Total posts: 5,875
Posted in:
When you have an argument, you won't need to insult people and scream, and then go running to the mod.
Stay honest, and everything will be fine.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Nowhere in this passage does it say it is a “ god inspired” gospel truth.
Not in that particular verse it doesn't .
Exactly. Yet you brought up as if it did.
But Timothy does inform us :
2 Timothy 3:16 King James Version (KJV)
All scripture is given by inspiration of God,
I remain correct. Nothing in Acts say so. You remain incorrect. What you cite is not in the passage you quote. Stay honest and there will be no problems.
You really need to read, understand and above all, know your scriptures before firing off wild accusations of fraud
My assertion was right. The passage you cited did not mention 2nd Timothy. Mixing verses can be a type of fraud. That is why verses are uniquely numbered. Stay honest and there will be no problems.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Paul is generally considered one of the most important figures of the Apostolic Age[10][11] and in the mid-30s to the mid-50s AD he founded several churches in Asia Minor and Europe.
Jesus is the only founder of the church in the NT. That is why Jesus calls it His church, and the name of the church is, "The Church Of Jesus Christ." Paul is an important figure, but he started no churches.
He took advantage of his status as both a Jew and a Roman citizen to minister to both Jewish and Roman audiences.
This is just fluff that says nothing about Paul starting any churches.
Nowhere in scripture does it say Paul heard the voice of a dead man rises
Read what I wrote and not what you believe I wrote.
I read exactly what you wrote, and nowhere in scripture does it say Paul heard the voice of a dead man rises
What was jesus if he wasn't a deadman risen?
The bible tells us Jesus was alive, not dead. Jesus was and is the King who is alive forevermore.
Are you now denying the resurrection.
No. I am denying your claim that Paul heard the voice of a deadman. Scripture says no such thing.
Nowhere in this passage does it say it is a “ god inspired” gospel truth.
And I didn’t say that it says that in bible.
You said, "all is supposed be a “ god inspired” gospel truth. Why is it supposed to be? If it doesn't say so in scripture, why do you think it's all is supposed be a “ god inspired” gospel truth?
You can't find contradiction, so you manufacture one, and then pretend its in the script. It isn't in the script. You later hedge by saying you didn't say it was in the bible, but that is the exact impression you intend to give.
Are you suggesting that those verses I have produced as examples of contradictions are not from the Book of Acts?
No sir. I have shown you that you have produced no contradictions. You have said things that aren't true. You have manufactured fake " contradictions" by misstating what scripture says.
The anomalies are there to see.
No sir. When I expose your fakery, we see no anomalies. The contradictions are in your false verses, not in scripture.
Get over it. The blinding muddled mind of these gospellers or Paul himself just cannot get their stories straight, and it gets worse.
Then why do you need to insert fake scriptire? If the gospel were really muddled, you would not need to muddle them further.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
I know what you liberals were singing before Trump took office, even if you'd like to now pretend you weren't warbling like songbirds.
If Trump takes office, the stock market will crash....
If Trump takes office, unemployment will skyrocket....
If Trump takes office, the economy will tank...
If Trump takes office, blacks and minorities will be burned in the streets...
If Trump takes office, he will lead us to war....
The stock market soars.
The new song liberal now sings, "Trump's not responsible."
Unemployment at record lows.
The new song liberal now sings, "Trump's not responsible."
The economy going better than even Trump predicted,
The new song liberal now sings, "Trump's not responsible."
Record employment for minorities,
The new song liberal now sings, "Trump's not responsible."
Yemen, Columbia, Syria, and North Korea cooling down,
The new song liberal now sings, "Trump's not responsible."
What does it matter what one says to people unconcerned with reality? You keep singing your little birdsongs. Real men who deal with reality will keep the country on keel.
No need for thank yous. It's called love of country. Patriotism.
(No bsh1, I did NOT advocate burning minorities in the streets. Please read my post before kneejerking)
Created:
Posted in:
I know Casten and know she didn't mean it that way. But this is a hot bottom issue. What was done to the Judge was inexcusable.
Created:
Posted in:
Yeah. But if those things were bad, we know the song you'd be singing. How is Canada looking?I don't believe the president is responsible for employment, consumer confidence, or the economy.
Created:
Posted in:
Then we can return to the days of high unemployment, a joke of a foreign policy, low consumer confidence, and a president who apologizes to the world for us being American.
I can't wait!
Created:
Posted in:
The worst that could happen to me is to have my daughters, whom I would shield with my life, look at me like a rapist and a lying drunkard, causing them to doubt my Master and King because of lies said about me. That would be a horror I would not soon get over.
And those scars on my daughters would always be there to let the people who so scarred them know, if you ever wish to see how vile I am compared to the Jesus you call evil,.....
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
I'd want to know what moose meant. I may have a different understanding than him.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
I've wondered that about progressives too, because it seems to be generally true.
Created:
Posted in:
What should be truly concerning here is that so many Americans were willing to throw away founding American values as "innocent until proven guilty," and "no conviction on accusations alone."
These people actually believed the judge was first guilty and had to prove his innocence. And that he should have been convicted on Fords accusation alone. I am not convinced that another civil war is not in our future.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
With the economy going the way it is, and foreign policy going the way it is, I think I'll keep Trump with just the qualities he has. Darlings of Europe are a dime a dozen. Good presidents are rarer and vastly more valuable.
Created:
Posted in:
So you think reading the books are worth it even if you've watched the show?
Created:
Posted in:
I had the pleasure of meeting the super beautiful First Lady of our great nation. She was funny, kind, and treated us like real people.
To my great honor, I was able to assist on some small errand for her. What a privilege! My daughters met her too. It was a thing to remember for all of us. What a classy lady.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
For the life of me, I saw no inconsistency except the one you tried to slip in.
Examples:
one of the founders of the early Christian Church
Paul founded no church
this apostle supposed to hearing the voice of a dead man
Nowhere in scripture does it say Paul heard the voice of a dead man.
all is supposed be a “ god inspired” gospel truth.
Nowhere in this passage does it say it is a “ god inspired” gospel truth.
You can't find contradiction, so you manufacture one, and then pretend its in the script.
I do at times feel genuinely sorry for Christians.
It isn't christians who need pity.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Aporia
You have a good eye for the subtlies of the show. You like the books better don't you?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ravensjt
America will never be socialist country. Learn to accept it.
Created:
-->
@ravensjt
Last time I checked, countries in Africa and Arabia had their own govts and money. And no pàrt of the american budget had money from other countries in it.
Wealth belongs to those who generate it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Imabench
The religion board often had the most threads and most posts.
Yes....
Then what you said was eminently stupid. Even for you.
You first insulted him
I actually didn't...
Yes you did. And lying now won't change that.
If anything I insulted the guy he's referring to in the first place going around preaching.
Oh you insulted him too. Trolls tend to be that way. I happen to like trolls.
You're reading skills aren't on par with people who could reach that natural conclusion though, so you're forgiven, boy.
But my troll thumping skills are fine. You have a thick skull, so it'll take you a while to notice you've been pawned.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
And you are chasing me around with made up nonsense after you have been dismissed. Are you anal or just retarded?
OK, back on ignore you go.
Created:
Idiot morons have been talking about this world wide revolt since Trotski, Mao, and Pol pot.
The world's resources belong to those who work for them, not dolts who don't work and don't produce.
It.is.not.your.money.mooch.
Created:
Posted in:
...Religious forum where all the other lunatics on the site go to spend their time posting things nobody actually reads,
Sometimes I wonder what reality you exist in. The religion board often had the most threads and most posts. "No one actually reads"? You really should run what you post past your brain before you post it. Really.
The fact that you take that as personally
You first insulted him. You first used vulgarity. How is he the one taking it personally? No sir, it's you, and even you call yourself a useless troll. Even you.
No one wants to read your posts, which is why you need to resort to gimmicks, antics, and vulgarity to get reads. Seriously consider including your brain in your process of posting. If you have a working one that is.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@disgusted
What about everyone else who treat you like rotten meat? Everyone's running from you?
Lol. Be happy in your delusion jasper.
Created:
-->
@disgusted
Th 1% could house clothe and feed all the homeless in america without even noticing a change in their bank balance, why don't they want to put america first, why do they spit on the less fortunate
Because you liberal commie pinkos are never done. You want ALL their money. The problem is your illogical thought processes. You actually think other people's money belongs to you.
How is it hypocrisy to keep your own money? Here, read my lips.....and why do the pseudo christians applaud their and your hypocrisy?
It.is.not.your.money.brainiac.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Goldtop
Sounds like someone we would be disgusted by. I may know him.
Created:
-->
@linate
isn't it all about priorities? the funds i'm proposing are extremely minor in the bigger scheme of things.
All the priorities should be American.
we could probably even do things i'm proposing with the aid money we have now but only spent more wise..... i can't see a reason you'd oppose that?
I don't oppose that, as long as we've taken care of Americans first.
i guess you can legit argue we spend too much, but that doesn't mean we can't spend more on things that matter, or get spending better in line and then spend that aid money i'm proposing.
True, but we all know what things "matter" to liberals. Let's take care of Americans first and talk about the aid after.
society and a lot of us have decided that no every ill problem that affects the usa citizens needs to be addressed. so just because there will always be problems with our citizens doesn't mean we can't help other countries too. humanity doesn't have a border.... massive problems elsewhere trump more minor problems here.
Society has not decided this. We can take care of Americans first. If there is anything left over, sure help little Fatima. But not before.
Created:
-->
@ravensjt
Fake question.
Do you think that Americans should give no money to any foreign entities for charity, trade or any other reason until the needs of Americans are met"?
I win on the real question.
>Naw Bro, your deflecting via a "slipper slope", you know forwell that no Country has ever claimed to have "all their needs met"
Because there are always people like you who want to take their money and give it to others. Why?
>Mind you that we currently live in the richest, powerful most prosperous Country in the History of the World.... and you still are saying that all our needs arent being met!
Because there are people like you who take our money and give it to others. Why?
My complaint was that they should not be here at all. Anything after their illegality is moot
>Your from post #19:
Illegals should not be here in the first place. And talk about rose colored glasses! They are an overall drain on the economy through crime and social services.
Look at the first sentence again.
The only dissonance is from you trying to conflate taxation and socialism. And I am the one complaining that our tax dollars are being given to foreigners. It shouldn't be as long as there remain Americans in need.
>Taxation is taking money from everyone to help those less fortunate via Social Programs, Medicare etc......
That may be what you like to tell yourself, but that isn't what tax is. And some people in America are exempt from paying taxes.
>Socialism is just an economic system in which things are distributed through the State from everyone collectively.
Different from tax. Thank you.
>So yes, Taxation is a form of Socialism....
No sir, it isn't. It's a fake definition you use to introduce socialism to people who don't want it. Taxes pay the operating costs of a society, socialism redistributes wealth from people who are productive to people who leech off of society.
>Have you never seen who refuse to pay taxes use that exact argument? Wasn't this the exact reason many people claimed that President Obama was a Socialist?
He was. He wanted to take money not his, and give it to others not producing. And as you see, the people rejected that socialist nonsense.
You added in "and only". Why? America is making sacrifices now. So yes, I think Americans would be willing to do so.
>Because YOU said that nobody should be taken care of until all Americans are first.
That doesn't mean never sir. It means not until…
>Sounds ugly when you read it back doesnt it?
No. It sounds deceitful. I don't have to change what you say to make my point.
>And the "sacrifices" that America makes is exactly what you were complaining about!
Then it wasn't " giving" was it? It was trade, not charity. And let Americans themselves choose their sacrifices, not have liberals choose for them.
>Because you said you were against Imports (trade)
Untrue. I said many imports would not be needed if we got all Americans to work. I have no problem with imports or trade. I have a problem with liberals giving away the people's money to strangers when the people still have needs.
it's their money. They do not need to justify keeping their own money. They commit no crime in keeping their own money. No one else is entitled to their money. And as we kick out the liberals, more and more of the peoples money will stay with the people
Created:
Posted in:
It was you who said everyone runs away, not me. That was your observation. Think man.
Nobody wants to talk to you. Most think you are offensive. You are repeating your history here. Everyone else can't be the wrong. Just resist the urge to be vitriolic. Remember that Ram and Stronn will be your willows and Keith and survive your leaving.
Ask yourself, why do they all "run away"? It isn't your "cutting questions". I've asked you before, I'll ask again. Is this really how you want your life to be?
Really?
Created:
Posted in:
So the noob was right about pie. Came to the same conclusion as the big boys.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
How do you get drafter as town? You yes, drafter? No. Its been all about roles with him.
Drafter - Are you saying your state indicates what role you are? Post 76
Ethan - You know this. You want claims in case there are roles. You are scum.
Hammer – Yeah. VTL ethang. Post 79
Ethan - You want claims in case there are roles.
Drafter - Are you saying your state indicates what role you are?
Ethan - No. I'm saying, as scum you want to know who you can kill safely. Post 94
Budda- Drafter seems to haslve come out more aggressive in this game. But independent of that I really like how he RVS'd another player as oppose to joining the Pie wagon I tried starting. Post 99
inb4 the theme is states who voted for trump (town) vs those who voted for hillary (scum) post 126
Drafter - I'm being tongue-in-cheek. The theme could be anything.
Drafter - I think we at least need a role claim from ethan now. Post 176
Drifter - I'd like to see him role claim first. Post 194
See?
Created:
Posted in:
Really? Wait let me check to see if I confused you with budda.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
You are clearly not town because right from the start you were more interested in roles than states. And when you found out there were no roles, wanted everyone to claim.
why aren't you voting for me if you believe I am?
Because it would not be profitable. You have been gunning for me since the start. Voting for you now would only make you more determined to L me. No one is going to jump on the bandwagon of a noob. On that front, I'd lose to you.
I can only try to convince people that lynching a town is a bad move, and that you are too good a player to not know that. Do we have to lynch someone?
I'm just flabergastered that all the townies are quiet. I don't mean speaking up for me, but for the town. Where are the game players?
So some experienced player says "let's lynch" and you're instantly down?
He had to have gotten information about vanillas from someone.
Doesn't everyone know about vinallas?
Thanks for the unvote.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mopac
Everyone recoils at the stink, he never figures out he's the stink. Everyone else is the problem.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
But something of value will be gained by you and your scum partner.And nothing of value was lost.
Do you guys think of the wider game? Could Draft possibly want to L me and bring the ratio of town to scum to 2/5 just before NP?
All along he has been trying to know our roles, now that it's confirmed we have no roles, any townie is good for him. Danielle is next cause they know she's also town. At 2/3, scum wins. But wheeeee! The bandwagon ride was great!
Created:
Posted in:
- Illinois is an Indian name. I did not say supa said it. You assumed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
No. But things like that have to be considered in reads.
VTL PIE
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Buddamoose
And pie was so quiet at first. Some people trust in the mindless bandwagon.
So wait, why am I less likely to be Drafters partner/why is Pie more likely, if thats what the probability is referring to?
You and Drafter play to similarly. The chance that supa would have made both of you scum is low. Pie is a bandwagon type guy so you view him as on your side.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Plisken
Being called cute is not an insult
Please tell him. I haven't a clue why he'd take offense.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Because he isn't part of their clique.Why are we killing the new guy?
Created:
Posted in:
Pie is town, but if he isn't, he 83% likely to be drafter's scum partner. The percentage refers to the likelihood that he's drafters spare, not the likelihood that he's scum.
I can see some of you treat the game like you do the board. You like your board buds in the game, and vote out the people in the game who are not in your board clique. That's kinda weak.
In the end, you will see I was right about drafter. Pie is town but a follower, sure now. Hammer, I'm still not sure.
Created:
Posted in:
Its so easy to see drafter is not town.
GP is too hyper to be scum. Haven't heard from Danielle. Hammer is quiet, never seen him play so I don't know. He may be trying to coast under radar.
Pie is town. Budda is a hard read, but he seems a little different than his usual game.
Drafter is scum. Hammer or pie is the other.
Budda = 67%
Pie = 83%
Drafter, why should I not VTL you?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@disgusted
Are you still waiting on a ban list? Hehaw hehaw hehaw!
Created: