YouFound_Lxam's avatar

YouFound_Lxam

A member since

3
4
7

Total posts: 2,182

Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
I can assume you are a "pseudo-christian" because of your Bible stupidity in NOT understanding your Jesus inspired Big Bang as I have shown you at your embarrassment in my post #23!  LOL!  Furthermore, whether you are a non-denominational, only on Sundays, or when "cherry picking" Bible passages to support your weak opinions, Christian, YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN as even your lame biography so states! Therefore, I did not spew out lies, get it Bible fool?
You have not proved my Bible stupidity; in fact, I have proved you wrong in that area of logic. 
And yes, you did lie. You called me pseudo-Christian without evidence, and you were wrong.

"cherry picking" Bible passages to support your weak opinions
You did this as well, trying to prove to me that God does not give free will, which I have proved wrong.

YOU ARE A CHRISTIAN
Yes....I am. I am a non-denominal Christian, which is not the same as a pseudo-Christian.

Pseudo-Christian: "Pseudo religion or pseudo theology is a pejorative for a non-mainstream belief-system or philosophy which is functionally similar to a religious movement, typically having a founder, principal text, liturgy and faith-based beliefs."

I am not non-mainstream. 

Listen up, when you use the "Day Age Theory" for Creation, you are proffering that the time frame of the Big Bang in Genesis 1 and 2 is only 6000 years in a 6 day Creation, and where comically you propose that on the 7th day, Jesus as god, RESTED for a thousand years!  ROFLOL!  Furthermore Bible fool, you also say that Adam hung around for TWO THOUSAND YEARS before God created Eve from one of his ribs?  (Genesis 2:18-22) You "Day Age Theory" does not work for the Creation stories, understood?  Are you a comedian from Saturday Night Live comedy show? LOL!
Again, you are assuming my thinking, which is not a very smart thing to do, and you are entirely wrong.

when you use the "Day Age Theory" for Creation, you are proffering that the time frame of the Big Bang in Genesis 1 and 2 is only 6000 years in a 6 day Creation,
I am not proffering this. I am saying that what I believe happened, is that the Gods 7-day creation didn't happen in 7 days, or 7 thousand years, but rather, the way science explained it, is the way it happened, through millions of years. 

2 Peter 3:8, "But you must not forget this one thing, dear friends: A day is like a thousand years to the Lord, and a thousand years is like a day."

I believe that this scripture is a metaphor and is trying to show the fact that God lives outside of time there for, a day could be like a thousand years for God, or it could be an eternity. But then again, it could have been 7 days, or 7 thousand literal years, I couldn't say for sure. That is just my take on it. 

Furthermore Bible fool, you also say that Adam hung around for TWO THOUSAND YEARS before God created Eve from one of his ribs?
No, I'm not saying this. But that could have been the case. Let me explain.
Before Eve ate the apple from the Tree of Good and Evil, there was no sin. There was no murder, and there was no death. 
It was only when Eve ate the apple, and disobeyed gods command, that sin entered the world, and the curse of death was put on us. 
So yes, Adam could have been around for a long time, (longer than the modern lifespan of a human) and God saw that he was lonely, so he created a woman a while later.

You "Day Age Theory" does not work for the Creation stories, understood?
Yes, it does. I just proved that to you.

Now listen, I want to have an intellectual conversation with you, but you are spewing out insults and making it hard for me to debate with you. That is why I haven't replied to your post until now. Trust me, I am open minded, and will listen to anything you have to say, but calling names is not going to get you anywhere. 
Half of your posts is just you, making rude remarks.
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
So where does God come from? It makes just as much sense for the universe to be eternal and without cause as for God to be eternal and without cause.
God is eternal without a cause because he lives outside of time. Think of it like this:
In a metaphorical sense, there is a box, and in the box is all of time/space. God doesn't live in the box. He lives outside of that (outside of time and space, things he created.) 
He can stick his hand in the box and affect things, but he doesn't live inside that box.

So, he lives outside of time, therefore he is eternal. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
I agree, that, your a sick-n-head virtual rapist
I am not a rapist, I am actually the opposite
I believe rapists should be castrated or killed.

sticking your nose into a pregnant womans bodily business without her consent.
It's another human in there, yes, I have the right to argue about this topic.

Morally { whats best for pregnant woman and humanity }
If its morally for humanity, is it good for humanity to be killing future Docters, lawyers, and politicians, by the masses.
Created:
0
Posted in:
The United States of America is The Best and Most Successful Nation by Far
You already agreed that US is unable to intercept North Korean missiles,
When did I ever agree to this? This is a blatant lie.

You started talking about human rights. All rights are given by power, and North Korea has all the power.
Another lie. 

 and you agreed that North Korea will destroy most of USA if Kim commands it.
Oh, and another lie as well.

Created:
0
Posted in:
The United States of America is The Best and Most Successful Nation by Far
-->
@Best.Korea
If you really think North Korea is better buddy, then go move there. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.

This is an example of a VERY RARE, condition happening with twins. 
So, this is to prove that all abortions are right?

PS, I’m not even going to dignify you vagina comment to human crap. You’re too young and uneducated to even comprehend this subject matter. It’s like you dove into the deep end of the swimming pool on purpose so you could drown. Drown you did.
No, you just don't have an answer for this, and taking my age and saying I can't make an argument, is not a reason to just give up. 

All I have done is make argument after argument, yet you have yet to make an actual valid counter argument, and instead repeat what you are saying over and over again, and, yes, I'm going to call it name calling.

To date NO one has successfully rebutted ANY of the positions I’ve put forth. No one. 
I just did. 

Oh, and as far as you’re concerned here at this site… I [am] the “authority” on the abortion topic. And that goes for anyone else here too. 
What gives you the right? This is my thread that I made. You are the authority on this topic, on this whole site. Wow you have a massively big ego.

I have over 30 years academic, professional and life experience on you kid. You’re too young and wet behind the ear to even know what you’re talking about in this discussion. Hence my repeated point of addressing the fact you LACK not only the requisite knowledge of the subject, but also the emotional and intellectual intelligence to even debate/discuss this subject. 
Well, my arguments are valid, your only argument, is that just because there have been rare cases of needed abortion, then all women should have the right to murder babies, whenever it feels convenient to them. This is the American Genocide.

Here endeth the lesson. 
No answer the question, if you have: 
I have over 30 years academic, professional and life experience on you kid.

Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
-->
@ebuc
Universe has not purpose and does not design.
Literally look at biology. Things can't live, unless they work a certain way.

There is no origin since energy cannot be created nor destroyed it eternally exists in various phase-states  of fermionic matter, bosonic forces, Gravity and Dark Energy.
Well, there has to be origin, because something can't just come out of nothing, so it is ludicrous to believe that all of this has no origin. 
It takes more faith to believe that the universe has always existed, than the idea of God.

 w dont know that biologic life was created,
Yes, we do, because it exists, and scientists even claim that there was a universe, before life.

.....space(> * <) i  (> * <)space.....

space = truly non-occupied and occupied

>< = dipolar invaginations from ultra-high nummber of space-time tori, that, result in sine-wave pattern /\/\/ aka physical reality

* * = bilateral consciousness found in reality with woman being the most complex entity of Universe, barring  two or more women or man and woman or a black hole with encoding for biologic life embedded within

(  ) = postive shaped geodesic Gravity aka Spirit-3 { Meta-physical }

)(  = negative shaped geodesic Dark Energy aka Spirit-4 { Meta-physical }

i = ego identification as Meta-space concept
And yes, this is nonsense.
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
Actually, I did respond to that post in post #55, if you were paying attention.
I only responded to that portion, because the rest was just you calling names. Rephrasing what I said and calling me stupid.
You still assume that I am psudo-christain, and keep bringing up arguments that I have already explained to you. At least make a counter argument.
Are you that NERVOUS and AFRAID of the biblical axioms and truths that I have shown you in the link below, therefore you have to RUN AWAY from ALL of them?  
No, I have responded to them, but you seem to just not care.

In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will,” (Ephesians 1:11).  Key word: PREDESTINED where Jesus’ creation have absolutely no free will, period!
This scripture does not represent God making our will for us. If you look at the scripture. It says," In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will,” (Ephesians 1:11)."

The "we" the scripture is referring to is we the people of God, the people who have accepted his invitation to eternal paradise with him. Not all people. And if we follow his will, according to his purpose, then we have obtained and inheritance. The scripture also says "In him" meaning only through him. 

“The lot is cast into the lap, but it's every decision is from the LORD” (Proverbs 16:33).  
The version I go with (NLT) states," Proverbs 16:33 We may throw the dice, but the LORD determines how they fall."

Either version has the same message, and that message isn't that we don't have free will, but that ultimately, God lives outside of time. Therefore, he knows every future possibility, and every outcome. He makes the decision, for the good of his people, who have decided to follow him. He doesn't take away from our personal decision to follow him, but he instead works and makes decisions for the good of his people.

"Many are the plans in the mind of a man, but it is the purpose of the Lord that will stand (Proverbs 19:21).
"the purpose of the Lord..." This means that only the people who follow his purpose will stand.

"The heart of man plans his way, but the Lord establishes his steps" (Proverbs 16:9).
This literally proves free will rather than disprove it. 
"The heart of man plans his way..."

For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope (Jeremiah 29:11).
YES! He knows the future and the good path he has for us, only if we give our hearts to him, may we see those plans.

Further passages proving that we TRUE Christians DO NOT HAVE FREE WILL, and where Jesus controls our every action!
If he controls our every move, then we would be not capable of love, because to love is to decide to love, not to be forced to love. Do you think that humans are incapable of loving?

Therefore, this statement is wrong, and the reason to use those quotes for that purpose have been proven wrong as well.




Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
-->
@Elliott
Basically yes, although evolution operates through selection rather than creation, it simply selects those traits that are beneficial for survival.
You said yourself that evolution selected those traits, but from where evolution selected those traits? Where did those traits come from.
Created:
0
Posted in:
How Young Does Someone Have to be to Choose Their Sexuality?
You agree that government and parents should make decisions about child's body according to their will.
No, they, should make decisions for children for their best interest.

If government decides that child should transition, then child will transition.
No, because it is the people's/parent's decision as well.

You agree that it's not right for society to hurt children, but you claim that you can't do anything about it.
.... Yes......that is exactly what I agree with.

Would you agree that you cant do anything about child transitioning?
I agree that I'm not in a position of power to make that kind of decision, but as a US citizen, I have a voice to express what should be done.

Not getting caught, being fearful and obedient - are these good characteristics for a person to have?
Ok I mistyped. I meant to say not getting into trouble, instead of not getting caught. And when I say fearful, I mean respectfully fearful of their parents, but besides that yes those are good characteristics for a person to have.

So, is the behavior wrong if it is not shared by all humans?
No, human nature is not always good, it is both good and bad things. But cutting your limbs and organs out is certainly not a part of human nature. 

And what behavior is shared by all humans?
Human behavior?......

Would you do anything to kids to push your own political agenda? Didnt you label kids as property? Didnt you say that they shouldnt have a choice just to push the anti-transition politics? Didnt you say they need to be spanked to be obedient?
No, I would not do anything to my kids to push my own political agenda. And in a way, yes, they are property, for you to mold into a good and successful person, but that doesn't mean they aren't humans with feelings and emotions. You just have to be careful about disciplining your parents. Yes, they do need to be spanked and to be obedient, because if they just grew up as kids with no obedience, then they wouldn't' t be able to survive the world. By disciplining them, you are setting them up for success.

So, your objection is that their decision alters their life, so you want to alter their decision, so it suits your world views.
YES, IT DOES! Their decision does alter their life. It would be stupid to think it doesn't. 

No, I do not want to alter their decisions, I want to persuade them to make the right decisions.

In the end your children are yours to shape and mold, but once they leave, it's up to them to make their own decisions.

Why does it bother you if someone wants to alter their life?
It doesn't when it is an adult, but when it is a child, then it bothers me, because of basic morals. The child is not smart enough, and could hurt themselves, or ruin their body's, without realizing it.

Instead of allowing a child to decide about their body and property, you want to take that decision to the future adult they may be.
Yes....that is exactly my point.

Your moral system is based on a chance. Its not "children will regret". Its "children could regret". This "could regret" does not apply same to all transitioning proceedures, nor it applies same to any decisions in general.

Ok and? The reason we haven't seen studies on people regretting these things, is because it has just started right now. There have been a couple of cases of people regretting it. This next generation will show the rest of them.

Despite me saying that if children have money and doctor is willing to perform, then they should be able to transition, you still misunderstood it.
How would a child go about getting these types of surgeries to change their bodies without money?

I am saying again: if child has money and manages to convince a doctor to perform surgery, why should parents get a say or the government?
Because that child is too immature to understand the consequences of their actions.

Why does "future adult could want" matter more than what child wants now?
Because they are more mature and educated to make that decision.

Created:
0
Posted in:
The United States of America is The Best and Most Successful Nation by Far
Ok fine, but this is my last argument against you for this topic, since you are too scared to accept a debate.
And also, I am only doing this, because I enjoy it. 


Reasons the USA is The Best and Most Successful Nation by Far. 


The USA has a well-established and stable political system:
"For that indicator, we provide data for the USA from 1996 to 2021. The average value for the USA during that period was 0.42 points with a minimum of -0.23 points in 2004 and a maximum of 1.08 points in 2000. The latest value from 2021 is 0 points. For comparison, the world average in 2021 based on 194 countries is -0.07 points. See the global rankings for that indicator or use the country comparator to compare trends over time."

"Definition: The index of Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism measures perceptions of the likelihood that the government will be destabilized or overthrown by unconstitutional or violent means, including politically-motivated violence and terrorism. The index is an average of several other indexes from the Economist Intelligence Unit, the World Economic Forum, and the Political Risk Services, among others."

The US, political system is one of the best in the world. The government is limited, giving rights to the people on how to run the country, which makes the country stable, and less susceptible to riots and civil war outbreaks. There is no other government in the world who is as free and strong as the US government.


The USA has a multicultural society:
"The United States of America, due to its immense size and diverse heritage, has one of the most complex cultural identities in the world. Millions of immigrants from all over the globe have journeyed to America since the Europeans discovered and colonized the land back in the 17th and 18th centuries. The blending of cultural backgrounds and ethnicities in America led to the country becoming known as a “melting pot.” As the third largest country in both area and population, America’s size has enabled the formation of subcultures within the country. These subcultures are often geographical as a result of settlement patterns by non-natives as well as regional weather and landscape differences. While there are countless ways to divide the U.S. into regions, here we have referenced the four regions shown in the map below. People from each region may have different lifestyles, cultural values, business practices and dialects. While there are qualities and values that most Americans commonly share, it is important not to generalize or assume that all Americans think or act the same way." 

The US is the most diverse country in the world. Most other countries don't accept refugees, and immigrants like we do, while keeping it the safest country in the world.


The United States of America has been instrumental in the development of international human rights:
"The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Supporting democracy not only promotes such fundamental American values as religious freedom and worker rights, but also helps create a more secure, stable, and prosperous global arena in which the United States can advance its national interests. In addition, democracy is the one national interest that helps to secure all the others. Democratically governed nations are more likely to secure the peace, deter aggression, expand open markets, promote economic development, protect American citizens, combat international terrorism and crime, uphold human and worker rights, avoid humanitarian crises and refugee flows, improve the global environment, and protect human health.
The United States uses a wide range of tools to advance a freedom agenda, including bilateral diplomacy, multilateral engagement, foreign assistance, reporting and public outreach, and economic sanctions. The Department of State works with democratic partners, international and regional organizations, nongovernmental organizations, and engaged citizens to support those seeking freedom.
Read more about what specific bureaus are doing to support this policy issue:
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL): DRL leads U.S. efforts to promote democracy, to protect human rights and international religious freedom, and to advance labor rights globally. Read more about DRL"

The USA is one of the many countries who have made human rights a big deal, and have acted upon that decision, by helping other countries, and protecting their human rights.


The US offers a better quality of life compared to other countries:
"The United States performs well in many dimensions of well-being relative to other countries in the Better Life Index. The United States outperforms the average in income, jobs, education, environmental quality, social connections and life satisfaction. These assessments are based on available selected data."
Money, while it cannot buy happiness, is an important means to achieving higher living standards. In the United States, the average household net-adjusted disposable income per capita is USD 51 147 a year, much more than the OECD average of USD 30 490 a year.
In terms of employment, about 67% of people aged 15 to 64 in the United States have a paid job, slightly above the OECD employment average of 66%. Some 72% of men are in paid work, compared with 62% of women. In the United States, 10% of employees work very long hours in paid work, the same as the OECD average of 10%, with 14% of men working very long hours in paid work compared with 7% of women.
Good education and skills are important requisites for finding a job. In the United States, 92% of adults aged 25-64 have completed upper secondary education, higher than the OECD average of 79%. However, completion varies between men and women, as 91% of men have successfully completed high school compared with 92% of women. In terms of the quality of the education system, the average student scored 495 in reading literacy, maths and science in the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). This score is higher than the OECD average of 488. On average in the United States, girls outperformed boys by 5 points, as the average OECD gap.
In terms of health, life expectancy at birth in the United States is around 79 years, two years lower than the OECD average of 81 years. Life expectancy for women is 81 years, compared with 76 for men. The level of atmospheric PM2.5 – tiny air pollutant particles small enough to enter and cause damage to the lungs – is 7.7 micrograms per cubic meter, below the OECD average of 14 micrograms per cubic meter. In the United States, 88% of people say they are satisfied with the quality of their water, higher than the OECD average of 84%.
Concerning the public sphere, there is a strong sense of community and moderate levels of civic participation in the United States, where 94% of people believe that they know someone they could rely on in time of need, more than the OECD average of 91%. Voter turnout, a measure of citizens' participation in the political process, was 65% during recent elections, lower than the OECD average of 69%. Social and economic status can affect voting rates; voter turnout for the top 20% of the population is an estimated 77% and for the bottom 20% it is an estimated 51%.
When asked to rate their general satisfaction with life on a scale from 0 to 10, Americans gave it a 7 grade on average, higher than the OECD average of 6.7.


The US is No. 1 in military superiority:
"Ranking the total available active military manpower by country, from highest to lowest.
The finalized Global Firepower ranking below utilizes over 50 individual factors to determine a given nation's PowerIndex ('PwrIndx') score with categories ranging from military might and financials to logistical capability and geography.
Our unique, in-house formula allows for smaller, more technologically advanced, nations to compete with larger, lesser-developed ones and special modifiers, in the form of bonuses and penalties, are applied to further refine the annual list. Color arrows indicate year-over-year trend comparison (IncreaseStableDecline)."

"For 2022, United States is ranked 1 of 142 out of the countries considered for the annual GFP review. It holds a PwrIndx* score of 0.0453 (a score of 0.0000 is considered 'perfect'). This entry last updated on 04/09/2022."

Visit this site to see the comparisons of your "dear country" and the USA.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
Hypocrite. You're one to talk about "name calling."
Yes, I am terribly sorry, go ahead keep name calling, it is really supporting your argument.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
A birthed person is no longer a fetus you dumbass!!!!!!
If you're going by the definition of birthed, then you will agree with this definition:
Birth: "give birth to (a baby or other young)."

Now you used the past tense of birth, birthed. 

Now let's just say that was a mistake, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
The technical meaning of birth, is," birth, also called childbirth or parturition, process of bringing forth a child from the uterus, or womb." 

Ok so now let me ask you a third question.
Does the vigina of a woman, magically make the baby a non-fetus?
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
And God spoke all these words:
2 “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.
3 “You shall have no other gods before[a] me.
4 “You shall not make for yourself an image in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.
Well, if were going out of the realm of physical facts, then I can give you a bible lesson.

God doesn't want people to worship him. In these scriptures he is specifically talking about what is right and what is wrong. though the scriptures say he is commanding his people to do these things, he is not commanding them in a way to force them but commanding them as to lead them on the right path righteousness.

Fear the Lord your God, serve him only and take your oaths in his name. 14 Do not follow other gods, the gods of the peoples around you; 15 for the Lord your God, who is among you, is a jealous God and his anger will burn against you, and he will destroy you from the face of the land. 16 Do not put the Lord your God to the test as you did at Massah. 17 Be sure to keep the commands of the Lord your God and the stipulations and decrees he has given you. 18 Do what is right and good in the Lord’s sight, so that it may go well with you and you may go in and take over the good land the Lord promised on oath to your ancestors, 19 thrusting out all your enemies before you, as the Lord said.
Those are the words of someone who only wants love?
 When Christians talk about fearing the Lord, we don't talk about fear in a sense of fear, like people normally portray fear, rather we fear him, as to respect him.
Christians believe that God is perfect, and the type of anger and jealousy that he portrays, is not the bad kind. He only is angered, because he created us, and we look to other material things to worship, even though his soul purpose of creating us, was to love and to have fellowship with us. 

Now when it says that gods anger will burn against you, it doesn't mean that he will put his anger out on us, no he loves us too much to do that. Instead, this scripture represents, that God will not use his power, or take your free will away, just to make you love him. Instead, he will let you go down the path of destruction and face the eternity that you have chosen, because true love is not true, unless that person choses to love and is not forced to love.

God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell
This instance where God cast the angels to hell, was not him physically forcing them to be there, rather, the angels had sinned, as well as lucifer, who Jesus loved dearly, and they could no longer be in the presence of God with sin in their hearts.

 hath power to cast into hell; yea, I say unto you, Fear him.
Rather, he has the power, and the will, to not save you from eternal doom.

And the Lord hardened the heart of Pharaoh, and he hearkened not unto them
You are looking at the wording wrong. The lord himself did not harden his heart, instead this scripture means the idea of the lord, or another god, hardened the heart of pharaoh.

Consider the work of God: for who can make that straight, which he hath made crooked?
This scripture represents, that no one can change the will of God, and no one can change sin into a good thing. For instance:
No one can make lies right, if God himself has proclaimed them to be evil.

Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,
This scripture means, he has made us loving and caring, not forcing us to do so.

 And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord: and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed.
Living an eternal life, is not something that he has forced us to do, rather, it is a gift he has given us. Now how to spend that eternal life is up to us.

 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.
So, God isn't allowed to have free will? He never said I will kill who I will hate etc. 

 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
Yes, God shows mercy, because if he really wanted to, then he could not show mercy, but that would be against his own scripture and laws. He won't so he will show mercy.

Who hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began,
This scripture demonstrates that God is not looking for us to do good deed to enter into his kingdom, rather, he is looking for people that follow his laws on purpose and grace, which was given to us by him. If anything, this scripture proves free will rather than argues against it.

And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, 12 that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Well, if you looked earlier at the scripture, you would see that is says this:

"The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, 10 and all the way that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 12 and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness."

God only send them those delusions through earthly things, because sin has to exist in a world full of sinful people, therefore God is playing into the sinner's desires, to show them the path of destruction.

 But we are bound to give thanks to God always for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God from the beginning chose you for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth,
Yes, he chose us, and gave us free will to choose salvation or not.

All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast—all whose names have not been written in the Lamb’s book of life, the Lamb who was slain from the creation of the world.
The Lamb's book of life, is described as a book, in which God keeps all of his followers in. This scripture takes place in the last book of the bible, explaining the end times. So yes, at the end, when he comes back, he will have that book, to show all of the sinners' sins, and the righteous good doings, and vice versa.

Then why should I take any of it literally?
You should, and you shouldn't. That is one of the jobs of people who study the bible. They look at the bible and using context clues determine which scriptures have literal value. And which scriptures have metaphorical value. But all scriptures have both in some quantity.
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
-->
@K_Michael
He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved.
Again, this can be seen as metaphorical. Don't take everything in the bible literally.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
Fetal viability has absolutely nothing to do with a birthed individual at any stage of their Maturation. It’s a patently false equivalency fallacy to compared a pregnancy at the point of fetal viability and that of a born person. 
Ok well I ask you this, what is your definition of born person?
Fetal viability has absolutely nothing to do with a birthed individual at any stage of their Maturation
The definition does if you look at it logically.

Dare I repeat myself once again, you are I’ll-equipped to even be engaged in this debate/discussion. 
You lack logic and are full of bullshit emotive ignorance. 
Your ignorance on this subject ans the Bible is why o removed you, not because of your emotive fictional 💩
And name calling is not an argument and will not get you anywhere.

Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
-->
@K_Michael
If God wants people to worship Him so bad, it would be trivial to include this information. The fact that the Bible is so often wrong on both historical and scientific claims is very strong evidence that it's NOT the word of God.
Well actually there is your fatal flaw. God doesn't want us to worship him. He only wants us to love him. He doesn't send people to hell, because he's bad, but he tries to save them. If God really wanted us just to worship him, then he wouldn't have given us free will.  Every actual legit Christian you ask will give you the same answer. That is the Christan belief.

Also, the bible is actually very accurate when it comes to historical happenings and given that you read the bible in a metaphorical since, and in a physical stance, then it is very accurate when it comes to scientific claims as well.

Even worse, because it's in the Bible, the holy Word of God, you aren't allowed to question it when your religion says the earth is only six thousand years old.
This is an old claim that is actually very untrue, and there have been many other ways of showing the timescale of the universe parallel to the scriptures.

'Be faithless to your cause and betray it to a stronger enemy.
And did you know that it takes more faith to believe in sciences claims about the universe, than it is to believe in God. 
Don't just take my word for it though:
That is a documentary, that has a lot of compelling arguments.

I personally have the idea, that science is a tool that God has given us, to explore and work out his creations, he has created us curious for a reason, and gave us science in order to understand his creation even more, but we will never understand the true extent of his creation, which is why science is unable to prove certain things to be true.




Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
I would assume with all of the knowledge that you have on this topic, then you would be able to at least make some counter argument.

But no. You are so immature, that you are going to go into a fit about it, and remove me from your friends list? 

Wow.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
-->
@TWS1405
Well, as I see you have removed me from your friends list, I can only assume that you didn't like those facts.
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
That's what science does, except it has to show it's work.
But even science sometimes can't show its work or prove things.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
Ok thank you. 

So, you stated, and I quote," Less than 1.3% of ALL abortions any given year are after 22-24 weeks gestation, the point of sustainable fetal viability. Those are for cause and not on a whim." 

So, your reason, for that cutoff point is fetal viability. 

Fetal Viability: "Fetal viability is the ability of a human fetus to survive outside the uterus."

So, taking that into consideration, let me ask you this:

If a human adult was in an accident, and they weren't able to survive without multiple machines helping them survive 24/7, and it has been confirmed that the person will recover, and get off of those machines in a matter of months, then do you think it would be morally ok to kill that person?

Again, let me rephrase.

You are "saying", A human is in the womb, and they aren't able to survive without the help of the mother, and you know that the baby will be able to in a matter of months, then it is morally ok to kill that human.

I am saying, if a human adult was in an accident, and they weren't able to survive without multiple machines helping them survive 24/7, and it has been confirmed that the person will recover, and get off of those machines in a matter of months, then do you think it would be morally ok to kill that person?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
-->
@TWS1405
Ok I'm going to politely ask one more time this question. If you decide to dodge it, then that's on you.

You said that 22 weeks should be the cutoff point in your opinion. 
The question is:

What defining thing, happens at 22 weeks of pregnancy for it to be that cutoff point.
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
Here's the thing about scripture. If the Bible had called, thousands of years in advance of science, stuff that no other religion claimed,  it would be HUGE. Like if Genesis said, 'Hey, there are 8 planets. Two are closer to the sun than Earth is, and two of them are so far away you can't even see them yet.' And then when telescopes were invented we were able to look and be like, 'yep, there they are.' You would have to believe that the Bible was either the word of God, aliens, or some advanced human civilization lost to time, like Atlantis.
That's what science does, except it has to show it's work.
Yes, it would be huge.... your point?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
-->
@TWS1405
I'm not going to go through all of your arguments, and point them out, because then I would straw away from the topic at hand.

Just answer this question so we can move on from their.
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
You are 0 for 0 on two threads you started here: this one and the abortion one. 
Best quite while you are behind, very behind.
Only because you just don't want to believe what I'm saying is true. 
You all argue that I am only proving that there is a higher force or being and not the Christan, God exists. And you are right. But I am proving that there is a higher being, which is a start. I'm still doing research on the rest. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
NO FUCKING "BABIES" INVOLVED!!! 
Yes F***ing babies involved.

Ok let's go back to when you said you think that 22 weeks should be the cutoff point for abortion.
What happens at 22 weeks that makes you believe that that should be the cutoff point?
Easy question just answers that, and we can move on from there.
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
So the 7 day creation story is not to be taken literally but the  1 day = 1,000 years is to be taken literally?
How do you know?
And have you recanted on your belief that you can prove god exists and that there are many ways that you can to prove it?

Here's the thing about scripture. If the Bible had called, thousands of years in advance of science, stuff that no other religion claimed,  it would be HUGE. Like if Genesis said, 'Hey, there are 8 planets. Two are closer to the sun than Earth is, and two of them are so far away you can't even see them yet.' And then when telescopes were invented we were able to look and be like, 'yep, there they are.' You would have to believe that the Bible was either the word of God, aliens, or some advanced human civilization lost to time, like Atlantis.
That's what science does, except it has to show it's work.
Here is the thing about the scripture. The scripture doesn't always mean something literally happened, and it doesn't mean something metaphorically happened.

For instance, "So the 7-day creation story is not to be taken literally but the 1 day = 1,000 years is to be taken literally?"

Yes maybe. But maybe by the scripture saying that, it could be representing that God lives outside of time, therefore it was portrayed differently.

But then again it could have meant a literal 7 days, or 7 thousand years. Thats the fascinating thing about the bible.


Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
You claim to believe in and argue for the existence not only of a God, but specifically the Christian god Yahweh/Jehovah, yet you only made theism arguments, not Christianity arguments. Every single one of your arguments is equally valid for Allah or Zeus or Quetzalcoatl. Furthermore, your professed belief in certain scientific theories are directly opposed to the Christian creation myth.
This is why there are so many agnostics and spiritual types that don't profess a specific religion. They look at part of the universe they're confused by like the Big Bang and evolution and conclude that some higher Power must be behind it. Unfortunately, there's no evidence on whether this Power wants to be worshipped, much less how it wants to be worshiped. They might read different scriptures, trying to find one with a hint of Truth, something that holds that same awe and answers their questions, but there are hundreds of religions, and most have fundamental disagreements, and many also contradict what you already know, like how the Bible says flying insects have four legs. (Lev 11:20-23)
I have already taken this fact into consideration, and have already expressed that that was my mistake, and I am working to prove it.
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
And you would never get a human from shaking a box of organs. This is a terrible analogy. Evolution doesn't work with a box of parts. On the most fundamental level, it uses DNA replication as a filter for successful strategies. While this method has produced incredible results, it's hardly what I would call "intelligent." Think of how a computer programmer writes code. If a line fails, they can tweak parameters or try different stuff until it works. If necessary, he can remove entire sections of code and replace them with cleaner, more efficient code. With time and innovation, he can create new programs that do things no program has done before.
I was referring to when the big bang happened, how did one big explosion from nothing cause all of this. Life doesn't come from explosions.

You took a philosophical question, 'why can only humans reason' and then said, because God made it that way. I could literally say that in ANY POSSIBLE UNIVERSE. Imagine a world where every animal can reason. You regularly have debates on politics with the squirrel in your backyard. One could then pose the philosophical question, 'how do all of these animals reason' and answer the same, 'because God made it that way.'
You can ask that question, yet you can't answer it. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
The United States of America is The Best and Most Successful Nation by Far
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Best. Korea has no argument; it is just best to ignore him.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
A lump of coal isn’t [a] Diamond. 
An acorn is not an oak tree. 
A block of wood isn’t charcoal (burnt wood). 
So on and so forth. 
Same could be said about sperm, or the female's egg, but when natural processes occur, then all of these transformations can happen.



Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
And I don’t care what the abortion process is. It’s irrelevant to the autonomous god given right of liberty and choice that a girl or woman must possess and retain at all costs. 
It's not a god given right to dismember babies.

As I said in post #3 (that you continue to conveniently ignore), the only reason(s) for late term abortions (less than 1.3% of ALL abortion) are for extenuating circumstances and not for convenience. 
I actually did in post #23, by stating," But how many cases of that happening happen a year? Maybe a couple. But we should not make abortion legal, just because there are two cases where it has to be done. Because a lot of people will just use that as an excuse to get rid of the child. 

But that means that an abortion should only happen if the mother has already had an examination before getting pregnant, finds out that if she gives birth, then she will 100% die, and there is no alternative at all.

And if you take all of those facts to law, then that means that there would only be about 1 maybe two abortions per year."


Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
-->
@Stephen
And God said, let us make man in our image. Genesis 1:26And the Lord God said, Behold, then man is become as one of us, to know good and evil. Genesis 3:22
Let us go down, and there confound their language. Genesis 11:7
The Old Testament God is a "god of gods" who is worshiped by the other gods.
God is using the saved peoples as a whole for this part.
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
I can assume you are a "pseudo-christian" because of your Bible stupidity
Thats not a viable reason to assume. 

Listen up, when you use the "Day Age Theory" for Creation, you are proffering that the time frame of the Big Bang in Genesis 1 and 2 is only 6000 years in a 6 day Creation,
No, you are not me.

First thing Bible fool, creation was 6 DAYS, because Jesus as our serial killer God RESTED upon the 7th day, understood Bible inept fool?
Yes, but the story of creation was in 7 days. I never said that he created anything on the "7th day" I in fact provided evidence proving otherwise. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
-->
@Elliott
 morality was selected by evolution
So, evolution, can create emotions and morality?
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
Peter was called Satan by Jesus and Peter hijacked the early church from Jesus' brother James.
Those facts are wrong. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
God exists, and I Can Prove It.
And claiming to be a Christian is your denomination.
You obviously don't understand the denominations of Christan's, and my profile says Christian not pseudo-Christian. Do your research.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
And I DONT CARE IF YOU THINK THE TERM BABIES IS TOO EMOTIONAL.

Without emotions, then humanity wouldn't exist. WE WOULD ALL JUST BE KILLING EACH OTHER.

IT IS AND HAS BEEN CALLED FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS, A BABY. 

Created:
0
Posted in:
Educated Republicans aren’t MAGA Republicans, i.e. Trump voters tend to have a low education.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
You are just not listening are you. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
Pro-choice up to 22 weeks gestation. 
So, you believe that it is ok to kill before this timeframe.

Ok well let's look at the facts:
"Twenty-two weeks into your pregnancy, or 20 weeks after conception, your baby's eyebrows and hair are visible. Brown fat also is forming, the site of heat production.
For boys, the testes have begun to descend.
By now your baby might be 7 1/2 inches (190 millimeters) long from crown to rump and weigh about 1 pound (460 grams)."

Thats 22 weeks. And by then the baby has a heart, different blood type, bone structure, urine, brain function, hair, movement, apparent sex organs have been created, thick strong healthy skin, already past 3 pounds, it has ears, its eyes have opened, and it is halfway to birth.

Now you really want to see babies who have all of that aborted, just because people feel like it, no. 

You really want to see what a 22-week-old, aborted baby looks like, here:


Or how about the process in which they abort babies. 

"Dilation and Evacuation (D&E): between 13 to 24 weeks after LMP
This surgical abortion is done during the second trimester of pregnancy. At this point in pregnancy, the fetus is too large to be broken up by suction alone and will not pass through the suction tubing. In this procedure, the cervix must be opened wider than in a first trimester abortion. This is done by inserting numerous thin rods made of seaweed a day or two before the abortion. Once the cervix is stretched open the doctor pulls out the fetal parts with forceps. The fetus’ skull is crushed to ease removal. A sharp tool (called a curette) is also used to scrape out the contents of the uterus, removing any remaining tissue."

THAT is what they do to them. So, if you really think that THAT is ok, then your morals are not in line pal.



Created:
0
Posted in:
Educated Republicans aren’t MAGA Republicans, i.e. Trump voters tend to have a low education.
The article is about the Tax Law of 2017
Yes, but it talks about how Sen. Ron Johnson, made those decisions, and not Trump.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
A pregnancy ≠ [a] baby.  A zygote ≠ [a] baby.  A blastocyst ≠ [a] baby. An embryo ≠ [a] baby. An unviable fetus ≠ [a] baby
And yes, it does. 

Baby: a very young child, especially one newly or recently born.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Educated Republicans aren’t MAGA Republicans, i.e. Trump voters tend to have a low education.

Also, where do they get these "secret IRS files" exactly?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
So, you believe that a living human isn't a, well, living human when it is in the womb?
If you answer no to that question, then answer me this:
At what point is it morally wrong to kill a living human in the womb.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Educated Republicans aren’t MAGA Republicans, i.e. Trump voters tend to have a low education.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
This article seems to be more about Sen. Ron Johnson, and just the title being aimed at Trump. 

"Confidential tax records, however, reveal that Johnson’s last-minute maneuver benefited two families more than almost any others in the country — both worth billions and both among the senator’s biggest donors."

Also, it did go to two family's more than any other in the country, but it still went to the rest of the country. And that was Johnson's decision not Trumps. 

I suggest that you read your articles before you use them as evidence.

OMG, you’re a sweet kid.
Yikes. 
Created:
0
Posted in:
Educated Republicans aren’t MAGA Republicans, i.e. Trump voters tend to have a low education.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain

"Within two weeks, Johnson’s ultimatum produced results. Trump personally called the senator to beg for his support, and the bill’s authors fattened the tax cut for these businesses. Johnson flipped to a “yes” and claimed credit for the change. The bill passed."

This article uses words like, "beg" and," flipped to a "yes" " 

This shows that this article is very biased, but I will continue to read.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
-->
@TWS1405
For your sake, because you can't take the emotional distress of hearing the word baby, I will use the term living human.

So, you believe that a living human isn't a, well, living human when it is in the womb?
Created:
0
Posted in:
Educated Republicans aren’t MAGA Republicans, i.e. Trump voters tend to have a low education.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Also, what article? You may have forgotten to send it.
Created:
0
Posted in:
Educated Republicans aren’t MAGA Republicans, i.e. Trump voters tend to have a low education.
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Because words having meaning you idiot. He passed a tax cut. It wasn’t the biggest in history. What he did pass however, mainly benefited corporations and the wealthy. Here’s an article that tells you who it benefited the most but I doubt you have the ability to read such a long article.
Well now your just getting heated, and you are name calling, which is not an argument. 

No, he didn’t. He also didn’t have the biggest show on television either, but he said he did. Trump is a liar.
Every president has lied. Do you really think that an example of him lying about having the biggest show on television proves that everything that comes out of his mouth is a lie? He might have not even known that it wasn't, and just didn't have his facts right.

Created:
0
Posted in:
Abortion is morally wrong, no exceptions.
Now I am contradicting myself here a little bit, but I do believe that in the extreme case of a mother not knowing that she could die from getting pregnant, and the doctors tell her that if she gives birth then she will die, then that should be the only exception for abortion. 

But how many cases of that happening happen a year? Maybe a couple. But we should not make abortion legal, just because there are two cases where it has to be done. Because a lot of people will just use that as an excuse to get rid of the child. 

But that means that an abortion should only happen if the mother has already had an examination before getting pregnant, finds out that if she gives birth, then she will 100% die, and there is no alternative at all. 

And if you take all of those facts to law, then that means that there would only be about 1 maybe two abortions per year. 
Created:
0