Total debates: 34
Ks are beneficial for debate.
No description has been provided
I'm no professional on the matter but it interests me and it doesn't seem like this site has had all that many anarchist debates.
When i say systemic racism is real in America I mean black people as well as other races (but this is mainly on the topic of black people) are oppressed provide your argument first
This is a debate about Pitbulls. I'm against their prohibition. Wylted is in support of their prohibition.
Gary plauche did the right thing by murdering a child molestor.
Just debating the fairness of athletics
9/11 was the fault of Israel
500 characters. This is going to be a tough one.
I hold that capitalism is a superior economic system to socialism.
White people are superior
In this debate I am taking the pro stance on the resolution.
No description has been provided
Wylted needs to be put in place. I give him an argument. He hears what he hears then runs with it (see discord). The least I can do is show people the very same thing because I don't think someone who goes out of their way to misrepresent me clearly is open minded to actually look at what they say and realize. It does not debunk my argument.
No description has been provided
Back from my trip, still have work to do but I have time for a few debates.
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
I'd appreciate if this was not accepted by rational madman or other people with similar issues. He honestly writes in some sort of oddball way. Like he can write I am going to the grocery store and not only would it take him 2 sentences to write it, but it would be written in some mix of Olde English, baby talk and using odd slang, which would take me 2 hours to interpret his writing, giving me an unfair disadvantage.
Resolved: Donald Trump ought to be removed from office
No description has been provided
Pro is going to argue that the Judeo-Christian God can create a stone that is too heavy for Him to lift, whereas Con is going to argue against this resolution.
This debate is about whether polygamy should be legal. I am taking the Pro position on the question--that is, I am arguing that some form of polygamy should be legal. Read the full description for the complete resolution and the rules for the debate.
Ahmed Mohamed and his family claim that they were discriminated against by the public school system and the police. Pro contends that the facts indicate that no discrimination took place and the incident was exaggerated by the media before all the facts were known. Con may argue in support for the Mohamed family.
Anyone who is stupid enough to order drinks without ice in the drive-thru is welcome to debate me.
I should kill myself
I am for transhumanism and I think it is inevitable.
I wish to debate in favor of the position that more bad than good came out of giving the women the right to vote in the United States. Anybody want to debate minor alterations of that is welcome to do so with permission before starting the debate as long as I think it will still leave me enough ground to debate on.