ebuc

Waterman Projection Map LINK most accurate 2D map

...." I realized I could make a back-to-back circular map: like an old-fashioned phonograph record. One side of the map shows the Northern Hemisphere, the other side shows the Southern Hemisphere, with the equator running around the edge. It has no boundary cuts and the correct topology of a sphere. One simply “squashes” the sphere flat.

We then had to find the best formula for plotting the features on each side, one that would minimize the Goldberg-Gott error score. The answer is one in which the North Pole appears at the center of the north side of the phonograph record, with longitude lines spreading out equally from it where the scale on each longitude line is uniform, and similarly for the south side. Distances between cities are measured by simply stretching a string between them; if they are in opposite hemispheres, the string simply stretches across the equator at the edge of the map.

A disadvantage of the new map is that you can’t see all of the Earth’s surface at once, but remember this is true for the globe as well. Our map is actually more like the globe in this respect than other flat maps. To see all of the globe, you have to rotate it; to see all of the new map, you simply have to flip it over, as you can see below

This double-sided map has a Goldberg-Gott error score of only 0.881 versus 4.563 for the Winkel tripel. It beats the Winkel tripel in each of the six error terms! It has zero boundary cut error since continents and oceans are continuous over the circular edge. It has a remarkable property no single-sided flat map possesses: distance errors between pairs of points (such as cities) are bounded, being off by only at most plus or minus 22.2 percent. In the Mercator and Winkel tripel projections, distance errors blow up as one approaches the poles and boundary cuts."....

Fullers Dymaxion Map LINK  aka one-island-world

My worst personal fears are death by fire.

My worst fears beyond myself are death of humanity by hydrogen bomb wars ergo death many by fire.

You are either r very young ergo ignorant of this age old question, or your ego is practicing avoidance of the question posed to you, or both.

More ego driven avoidance of answering the question as posed to you

The question was not about "space" in general, --that is a whole separate quetion in of itself--- and you apparrently are not familiar with how Universe is defined, ergo, I can direct you to a dictionary definition, i fneccessary.

That above you did some how manage to give a correct answer "yes", the our Universe is finite. +1

Incorrect answer. You answered yes to #3 i.e.  we live in affinite occupied space Universe, ergo, there can exist no other occupied space outside of our finite, Universe.  Again you to need a definition for the word Universe.  Uni = one and verse = narrative definining occupied space.

Incorrect answer.  Saying Universe is close ---not all the way---  to being a perpetual motion mechanism or operating system is like saying our finite Universe is close  to being infinite occupied space.  It is irrational, illogical lack of common sense to say anything is near infiinity.

You need to learn about the 1st law of thermodynamics, that transfers over as, occupied space cannot be created nor destroyed, only transformed from state of occupied existence to another.

+2 as no one knows for sure, as rational, logical common sense based on ideas of a finite occupied space Universe ---and not you incorrect "other universes" answer-- inherently mean our finite Universe has an associated dynamic that can be arrived at using various rational, logical common sense pathways of thought.

That is not an answer to the question, presented to you, ergo, incorrect answer.

It is well known that, the word "soul" is associated with humans. What is not as well known is, that the word "soul" is just as rationally, logically and common sensically associated with all biologic creatures.

Yes, it is true that most humans have this unique ability of access to Metaphysical-1 mind/intellect/concepts/ego, yet what humans have in common with all biollogic creatures is that of synergetic system of the whole being greater than than the sum-of-parts as unique { rare } biologic life in our finite, occupied space Universe.

1} the game 'observer and/or player' is not actually in-the-game, they are experiencing { quanta } observering-playing game and this is a semi-shared knowledge, based on their  experience { quanta } ergo known to all observers-players,

2} the game itself is more likey than not ---practically speaking--- to contain context of the peoples

Understand, that, the study was very small compared to the spread of ionizing radiation across Europe and further by the winds.

..." studying the DNA of over 350 people who developed thyroid cancer after being exposed to radiation as young children. They created a comprehensive molecular picture of these tumors. Then, to see how they differed from thyroid cancers caused by other factors, the researchers compared these tumors against tissue from 81 people who were born near Chernyoble after 1986 and developed thyroid cancer but were never exposed to radiation. "...

Background ionizing radiation exists every where on Earth and and that is abput 17 millirems per minute. So when every uranimum is dug out of Earth to processed, or nulcear accidents, or other, more radiation is added to the background count overall. And eventually that radiation count average will be raised becuase of human nuclear ativities

More clarification of time dilation/Lorentz contraction. Previously I attempted to make clear that this dilation-contraction is a linear procedure

....." Special Relativity tells us that a moving frame of reference has its spatial dimension shortened in the direction of motion relative to the stationary observer, and, has its time dimension slowed down relative to the stationary observer.

.....These effects are known respectively as "length contraction" and "dilation ...".

That web site also stated dilation-contraction only mattered at near speeds-of-radiation, however, we know that in a lesser gravitational field ---i.e i. higher altitudes away from gravitational mass of Earth--- that, clocks run faster ergo time dilation. { LINK } 

Is there a visual process we can assign to this dilation-contraction? See bottom of this page for the assigned values

Previously I presented the  the tri-topes { tetrahedron } =  6.05 05 41 58 95 at the outer perimeter end of any one of the four axi, in VE 60 degree orientation to each other, with four hexagons of VE as sort of nucleus or the end resultant if al four tetrahedra{ tri-topes? } were to go through the transition to commonly shared four hexagons as VE aka 4D { 4 spatials or powers } by Fuller, as is the the tetrahedrons four surface openings in 60 degree 4D orientation to each other. Ok? Good.

So 'faster speed' {  or acceleration } and 'gravitational field' appear to be equilvalents.  Ok? Good.

Time ergo motion and speed was Fuller 5th power/dimension as spin.

Previously I presented the obsever as the outer tetrahedral { tritope? }.  Well observer and observed are also known as a 'frame-of-reference', however, be clear that they both are in Universe as an occupied space ergo  not outside of  Universe as a Metaphysical-1 concept/intellect/mind.

Scenarios for frames-of-reference regarding the four axi of opposing surface tetrahedra{ tritopes? } infolding at outer permeter and unfoldinolding as inner VE { 4 hexagons }.

1} the outer perimeter tetrahedron { tritope ? } is the infolded observer, that,

...........observe's VE{ see 10 great circles of icosahedron LINK } as maximally expanded { released/unfolded } speed-of-radiation or

...1a} or as if in various states of lesser graviatioan field ergo clocks running faster as octa-tope, pentatope or the 4D VE{ maximal expanded release }.

H,mm, better stop there as that is plenty for a start and maybe the best scenario available ---I dunno--  within the context of the parameters of Synergetic garphic I'm considering and hope others will consider.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bottom of page:

Values under consideration as related to the Synergetics graphic here LINK

Outer perimeter and infolded tetrahedron { tri-tope? } value is 6.05 05 41 58 95 --mininmal infoldment--

Next more expanded { ufolded } is a 5-gon { octa-tope? } is  24.35 22 7 27 55 7 --media--

Next more expanded { unfolded } is the 6-gon { penta-tope? } is 42.05 05 41 58 95 medial---

And the most expanded { unfolded } is the VE { 14-gon } is 66.4 or some approximation near that ---maximal---.

And  who assigns those rights. Government. If not government, then it is chaotic mess of who ever comes to the meeting with largest guns { most explosives } to rule those they are in disagreement with.

Right wing wants to go back to the good ole days when men were men and women were women and and a exposed gun on hip, shoulder, legs arms is the best way forward for humanity to meet in the streets, the shopping malls, restaurants. park and day care center.

2232 is my my best prognostication of the end of humans on Earth, due to their actions or lack of action.

..." To make more sense of this, let's review quickly what Special Relativity establishes.

.....Special Relativity tells us that a moving frame of reference has its spatial dimension shortened in the direction of motion relative to the stationary observer, and, has its time dimension slowed down relative to the stationary observer.

.....These effects are known respectively as "length contraction" and "time dilation".

.....Here on earth, we don't notice these effects in everyday life because we are going far too slowly. Length contraction and time dilation only become significant when you are traveling close to the speed of light. The speed of light is very fast (300,000 km/s or 670,000,000 mph), far faster than any speed that a typical human experiences relative to the stationary observer.

...Note that the key phrase is "relative to the stationary observer". Relative to itself, a reference frame is at rest and experiences neither length contraction nor time dilation. An astronaut on a speeding spaceship does not see his own rulers shortened nor his own clocks running slow. Rather, it is the man on the ground who sees the rulers on the spaceship shortened and the spaceship's clocks running slow."....

Zed, Is'nt this a similar rational for those who refuse to get a Co-V-2 vaccine?

Ok, this is rich { deep } and I dont recall noting this following scenario at any time in all of my explorations of the Vector Equlibrium etc.

So I posted this grahic LINK in Synergetics, right? That I thought some how maybe could be related to time dilation-Lorentz contraction, and I briefly mentioned to be considered as four of them each on its axis of the VE's four primary axi of the its diametrically opposing  surfacing triangles.

So tonight I went back to  the value of Pi^4 = 97.40 90 91 03 40.......02437236440332688705

But since that was 4D was inferred by me to be  four spatial dimensions, I never did much with it, until now.

97.40 90 91 03 40 / 24.35 22 7 27 55 7 = 4.00 00 00 00 04 i.e. four of the above linked grpahic ---ergo four hexagons of the cubo-octahedron/Vector Equlibrium.

I.e. we take the above Linked to graphic, that I'm now going to refer to as four,  dilation-contraction  axi, and we apply in four  4.00 00 00 00 00 04 times, in 60 spatial coordination, as in accoordance with the 4-fold, VE/cubo-octahedron.

we envision a graphical that Ive never envisioned before.  Truly sorry I'm not a graphic technician cause I would love to see those four as 60 degree coodinated,VE-Time-Lorentz axis set.

So yeah, this in of itself does not produce a whole lot of SHAZAM! revelation, however, there is something about it, that perks my curiousity.  Fullers first book was 4D Time-lock and he had to get Einstiens permission before it  would be published.

Omni-directional Time-dialtion/Lorentz contraction?  Seriously, why not?  Did anyone ever say that Time dilation-Lorentz contraction is only a linear operation?

So we see maximal contraction {bottom end limit? } --ergo 6.05 05 41 58 95-- as each of the VE's surface 8 triangles, and,

the maximum expansion of its four great hexagonal planes a---ergo

42.05 05 41 58 95. 

So yes this is a little or a lot differrent than my former, and more linear approach, but hey, I'm still exploring possibilities of what we can attribute to what, specifically.  So in this latter above, the maximum time dilation-lorentz contraction does not take place at one and or the the other of the Time dilation axis, rather,

it takes place at cosmic zero equlibrium of four hexagons.

Four 42.05 05 41 58 95's balance with eight 6.05 05 41 58 95's????

Well maybe balanced is'nt the correct word, since 8 * 6.05 05 41 58 95 = 48.404332716.

I am tired so these resultants dont jump out at me and go Holy Mackeral or Holy Cow!  Maybe there is a synergetic effect I'm not considering ex 2nd powering of one the above values, as in 2nd powering of E = mc^2. I dunno. Just exploring

Well Zed, 3ru states 80% is USD's, ergo currently 80% of global control is being done by Janet Yellen and whoever her boss is.  Biden?

Before that it was Trumpet and his treasury chair who had 80% of global control.

Before him it was Obama and his treasurer.

Before him it was Bush Jr. so and so on. So that is primary two people for ---that may change every four years--- that are in global { 80% } control, and these people are not faceless.

I dont see a any single entity being in position of global control, ---master brain---   except for Co-V-2.

Pi-Time absolute and time dilation{ Lorentz contraction } Revised 4/23/2021

Thinking about my truncated Pi explorations might be related to time dilation ---ergo length contraction-- I tried something new and it led to 42.

1} 66.40 28 14 34 52......Absolute { cosmic } Pi-Time value

2} 24.35 22 7 27 55 7….this is my re-normalization value of Pi^4{ XYZ + time } / 4

3} 42.05 05 41 58 95..... subtraction resultant from 66.4…is 42 the answer to everything?.....

Here is the background that is associated with and led to the resultant above.

In the following I use Pi values that only go to 10th position on irrational side of decimal place. Overall positions include one or two positions on rational side of decimal place, so twelve is total overall positions to be considered –for the most part--  in the following speculative explorations.
1} Pi = 3. 14 15 92 65 35…… 89 7 93 23 84 62 64 33 83 2 7 95…7 occurs in  overall 14th place/position…..,
 
2} Pi^2{ 2D } =9.86 96 04 40 05……25 17 10 62 25
…7 occurs on overall 15th position….
 
3} Pi^3 {XYZ-3D } =31.00 62 7 66 77 6…..4 11 48 95 09 95 39 11 80375…..
…7 occurs in  overall 7th position...62 is twice…00 minimizes relevance to 62 7 66…
...repetition of prime number 31 goes out to 7 places 33 33 33 1 is 6 + 1 places ergo 7 places and is itself a prime number in each subsequent iteration..
 
4} Pi^4 {XYZ + time } = 97.40 90 91 02 28….65 82 12 53 74 63…
……7 occurs overall 19th position on irrational side….
….97.40 9090 96 divided by 7 = 13.91 55 84 43 18….28 57 14 28 57….
…7 falls in overall 15th position on irrational side…13.9 is close to 14…
… we see 55 and take note of Fibonacci number 55…..
 
5} Pi^4 { XYZ + t } / 4 = 24.35 22 7 27 55 7……
..this latter above is my re-normalization approach  and I likened it to Feynman’s{?}  renormalization process to get rid of  all their infinite value resultants ….that could not be dealt with…ergo a truncation process to get rid of the infinite value and have   to a finite value to deal with…..

….7 occurs on overall 7th,  9th  and 12th positions…just after our next noting of 55 ergo Fibonacci number…. 
5} Pi^4 { XYZ + t } minus the Pi^3{ XYZ-3D } 66.40 28 14 34 52 …..and 66.4 is my  cosmic absolute, Pi-Time value…..
…28 and 14 both divide rationally by #7…..
 
6} 66.40 28 14 34 52 minus 24.35 22 7 27 55 7= 42.05 05 41 58 95 and that #42 is Douglas Adams { Arthur Dent Great Computer } ‘answer to everything’ resultant, that, I wonder --and began exploring to see-- if it has even the most most abstract association to  time dilation ergo Lorentz contraction….
 
7} 6 * 7 = 42  and 42.05 05 41 58 95 is shy ---4.94 94 58 41 05--- of Fullers consideration of prime number 47 being the cause of all superficially appearing randomness { dust } of Universe, and #47 being the first prime number beyond the 45 degrees of trigonometric limit to create everything of Universe.
…note: flip 45 four times to get 360 degree whole….

8} 42.05 05 41 58 95  minus 18 = 24.05 05 41 58 95 and I wonder if this 18 is representative of top half of time dilation { orentz contraction } limits?.... 
…..8a}  and 24.05 05 41 58 95 minus 18 = 6.05 05 41 58 95 and I wonder if this representative of lower end of time dilation { Lorentz contraction }?
……8b} Recalling that, the Vector Equilibrium { 4D/VE } ---aka cubo{6}-octa{8}hedron--- represents zero { 0 } via balance between has 24 chord/edges { embracing } and 24 radii {radiant } when constructed from four great circle planes, --circular hexagons--  that define it,
 
9} ergo  I see a scenario unfolding here regarding time dilation { Lorentz contraction } as follows starting with 66.4 { Pi-Time } and  ending at 6.05 05 41 58 95 as minimal time dilation {Lorentz contraction } limit;

…9a} 66.4 as cosmic absolute Pi-Time that we can never attain  i.e a most pure ergo most refined absolute truth---   and as an irrational, it complements our off-center { irrational process above } as Spirit-2{ observed time } physical reality { quantised and quantified } occupied space.
…..9b} prime number 49 { 7 * 7 }  ---and lets call that 7 axi * 7 axi or 7 axi subsets { 56 or 83 minus 14 redundant great circle planes  ergo 73 primary planes LINK  http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s11/figs/f3201b.html
7 *  73 = 5,329 however, this pathway is very speculative and unexplored by me currently  so do I do not place much emphasis or significance here, yet,

….9c} and prime number 47 as Fullers  speculative …’cause of all seemingly random-ness of Universe’ aka God, that, for now, I will call the top { maximum } occupied Space association to 42 { speed-of-radiation } and above that is, 
Metaphysical-3{ spirit-3 } Gravity (  ) and,
 Metaphysical-4 { spirit-4 } Dark Energy )(, 
Note 1:  Fuller liked to remind the reader that Universe ergo God is always off-center i.e. never at exact zero balance aka equilibrium --or true vacuum--- ergo, we began with transcendental Pi and used truncated values to 10th irrational side and we currently end with an irrational resultant, that, is not irrational, as we find with the 7-gon polygon ---128.571 internal angle of 7-gon--  rather, is closer to pure/symmetrical  rational whole six { 6 } as presented in process above as 6.05 05 41 58 95.
 
Note 2: above I mention the Vector Equilibrium{ VE } as 4D and this should not be confused with prior places above that are are XYZ + time as 4D.  The VE four dimenstion is four diametrically opposing triangular spatial planes, that, coincide with the VE’s four great hexagonal planes that define it.
 
And those four planes are in 60 degree corridination to each other not XYZ. And those four planes are defined by a tetrahedron when its four planes contract to define a zero volume tetrahedron, that, results in a VE. See LINK
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate31.html
 
Note 3:  it seems strange that 42 would be the answer to everything, because, Fullers approach would have 45 degrees of he trigonometric limit being the basis for incorporating all occupied space that exists.
 
So if of my above is correct, how is it 42.05 05 41 58 95   is the top end of physical reality ergo time dilation{ Lorentz contraction } and,
 
6.05 05 41 58 95. Is the bottom end limit?
 
Note 4: it was my arbitrary decision to subtract 18 from 42.05 05 41 58 95   ergo the difference between top end and low end limits is exactly 36 and just happens to coincided with 18 quarks and 18 anti-quarks of Universe.

Note-5: I could not find a reference to time dilation{ Lorentz contraction } in Synergetics.  I did find the following  graphic LINK in Synergetics and wonder if it could some how be spatial association or representative of  my positive and negative time dilation considerations via Pi.
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s06/figs/f1020.html

So the video was about finding true nature of reality.

Fuller was searching of the nature's coordinates.

My approach is a combination of;

....1} extrapolating out from Fullers 4-fold set of four axis { 3, 4, 6, 12 ergo fermions } sets and 5-fold 3 axis sets { 6, 10, 15 ergo bosons } = 7 primary axis sets, as,

......2} 4D, dynamic spiral, helixed, partial inversion-outversions, overlapping, and,

......2a}  seemingly 2D nodal events, ---virtual particles?---  interfering as 3D vertexial events  ---real particles?---,

......2b } as related to  positive and geodesically curved, outer surface events, that, are ultra-micro, ultra-high-tension, ---ultra-thin---  Metaphysical-3 { spirit-3 } Gravity (  ),

.......2c} inside the toroidal tube, physical reality { observed * * time } ergo quantize-able and quantify-able,

......,2d} negative and geodesically curved, inner surface events, that, are ultra-micro, ultra-high-tension being released, ---ultra-thin?---  Metaphysical-4 { spirit-4 }, Dark Energy )(.

Here is a simple example to explain why I believe your incorrect in you assessment.

A house has and electric service panel in it, full of breakers and wires. Some non-electrician person upon first time looking in the box may have the idea that this is a mess and might even say that is a mess of wires in there.

The electrician looks in the box and sees the order of neutral whites here, black leads there, bare or green grounds over here and seperate bars for ground and nutral whites and say looks to be in the correct order.

Torque > precession = g factor of QEDynamics and that, the  calculated value agrees with the measured experimental observed values too 10 decimal places on the irrational side of 2 i.e. the value for the g factor is 2.00 23 19 30 43......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UwigY4SjKY

See this value 2.00 23 19 30 43 in the above video at 11:18, however, to better understand the context of the g factor, watching the whole video is best.

So I first take note of the of there commonly shared value at 11 over all positions, where as I arbitrarily decided on overall 10 overall positions in my Pi explorations.

Hope you find time for this video as it is about science discovering the true nature of reality.

I dont have the context from which that was pulled from, howevr, genernally speaking.

The most wholistic set, is like the greatest set ever, or the largest set ever, or the most all-inclusive set. Ex say you have a new board game called " U "niverse/" G "od  and that game comes with a set of cards, dices, pieces. parts but you notices that there are no directions say this is not the complete set. 

Space, occupied or not exists far beyond Earth.  I learned this as young child in public school.

I dont recal the context of where you pulled this from and I dont recall using the word Descarte in this thread.

If we dont take a dump, then a our religion becomes meaningless cause we will die from not takeing a dump.

And being very irregular ---ex irritable Bowel Syndro--  with a dump is also no fund.

Were are spiritual beings and all that we do, whether geneticall induced or not, is related to spirit-1 and 2, most imediately here on Earth.

i (O) i =  " U "niverse/" G "od  is the labeling I use for the most whlolistic set, and, the italics is specifically are  used to express that Metaphysical-1 { spirit-1 } mind/intellect/concepts/ego{ i }/identity{ i ] complements the finite occupied space Universe

the above totalt to 56 great circle/planes 3D tori, however, since the VE/jitterbug contracts-expands, it has left-and right-skew versions of the 5-fold icosahedron this means we add additonal 31 circles/tori to the overall count. But 14 of the 87 are redundantly congruent, ergo there exists only 73 total primary great circles/tori { 3D }. see LINK and read the caption to specific great circles that are redundant