ethang5

Massive, massive ignorance and denial. Hilarious.

Never said anything of the sort

Denial of truth is your ego speaking and the greatest danger to humanity.

These are all repeatable experiments - and do not by any means postulate impossible conditions.

As a result they fully match any reasonable criterial you have for what is considered “science”.  

Science deals with what is possible. Life from non-life is not. It is actually science that tells us that life comes only from life.

No  one in this thread has called you either of those names 

You have Cletus. And you call others idiots and chimps. I have found that it is almost virtually morons alone who do that.

Are you asking me or telling me?

The  contradiction is that this so called "god" encouraged one person to touch him and disallowed another to touch him. 

The scripture mentions nothing about it being ok to do so later in the day.

The risen man was still  earthbound, he tells us he is not a spirit and he has obviously not descended at that time, as I am reasonably confident it would have been mentioned if he had "ascended to his father". 

If you believe it was somehow all to do with "time or timing" please provide us with the evidence.

Until then,  this still stands as yet another somewhat bias,anomalous contradiction, by these gospel writers.

It is interesting that both yourself and Mopac have different reasons for this anomalous contradiction.

Correct, but that's what science is: theories. We're talking about science, remember?

Science incorporates a variant of inductive logic known as abductive logic.

I'm open to alternative deductions. Do you have one?

I am simply noting we lack the requisite knowledge to rule out that it has happened or is happening with the level of certainty you display.

That's what's science is about, baby.

No, for this specific statement we were talking about laboratory conditions

Where's your zeus?

Probably in the same place your intelligence is.

Thousands of years multiplied by thousands of scholars has been indisputably refuted by some simpleton on the internet. HOORAH.

You fucking moron.

Reported. Thanks.

As per your and others usual, you offer no rational, logical common sense that invalidates any of my givens.

Your "givens" were off topic. You come onto threads and spout gibberish that make sense only to you. No one is interested in your manifesto. Make sense, or be prepared for people thinking you're a loon.

The "proto-chicken" is yours so the onus is on you, I've never mentioned a "proto-chicken".

I'm waiting.

So are we.

I made no claim that a chicken was created from nothing

Then explain where you think it came from.

Same to you. And please take idio-ump and any  other Trumpanzees with you.

Please learn the truth/facts in message #1 before you post in this thread again.

Your message #1 is idiotic nonsense, that is why you can't address criticism to it.

What difference does it make if parents are separated from their children at the border, or in Clarksville Tennessee? You seem to be only interested in alien children.

You are the very type of political correct doofus that caused the people to vote Trump into office. For you, America's money and land is for foreigners first. No wonder you're angry.

So no matter what stupidity you post, you aren't an American, and it is Americans who decide, not you, not the UN, and not mooching illegals. 

Trump and his supporters will stay here. You have to go. This isn't your country. And if you don't like who the American people choose as their leader, tough bananas. Your stupidity cannot change that.

But it does make us see why Trump is president and you're an illegal alien insisting that other people's money should be given to you. Trump is not an idiot because he won't let you freeload off America, but you are an idiot for demanding it.

Still as childish as ever. You do realize that's how children talk, E? Lol.

I do. I remember when you did that weird thing of posting the same "tell it to the tree" stupidity to every post to you. That was childish. You seem to have managed to keep the boy in you.

Good point.  I'd say abiogenesis is more of a hypothesis.

They believe it as if its fact though.

This aint complex..... If Blacks are in Power and the persecute Whites based off of their Race, then thats Racism    that includes but is not limited to South African Blacks.... does that obvious disclaimer make it more clear?

Yes, it does. Thanks. I knew I could not be wrong about you.

There is no scientific theory that suggests that life has always exists. We're talking about science, right?

You are now trying to ooze to "life always existing". Defend your claim. Abiogenesis has no scientific evidence at all. None. Theories do not mean the idea is true.

Plenty of scraps. At some point in Earth's history there wasn't life. At some point there was. Ergo life had to arise from non-life: abiogenesis. We're just working on the details.

I mentioned that creation Ex Nihilo is a form of abiogenesis. You said you didn't see how.

The only way to confirm that abiogenesis never happens in nature would be to have complete knowledge of everything going on in nature. No one has that.

Yep. And?

You are correct in that we have not figured out the exact scientific mechanisms under which abiogenesis happened. We're still looking.

We weren't talking about "instances in nature" we were talking about in experiments. No experiment has set up sustained fusion. Ergo, according to your logic, fusion is impossible.

No one asked you to post your ignorance of science here,....

Someone obviously asked you.

You should have declined.

It is not true nor false. It is just a hypothesis prone to speculation.

I think this hypothesis comes along with the evolution theory, mere spectulations.

Thank you. 

But for how long will they hold on to this groundless speculation? In 6,000 years there has been no evidence, and no instance in nature or the lab. Not one instance in recorded human history. Why?

It's baseless speculation. It certainly isn't science.

To believe in Abiogenesis and then worse yet to call it Science seems to be a claim of faith

The exact thing that Atheists ridicule Theists over

Thank you.

And both of us agree faith is normal, it just should not be presented as science.

Science leads to abiogenesis.

Lol. Without one scrap of evidence? When you wake up, look up real science.

Abiogenesis means "life from non-life". Creation Ex Nihilo means "creation from nothing." Nothing is non-life. Creation is life. Creation Ex Nihilo is a form of "life from non-life."

Simply put, we don't know that.

There certainly hasn't been a recorded instance of abiogenesis,.....

....but that doesn't mean it isn't happening.

The same could be said for sustainable fusion. I guess fusion doesn't exist either.

The alternative to abiogenisis is to say that life always existed, forever.

Even creation ex nihilo is a form of abiogenisis.

I don't see how. In 6,000 years of recorded human history, there has NEVER been a single instance of abiogenesis. Not a single one. NEVER. Every single time life has started, it has come from previous life.

Every single experiment trying to simulate early Earth conditions, or set up conditions for abiogenesis, to see if life can start spontaneously, has failed miserably. All of them.

South Africans slaughtering Whites because they are White is a myth put forth in the media

Now, to answer your question, If Blacks are in the position of power, and they use this position to exterminate Whites because they are White then of course thats racism

Well, even theists accept abiogenesis (which simply means life from non-life);

That is not just untrue, it is illogical. And I certainly don't accept it.

It seems to me you should address the illogical, evident-less, gibberish you "accept" rather than speculating on what theists believe.

Feel free to help out your friend and present any scientific evidence for abiogenesis you can find. I know from experience that he comes with only insults when asked for evidence of abiogenesis. He even dodged the simple question to his O.P.

I assumed you were refering to the land that was taken from them