendered - I identify as the gender I was assigned at birth
- High Schooler auditing several college classes
Name one opinion you have that isn't stupid
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
I thought you were able to guess Poly was scum within the first few minutes of the DP? What happened to your acclaimed scum hunting abilities
This is why I urge town not to attack. People attacked tend to double down on their beliefs. I was able to step away as you can see and once I was left alone, I could more easily evaluate my position. I stand behind that what I saw is normally a strong scum tell, but like all tells. They aren't 100%. If my position is said to be stupid, it is hard for my ego to change my mind. That said, I still managed to do it. Dp3, I would have lynched Supa and if Supa was innocent than poly on dp4. Or visa versa. If you guys thought I was stuck on poly, I wouldn't have been NKed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
Well, that's on me. Still, well played on the whole, Supa. Definitely should've taken earlier behavior into greater account.
I think this analysis is wrong. The problem here might be overthinking. You didn't mess up by not analyzing enough. You had a doctor and watcher here on dp 3. Just flip a coin between poly and supa, lynch one then the next.
Looking for ways both can exist as town, is just talking yourself out of an easy lynch.
Created:
Posted in:
Watcher is basically the same as doctor in these small games, probably a bit more powerful. Poly should have CCEd supa. On dp3 though I messaged pie and lunatic and botched because it was obvious. Dp3 you should have lynched supa since he was CCed. By poly essentially and if he was town dp4 you lynch poly.
However, yes. It was extremely obvious supa was scum . He clearly displayed motivated reasons.
Poly, for fucks sake. In a game this small, if somebody claims a role like doctor and you are watcher, CC them so we can lynch them. Supa would have been dead dp2, had you not been elusive about what your role was.
Supa tried to act like watcher was a weak cop. In reality, doctor is a weak watcher. Like tracker is a weak cop.
Created:
-->
@Mesmer
Yes it's enjoyable for me. I like making excellent arguments and doing better than other people, as does anyone else. It feels really good to know you're right about something.
I sense there is an element of psychology at play here. Perhaps some sort of inferiority complex, where feeling right alleviates those feelings of inferiority. Nobody is better than you Mesmer. You have nothing to prove
It's also helping fight anti-white narratives that are crippling humanity. Anti-white narratives are hampering White people from doing another industrial revolution type event wherein the WHOLE world's standard of living increases. If people would just leave White people alone for 100 years, maybe they'd invent transhumanist/posthumanist technology that allows humanity to move past tribalism, because this whole swinging between Traditional Conservatism and Progressivism isn't going anywhere and is causing a lot of suffering.
Ted kazynski has some interesting works explaining why transhumanism, will not alleviate suffering. As a transhumanist I've been meaning to get around to digging through his more obscure works to find a good outline of his arguments. he barely touches on it in his manifesto.
"moving past tribalism", is the problem with the white race. Whites have no racial identity. It's genetic, we mostly believe in individualism and merit based decisions. We have a lot of in group preference with every other race. This is like the whites have made the wrong decision in the prisoner's dilemna. We would all be better off, if we acted like individuals and believed in merit above all else. However, only whites believe in this, so it is harming both whites and society as a whole.
Moving past tribalism also brings a host of other problems. Over socialization is one. We care about others at our own expense and we have a society of martyrs, where only psycopaths who cannot be oversocialized can succeed. It leaves us in a less authentically connected community, where we truly have no close friends or support network, leaving us to feel empty inside and unloved.
The move away from tribalism, means we have less control over our fate. Far away presidents have more effect on our daily lives than tribe leaders who we could talk to on a daily basis. Moving past tribalism is not going to help us, or even necessarily move us to a post human world.
In 50 years there's a chance I'll be dead, but I'm doing things right now to influence people/communities and change them for the better. When most people get power/influence, their hands are tied by investors or other influential people, and so you don't actually get to do what you want to do a lot of the time. But if you're convincing 100s of people, and some of those 100s are convincing 100s themselves, ideas start to spread really quickly -- I'm already being useful and impactful just by typing on the internet.
That sounds very altruistic of you. You must be a very good person
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Will read right now. I am sure I saw it broken down by the cato Institute, but incase I am missing something will Google now
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
good thing I am both 5 ft and 10 in. ;)
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Yes hypergamy is a problem left unchecked. However I am referring to stuff like the following
A city whose population because if incarceration and early male death having
100k black women
50k black men
Women get horny too, and men are not incentives to stay in relationships as a result. Syre welfare hurts black families and incentives single motherhood, but if you have more women than men and men can control whether they fuck around or stay monogamous. Men typically choose to fuck around. This also helps lose the female's civilization g effect on men, which contributes to criminality as well
Created:
-->
@Mesmer
. I want dfss posting at his best because I want my arguments to be tested by the best.
I have never understood this about you. Why?
Do you want to have some great over arching philosophy you can share with the world when you die?
Do you just enjoy this? If so that is a good enough reason. Just asking.
It seems like you are building a great philosophy for no reason. You Don't seem to care about obtaining power or influence.
In 50 years, you'll be dead. You'll have a great philosophy that is accurate, but in no way practical to use, and you'll have wasted your time building this philosophy that has disappeared into the sands of times.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
I've studied this issue for a while. Male and females in white communities are like a 50/50 split. Meaning a balance of power in sexual dynamics. In the black community, so many black men are in prison that you have like 10 black women competing for 2 guys. Men have too much power in mate selection and avoiding the socializing effect of women, means that men control those dynamics. When men control sexual dynamics, more partners will be had by the women, and by the men. You can see this effect in other populations where large scale male migration left women as a disproportionate majorities. Practically the same things happen as in black communities
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
The only undisputed proof of systemic racism in the USA is the rates of single motherhood by ethnic group, a known precursor to criminal activity and lower wealth and education rates.
It's true, and is easily corrected with judicial corporal punishment. If you just used whips to punish people and let them out, they would have lower recidivism rates, not learn other criminal behavior and have criminal contacts they meet in prison and they would still be there for their families and we could lower the rate of single motherhood and other massive problems that result in a lack of black men in black communities. It's cyclical. They have single mothers because their dads were in prison, and single mothers create criminal blacks. We eliminate the cycle by eliminating most sentencing and using judicial corporal punishment
Created:
-->
@Mesmer
Firstly, this is a lazy, garbage way of making arguments. I don't expect anything better from useless, genuine idiots like Reece101, but you've shown that you're capable of actually engaging with the papers themselves. This is quite disappointing.
Bow do you expect to persuade people by insulting them? It doesn't accomplish anything but making them clam up and doggedly stick to their beliefs more.
I genuinely like you and want to see you become .ore persuasive. This doesn't help. Studies show, asking for their premises and then disproving a premise, works better at changing minds.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mesmer
if RM cared that much about doing me, he would have already figured it out. I'm just not that good at personal security
Created:
Posted in:
I somehow doubt Australian laws will hurt RM here, even if whatever random wrong think he is being accused of is true. That is more like you post wrong think on Facebook and a family member reports you, type law. Not a post on random website anonymously type enforcement
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@949havoc
To treat dissent by censure is the sure sign that you're afraid of something atheists represent. What is it and why are you afraid of it.? It
That sort of dissent belongs in the philosophy section. Us theists are welcome to post there as well, so that bs should still be challenged
Created:
Posted in:
I can tell you, I think I know who you were talking about, because I would occasionally pop in when banned, and that user was saying outright racist things, while I really only say shit that offends liberals, but I could easily defend to my black relatives. The racist user in question though, should not have been banned for wrong think however
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
done
Created:
Posted in:
You are only allowed one campaign thread and you posted it about 3 months too early. Great strategy
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drlebronski
not suprising that youll vote an actual neo-nasi troll who said he would answer the jewish question if he got elected
That was in a private conversation, but yes I would require them just to make themselves known by replacing their profile pics with a star of david
Created:
Posted in:
Have you received either 2 bans in 2021 or have been banned for over 21 days RM?
You may not qualify either. I was gone so did not track your bans
You may not qualify either. I was gone so did not track your bans
Created: