Total posts: 5,432
Posted in:
1. Tyranny (and its instrumentality, bureaucracy).
Putin, China, Saudia Arabia, Iran, Cuba and all government i that order of USA is last in that order?
2. Ignorance.
babies are born ignorant and stay ignorant of some time. All animals other than some age of humans---and those with mental hand-caps--- --- are ignorant to various degree.
3. Identity politics.
Ex ? People who identify as smarter than others and subsequent look at others as ignorant aka snobs
4. Anthony Fauci.
Trumpetes CDC official pick. Infamous for his no-mask at basball gamae with friend?
5. Joe Biden.
President of USA and free world who identifies as president of USA and free world?
I'll think of others, later
Political and general narcissistic liars ex Trumpet, who always taut ..' only I can fix it '?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Intelligence_06
Start with first line of text and if you find word or phrase you dont grasp, let me know. Simple
Created:
Posted in:
Coal you have me blocked so cannot reply directly to you question.
Please share the top twenty you Hate/Despise the Most
I gave you list of things as examples of what may be in your list. Just example. Give the to 20 things you hate the most. Please
Created:
Posted in:
The Ebuc Graviton-Darkion has 14 nodal events: 9 are the outer surface ---that defines a surface of tube-- and 5 are the sine-wave nuclear set, inside the tube.
1} the first point to know, is to grasp a 3D tube ---ex toilet paper core of card board----, that can conceptually be extended and curved as a torus
----( )( ) is vertical bisection of a torus { ex a doughnut sitting on counter top } ----- however, in the long run this is a dynamic tube, i..e it undulates with places of closure { pinching off } and others that open wide, and then back to seemingly closure ex <><><><><><>
2} first a link to a visual of a triangular di-pyramid
3} 2nd a link to only one half of the above traingular based di-pryamid with one truncation, of what should be two truncations. Two such truncations gives us the basic Euclidean visual of tube that has three triangular openings and this is the basis of the Graviton-Darkion, I'm trying to present. <> or many of them as <><><><><> and they could have curved lines, i.e. were not limiting a Graviton-Darkion to be Euclidean { straight lines }.
4} in the above truncations ---as a three triangular openings--- we will find a semi-linear, or sine-wave patterned,nuclear set of five nodal events. These are 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 in the 2D lattice seen later below.
5} this is above is covered in section A further below. Before that I want cover my recent findings regarding the prime numbers found in my Graviton-Darkion particle as follows immediately below.
Ok, so the the basic structure is 15 outer surface chords as laid out as follows: 3 { end opening chords } - 3 { legnth chords } - 3 { mid-girth opening chords } - 3 { length chords - 3 { end opening chords } totals 15 chords that define the Graviton-Darkion
There are 6 primes in 14 nodal events --- 2,3 - 5 -7....11 - 13
and 24 primes in 91 lines-of-relationship ---- see this later below however, as an aside 24 is the number of power and equanimity in Synergetics ---
4 * 6 = 24 so there is a compatible of the two sets of prime numbers, but why? Typically the formula for where prime numbers fall is n * 6, plus or minus 1. Why this happens here is because 2,3 is does not fall into that forumula.
n*6
plus or minus one, is what I recall for where all primes fall except 2
and 3. Ahh, that must be it, the core grouping of 2,3-5-7 is an odd
person out varible, to the more common formula.
14 > 6 primes { 2,3 - 5-7....11-13 }
91 > 24 primes { 4 * 6 = 24 }
1}....... 2,,, 3,,, 5,,, 7.....
2} .......11, 13, 17, 19.....
3} .........23, 29, 31, 37.....
4}............41, 43, 47, 53.....
5}..............59, 61, 67, 71....
6}................73, 79, 83, 89....}
15 > lines/vectors define the base truncated di-pyramid.
.... { 2,3 - 5-7....11-13 } is same as 14 set of primes
So the core group appears for 14 nodal events and 15 primary structural chords
The Ebuc Graviton has 14 nodal events: 9 are the outer surface and 5 are the sine-wave nuclear set.
2,3-5-7, 11-13 and that is 6 prime numbers within 14 nodal events.
As
for prime numbers with 91 lines-of-relationshipe, we have, 6 sets of
four prime numbers beginning with the core sets of 2-3-5-7 ergo, 24
prime numbers with 91 lines-of-realtionship
2, 3, 5, 7,
11, 13, 17, 19
23, 29, 31, 37,
41, 43, 47, 53,
59, 61, 67, 71,
73, 79, 83, 89,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section A follows:
Below is the asymmetrical, 2D lattice, that, I came to create, via my inside outing of a symmetrical numericallly linear set of numbers, beginning with 0. The original symmetrical pattern is not shown below, on the inside-outed asymmetrical set.
14 nodal events is needed in the2D lattice total, to have
a tube, that, is defined by three triangular opening aka
A triangular based, truncated di-pyramid. This also happens to
be the minimal set of triangular openings that will define a
Euclidean torus
14^2 = 196, minus 14
= 182, and divided by 2 = 91 lines-of-relationship in sum-total
equal a Graviton-Darkion, that, I believe is half Darkion { Dark Energy
)( negative quantum } and half Graviton { ( ) as positive quantum
curvature }. Here is link for the math formula of lines-of-relationship
Previously we only
consider the sequential set of nodal events ratios
and lines-of-relationships ratio.
To total of nodal
events does not change. What does change is the finding the sum-total
of relationships for each specified set, and the overall sum total
lines-of-relationship using the formula n^2 minus n then divided by
2 As found at this Synergetics LINK
......1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable
Time inside
---Bucky Fullers-------abstract
great circle----central spine inside center the 3D torodial
tube---------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable
Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10..........................................DE
{ inner }..............
For top line G:
5^2 = 25, minus 5 = 20, and divided by 2 = 10 total
lines-of-relationship
For top inside line OT: 3^2 = 9, minus 3 = 6 and divided by 2 = 3 total
lines-of-relationship
For bottom inside
line OT: 2^2 = 4, minus 2 = 1, divided by 2 = 0.5
which in this case translates to 0.5 radii plus 0.5 radii = 1
line-of-relationship
...note: I use the
word 'radii' because of a consideration, that, each nodal event has a
2D area circle of influence, or in 3D, a volumetric sphere of
influence....
For bottom inner
line DE: 4^2 = 16, minus 4 = 12, divided by 2 = 6
total lines of relationship { same as a tetra{4{hedron
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So that is each line
as a catagory: Gravity { 10 lines-of-relationship }
and that semi-corresponds to my 1990’s Standard Model as:
EMRadiation { photonic particles } being the 5-fold 10 Great
Circles/Tori of the icosa{20}hedron ---they define 5 sets of interlacing
VE/cubo-octahedra. See LINK
And next I want to
combine the two inside lines, as a single catagory of a sine-wave
0\3p/6\9/12 pattern aka OT + OT: since we've joined two combined two lines, lets take the total nodal
points of those two lines{ 5 } and do the math for them: 5^5 = 25,
minus 5 = 20, divided by 2 = 10 lines-of-relationship and that value
matchs Gravity's 10, tho it takes two lines to do so.
Here we could
say that Gravity is equally effective to OT,
yet with only one line of consideration, not two.
And next were going
to combine outer surface { top G } nodal events { 5 } with the inner
DE { 4 } set of surface nodal events and that totals 9 do the
math again: 9^2 = 81, minus 9 = 72, divided by 2 = 36
lines-of-relationship. H,mm, interesting that in this case, our
total from combination of top and bottom line as 9 is a greater total
lines-of-relationship, than the combination of the top and bottom
lines additionally i.e. 10 + 6 = 16 but with 9 nodal events our total
lines-of-relationship is 36.
As best I recall,
there is exponential increase in lines-of-relationship resultants,
and doing them individual and then adding does not appear to be the
same level of exponentiation. I dont see any flaws in my math
above and tho Fuller never referred to the expoential increase as form
of synergy, I wonder if could be labeled that way. I'm not
smart enough to make such distinctions.
However, one thing
i'm good at and that is making associations, and just the outer and
innner set as 36 happens to be the number combinations of quarks ( 18
quarks and 18 anti quarks }.
So lets do one final
math and that is the total 13 nodal events as a single graviton
{ small g }: 5 G , + 3 OT + 2 OT 4DE = 14 nodal events.
...Note: 24 is the
number for VE ---labeled as equinimity--- i.e. 24 chords and 24 radii
when VE constructed from 4 paper hexagons...... =
14^2 = 196,
minus 14 = 182, and divided by 2 = 91 lines-of-relationship in
sum-total..i..e. .n^2 minus n and divided by 2 defines the
small g graviton, Who would have thought the most
simple particle of Universe, could be so complex. Oh but wait.
That value includes the small d, darkion of Dark Energy. This may be significant to point out,
that, Gravity { mass-attraction } and Dark Energy { mass-repulsion }
are two sides { outer and inner } of the same gravitonic
particle { <I> } of occupied space /\ and time
<-->
.....1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable
Time inside
-------Fullers-------abstract
great circle--------central spine inside center of 3D torodial
tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable
Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10..........................................DE
{ inner }..............
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Spam
...Ebuc....
It's man against
'Spam',
in virtual land,
we stand,
on freedoms front-lines,
guarding our portals,
from capitalism's
sublime,
network of tentacles,
probing for a hit,
then
sucking us in,
cloning our identity,
incorporating a
great hive,
incorporating a greater borg,
even while we
sleep,
the spam does not rest.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
There exist degrees of consciousness. The minimal consciousness is twoness ergo othernerss. If the two have graviational link, then that is the minimal consciousness awareness. the two are connected via mass-attraction.
The most complex consciousness is woman { X x ]. With man { X y } a close 2nd.
Humans > cetacceans > primates{?} > birds > pigs > rodents > ergo animals,
fungi > plants > Eukaryotes > Prokryotes ,
molecules > atoms > sub-atomic particles > Graviton-Darkion { single integrity with 14 nodal events { 0-13 } and 91 lines-or-relationship }.
.....1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable Time inside
-------Fullers-------abstract great circle--------central spine of the 3D torodial tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10..........................................DE { inner }..............
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable Time inside
-------Fullers-------abstract great circle--------central spine of the 3D torodial tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10..........................................DE { inner }..............
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Finite Universe, even if multiv-verse of local/pocket Unvierse, and there all connected by Gravity ergo the one, finite, occupied space Universe.
You never presented the argument some theorize how local universes can not be connected by Gravity. 3ru, do you know what part of the puzzle you keep leaving out in your comments?
How can Gravity not connect these alledged pocekt uinverses? I have an answer for the one also, but lets see if you make the correct comment first.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
distance is a function of "spacetimespace" which may or may not "exist" "between" "pocket-multiverses"
Yes distance exists between any two occupied space integrities { wholes }. Not sure where you getting you unicorn info from 3ru.
for example, there is recent speculation that a "black hole" may be an entirely surface phenomenon with technically "nothing" "inside"
Occupied space is 3D. Good luck with unicorn black holes of nothing.
what makes you think "darkenergy" will "expire" "before" "gravity"
Entropy ergo entropic heat death of Universe = ultra-cold Universe and cold things tend to contract, tho ice does expand, so you may have me there.
Cold slow metabolic processes tho, and there may exist many examples of cold causing contraction and enough cold may be what allows for Gravities mass-attraction to reverse the expanding process. Thats one scenario. There may exist many more if I do the research.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
what makes you think that the "space" "between" "pocket-multiverses" is able to transmit gravity (which apparently is a function of "spacetimespace"
Because of all we know of Gravity i.e. it has no distance limites, and I appear to have to keep repeating this over and over and over to you. C'mon 3Ru, get on the balll on here.
AND, even if your hypothesis is correctwhat makes you think that "darkenergy" will not cancel out the "gravity" "between" "pocket-multiverses" ?
I already addressed that 3Ru, dimminshed in short run is not canceled out forever. Are you reading my lips/text?
It is important to maintain a constant awareness of and vigilant respect of our epistemological limits.
If you say so. I have no idea what your talking about. Gravity has no distance liimits. Simple yet you appear to be in denial of this truth and fact.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
when two forces oppose, if one force is stronger than the other, the stronger of the two forces effectively CANCELS the weaker force
One is dimmished only insofar as, the other is winning the race between are we going to expand or contract.
Gravity always is the ultimate determer of fate of Universe. Entropy leads to a weaker Universe, heat death, and Gravity takes over at some point, because Gravity is never canceled out in the long run.
Again, you have not address the comments I made regarding multiverses all be connected by Gravity ergo all are the sum-total ---ergo a finite set--- that we call the one Universe ---with a capital U--. Understand 3Ru?
You contually avoid those comments because of their validity, and yours not.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Observations show that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, such that the velocity at which a distant galaxy recedes from the observer is continuously increasing with time.[1][2][3] The accelerated expansion of the universe was discovered during 1998 by two independent projects, the Supernova Cosmology Project and the High-Z Supernova Search Team, which both used distant type Ia supernovae to measure the acceleration.[4][5][6]
3Ru, your not giving me any information that I and others have not known for years. Your still confused about Gravitatioal strignths and effects [ mass-attraction } still occurs even if the Universe is expanding. I told you before and you still dont seem to grasp, that Gravity doesnt stop woring just because Dark Energy is also working.
There both workiing but DarK Energy, like EMRadiaiton is stronger than Gravity. Read my lipts/text 3ru. Gravity does not stop being mass-atttractive just because other expansive forces are stronger. Much stronger.
and for the rest of your "objections"the "unknown" is "unknown" and not necessarily similar to what you currently know.
3ru, you avoid addressing my statements as presented to you. Why?
I did not say anything about unknowable. That is your words not mine. and Ive addresse it before you ignore.
There are limits to what can exist. There is a finite set of cosmic principle and physical laws that are inviolate. You dont grasp this and/or just stick you nose in the air and say it aint true, without saying. This we know and your hand waving that maybe this or that exists is irrational , illogical speculation.
Ex there are not and never will be Toyota vechicls giving birth to biologic unicorns that then evolve into black holes in 5 days.
I will give you another example Ive posted for you and others countless times in this forum and others, and most ignore or make feeble attemtps to deny as absolute truth.: There can not exist more that five, regular/symmetrical and convex polyhedra of UNiverse, irrespective of multiverse scenarios. SO please 3ru, read my lips/text and address as presented.
The sum of the angles of a Euclidean triangle, is eternally 180 degrees when the base unit --a circle-- is 360 degrees---. Simple absolute truth is eternally inviolate, irrespective of multiverses etc.
And you still have not addresssed how two local/pocket universes are not connected by mass-attractive Gravity. You keep waving your hands in the air with stuff that is irrrelevant to my comments as presentd. Because you have nothing valid that address what I stated.
No where do I state Universe is not expanding, yet you through all this stuff out here about Universe expanding. Get grip 3ru.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
vast distances of "empty space" have a (demonstrable) net repulsive effect that not only "counter-balances" gravity, but outstrips it
Huh? Are you talking with our alledged local/pocket universe or outside of our universe?
If your saying there is occupied space with our alledged pocket/local universe, then I think very mistaken. No where have I ever seen evidence by scientist that Dark Energy in our alledged local/pocket universe keeps Gravity from not having mass-attraction everywhere.
this is why our own observable universe (cosmos) is continuously expanding at an accelerating rate with no signs of slowing down
Huh? 3Ru, your confused, mass-attracton is still happening in our alledged by you, pocket / local universe. All known forces are stronger than Gravity, and again, you dont seem to grasp the well not fact that Gravity/Mass-attraction has no distance limit.
Why you think our universe will expand forever I dont yet understand. Where did you get this idea that our universe is going to expand forever and infinitely?
That is really irrational illogical etc. The ultimate fate of our universe and any other local universes and the sum-total of all local universe is ultimately decided by the weakest force and that is Gravity.
also, gravity is not necessarily a component of these other pocket-universes
Where do you get this irrrationa, illogical ideas from 3Ru. Next your going to tell me there exists universes where there are Toyota cars and trucks that give birth to polka dotted unicorns, that transform into a black hole 5 days after there birth from a Toyota.
not all pocket-universes are necessarily "occupied" and may bear little to no resemblance to our own known-universe
Say what? Your not making any sense 3Ru. There exists Space: 1} macro-infinite non-occupied space, and 2} occupied space.
Where you get this idea of a universe that is not occupied space is likened to Toyota vehicles giving birth to unicorn that in five days the becomes a black hole.
3rU, you dont seem to grasp there exist finite limits that exist irrespective of one Universe we live in are finite multiverse set of that sum-totals to the one Universe we also live in.
There exist cosmic principles and physical laws that are inviolate, eternally. You dont grasp that yet.
Gravity exists every where as an occupied space, that is mass-attractive to all other occupied spaces.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
perhaps you are unfamiliar with the cosmological constant (dark energy)
Ive been posting about cosmological Dark Energy in regards to the space inside our finite Universe for years in this forum and others.
I'm still waiting for you to clarify how two or more pocket / local universes can not be considered part of one whole Universe in sum-total if Gravity has no distance limits to its mass-attractive phenomena. Please clarify your scenario to explain this.
How is it all of your multiverses are not gravitationally attracted to each other, ergo isolated as you stated, if ?I recall correctly
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
each "pocket universe" may be wholly isolated
How can is that these local universe can occur without Gravitational relationship between them? I mentioned this previously. There is no limit to gravity's mass-attractive effects. Clarity please on how this scenario involving Gravitaitonal union of them all in sum-total as the one Universe?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
they may be discrete
" Discrete " wholistic Universe? Clarify please
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
an incomprehensible, yet NOT "infinite" set
Ok so NOT infinite = a finite set of local universes, that, if all connected by Gravity, ---at a minimum----, then they sum-total as the one Universe.
The union of local universes as Universe ergo has a wholistic integrity.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Simmering Silence
..Ebuc....
Sweaty
metabolism,
Of
emotional distraught,
Unleashes
higher frequencies
Of
energetic spirit,
Begging
tantric teachings
That
some were never taught.
Take
a huge sniff,
Of
a fragrant flower,
Release
the excess fluids
Of
clinging perspiration,
Breath
earths new air
Then
take a long shower.
Now
you are reborn,
Just
like a brand new baby,
Observe
your new environment,
Put
all your blocks in order
Then
fall in love again
Or
just tell'em maybe.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
there is a not-impossible "multiverse"
3Ru please define and describes scenario for its existence. The most common is our is just a local universe.
So lets say multiverses exist. Were kind of back at the same place, finite = integrity, and infinite = lack of integrity.
In your scenario of multiverses, is there sum-total finite set, that we could still label as the one Universe, if there are connected by gravity, or,
is multiverse scenario an infinite set?
Created:
Posted in:
Please share the top twenty you Hate/Despise the Moste ex, vehicles, Dolly Parton, pigs, skyscapers, Congo { in Africa }, dance parties, apolitical people, swimming pools etc.
Created:
Posted in:
So Mr Rogers pulls out his gun at home to protect his home.
I recall at least one incident, where some person was going to house to ask for help the owner with gun shot him.
Ok that is normal behavior before and after the Civil War times out west where families are free to do whatever the please.
True liberatarians dont need know laws, no civil liberties, no court of review, no investigations of what occurred and certainly no code of ethics or morals. Well, unless it is the word of God, that they can recite from a book, then its all covered.
Then there is these these people I see more and more with pistols on their hip in grocery store, gas station etc. Some these people may not be the quickest at draw or at stopping someone from grabbing drawing their pistol off their hip. especially if they have been decapacited in some other way, getting access to there gun becomes even easier. So perpetrator, does not need to steal gun from hours or buy a gun where there is red flags etcs. No they just finagle the weapon from the more and more who caring them around on their hips.
So more guns = libertarians? More guns = common sense? More guns = more peacekeeper glocks on the streets?
I like the idea of these red flag laws, as this is a way, that if you do want to go investigate the degree of mental stability of someone living in your neighborhood, you dont have to personally have dinner with them in their house, or at Lenny's. There is the group of people who are trained to investigate and inquire and monitor behaviour and movements.
I see no problem with even letting the people know their being monitored and movements. McDonalds, playground, gym, work, friends home, porn sales, shooting range, drug deals, parties, etc. A barking dog does not mean they will bite, but doesnt mean I have to turn my back on them either and not watch their movements.
Be smart is the best 1st choice for humanity. Humanity was at least smart enough to know that Mutruall Asured Destruction in 60's, 70's, 80's was nuts, so they stopped hydrogn bomb bombers flying 24hrs round the clock in anticipation of a strike from the other nation{s}.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Let me tell the story, I can tell it all;
About the mountain boy who ran illegal alcohol.
His daddy made the whiskey, the son he drove the load;
And when his engine roared they called the highway "Thunder Road".
Sometimes into Ashville, sometimes Memphis town.
The Revenuers chased him but they couldn't run him down.
Each time they thought they had him his engine would explode.
He'd go by like they were standing still on "Thunder Road".
And there was thunder, thunder over "Thunder Road",
Thunder was his engine and white lightening was his load.
And there was moonshine, moonshine to quench the devil's thirst.
The law they swore they'd get him but the devil got him first.
It was on the first of April, Nineteen-Fifty-Four
The federal man sent word he'd better make his run no more.
He said "200 agents were covering the state;
Which ever road he tried to take they'd get him sure as fate."
'Son' his daddy told him, 'make this run your last.
The tank is filled with 100 proof; you're all tuned-up and gassed.
Now don't take any chances, if you can't get through.
I'd rather have you back again than all that Mountain Dew.'
And there was thunder, thunder over "Thunder Road",
Thunder was his engine and white lightening was his load.
And there was moonshine, moonshine to quench the devil's thirst.
The law they swore they'ed get him but the devil got him first.
Roaring out of Harlan; revving up his mill.
He shot the Gap at Cumberland and streamed by Maynardville.
With G men on his tail light; road block up ahead,
The mountain boy took roads that even angels fear to tread.
Blazing right through Knoxville, out on Kingston Pike,
Then right outside of Bearden, they made the fatal strike.
He left the road at 90; that's all there is to say,
The devil got the moonshine and the mountain boy that day.
And there was thunder, thunder over "Thunder Road",
Thunder was his engine and white lightening was his load.
And there was moonshine, moonshine to quench the devil's thirst.
The law they never got him 'cause the devil got him first.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
For Charlie Daniels it was going down to Georgia. The movie Spectre, is was Mexico for Day of the Dead.
Mahatma ( Great
Soul)
.....Ebuc.....
Thank You,
For the tantric teachings.
About love,
.....Ebuc.....
Thank You,
For the tantric teachings.
About love,
The
ultimate binder.
Truth,
The ultimate purpose.
Flirting,
The ultimate entertainment.
Humanity,
The ultimate local complex,
Of social inter-relationships.
About viewpoint,
The ultimate micro-universe,
Of semi-divine,
Self-manifesting integrity.
Truth,
The ultimate purpose.
Flirting,
The ultimate entertainment.
Humanity,
The ultimate local complex,
Of social inter-relationships.
About viewpoint,
The ultimate micro-universe,
Of semi-divine,
Self-manifesting integrity.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
The real question is how do we decrease the World's population by 70-80% ASAP non-violently and without diminishing the quality of life for all?
Bingo ! The 7.6 billion dollar question. :---) In 60's, 70's Fuller like to say that, we have 5 billion billionares on the planet, and we just dont realize that yet.
I forget how justifies his comments, but i'm sure was about doing more with less ---his ephemerlization-- and alternative sustain-able energy sources.
Created:
-->
@imdancin
I will not engage with anyone who has a vile mouth.
Putting the correct label on vile{?} person is called truth. You and none of you type can handle the truth of your being a virtual rapist, who enjoy sticking their nose into a pregnant woman's bodily business, is just sick in head, and you and your type need immediately cease and desist from this indecent, unethically immoral practices.
And then go for some re-education of ethical morals used by a truly civilized society that is facing huge over=population issues for the operating systems currently { 2022 AD } in place.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Rapid crowd outside his house chanting their rant and rave ...More Guns! More Guns! More Guns!....as they march on Washington Ave toward the the Capital Building.....and capital police poop their pants.
Then the Republicans all come out in front of Capital with tapping pistols in holsters on their hips and holding asault rifles above there heads in respect of Charlton Heston, they all shout in unison.....From My Dead Hands! From My Dead Hands! From My Dead Hands!
The Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnel and his wifel lift their rifles above their heads and taunt the capitol police to come and ...Just Try and Remove These Assault Rifles from our Hands!....
Then the Trumpet appears on top of the capitol building holding above his head.............
And the masses go wild and charge to building in support of the leaders of their massive USA gun movement to hand out assault weapons to any citizen who wants one and they all shout in unison, ...... Revolution! Revolution! Revolution!
Then Republicans across USA nation start taking over news stations shouting...Climate is not an Issue, Climate Is Not an Issue!, Climate is not an Issue!
Then the Trumpets Republicans in military make their move with banners on their tanks stating .....Make America Great Again!..Make America Great Again! Make America Great Again!
Created:
Posted in:
Regarding my past posts as ..' Fullers Abstract Great Circles '..., I hope to offer the final correct assessment regarding the gravitonic
particle, associate with Gravity { G } and Dark Energy{ DE }
14 nodal
events ---0-13-- is needed in the 2D lattice total, to have a tube,
that, is defined by three triangular opening aka a
truncated, triangular based, di-pyramid. This also happens to be the minimal set
of triangular openings that will define a Euclidean torus
14^2 = 196, minus 14
= 182, and divided by 2 = 91 lines-of-relationship in sum-total
equal a graviton, that, I believe is half Darkion { Dark Energy
quantum } and half Graviton.
Previously we only
consider the sequential set of nodal events ratios
and lines-of-relationships ratio.
To total of nodal
events does not change. What does change is the finding the sum-total
of relationships for each specified set, and the overall sum total
lines-of-relationship using the formula n^2 minus n then divided by
2 As found at this Synergetics LINK
......1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable
Time inside
-------Fullers-------abstract
great circle--------central spine to the torodial
tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable
Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10..........................................DE
{ inner }..............
For top line G:
5^2 = 25, minus 5 = 20, and divided by 2 = 10 total
lines-of-relationship
For top inside line OT: 3^2 = 9, minus 3 = 6 and divided by 2 = 3 total
lines-of-relationship
For bottom inside
line OT: 2^2 = 4, minus 2 = 1, divided by 2 = 0.5
which in this case translates to 0.5 radii plus 0.5 radii = 1
line-of-relationship
...note: I use the
word 'radii' because of a consideration, that, each nodal event has a
2D area circle of influence, or in 3D, a volumetric sphere of
influence....
For bottom inner
line DE: 4^2 = 16, minus 4 = 12, divided by 2 = 6
total lines of relationship { same as a tetra{4{hedron
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So that is each line
as a catagory: Gravity { 10 lines-of-relationship }
and that semi-corresponds to my 1990’s Standard Model as:
EMRadiation { photonic particles } being the 5-fold 10 Great
Circles/Tori of the icosahedron ---they define 5 sets of interlacing
VE/cubo-octahedra. See LINK
And next I want to
combine the two inside lines, as a single catagory of a sine-wave
0\3p/6\9/12 pattern aka OT + OT:
Ssince we've joined two combined two lines, less take the total nodal
points of those two lines{ 5 } and do the math for them: 5^5 = 25,
minus 5 = 20, divided by 2 = 10 lines-of-relationship and that value
matchs Gravity's 10, tho it takes two lines to do so. Here we could
say that Gravity is equally effective to OT,
yet with only one line of consideration, not two.
And next were going
to combine outer surface { top G } nodal events { 5 } with the inner
DE { 4 } set of surface nodal events and that totals 9 do the
math again: 9^2 = 81, minus 9 = 72, divided by 2 = 36
lines-of-relationship. H,mm, interesting that in this case, our
total from combination of top and bottom line as 9 is a greater total
lines-of-relationship, than the combination of the top and bottom
lines additionally i.e. 10 + 6 = 16 but with 9 nodal events our total
lines-of-relationship is 36.
As best I recall,
there is exponential increase in lines-of-relationship resultants,
and doing them individual and then adding does not appear to be the
same level of exponentiation. I dont see any flaws in my math
above and tho Fuller never referred to the expontial increase as form
of synergy, I wonder if could be labeled that way. I'm not
smart enough to make such distinctions.
However, one thing
i'm good at and that is making associations, and just the outer and
innner set as 36 happens to be the number combinations of quarks ( 18
quarks and 18 anti quarks }.
So lets do one final
math and that is the total 13 nodal events as a single graviton
{ small g }: 5 G , + 3 OT + 2 OT 4DE = 14 nodal events.
...Note: 24 is the
number for VE ---labeled as equinimity--- i.e. 24 chords and 24 radii
when VE constructed from 4 paper hexagons...... =
14^2 = 196,
minus 14 = 182, and divided by 2 = 91 lines-of-relationship in
sum-total..i..e. .n^2 minus n and divided by 2 defines the
small g graviton, Who would have thought the most
simple particle of Universe, could be so complex. Oh but wait.
That value includes the small d, darkion of Dark Energy. This may be significant to point out,
that, Gravity { mass-attraction } and Dark Energy { mass-repulsion }
are two sides { outer and inner } of the same gravitonic
particle { <I> } of occupied space /\ and time
<-->
.....1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable
Time inside
-------Fullers-------abstract
great circle--------central spine to the torodial
tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable
Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10..........................................DE
{ inner }..............
Created:
-->
@Novice
No schizoid on my end, ergo more evidence of a head sickness to create a false narrative and support an ego.
This is simple, if you stick your nose into a pregnant womans bodily
business, without here consent , then you are a virtual rapist. If you
have a better label for people who adhere to these unethically
immoral practices, the please share.
You do not because, that identifier fits so very well, If the shoe fits, then wear it proudly or in shame. Your choice.
If any person was to stick their physical nose into a pregnant womans physical body without her consent, it is rape. Simple.
Virtual rapist have not ethical morality in regards to the pregnant woman nor empathy for her and all of the circumstances surrounding her pregnancy. Their fundamentalism considers one and only one priority and that is;
> the fertilized egg { (/*\) }, >>> the fetus { (**), >>>>> fetus/baby { ( * .. * ) }, >>>>>>>>>>> born out, as an individual person, whose umbilical chord has been severed, and the babyy has taken its first inspiration into its lungs. Simple .
Created:
-->
@Novice
- Silly insult that fails to make any point.
I disagree and to believe a person is sick in head is not intended as an insult. You take offense when none is given.
This is simple if you stick your nose into a pregnant womans bodily business, without here consent , then you are a virtual rapist. If you have a better label for people who adhere to these unethically immoral practices, the please share.
You do not because, that identifier fits so very well, If the shoe fits, then wear it?
Narrow minded fundamentalist is correct assessment of these unethical and immoral attitude towards pregnant women. Please stop the virtual rape of pregnant women.
Arguments to altar a fundamentlist unethcially immoral practices. Re-education of the ethics of morality in a civilized community is what is needed for you type of people. A shrink of some kind or another, depending on the degree of sick in the head. Its a complicated issue for anyone to deal with.
Ask any pregnant woman what she has to deal with in her decision making, and you will learn something, tho I doubt any significant percentage would want you ---lacking empathy for her--- within 100ft of them.
Created:
Posted in:
Oops, my previous lattice was incorrect, Darn! Only 13 nodal events is needed ---not 14... in the lattice total, to have a tube, that, is defined by three triangular openings. This also happens to be the minimal set of triangular openings that will define a Euclidean torus
Previously we only consider the sequential set of nodal events ratios and lines-of-relationships ratio.
To total of nodal events does not change. What does change is the finding the sum-total of relationships for each specified set, and the overall sum total lines-of-relationship using the formula n^2 minus n then divided by 2 As found at this Synergetics LINK
......1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable Time inside
-------Fullers-------abstract great circle--------central spine to the torodial tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10..........................................DE { inner }..............
For top line G: 5^2 = 25, minus 5 = 20, and divided by 2 = 10 total lines-of-relationship
For top inside line OT: 3^2 = 9, minus 3 = 6 and divided by 2 = 3 total lines-of-relationship
For bottom inside line OT: 2^2 = 4, minus 2 = 1, divided by 2 = 0.5 which in this case translates to 0.5 radii plus 0.5 radii = 1 line-of-relationship
...note: I use the word 'radii' because of a consideration, that, each nodal event has a 2D area circle of influence, or in 3D, a volumetric sphere of influence....
For bottom inner line DE: 4^2 = 16, minus 4 = 12, divided by 2 = 6 total lines of relationship { same as a tetra{4{hedron
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So that is each line as a catagory: Gravity { 10 lines-of-relationship } and that semi-corresponds my Standard Model of for EMRadiation { photonic particles } being the 5-fold 10 Great Circles/Tori of the icosahedron ---they define 5 sets of interlacing VE/cubo-octahedra. See LINK
And next I want to combine the two inside lines, as a single catagory of a sine-wave 0\3p/6\9/12 pattern aka OT + OT: Ssince we've joined two combined two lines, less take the total nodal points of those two lines{ 5 } and do the math for them: 5^5 = 25, minus 5 = 20, divided by 2 = 10 lines-of-relationship and that value matchs Gravity's 10, tho it takes two lines to do so. Here we could say that Gravity is equally effective to OT, yet with only one line of consideration, not two.
And next were going to combine outer surface { top G } nodal events { 5 } with the inner DE { 4 } set of surface nodal events and that totals 9 do the math again: 9^2 = 81, minus 9 = 72, divided by 2 = 36 lines-of-relationship. H,mm, interesting that in this case, our total from combination of top and bottom line as 9 is a greater total lines-of-relationship, than the combination of the top and bottom lines additionally i.e. 10 + 6 = 16 but with 9 nodal events our total lines-of-relationship is 36.
As best I recall, there is exponential increase in lines-of-relationship resultants, and doing them individuall and then adding does not appear to be the same level of exponentiation. I dont see any flaws in my math above and tho Fuller never referred to the expontial increase as form of synergy, I wonder if could be labeled that way. I'm not smart enough to make such distinctions.
However, one thing i'm good at and that is making associations, and just the outer and innner set as 36 happens to be the number combinations of quarks ( 18 quarks and 18 anti quarks }.
So lets do one final math and that is the total 13 nodal events as a single graviton { small g }: 5 G , + 3 OT + 2 OT 4DE = 24
...Note: 24 is the number for VE ---labeled as equinimity--- i.e. 24 chords and 24 radii when VE constructed from 4 paper hexagons...... =
24^2 = 576, minus 24 = 552, and divided by 2 = 276 lines-of-relationship in sum-total..i..e. .n^2 minus n and divided by 2 defines the small g graviton, Who would have thought the most simple particle of Universe, could be so complex. Oh but wait. That value includes the small d, darkion of Dark Energy. This may be significant to point out, that, Gravity { mass-attraction } and Dark Energy { mass-repulsion } are two sides { outer and inner } of the same gravitonic particle { <I> } of occupied space /\ and time <-->
.....1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable Time inside
-------Fullers-------abstract great circle--------central spine to the torodial tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10..........................................DE { inner }..............
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
They shoukd call them" 1 week babies" . " 2 week babies "
False. They are fetus/babys and more fetus than that are live, indepent, individual, living baby, until the umbilical cord is cut, and the baby has taken its first inspiration of breath.
Why people want to not see is truth is sometimes very obvious and others times not so obvious why they do not seek truth.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
How many people can fit in heaven? - Only 144,000 as the bible states. The Bible states that the majority of mankind will not go to heaven.With 8 billion people on the planet now when there was only 2 originally, it would seem like we need a lot more abortions.
Would would have belived the bible would come to humanities rescue. Great find.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
So as to not vote Trump, to Santos etc. These majority of these republicans are immoral to core of the bone if not their bone marrow.
Morality and intelligence of what is best for humanity ---not just USA--- is at core of moral belief system.
'War is obsolete'...Bucky Fuller 1969...yet somehow, some countries have not yet gotten that message clearly.
Financial begins with less greed.
Created:
Posted in:
It is important to me to get this correct. The 2D lattice below, transposes as a 3D torus, and specifically a sequentially defined, spiral trajectory, that creates a internal sine-wave ---0, 3, 6, 9, 12-- via invaginations at peak of outer and inner geodesic curature i.e at nodal events ---2p, 5p, 8, 11p.
.......1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable Time inside
-----------------abstract great circle---------central tspine to the torodial tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10.................................14.....DE { inner }..............
Based some other geometry from some years back, I became convinced, that, the Graviton { Gravities quanta particle } is likened to a triangular based di-pyramid , --5 vertexes and 6 triangles--- however, I still felt something was missing, and the dipyramid should be truncated at its two diametrically opposing ends, so as, we have a tubular Graviton 3 - 3 - 3.
This meant 3 vertexes at one end defines a triangular openting, 3 at other end and the three in middle girth of the dipyramid. It is is all much more dynamic then just this simple Euclidean polyhedron, as I also felt it should be a series of truncated dipyramids that form a longer tube.
So in the 2D lattice above, that I came to some ten years later, I was now into a newly discovered numerical tublar aka torus.
The three triangular openings are, 1, 2p, 5p........7p, 8, 10........11p, 13p, 14, that is the triangular openings on the 2D lattice, that, transposes as a 3D torus, with a sine-wave on inside. Here it is again below, and take note of the central Abstract Great Circle, from which Synergetics uses and I make evident as the central abstract spinal cord of each of my tori.
.......1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable Time inside
-----------------abstract great circle---------central tspine to the torodial tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10......................................DE { inner }..............
So next I want to establish clearly the nodal events ---i.e. V phenomena of the traveling trajectory---- involved with outer surface, inner surface and inside-the tube sine-wave /\/\/\/ patterning. If we only counted the lines-of-relationship, that, formed the sine-wave pattern inside the tube, we would only have four such lines as 0____3,..3____6,.......6____9,..........9____12, between the 5 nodal events. So that is a 5:4 ratio when combine lines and nodal events, considered in sequence, as this is the basis of this 2D lattice formation/format.
If we just stopped there, and compare that to that total outer and inner surface nodal events, we have a 9:5 ratio of nodal events.
In sequence, we have on outer and inner nodal events, 1, 2p, 4, 5p, 7p, 8, 11p, 13p, 14 ergo a total of 9 nodal events and that is, in sequentially linear format, as follows;
1___2p...2p____4,....4___5p,.....5p___7p,......7p___8,......8____11p,........11p___13p,....13p____14 and totals as 8 lines-of-relationship. OK? So to compare the sequential set of lines-of-relationships between outer-inner and the inside set we have a 8:4 ratio of lines-of-relatioship.
So this above is the simplest way to understand, the structure of a Gravition { Gravity's quantum particle }. Ok?
The inside sine-wave show us the Graviton is nucleated with 4 lines-of-relationship and that is not enough to be considered as a a set that is equal to the 6 lines-of-reltionship that define the minimal structure of Univer{4}hedron.
However, this whole Gaviton outlay above, can get fairly more complicated, if we are to step outside of the numerically sequential format this above four lines and 14 nodal events based upon. More on that next time let this above seep in as what a Graviton of Gravitational space, may be structurally composed of.
.......1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable Time inside
-----------------abstract great circle---------central spine to the torodial tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10......................................DE { inner }..............
Created:
Posted in:
Had a new thought about the structure of Graviton aka the quantum-of-Gravity, that, we have not, and probably will, ever pop out of Graviational [ G } space.
With my 3D torus, as developed from 2D, inside-outed, asymmetrical, numerical lattice, that, has:
1] outer surface set of nodal events, as positive curvature as Gravity,
2} inside the tube sine-wave reality association, and,
3} inner surface set of events that correspond negative curvature as Dark Energy[ DE }
See 2D lattic graphic below
My new revelation is, that, that inside the Graviton, we have four and only four lines-of-relationships 0---3----6----9----12. This interesting because, the minimal 3D polyhedral structure of Universe---the tetra{4}hedron--- has no less than 6 lines-of-relationship. Whereas the outer and inner surface set of events of the torus sequential total as 9 nodal events i.e.. 3 triangular openings to define the minimal tube length, that, we can assign as the Graviton, with the inside five lines-of-relationship inside, as the sine-wave.
.......1.............................5p...........7p............................11p.............13p...........G{ outer }....................
-
-
0..............................................6.................................................12..................Observable Time inside
-----------------abstract great circle---------central tspine to the torodial tube-------------------------------
........................3p............................................9.................................................Observable Time inside
-
-
.................2p............4................................8...........10......................................DE { inner }..............
Note: in this above scenario, has always been a sequential set of events for me, i.e. ve never consider the lines-of-relationship between say 0 and 6, 6 and 12 and 3 and 9.
Same goes for counting the lines of relationship between 1 and 5, or 5 and 7 or 2 and 4 etc. The ratio of lines-of-reationship of outer and inner, to the inside set remains the same.
The sequential couting of outer and inner surface lines-of-relationship total 13.
Inside is 4.
H,mm this is all not quite figured out correctly yet since it is confusing the count of nodal events with the lines-of-relationship counting, and wheter including non-sequential set also. more later
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Though dickheads will be dickheads.....But tend to be the ones that end up causing social problems.
And they run in same circles:
1} more guns with more power, to kill more people quicker is better is best and, 2} protect the unborn fetus ---has not taken first inspiration of air-- at all costs with no consideration or empathy for the pregnant womans concerns. Now thats irony for USA peoples.
So if it is a sacrosanct right that dickheads should be able to own a remote killing device, then so be it.
1776 was a good year for making constitutional laws. 2076 --Return of Mad Max--- may be a good year to amend some of USA laws to better fit the times, some 300 years later.
But let's be perfectly honest, why does a youth untrained in the use and mental responsibilities of gun ownership, need two assault rifles.
More is always better. Greed is always better. To have ability to killl ever easier and faster is always better. :--(
And don't give me the old amended archaic constitutional BS.....Just reamend it and update it.
Civilized peoples have civilized laws. I was 18 when the Alice Cooper song came out, 18! 18! 18! I'm 18 and I like it! I'm a boy, I'm a man, I'm 18 and I like it!
Created:
-->
@imdancin
But I value the life in the womb.
I think you are sick in head and value any fetal/baby more than any pregnant woman, or her personal concerns and what is best for humanity. More sex education a--starting at home--- and pregnancy prevention at a minimum for starters.
Virtual rapist is what you are. Simple and not complex to grasp. Please keep your nose out of pregnant womens bodily business, whom have not given their consent for you to stick you nose in.
Narrow minded fundamentalist is correct assessment of attitude towards pregnant women.
Created:
-->
@3RU7AL
There is no law against spanking a child or using, what the law calls, "reasonable discipline."
At least not in USA. I thought Sweden banne spanking back in the 80's
..." Since 1979, all corporal punishment of children has thus been forbidden
in Sweden. This means that corporal punishment is viewed as criminal
assault, depending on the severity of the actions there is no exception
(defense) of parental discipline. The explicit exception for “aga”
(disciplinary violence) was removed from the Criminal Code in 1957. "...
Germany, Spain, Brazil, Ukraine and New Zealand are among the countries with full bans. Inside countries with partial
bans (in schools only), females showed a 56 percent lower rate of
physical fighting. There was no change among males. Partial-ban
countries include the U.S., U.K. and Canada.Oct 29, 2018
Created:
-->
@Benjamin
There is a connection between oxygen and personhood, both mythologically and chemically.
I agree. The person is likened to social construct as it is made from many cells --many with the mitochondria-- cooperating to create a global lywhole body { spirit-2, 3 and 4 } unit, that, with humans has most access to and a ' mythological ' via Meta-space/Spirit-1 mind/intellect/concepts/ego placed on self, within context of social environment of others also subjectively applying their construct { image } onto us.
This is not the same as the borg { Star Trek } or hive of bees etc. Primarily because the complex biologic is composed of so many differrent kinds of cells and functions. The complex Universe conquers by division of it self into so many varied parts ex atomic elements.
On the other end of that, is the ability to cooperate on the same goal/thoughts/ideas etc like a borg or hive to move mountains, oceans, power sources or whatever, maintain the ecological systems and a reasonable { not greeedy } standard of living.
Mitochondria.... " The classic role of mitochondria is oxidative phosphorylation,
which generates ATP by utilizing the energy released during the
oxidation of the food we eat. ATP is used in turn as the primary energy
source for most biochemical and physiological processes, such as growth,
movement and homeostasis. "...
..." Mitochondrial dysfunction is widely implicated in ageing and in the
diseases of ageing, [-- ergo, the standard of living--] through dysfunction in adenosine triphosphate (ATP)
synthesis, Ca2+ homeostasis, central metabolic pathways or radical production. "....
" Mitochondria are membrane-bound cell organelles (mitochondrion, singular) that generate most of the chemical energy
needed to power the cell's biochemical reactions. Chemical energy
produced by the mitochondria is stored in a small molecule called adenosine triphosphate (ATP). "...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Go back and find em. Ive posted and reposted you to answer and you continually ignore. Waste of space, time and Spirit-1 mind. :--(
Created:
-->
@imdancin
Point 1…….We don’t confront anyone by yelling, screaming.
I asked the question why you go to abortion clinics and confront. I said nothing about yelling and screaming yet I'm sure that happens as well as the fundmentalis nut cases who shoot to kill. Sick.
Most groups go
to pray. We abide by the law concerning restrictions, where to stand
etc.
No your not aiding the pregnant women or anyone a part of that process. You are virtual rapist and nusiance to society uneccessarily. Sick.
The fact that we are anti-abortion should not matter as other groups in our country are very free to be seen and heard.
Natural abortion happens all the time and it is relabled as a misscarriage, but is an abortion. Your medically induced or other kinds of human induced abortion. Again your a virtual rapist.
And you have
the gall to say we are violent? LOL
False. never said you personally were violent. Your confusing me with some one else, In fact this response to you is the firsts time Ive mentioned violence by anti-human-induced abortion.
Point 2….Mother to be?
Yes, I make differrentiations regarding egg, fertilized ege, travel the uterus, 9 months gestation, born out, umbical cord cut or not, first inspiration of breath or not. You narrowed minded virtual rapist ignore the pregnant womans concerns, one of which is the most important, one, that the fetus/baby is an organsim o f the pregnant woman who is not a mother until the baby is born out, umbilical chord cut, and the baby has taken its first inspiraiton of breath to become and independent individual human seperate frome the pregnant woman.
No at the moment of fertilization the woman becomes a mother.
No, because, I make a distinctions here and you do not. You want the whole process to be either black or white and and in no way is that the set of circumstances were dealing with. Your a sick virtual rapist.
That which she help create is not a part of her, it is a separate human being with its own DNA, fingerprints, organs, circulatory system etc. So you say the mother should be able to kill her child because she is ethical and moral. So she has the right to kill it up until the unborn natural delivery…wow.
YOur still confused and have not ability to differrentiate and make distinctions of the processs involved. Pregnancy and the pregnant womans concerns is a complex process, of which you and your kind need to keep your friggin noses out of her bodily business. Sick is what you are.'
Point 3….Others are there to kill the unborn. The person that drove her to the abortion mill, the receptionist or office staff that takes the money, the nurses who help get her ready and the doctor who carries the killing out.
You a virtual rapist who needs to be re-educated in the ethics of morality, to aid in your sick in the head health issues.
Do no harm?????? LMAO Just brutally kill the unborn inside the womb.
What is diffferrence between allowing to die, by giving no aid after birth or duing pregnancy, and your "brutally killing". You just throw that word in there to make you sound like your the person on the higher moral ground when you are not.
The pregnant woman is on the highest mortal ground, until, the baby/fetuses umbilical cord has been cut, and the baby has taken its first inspiration of breath.
Your have absolutely zero compassion, empathy or prayers for the pregnant woman who may become a mother of a living breathing, independent individual human. This is partly why your sick-n-head in these regards and my guess is many others.
Created:
-->
@imdancin
Anyone can try to kill their child in any sort of way. That has been happening since the beginning of time.
And in poor country areas globally, women over 1000s of years, have no way to abort, so the only way is to wait to baby i born-out, and then make choice to aid in it continuance or not. Tough choices that only the woman should be allowed to make.
Created:
-->
@imdancin
So she should be able (because she is the mother)….kill her unborn up until the natural gestational age of the unborn?
1} why your going to confront pregnant women at abortion clinics ---is virtual rape-- is insanity and creates insanity for those who work there and going for an abortion for starters,
2} yes she is the pregnant woman and mother to be, once the fetus/baby is born-out. Until the umbilical cord is cut and now independent baby takes its first inspirited breath, the mother is the only ethically moral person who gets to decided, if she or others are allowed to assist the baby in getting its first inspirited breath,
3} others are there to assist the pregnant woman >>> mother and her wishes, nothing else. She will have to deal with her choices more than anyone else, so others should follow the first rule of medical response, do know harm, and this case do know harm to the mothers by obstructing her choices of how to respond to the babies needs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
A partial meltdown is not a complete meltdown and containment breach
#7 you stated meltdown yet a partial meltdown occurred. Your still running from truth and facts and you did not answer any of my questions yet here you are asking me to answer your questions.
Get real Sadlite.
Answer my questions first, then I can consider your nonsense, and ignoring truth and facts
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Post # 7..."Three mile island did not melt down, not even close. "
false as I stated previosly and you never addressed any of the questions posed to you. Running scared of truth.
A partial meltdown of 3 Mile Island Core occurred. Watch the movie or keep allowing your ego to ignore truth and facts Sad :--(---olite
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
What truth am I running from?
In several posts above I pointed out one or more and you ignore them. Ex you fear truth --run from it-- that there was a partial meltdown at 3 mile island. Sad--- :--( ---olite.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Yet more truths that Sad will run from. The ego force is strong Luke Skywalker.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
I don't fear the truth,....
Your in denial, as is obvious. Why you do not answer the questions I posed to you?. Simple not complex to grasp
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
I was alive when it happened, heard about it in real time. There was never any danger of a containment breach. Yea there was an accident, but it demonstrated the safety of nuclear energy, not the pitfalls.
So why do you fear answer the question Sad? Did you watch the doc. posted? Why do you fear truth?
There was partial meltdown of the core, and there were two other main points of movie that you missed.
You probably missed these same points at time you " I was alive when it happened" as I was also and avid anti-nuker leanring about ionzing radiation, as so m any of us were doing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Three mile island did not melt down, not even close.
Didi you watch the doc. Sad? They said the core was partially melted and they have photos.
Similar but much in Chernolbyle and they have those photos in movie.
And the partial meltdown is a side issue from two other main points of the movie.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
The 50's UFO hype was top-secret but at 50 years 2000, was released. I saw the doc of dude who was part of the military in New Mexico area 51 etc and he states, that the wierd symbols on some allumin stuff ---and other--- was actuall christmas tinzel from around that time, that they used on these weather ballon-like tests etc they were doing. I could probably find that doc, if I search enough. It was on PBS or Discover or whatever. I think I may have had direct tv the time so hard to say what programming it was on.
The Day the Earth Stood Still is imaginary conspiracy hype. The only thing standing still is some peoples ability use common sense.
Zed states it correctly, no one is traveling light speed for millions of light years, just to sit around undetected not say hi, we are your leaders now.
These irrational conspiracy types like it to be spooky --extra-terrestrial who invade our bodies and pretend to be your neighbor etc.
Conspiracies exist, just not ones involving intelligent life from out there.
Created: