Total posts: 5,653
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Uh... that's not virt. I fear that Supa is deliberately trying to get lynched because he's a goon vs. a roleblocker.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Supa slipped. He's scum. It's just you and me. Can we Lynch virt please?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Except if virt was town, the Lynch wouldn't have gone through.
Also, it's amazing you got three results that all make me guilty.
You realize that Oro just has to confirm with the mod that you only get one dream, right? Just give it up, dude
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Lol, so you faked your results based on how you run the role rather than how DD does. Excellent.
Created:
Posted in:
My actions last night:
Vig Zaradi
Doc oro
Dream (You dream of pressF4respect, Virtuoso, and ILikePie.)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I said misread something again, this is a common occurrence for me drafterman stop acting like this is new shit that happens from me
It's not about you misreading things, it's about you apparently forgetting your own actions you submitted.
They are not fucking guarenteed mafia because I used all 3 of my powers in one night and I copped you and you came guilty. Suck it
You haven't really figured out how this game works, have you?
From DP1 OP:
1) The number of votes needed to end a DP is equal to half the remaining players rounded down. However, if all surviving members of the town are on the same wagon or VTNL then that lynch or VTNL will go through.2) Players on the mafia team will not have their vote counted unless there is a townie on that wagon, in which case for each townie on the wagon one mafia players vote will count.
Last phase's lynch at 4/5 only happened becaus every townie was on that wagon. That's the only way it could happen according to the rules of the game. If less than one Townie was on the wagon then it would have required all 5 votes. That means everyone not on that wagon is scum. It also means that exactly one person on the wagon is scum as well.
It doesn't matter dreams of scum can appear on mafia sheet too
You only get one dream. You either get a dream of one person you can trust OR you get a dream of three people of which at least one is mafia. You don't get both dreams.
This is a desperate gamble because you've realized it's autolose for Mafia.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Who can I trust from the dreamOromagiDrafter came out as guilty from copVig kill on fucking Speed. Booyah
Three people that could be scumDrafterPieOro
Which is it, did you get the "one person you can trust" dream or the "at least one of three is mafia" dream?
Created:
Posted in:
For the record, your gambit here requires that oro be foolish enough to lynch among either of us when Virt and Pie are known, guaranteed maf.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Greyparrot was lynched on page 5, he was guilty! The final vote count is as follows:
He was lynched at L1 because every townie was on him, as per the rules.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Grey was lynched. Either way, this is gg. If the VC ends with your vote, we know it's you and me. If it ends with Oro, I know its me and Oro.
Created:
Posted in:
Grey (4/5) - oro, supa, drafter, F4
This means that all three townies were on the Lynch. That mea s everyone not on that Lynch, and one person on it, are maf.
Press flipped town.
So me, Supa, and, Oro just vote everyone else.
VTL Virt
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
If I was the vig I would definitely kill him
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
But he's just going to get NKd by the vig
Created:
Posted in:
Town
me
Speed
Supa
Null
Grey
Ragnar
Pie
Luna
oro
Warren
Lean Scum
Press
Water
Created:
Posted in:
Okay, just looking over the DP again, looking at posting and voting behaviors. Nothing really strong but here are my reads:
Town
me
Speed
Supa
Null
Ragnar
Pie
Luna
oro
Warren
Lean Scum
Press
Water
Grey
I wouldn't mind lynching among my bottom 3
Unvote
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
He's dead wither way, so it doesn't really matter.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
Because in a game of lies I don't take people on their word?
Also, none of the reasons he gave for his inactivity will change in the near future.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
I counted up the number of posts at the time and Pie had the least.
And I was on warren initially; Virt simply hasn't updated the VC
Created:
Posted in:
I don't want to lynch Ragnar. I don't agree with his plan but at least he's trying to come up with one.
Created:
Posted in:
I think lynching the person with the least activity is better than lynching the person that simply was the last to post. In this case, that would be Pie.
Unvote. VTL Pie.
It's too easy for Mafia to fly under the radar by being less activity, especially when Town out numbers them by so much. I'd rather lynch the people who interact the least thereby forcing everyone else to be more active and generate more content for analysis. All we are going to have to go on are people's statements.
Since that's all we have to go on, I think we should cut down on fluff and jokes since that's just going to create noise.
Created:
Posted in:
That said it was dumb to claim Vig in any event. Either the real vig kills you or mafia does.
Created:
Posted in:
Lynching speed is dumb. Even if he's lying, vig wouldn't CC, he'd just NK him. It's a problem that solves itself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
You haven't explained how it's "defeatist."
And the purpose isn't to gain information, it's to reduce the pool of scum candidates.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
We've had this discussion before. You admit that activity isn't an indication of alignment or good basis for a Lynch but choose to do it anyway.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
Defeatist? How is lynching people defeatist? It's Town's primary tool to win the game and I'm suggesting we use it.
I think it should be random, not just the last person that shows.
Created:
Posted in:
There really isn't any behavior to go one. So at this point it's either going to be RL or NL at this point.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
I've gone round and round with you before. Adding numbers and joining words by slashes makes your statements nonsensical. Don't bother replying to me if you don't intend to speak clearly or explicitly define what you mean by this unique notation. Or you could just write like a normal person.
Created:
Posted in:
Where is all this confusion about mafia getting an NK coming from? Of course mafia gets a night kill.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
Einstein was very good with math. Arguably, he was better at math than science.Not relative to the math he needed done to help with his gravity concerns and again,
You said Einstein was not good at math. That is false.
I said probably not as good as his wife.
Which is either false or baseless. Your pick.
That would be an interesting feat since Riemann died over a decade before Einstein was born.That is the info I recall reading many years ago. I may have the name wrong. took all of the info at face value when I read it. There were maths needed to complete his thoughts of gavity and curvature of spacetime that he did not have ability do. That is what I read then. If I find time will try to find specific info for.
Okay, so then it's false.
Maybe, since she also a mathematician, but there is no evidence to support this. Her contributions to Einstein's own work is disputed and she doesn't appear to have any of her own work that stands out.I dont know for sure one way or other. Again I would have to find time to research that specific. What I recall was it was someone --if not Riemann--, that he had to get to assist or do the more complex trigonometic maths.
So either false or baseless.
I specifically an referring to statements like this: "metaphysica-1, mind/intellect/concepts" This is gibberish. I discern no meaning or sense from it.1} so you are not disputing the facts of magic mushrooms inducing the creation of new brain cells in adults, as I stated,
I neither accept nor reject the assertion.
2} you need to reference a dictionary for all four words and instead of taking a snob stance.....2a} metaphysical is in dictionary and meta = beyond........that you cannot grasp beyond the physical is your refusal to play fair --i.e. playing snobbish mind game sad :--(....2b} using any enumberation method is common in dictionaries and a method for makng clear distinction between multiple definitions, ergo that you pretend any enumeration that you do not approve of, is more evidence of unfair, snobbish mind game on your part,
Enumeration of definitions of an entry is common, yes. Embedding references to specific enumerations in normal text isn't common. Especially when you don't specific which dictionary you are referring to; different dictionaries order their entries differently.
3} use a few dictionarys and learn what mind is and know that, you will find defintions that place mind outside of aka beyond the physical,4} intellect is obviously associated with mind, and again, your refusal to accept these truths is just snobbish protection of your ego,5} concepts are in dictionary, and that you cannot associate concepts with intellect, mind, and metaphysical, is more ego based snob speaking to protect acknowleding that, you do to know exactly what I mean, and that my phrasing is valid, contrary to your egos defense of self as a unspoken 'I know better than you' type attitude.
I know what the individual words mean. What I don't understand is what you mean when you jam them together with slashes and jam them into a sentence willy nilly. It is meaningless and nonsensical.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
Everything I stated in that post regarding math is true.
Sigh. Okay then.
1} Einstein was not that good with math,
Einstein was very good with math. Arguably, he was better at math than science.
ergo he got Riemann to help him with the complex trigonometric math.
That would be an interesting feat since Riemann died over a decade before Einstein was born.
2} Einsteins wife was probably better at math than him.
Maybe, since she also a mathematician, but there is no evidence to support this. Her contributions to Einstein's own work is disputed and she doesn't appear to have any of her own work that stands out.
I made two differrent statements;1} regarded scientific evidence, ergo truth and fact,......that you do not accept the #1 is you lack of knowledge. Drop the ego and search for truth.2} the other involved speculations by McKennaThat you address #2 not as not seperate consideration from #1 more evidence your ego-protection mode kicking in. Sad :--(
I specifically an referring to statements like this:
"metaphysica-1, mind/intellect/concepts"
This is gibberish. I discern no meaning or sense from it.
Created:
-->
@ebuc
1} Einstein was not that good with math, ergo he got Riemann to help him with the complex trigonometric math.2} Einsteins wife was probably better at math than him......"My education has been of my biggest impediments to my learning"...A. Einstein....."Dare to be navie" Bucky Fuller......"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool."...R Feynman
Einstein excelled in math.
3} There now exist evidence that magic mushrooms can grow new brain cells in adults.....Terrenance McKenna believe that apes eating magic mushrooms is how apes with more access to metaphysica-1, mind/intellect/concepts came to occur.
This is gibberish.
Created:
I think the laws of physics guarantee this outcome. Just depends on how "gradual" you want things to change.
Created:
Posted in:
Good ol' Clavin Coolidge. Right up there with Greg Washington.
Created: