Yassine's avatar

Yassine

A member since

3
2
6

Total posts: 1,201

Posted in:
Church of martyrs 50 million killed for being Orthodox
-->
@Mopac
I just want to make it very clear that The Orthodox Church does not act as  a worldly government, neither does it wish to. It is not really right to judge the church or Christianity based on the actions of a worldly state.

I would also like to point out that The Roman Catholic Church, which has not been Orthodox for over a thousand years, does not represent us or our ways. In fact, they attacked us during the crusades as well!

Protestantism is a reaction against Roman Catholicism, but they ditched the church along with Rome.

I would also like to point out that even Orthodox Countries have oppressed the church. The Roman Emperor meddled with the church quite abit, often times erring on the side of heretics. The Russian Tzars were not much different. 

The point being, the actions of these states must be understood to be distinct from that of the Church, because The Church is not a secular authority. It doesn't really matter how godly these governments claim their intentions.

What we Orthodox Christians are called to do is pray for the governing authorities, even if they are oppressing us. Maybe even especially if they are oppressing us. Indeed, we do this during every liturgy.

Our religion is very much not to be trouble. The only time we are trouble to governments is when they attempt to coerce us into worshipping idols or abandoning Christ. In that case even, the example we were given is to die peacefully as witnesses. Not that we seek death, but sometimes circumstances make it an unavoidable situation.
- This is a very good attitude. Piety > religiosity.



Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@Mopac
The Son is The Most Perfect Image of God. The Word of God. The Truth.

The Holy Spirit is The Spirit of Truth.

The Father is revealed in The Son by The Holy Spirit that proceeds from The Father, through The Son, and acting in us through cooperation and submission to His Will.

As Jesus Christ said, "true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him."

Worshipping The Father in Spirit and in Truth. This is The Trinity.

So if The Father is known to us by the spirit of Truth in The Most Perfect Image of The Truth, what does that tell us about The Father?

We both know that God is The Ultimate Reality. The Truth.

And so The Trinity explains how God is with us. The Trinity, One in essence and Undivided. Not three Gods. Not God in 3 parts. 

This is called a divine mystery for a reason, but it is important and it means something. As I said, it is the difference between worshipping a conception as God and recognizing that as created beings operating in the realm of creation, our relationship with God is through creation.

And it is in the hypostasis of The Son that all of creation is united to God.

- Are the Father, Son & Spirit identical or distinct beings? If they are identical then why the distinction! If they are distinct then they are three divine beings, not just one. There are expressions in the Quran as 'Truth' & 'Spirit' to refer to God, we don't jump up & say, oh that must be Jesus or Mohammed (pbut)! & you still haven't showed me this unbroken chain.
Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@Mopac
It might also seem strange to you that we are a nation of priests as well. What is commonly referred to as a priest is in fact a presbyter, or elder.

But as far as tracing ordinations, every single Bishop of our church can trace their ordinations back to the apostles. When we say in our creed, "One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church", the "Apostolic" part refers to this aspect of the church.
- The apostles of the Church do not have a direct ordination from Jesus (pbuh), they never even met him. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@Wylted
Yep, nobody claimed it was exclusively a Muslim thing. Everyone acknowledges those groups have no go zones as well.

- The thing is though, I can point out where these ghettos are & the shoot-outs that happened there -these don't stay out of police reports... Where are these Muslim no-go zones? Or do police suddenly get amnesia when it comes to that...
Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@Mopac
Intolerance and Christianity are not compatible.

In fact, we are taught a step above simply tolerating others. We are taught charity. That is, loving those who are tolerated, not simply putting up with them.
- Indeed. Tolerance is a weak concept. Secularists, in advancing their ultimate morality, fail to deliver & impress. Kindness, Respect, Charity, Affection & Compassion are far more valuable than just Tolerance.

Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
Just for clarification if a government is under a rule of a Religion it is not secular. Yassine mentioned a Caliph is secular but it isn't.
- No! A caliph is a secular ruler, by design. Authority in Islam is naturally inherited from the Prophet (pbuh), in the secular realm by the caliphs, & in the religious realm by the 'ulams. In the Shia tradition, however, they believe leaders should hold both religious & secular authority, whom they call imams.


3 definitions of secular below:

@Yassine and whoever I had as a reciever wants to read this
I do understand where you got the worldly definition but when people say secular what they mean is a non-Religious government in the context of when they are talking about the government.
Secular Merriam Webster: not overtly or specifically religious

Secular Cambridge Dictionary: not having any connection with religion

Secular Oxford Dictionary: Not connected with religious or spiritual matters.
- I know perfectly what secular & worldly means, in the appropriate context. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@Mopac

I'd be surprised if you found Muslim sources for any, as they probably wouldn't be worth noting. We remember these things because it is part of what the church does.
- You'd be surprised what you find in Muslim sources. Muslims were keen on recording their history ad nauseam. Maybe there are, but not easily accessible. I found that in these accounts, there is always more to the story than pretended. I understand why Abu of Tbilisi was executed, from a Fiqh point of view. The other two, there must be more to their story. Regardless, it's admirable how they held on to their beliefs despite adversity.


It is also worth noting that just because someone hasn't been glorified by the church as a saint does not mean that they weren't a saint. 
All right believing, true worshiping Christians are saints.
- That's a different notion of Sainthood than ours. 


Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
Yet Jesus Christ promises that the gates of hell will not overthrow the church, so there can not be a time when the church ceased to exist. The chain is not broken. 
- Then show me this unbroken chain. I can show you millions of chains of authority starting with over 4000 companions to the Prophet (pbuh) & ending with every licensed scholars who ever lived. Show me one.


I understand you must believe this in order to justify Mohammed, but we certainly see him as a false prophet and forerunner of the antichrist.
- The Prophet (pbuh) & his miracles are enough proof. Why don't we have a formal debate about this?


That might not sound nice to you, but it is what we believe. Several of the things that he taught about Jesus were condemned as heresies centuries before he lived. The writings of the apostles themselves testify against him.
- Yes, deemed heresies by the those who deified Jesus (pbuh) centuries after him. Of course you believe what you believe.


In fact, if you make Jesus a mere man or prophet, you disrupt the very prophecies that He came to fulfill.
- So he is a God? Can you prove this?


You don't understand what the trinity is. We certainly believe in one God. In fact, tritheism we recognize as a heresy. As is calling Mary a part of the trinity as your Koran claims we believe.
- No such thing... 


Acknowledging The Trinity is how we know God and recognize God rather than mistaking a conception of God as God.
- Why don't you explain how three gods = One God then?
Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
Saint Abu of Tbilisi

Another good one though who was also a Turk

Saint Constantine Hagarit

Saint Ahmed the Calligrapher
- Interesting read, I haven't found any Muslim sources for the last two though. Are martyrs considered saints in your tradition?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@Mopac
Church canons are not secular laws. 
- Yes, & they deal with penalties as such.


Jesus Christ appointed apostles. The apostles appointed bishops. We know what Jesus taught. We know who Jesus is. 
- No you don't. That chain is broken.


We do not believe in three gods, we believe in One God.
- That's what you claim, but it's not what it really is. Trinity =/= One!
Created:
0
Posted in:
Church of martyrs 50 million killed for being Orthodox
You are kind of on the side of the oppressors, so I don't expect to convince you that we are a great deal more offended at these things, and justifiably so than you can understand.
- I'm absolutely not on the side of the Ottomans in this case, for the practice is simply un-Islamic, it's immoral, it's sinful. But I do understand the rationale behind it, as you should. In principal, Muslims should be the ones to fight, whereas non-Muslims pay the Jizyah in exchange for exemption from fighting because you can't expect them to fight for a cause they don't believe in. The Ottomans reversed this in Devshirme, they dropped the Jizyah & instead replaced it by a military tribute, in which they take non-Muslims to fight for them. It's really convoluted & shady. But you have to understand, they were surrounded by enemies from every side ready to eradicate them. Conscription is the only option. This was also unfair to the native Muslims, because the military (Janissaries) had immense power & influence in the state -a privilege these natives were forbidden.
 

Kidnapping children, forcing them to convert to Islam, and having them fight in war is like comscription in The United States. WOW.
- Unhistorical sensationalism. In the 19th century, 7 year olds were hanged for committing a crime in Europe. Societies then didn't deem them children. Many kings were crown as young as 10 years old. Mehmet the Conqueror was 12... Conscription is indeed kidnapping by the state, forcing you against your will to sacrifice your life, which is, Yes! indeed, what the US & Ottomans did (& many other states).
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@Mopac
"Canon law" is a very Roman Catholic way of refering to the canons of the church. The Orthodox Church is not a legalistic entity.
- Canon Law was developed primarily by the Eastern Church...


I must again point out that the church was pushed into a position of governance under the Turks, and this arrangement in itself is not canonical. That is why today the church doesn't operate in this manner.
- Again, the Ottomans just let them practice their own laws.


Of course we know why you don't agree with The Church on what Jesus taught or even about who Jesus is. It is because you believe the false prophet over The One Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.
- So the Church decides what Jesus (pbuh) taught not Jesus himself...?


But the fulfillment of your religion is in Jesus Christ, and it is impossible for you to understand this with a Muslim understanding of Jesus. You must have an Orthodox understanding of Jesus.
- Which is to us a corrupt understanding of Jesus (pbuh), granting him a divinity which he never claimed.


For it was said by Christ himself "this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."
- There is indeed only One true God.


You know sure as I do that The Ultimate Reality is God, and there is no other. You don't know Jesus Christ. For knowing Jesus in the  way you know Jesus is not eternal life.
- Yes, the Ultimate Reality is God, not three gods.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Church of martyrs 50 million killed for being Orthodox
-->
@Mopac
Devshirme
- A categorically un-Islamic practice through and through, though perfectly understandable. Conscription was an essential part of the Ottoman regime for a good part of its history, given its geopolitical situation in being surrounded by great enemies from -literally- every side. In times of war, countries always opt for conscription, as did the US for instance during the many wars it was involved in, from WWI to the Vietnam War. I guess the Ottomans figured they should do that to in such times of war...


I'm amazed you believe that the Turks simply left Christians be to practice their religion in peace without interference. That is certainly not in line with the experience of the church.
- Indeed, it is a fact. It's called the Millet system. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@Mopac
You really underestimate our faith. Christianity does not need the protection of a state to live. If this was the case, The Roman Empire would have stamped out Christianity before becoming Christian 300 years after pentecost.
- Faith is ultimately an individual cause, some have stronger faith than others, for good or for worse. You may possess a strong faith, many others don't. But I will grant you this, Christianity & Hinduism are the two faiths which have persisted the most under Islamic rule. Zoroastrianism, Buddhism & the many local religions from Indonesia to Morocco did persist as much, with small & scattered communities surviving today. 


Islam thrives in an environment that silences anything that disagrees with it. If The Church were truly given liberty, and Muslims were not threatened with death for converting, Orthodox Christianity would truly flourish in the middle east.
- I see you love to insist on saying things which aren't true. I really don't need to tell you the history of the Church & those who disagreed with it... That said, the Church as indeed given all the liberty it could have, granting its patriarchs the highest positions in the state, & organizing regular debates between Christian scholars & Muslim scholars, even giving them free reign in terms of writing & publishing content. If the Muslims were allowed to preach to Christians in the MD then, there would be none left today. & indeed, the Church had supreme liberty to preach to its heart content across the Muslim world for the better part of a century -under Colonialism, & they failed spectacularly.


It is our duty as Christians to preach the gospel. To prevent us from freely preaching the gospel is to oppose God. It matters not if Muslims are not allowed to try to convert us. Indeed, if they tried, and found themselves being the ones converted, they put themselves in danger! And surely, The Church is no stranger to this. We recognize many Muslims who became Orthodox as saints, after being discovered, refusing to renounce their faith under threats of death that were not empty.
- So is it the duty of Muslims to call to the cause of God. You don't do that by preaching to the gullible or desperate, to separate families & instigate hate & hostility within communities. That's not the way of truth. You do it by proving the truth of your claim to a wise audience, if it has any merits, then truth shall truly prevail. Can you give me an example of a Muslim who became an Orthodox saint?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Ask Ramshutu. I can't debate this. It will take too long given the amount of depth I would have to go to.

If Ramshutu doesn't want to do it then simply have it open and if unitelligble people accept the debate you will get free wins and you can  use the comment section to decide a better candidate. 

Sorry about that. Learnt my lesson for accepting debates that I have no real interest in partaking in like the more recent border wall. It was a catfight turned into a debate. Rarely turns into something fruitful. My main reason is still time even if I was given a week to post arguments. 
- So you're conceding the debate? After all that fuss about "truth" & "wrong"... should've known.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Ask me anything: Judaism
-->
@Outplayz
Simply bc there is no one else that can be me for me to survive. In any other scenario, i'm dead and gone. Therefore, anything that happens to me after death i'll be the driver and have to deal with it. Arrogance and delusion are just part of the game. That's why imho it's best to realize it's a part of you in order to be its master and not vice versa. 
- Arrogance & delusion indicate a state of separation from reality, this can't be realized, because it can't be real. When reality hits, delusion dissipates.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Church of martyrs 50 million killed for being Orthodox
-->
@Mopac
Note the genocides of The Turks. There are Armenian diasporics that are welcomed at our church. Most people hear of the Armenians, but they are not familiar with the Assyrians and Greeks who were also targets of this genocide against Christians.

Millions killed.

- This is not History, it's sensational propaganda. Why would the Ottomans suddenly decided to "genocide" the Christians in their lands after 6 centuries of protecting them?! Prior to this so called "genocide", & following the Greek revolution (Orthodox Church) early 19th century, 5.5 million Turks were killed in the Balkans & more than 5 million were displaced from their homes -all purged to the last person, their villages, mosques, schools... all decimated to the ground -all this with the full support of western European countries, Britain & France. The Armenians sided with the Russians in the war, that makes them not just enemies but also traitors, & the Turks lost 700 thousands fighting them too. This was no "genocide", it was war, during which the Turks lost far more lives more than the others combined. The Young Turks, to whom much of this is attributed, isn't even a Muslim government, it's a secular government with nationalistic & European ideals -which begot Ataturk.


Not hating on you or the Turks, simply pointing out relatively recent history of how Christianity has not been allowed to flourish in Muslim countries as you claim, even in your own country.
- When the Ottomans took Constantinople, thereby annexing Greece (which was under Byzantine rule), they just let them be & gave them the freedom to practice their religion & laws without interference, they even reinstated their Patriarch in Istanbul. When the Greeks gained power & took over, they literally purged the Turks to the last man.
Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@Mopac
Mohammed and his successors were heads of a secular government. Secular means worldly. Clearly, the caliphate was a Kingdom of this world.
- It absolutely is. A caliph is, by all means, a secular ruler. The Prophet (pbuh) obviously isn't.


And there is nothing about Muslim rule that has been conducive to flourishing for us.
- Umm? Having your own lands? You own leaders? Your own laws? Financial independence?... If it had been a Secular rule, you'd simply be subject to the rule of the majority, laws & leaders not yours, living among a Muslim majority, losing your religion & customs & culture, quickly going extinct.


Preventing us from building churches and monasteries, confiscating churches, preventing us from preaching publically, killing Muslim converts to Christianity... tip of the iceburg stuff.
- Propaganda nonsense. Almost *all* Churches that exist in the Middle East today were built under Muslim rule. Yes, as were Muslims prohibited to preach publicly to Christians. & unless those Muslims did more than just convert to Christianity, I assure you they were safe. & history is filled with such cases. Pick any history book. Why don't you tell me about the whole ice-burg.


But as The Lord Jesus Christ said to those who crucified Him, "Forgive them, for they know not what they do."
- Now, that is a beautiful thing to say.


And I hold no animosity towards Muslims. I do not believe that Mohammad was a prophet though, as his teachings concerning Jesus Christ are contrary to what the church has always believed since the beginning. 
- As I hold none towards Christians, especially Eastern christians. Personally, I feel that Eastern christians belong with us Muslims as natural brothers, as opposed to Western christians, who I feel are distant.
Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@Wylted
No go zones are a fact. The arguments liberals use against them amount to "no official no go zones are documented by the government". Well no shit. Police are not going to openly admit they are afraid to go to a location without significant back up
- Reminds me of those 'Patriot' groups in their no-go-zones... Black ghettos in their gang territories too I guess.

Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@keithprosser
It is most definiterly not irrelevant. There are social tensions between communities in the UK and europe and people are dieing at the hands of radicals and fanatics on both sides. Is it 'irrelevant' that young men are being motivated and radicalised to commit murders in the name of Islam? Is it irrelevant that non-Muslims murder Muslims in retaliation, as in new zealand a few weeks ago?
- Exactly why the designation is irrelevant. It is but a meaningless ignorant label with no substance whatsoever. Man is enemy of what he does not know. The solution is simple & easy, but systematically unattainable -& partially because of these stupid fanciful labels.


And all you can do is bad mouth christians! Is that supposed to help? In what way does that promote peace? Are you better than Steve or of the same vile type intolerant bigot that causes ordinary men and women to die for nothing, sacrificed as pawns by ideologically driven fanatics?
- LOL! Straw-man! I forgot that part where you were talking about 'moderate' Christians & 'fanatical' christianists... My point was clear, the very designation 'moderate' is a joke, for reasons cited. Intolerance is but a symptom of ignorance & arrogance, which anyone is susceptible to.


Christians and Muslims profess love and peace, but it seems that it is me, an atheist, that is the only one here working for reconciliation.
- Love & Peace are first & foremost a spiritual state & a mental realization, which comes with persistent struggle & self-discipline within oneself. As a Muslim, from God all things come & to him all things belong, the world & all in it -all I must accept. This, however, should not impede judgement or compromise belief, what is wrong is wrong & what is right is right -be it from Muslims or Christians.
Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@Mopac
The Orthodox Catholic Church is the second largest congregation of Christians on the planet.

Despite being subjected to Muslim dhimmitude in the middle east and Africa for a good chunk of its history.
- Under which they flourished & lasted. If Muslims had adopted a secular-like system or a Christian-like system, there will hardly be any Orthodox christians today. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
If you believe I am ignorant about something, don't think that puffing yourself and acting condescending will impress me that you know better. 
- I'm not condescending, I don't like revisionism & denial, which is a RAMPANT thing amongst Christians today to an exhausting degree. 


I know it is hard for you to understand, because the state and church are so intertwined in Islam, but this is not how the Christian Church is. You mock us because governments can and have bullied the church around, but because of how our church is structured it always reverts back to normal. The Turks could not genocide our church out of existence, neither could they, despite their meddling in church affairs, corrupt our faith. The Soviet Union could not genocide our church out of existence, neither could they, despite their meddling in church affairs, corrupt our faith. We are not like The Roman Catholics, who can have their whole church corrupted by one bishop, as they have when they altered the creed of the church. We are not like the protestants, who lacking real holy orders and unity find themselves being corrupted into abominable heresies at the whim of their surrounding culture.
- I don't like either Catholicism or Protestantism for the very reasons you cited, the former lacks scholarship in favor of hierarchy & the latter lacks authority in favor of "interpretation". This does not change the fact that the Eastern Church has authority, both ecclesiastic & moral, in the form of canons, aka Canon Law. Plus, under the Turks, the Church was running in the show...


Our is The Church of Jesus Christ and the apostles, the very Church that Christ promised the gates of hell will not overcome. When you say that the church fell away or died and needed to be replaced by Islam, you are calling Jesus Christ a liar.
- If I call Jesus (pbuh) a liar, then I'm an apostate... You know we don't agree on what Jesus (pbuh) taught.


But Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the law and all the prophets. At the end of Islam is Jesus Christ.
- I don't understand this part?


The Church does not make secular laws. Historically, emperors and such felt that they should enforce religion on the population. This is not denial of history, I am simply not making the identity fallacy that you are likely unintentionally making.
- They do indeed, it's called Canon Law, inspired from the Bible & the apostles writings which deals with both ecclesiastic & moral issues, including penalty decrees for murder or sorcery or adultery or apostasy or theft...etc. Plus, the Church also adopted Roman Law & Islamic Law for a lot of issues. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@Mopac
I am the only Orthodox Christian here. You should not take the deviations of heretics as being representative of Christianity.
- It is indeed a sad fact that Western Christianity took the lead in most Christian history. The world would look so much different if Eastern Christianity prevailed.

Created:
0
Posted in:
No go areas in the UK
-->
@keithprosser
I'm more than happy to not use the word 'moderate' if you suggest an alternative.  There are Muslims who want to establish a world Caliphate and are prepared to use violence and force to achieve it.  There are  "muslims who actually do want to actually live in a peaceful  integrated western society." - at least in theory!  

We need labels to discuss the issue.  In the west non-muslims have adopted 'Islamist' and 'Moderate' for that purpose.  Many Muslims do not like those terms, for reasons I gave earlier.

So please do uggest term for the different sorts of Islam and their followers - they may catch on! But I  don't expect many Muslims to read my posts, so I will stick with 'islamist/ihdist/fanatical' etc for one sort and 'moderate' for the other.
- Or just, Muslims.


I've @ed Yassine to see if we can get our resident Muslim's view!
- All this is entirely irrelevant. A good chunk of Christians hold the most aggressive views (in my estimate far more than Muslims), which they are not particularly designated for -at least in their world. The overwhelming majority of wars -& deaths- in this century or the past century (or any century) were instigated by Christians, yet all they see is the aggression of others... For every Muslim that holds such views, 10 Christians hold worse views. Just scroll through this Forum & take notice of their attitude & tone, complete utter callousness. Our friend Stephen is a prime example. At least the Muslim side is understandable, given the immense suffering & humiliation they endured.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Why are democrats wrong about everything?
-->
@dylancatlow

Either way, I hope all would agree that it’s time a bunch of little asteroids hit them all.

“But Dylan, that’s a mean thing to say. Surely you wouldn’t say that we should nuke Harvard and Africa!”

Uh, yes I would. Frankly, snow and ash are preferable to these people, no matter how much of it we have to deal with once “nuclear winter” is a thing. We could even make little snowmen and think of them as democrats while we kick them apart.
- I don't know about democrats, but whoever believes this is definitely wrong...
Created:
0
Posted in:
'God' and 'god'
-->
@Mopac
The heterodox wouldn't see that way, because they deny the church or prescribe to an understanding of the church that is different than what the ancient church believed. 
- Heterodox... LOL!


I am baptized and Chrismated in The Orthodox Catholic Church. So yes, you could say Eastern Christian, though I live in The United States. I go to an Antiochan church that was planted by Lebanese immigrants.
- Oh, that's nice.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Omnipotent, omnipresent etc,
- You mean definition, of course that would laid in the debate.


Who is starting? I would like to since the BOP is shared.
- Alright.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@Mopac

What is the prescribed penalty for apostasy?
- That's an interesting question, for it involves the first of the 6 Sacred Necessities of Sharia: Religion (the other beings: LifeReasonProgenyProperty & Honor). Religion is indeed a sacred right in Sharia, thus religious freedom -in both belief & practice- is guaranteed & religious coercion is categorically prohibited. This is expressed in the legal notion of 'Ismat al-Millah' (Inviolability of Faith) for Muslims (& non-Muslims in the Hanafi school) & 'Ismat al-Dhimmah' (Inviolability of Protection) for non-Muslims (in the other schools), which mandates that a Muslim or non-Muslim are inviolable in the 6 sacred necessities, i.e. in their religion, life, reason, progeny, property & honor. Thus, the inviolability of a Muslim is tied, not just to his allegiance to the faith, but also to his allegiance to the state & to the community (this is true for other than the Hanafi school). Subsequently, the status of apostates is a special one, for it indicates the simultaneous rejection of faith & state & community at the same time, thus do not warrant neither the inviolability of faith nor of protection. 

- In this sense, Apostasy is seen potentially as a political offense rather than just a civil or criminal offense, hence dealt with accordingly by the state. The punishment of Apostasy thus varies depending on circumstances. It can even be frozen or dropped if the circumstances demand so, or if the state deems it best. Particularly, individual apostasy, as opposed to collective/public apostasy, is regarded as politically inconsequent & thus doesn't warrant a penalty, though it warrants questioning & other civil solutions. Depending on the different legal schools, its punishment ranges from nothing to death penalty. Some schools prescribe the death penalty only for apostasy that involves high treason, banditry, revolts & such (Nakhii school). Some others punish apostasy that also involves all kinds of militancy or hostility (Hanafi school). Some schools punish even whimsical (not founded on solid conviction & sincerity) apostasy (Maliki school).

- The biggest issue jurists face in the implementation of this penalty is its conformity to the principal of "there is no compulsion in religion". For Coercionnullifies Accountability. A coerced person can not be accountable, wether in this life or the next. To reconcile this, the jurists view Apostasy as a negative act (in not upholding the religion & the state & the community) rather than a positive act (in joining a new belief). Example, punishing murder is not coercion into not committing murder (negative act). Further, they also postulate that, in theory, the punishment is actually relief from coercion rather than coercion, for allowing whimsical apostasy would inevitably impede reason & morality in favor of foolishness & immorality, which entails the violation of two sacred rights in Islam: Religion & Reason (& probably the rest). In short, the framework is built in such a way that apostates who are law abiding citizens, genuinely seeking truth, know about the religion & have valid objections against its principals, may be spared from punishment, for these are expected to eventually return back to Islam after engaging with assigned scholars to argue said objections. 


Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@Mopac
Secular is another way of saying worldly. 
- Sure.


You confuse The Roman Empire with The Church. We do not kill apostates.
- I may not be an expert in the Bible & the various Christian traditions, but I know a bit about history & I don't like when Christians deny their history. *Canon Law*. Death penalty for apostasy was a normal thing in all religious traditions, be it Jews or Christians or whatever.. even John Locke, the supposed father of Liberalism, believed in penalty for apostasy. This whole change of attitude is quite recent...


Muslims do kill apostates though, and this goes back even to Mohammed and his successors.
- The Prophet (pbuh) never punished an apostate for apostasy. His successors diverged on the matter, some penalized whereas others opted otherwise (like Umar).


The church has not changed morally, we have always taught the same thing.
- Have you heard the terms *the great apostasy* (or something), reflecting the huge divergence of the Church from its traditions. I don't think you're aware of the scope & scale of the change the Church experienced the past couple centuries...


The Turks imposed on the church to act in a judicial manner through the millet system, but the church is not intended to be a worldly power.
- The more you say, the more I realize you haven't gotten a clue what you're talking about. The Turks didn't impose anything, they merely let them do what they've always done, that is practice their own laws, which were a mix of Canon Law & Roman Law.


Because of how the Orthodox Church is organized, it is able to revert back to normal after government imposition ceases. There has never been a period in history where government didn't meddle with the church, but the church survives.
- I'm talking about the Church as an authority, not outside governments.


Guidance yes, dictate, no. The church is not a worldly authority. Islam is as much a worldly secular authority as it is a religion. We Orthodox are not like this. The church is distinct from secular worldly government. 
- Yet, history is testimony to the contrary. Christians have never thought that way until post-Enlightenment. This is revisionism. 


Of course. God granted authority to the Roman Empire. God granted authority to the Tzars of Russia, the bolsheviks. The Caliphate. Who can give authority but God? Even Satan has no power but that which was granted by God.
- Alright, this is a bit different than I'm used to hear from Christians.


Your examples of "Christians" killing apostates is somewhat silly because none of the examples are Orthodox Christians, and even if they were, the Church's official position is that we do not kill apostates or execute any type of juridical authority whatsoever. In fact, the merging of church and state even has its own heretical name in Caesaropapism. 
- I call BS. This just undermines more your premise, in that Church authority can not compromised. LOL!


I find it difficult to believe that in Islam it isn't the norm for apostasy from Islam to be punishable by death, since this has been the norm since the beginning.
- Maybe what you believe or don't isn't quite what is or isn't. I was asked this same question by someone on this thread, I'm just gunna copy/paste the response here:


Created:
0
Posted in:
Democratic Primaries
-->
@Outplayz
I agree. Bernie is pretty set in his ways and seems for real. He's just not articulate (manipulative) like a lawyer which works in his determent unfortunately. But i like how he sets the goal post at the extreme bc in an perfect society... his vision should be realized. Yang is awesome bc he paints that picture on how to get there. I'm not too sure about UBI... i remember him saying how it won't result in inflation... but that's everyone's concern. More money in the regular person's hand means the pizza place can charge more... so i have to research that again bc i do remember him saying on some program his way won't effect inflation. Idk at this point.
- There is always inflation. Inflation happens when there is a gap between real added value & money circulated around. Most likely $1000 extra would create real added value, actual production, more cars, more pizzas, more stuff. Or maybe not...


Other than that... yes, corporate interests and powerful people interests rule the world. Especially bc most of these people are male. I don't know how power translates to females, but to males it's like being a god in this world. I don't think any male would want to give that position up and will spend all their money to keep that power. It's sad the world revolves around the super power of money and power... but it does. People will flood anything they can to keep that power. 
- That is true, human nature.


I know you're religious so i won't get too into that... but it's that very power that i think has corrupted everything from religion to politics. The faster people realize what "power" to a single individual truly means... the faster we can wake up and say... "cool, if you can have that... I AT LEAST deserve a roof over my head and food" ... not asking for much or that power... just acknowledge us bc if you don't... the empire will eventually fall from within (that's my prediction anyways). Evil never wins. I think America is being more evil than good at this point. History tells us that doesn't last bc someone either domestic of foreign will get fed up with it. Most likely domestic in our case. 
- Indeed. One of the last stages of an empire is *corruption*. When people become corrupt, along with the system, it's their downfall.

We'll see. The last things i said is my speculation. But overall message is we need to work on "OUR" country. Bc guess what. If our country is great, if everyone (or mostly) is at least happy.... we won't need wars anymore, we won't need regime changes... the world will see. We are in the age of technology... EVERYONE will see. If they see a country that has figured it out... they will fight their governments, they will fight for what we have. Everyone is born to be free and happy (imho America's message)... we need to lead by that example.   
- Actually no. When people are prosperous & at ease, they start to occupy themselves with others' business, especially once they obtain power to go with that. All people aspire to live better lives & pursue success, America's example is a zero-sum game. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Ask me anything: Judaism
-->
@Outplayz
God is me bro... i wouldn't put that burden on anyone else. It's already enough to deal with my consciousness. Times infinity, are you kidding me? I get what that means. Delusion & arrogance will always be a part of the deal... bc i would choose it to be so, unfortunately. It's a bad realization. But, consciousness man... you'll find all the answers there, and if you search the platform and come to the conclusion of what that meanns... sure, you can call that god. 
- Alright! So willfully arrogant & delusional, but why though?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Tell me the labels you have for God that are in the Qur'an then I'll say what I'll accept.
- Wut?!


30k is the maximum not what we both be reaching. It is there just in case if we need it. You decide on the Rounds. More than 3 less than 5.
Who has the burden of proof? 
- If you're not gunna reach it, then you don't need it. 20k is too much. 4 rounds it is. Of course BOP shared. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@PGA2.0
The destruction of the temple and city in AD 70, for instance. The promised Messiah coming to an Old Covenant people that no longer exist in covenant relationship as specified in the (written) Torah after AD 70, for another. 
- I heard this argument before, it's very flawed, otherwise the Jews would've recognized him as the Messiah.


I mean the Old Covenant can no longer be followed as specified per the (written) Torah. The priesthood no longer offers sacrifice as specified. Many are dispersed across the Roman world. The feast days no longer are met as specified. The temple no longer exists in which the sacrificial offerings for the sins of the people on the Day of Atonement were offered to God. The scrolls that contained the lineage details are destroyed. Various passages of Scripture cannot be fulfilled after AD 70 concerning the Messiah.
- Alright, in a sense I guess. But didn't Jesus (pbuh) confirmed the Torah of Moses?



Created:
0
Posted in:
'God' and 'god'
-->
@Mopac
Western Christianity descends from Roman Catholicism which broke away from The Orthodox Catholic Church over a thousand years ago. 

We hope for them to return to the church. We can't compromise the faith though, so reconciliation is really the heterodox churches becoming Orthodox.
- I don't think they see it that way though...


I go to an Antiochan diocese, so our Church is currently based in Damascus.
- So you're Eastern Church?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@Mopac
The Orthodox Catholic Church recognizes free will as being part of what it means to be made in God's image. That being the case, we do not punish apostates, but pray for them.
- This attitude towards apostasy is quite modern in adoption, especially by the major churches (including the Eastern Church). Apostasy was punished by death -or at least exile- in much of the Christian world, until the late modern era. In the Islamic world, Christian dominions were specifically disallowed from carrying out apostasy penalties even within their domains, though with exceptions. That been said, things have indeed changed now, as secular law & morality took over.


We do not believe in persecuting heretics or waging holy wars. The Church is not intended to be a secular or worldly power, as Christ said "My Kingdom is not of this world."
- Yet, history is testimony to the contrary. The religion is still a source of morality & spirituality, & as a source of morality, it should dictate laws or at least guide them. Believing in the morality of the Church on one hand & practicing the morality of Secularism on the other, I find, profoundly incoherent & hypocritical.


We do believe that all secular or worldly authorities have been given that authority by God, whether they are good or evil. 
- Do you believe God gives authority to those who are evil?


The church's experience is that those who convert from Islam face very real threat of being killed in the Muslim world. Both past and present.
- I wouldn't know how the Church would've "experienced" that... On a case to case basis, leaving a religion sacred to those around you can harvest some bad consequences, that has nothing to do with Islam. I have a friend in Arizona whose father threatened to kill her if she becomes Muslim. Even in America, sometimes it does end with killing [https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2015/12/arizona-woman-shoots-and-kills-atheist-for-not-believing-in-god/]. In South America, it's not even uncommon. As to the directive of religion itself, the rulings on apostasy are clear & detailed (depending on the different schools of thought). A non-politicized or publicized apostasy is inconsequential in Islamic Law. Historically, there are no records of any penalized individual apostasy case by a sovereign authority. The cases in which these things happened, were usually under rebellious or fringe regimes, such as the case of Khawarij. In fact, some of the most famous intellectuals in Islamic history were known to have declared apostasy, like al-Maari & ar-Razi & al-Mutanabi...etc. 


We are really off topic here, I think it would be better to make a new topic if you would.
- Moved.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Ask me anything: Judaism
-->
@Mopac

The ecumenical councils did not innovate the faith, but clarify and reaffirm what was passed down by those ordained by the apostles and their successors.

The Roman Empire is not the church, and even after the empire became Christian, persecution of Orthodox Christians did not end. Many Emperors were not Orthodox Christians. 


The history is a lot more complicated than you know, but we certainly believe that The Holy Spirit guides the church, and tbat as Jesus promised, hell will not overcome it. The Church is the oldest continuous institution on the planet, which is amqzing considering throughiut most of its history it has been persecuted, oppressed, and slaughtered.
- Which Church are you talking about?


That is not in line with the experience of the church. Past and present.
- Not sure what you're referring to here? Do you mean apostasy laws in the Orthodox or Catholic churches? Or apostasy laws in Islam?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Ask me anything: Judaism
-->
@Outplayz
I have been born to not submit to anyone. Under pain, under pressure... you can do anything to me i will never submit to anyone other than a lie to end my life... which i know i can do and is ultimately always in my power... god doesn't make sense. God knows i will never submit yet will punish me anyways... that doesn't make sense. When will you guys understand this is a human creation.
- That's just delusion & arrogance. You are submitting wether you like or not, but deluded as to the truth of that, imagining you actually have power. You have none. There are laws within & without binding you to a reality you can never break from no matter how you imagine otherwise. That "power" you think you have is simply the will God instilled in you, to chose wether to recognize your powerlessness & submission, or persist in your delusion. That chose which would then decide your fate.
Created:
0
Posted in:
'God' and 'god'
-->
@Mopac
It isn't a language I am that good with. The church I go to has a lot of people who speak fluent Arabic, and at least one fellow from Iraq who hardly speaks anything but!
In English, Allah and illah are spelled and pronounced the same, which is unfortunate.
- I like Middle Eastern Christianity far more than Western Christianity, the latter just has the most outrageous doctrine & history.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Ask me anything: Judaism
-->
@Mopac
Islam (and by this, I don't mean submission to God, because truly that is our Orthodox faith, submission to God.) Does not know Jesus Christ. The Jesus Christ that is taught in Islam is not the same Jesus Christ that is known by The Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church.
- Submission to God is the message of all God's divine revelations, in that sense, they are all 'Islam'. Who says the Orthodox Church isn't the heresy? The Jesus (pbuh) taught in Islam is the one many sects in the Middle East then believed in (though now extinct), it's the one found in the Gospel of Thomas & others, which are rejected by the Church. The Jesus Christ hailed by the Church today was decided in the Council of Nicea. The Church, in the coming centuries, went on to massacre or oppress all sects of different beliefs than their own -which it regarded as 'heretic' & burn all other scriptures which they didn't acknowledge.   


An acceptable reason for killing a Muslim apostate is if they convert to Christianity, isn't it?
- That's not a reason, it's a type. Just converting to Christianity from Islam isn't enough to warrant death penalty, or any penalty. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@Mopac
We Orthodox Christians have a prayer that we say to begin our other prayers that explains it well I think.

"O heavenly King, O Comforter, the Spirit of truth, who art in all places and fillest all things; Treasury of good things and Giver of life: Come and dwell in us and cleanse us from every stain, and save our souls, O gracious Lord."


When Jesus Christ, took flesh from the ever virgin Mary and theotokos, He was conceived by The Holy Spirit. It is this same Holy Spirit that we say in our creed, or statement of belief...

"And I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, and Giver of Life,
Who proceedeth from the Father,
Who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified,
Who spake by the Prophets;"

So we say that the Holy Spirit is what spoke through the prophets.
- Some of this sounds like the archangel Gabriel. What evidence is there of this 'Holy Spirit'? Isn't God the giver of life?

Created:
0
Posted in:
'God' and 'god'
-->
@Mopac
In the Arabic language, the difference between illah and Allah.
- That is indeed true. Do you speak Arabic?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@keithprosser
So does the truth of the Koran depend on how many friends a debater has ?
- Of course not, that's nonsense. But in this forum, winning is indeed -at least partially- a popularity contest. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Confidence in your beliefs is not a good argument. My comment was not intended in anyway simply stating what is. I rather the arguments do what confidence can't which is make a convincing argument.
- Let's hope so.


Does the Qur'an support the existence of God?
This would be two burdens you would have to fill.
1) God exists.
2) This is supported using the Qur'an.
- Is this to say: God, as defined in the Quran, exists? Or: God exists & the Quran confirms it?


Since you are a Muslim you should already have the information with you to make such an argument.

I know I did say I will allow you to make the rules but there are 2 things I would like for the debate.
1) 1 week for me to make an argument/
2) 30k character limit. If that is too much just drop it down to as low as 10k. I don't think I have ever reached the 30k character limit but just to make sure if I do come close most of my argument can be submitted if not most then more than what the other character limits were able to do. 
- 30k is too much, no one has the time through a 60k character round! 20k tops. & how many rounds?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Ask me anything: Judaism
-->
@Mopac
Considering I believe Islam is a Christian heresy,
- That's a very old belief. What exactly do you mean by 'Christian heresy'? Why do you believe Islam is Christian heresy?


I do not believe that killing Muslim apostates is acceptable.
- For no good reason, of course it isn't.


As long as you are threatening people with death for coming to the true faith, you are surely on the wrong side. 
- You for leaving the faith?


Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@PGA2.0
Yes, I've heard that. It is somewhere I would like to see also. Are you located in Istanbul? So many of the Turkish shows I've watched have a panorama of the city. 
- I was in Istanbul, & I fly there frequently, but I'm located in Ankara now. I'm moving there soon though.


The biblical and historical evidence is strong to say He already has. Argued any other way shows many inconsistencies.
- What biblical & historical evidence?


No, I believe the OT was abolished in AD 70.
- What does that mean? Why do you believe that?

Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@Mopac
Ok, so you believe in God's word.

Do you believe in God's spirit?
- What does God's spirit mean? In the Quran, 'word' & 'spirit'/'soul' from God refers to Jesus Son of Mary (pbut).
Created:
0
Posted in:
Democratic Primaries
-->
@Outplayz
I didn't know they did it with my girl too. Shame. The party just doesn't learn. One big reason Trump won is bc the "people" felt like they picked him. That's huge and the democrats should be an example of that... yet, they don't learn. They go as extreme as they can, they pander... they play shady games. They will lose again if they continue this way. Plus, open borders essentially? Some of the stuff they were saying is too far left for me. 
- Democrats, just like Republicans, are driven by corporate interests. People like Bernie & Yang are a danger to that interest. They can't be allowed to go far, otherwise they'll make too much sense & actually serve the people's interests.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@keithprosser
The winner of a debate is the best debater, not the one who is right.
- It helps though. Debates are essentially about creating doubt or convincing others. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@PGA2.0
I enjoyed it. A really good series! I actually speak and recognize a few words of Arabic (i.e., Inshallah and of course the most common greeting "Salam Alaikum")
- Oh yeah, 40% of Turkish vocabulary is Arabic. I moved to Turkey recently, wonderful people.


It means that everything predicted about the Jewish Messiah was fulfilled by Jesus. It means that the whole OT is a type and shadow of a greater truth, a spiritual truth. Jesus is revealed in most pages of the OT. Not only this, what was predicted of Israel is fulfilled too.
- We too believe Jesus (pbuh) is the Messiah, & that he will descend at the end of time.


Yes, I know.

Psalm 118:22 (NASB)
The stone which the builders rejected Has become the chief corner stone.


2 Corinthians 3:14-16 (NASB)
14 But their minds were hardened; for until this very day at the reading of the old covenant the same veil [a]remains unlifted, because it is removed in Christ. 15 But to this day whenever Moses is read, a veil lies over their heart; 16 but whenever a person turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away.
- Do you abide by the OT?


His reputation goes before him. He has gained support. Thus, harder to win against. 
- He's a good debater too.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Debate?
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Insult and asking for a debate. Create the debate. If I like the rules then I will accept.
- Remarks*. Why don't you tell me what rules you like to see?


It has been a long time when we last spoke but I think I still have the better position. Quran is morally bankrupt. Quran is filled with false information which contradicts science. God doesn't exist so there is a heck of  burden for you to fulfill.
- I don't know, the Quran is a divine revelation & God absolutely exists. But I like your confidence. 


Do you really think you can win this debate? Okay then make it and I'll accept if I want to. 
- What should be the resolution?
Created:
0