Total posts: 5,875
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
None of that changes that her comment is as good as your declared opinion.
But notice she did not have a problem with your opinion, because she doesn't think her opinion should be truth for everyone else, like some do.
Created:
Lol. The genius killed his own thread by being a jerk to responders.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Or did you miss this entirely...
Nope. I'm just waiting for you to spam it several times as you will spam it repeatedly whether I respond to it or not.
After you get your spamming Jones out, I'll tell you it's disingenuous stupidity. But we're not there yet.
But I am wondering, how many people can a mental patient be obsessed with at one time?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
I didn't.
Was it my "declaration" that brought you here atheist?
And "crock of shite" is poor evidence.
It's as good as your declared opinion. Hmm hypocrite?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
It looks like it would be better if we stay on one topic because you lack basic reasoning.
I stayed on topic Cletus. You started yammering about dragons and killing sprees.
You might as well have just kept saying I’m wrong.
There was no need, you remained wrong.
If you have a question about my beliefs, just ask, instead of giving me the current militant atheist talking points about it and expecting me to know what you're blathering about.
Alright, I’m going to do you one better. I’m going to adopt a more logically consistent world view of yours and argue for it against yours.
??? Do you proof read your posts?
You would probably agree and accept what I’m about to say in different circumstances.Are you ready?
Sure.
Here we go:
Christianity begins with the creation of the universe. What's your religion that's older than that? You got a pre-big bang religion? Every other religion has logical errors.
Hasn’t Christianity always existed because God has always existed?
No. God is not synonymous with religion. God is superior to, and precedes, all.
So yes, I’m capable of fully understanding what people believe better than they do themselves.
Lol!! OK Jasper. Your IQ must be sky high.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
@Greyparrot
I think GP's point was that we get very little back for what we pay in taxes. For that, what we pay is pretty high. Most of our taxes are funneled to the bottom 45% of society.
,
Paying a higher rate in taxes because you make more IS regressive. It penalizes success, and encourages people to make less so that they pay less. We see this happening to the US right now. Our tax base is shrinking in relation to the total number of potential taxpayers even as total job numbers have increased.
Created:
-->
@Theweakeredge
Public school history should teach you what happened, not the morality of what happened. That is for ethics class. But today's public schools teach kids what happened from the point of view of liberalism.
Take WWII. I've seen schools that never teach that the Japanese attacked the US first. Only the destruction of the bomb, the suffering of the Japanese, and the moral question of whether dropping the bomb was needed.
I know high school kids who do not know what happened at Pearl Harbor, and could not tell you how many Americans were killed there. But they can give you details about the evils of dropping the bomb on Japan.
Ask any American public high school kid, how many times did the United States warn Japan and demand its surrender? You'll get blank stares.
So how is a public school student to know whether his education is correct or skewed? Here is a quick test. Find the biggest liberal and the biggest conservative in your society and find out what their answer would be to any given historical question studied at your school. Any school system that is 100% in agreement with either side is skewed.
In America today, we find that the history taught in public schools will be 100% endorsed by liberals. This tells us that what is being taught is not history, but propaganda.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
He would cherish it, but no addresses please.
Lol!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
Alright we’re now on the same page. So where’s the problem with “God sacrificed himself to himself to save us from himself.“?
God didn't sacrifice Himself TO Himself. Maybe you should explain that because it isn't in the bible. Further, God didn't save us FROM Himself. Maybe you should tell us where you got that because it isn't in the bible.
I don't agree with that. And you have not shown a logical error. The only thing you've shown so far is they you either don't know of what you speak, or you don't care if you lie. Either way you are less than logical.
Wait, you don’t agree there are older religions (than christianity) with logical errors which still have followers? Can you give reason?
Christianity begins with the creation of the universe. What's your religion that's older than that? You got a pre-big bang religion? Every other religion has logical errors.
Is that a truth you created?
No, it’s self-evident. When an entity has absolute power (omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence) it’s absolutely responsible.You don’t agree? Why?
Because I don't see how absolute responsibility can be self evident. I think it also depends on what this being with absolute power does that makes it absolutely responsible or not. It isn't absolutely responsible simply by existing.
Why would I lie to myself when tragedy happens? Oh, ah, you want me to take on your half-baked beliefs. No thanks.
My Life has meaning. It probably because I don't substitute my beliefs for reality. If you did that, you might find you life less meaningless.
Don’t conflate meaning for meaningfulness.
I said nothing about meaningfulness. I did not even use the word.
Yeah, If I didn’t have the dragon in my garage telling me not to murder, I would go on a killing spree.
Who would feed your dragon after you were arrested and jailed? Your dragon has vested interests in you not going on a killing spree.
That’s the same sentiment said by many abrahamic believers in debates. If that were true, they should keep believing. But sadly I think it’s not the case. I reckon it’s them just throwing a tantrum.
That probably made sense to you inside your head. But your comment was still wrong. Throw up a million tangents and you'll still be wrong. Now you're on dragons and killing sprees! You are aware that we cannot see inside your head right?
Can you please try giving reason for your beliefs instead of just saying I’m wrong.
All you've done is given us your beliefs, and then confuse them for mine.
Christians do not believe they would be immoral without God. We say morality would have no meaning without God. You seem not to be able to see the difference.
It's obvious that what you think is Christianity, is instead some gibberish you saw on some atheist website. We are currently correcting your beliefs, not stating mine.
If you have a question about my beliefs, just ask, instead of giving me the current militant atheist talking points about it and expecting me to know what you're blathering about.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Not by anyone under 35.
I am a Mrs. Ethan man. She's yummy!
And she's one of my proofs that there is a God!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
That is not to say, that what cannot be perceived is not of the same stuff as you and I.
Anyone can write stupidity.
If it is the same stuff as you and I, then it should be perceived. And remember I told you, no one is going to simply accept your pronouncements. You cannot royally declare evolution into existence.
Evolution has taken billions of years to create what a designer should be able to do in a day, or two.
Well close down the shop. It's been decided. Evolution is a fact! Zed says.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@janesix
I remember. Focus on your growth, not you past.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
You make a poor materialist then. They say that something that cannot be perceived, cannot exist.
Created:
I've been trained for people like you.
lol i wasn't aware that just lying and refusing to provide evidence for things required "training"
Do you often provide evidence for things you say you don't believe? D'oh!
You dodged every question I asked you hypocrite.
more lies. I responded to the relevant ones.
The gentle readers can see your dodge.
Your silly liberal belief that you decide what's relevant and what questions should be asked will suffer with me.
lol, your silly completely lacking beliefs have no idea what is relevant.
It will bug you to high heaven then that I will decide what is relevant and all you'll be able to do is yap at my heels.
no, your are the guy who spreads misinformation and baseless rumors on the internet.
And you're the SJW that's gonna correct that?
I can't prevent you spreading misinformation. I can however point out that is what you are doing.
Lol. You are inching towards the truth that you don't run anything. You keep "pointing out" Karen, and I will keep burning you. Deal?
You didn't ask me to back up anything moron. You told me not to ask questions. That is fascist.
I asked if you had any evidence to back up the conspiracy theory you were spreading.
And I told you it was idiotic to ask someone to provide evidence of something they have said they didn't believe. That took a while to get past your TDS.
You said you don't. see, I asked you if you could back it up. You couldn't.
Of course Jedthro. Why would you ask me to "back up" something I've told you I don't believe? You're still struggling with that one aren't you? Your IQ really isn't high enough for you to be this militant HB.
Now you are screaming and crying that you need to be allowed to spread lies without having it called out.
You've "called it out". Is your SJW Jones satisfied? You are exactly like those fascists uni BLM liberals stifling free speech but thinking they are "calling out" someone. It may take you a while, but you will see that stupidity is not s good tool.
I was the one attempting to validate information. You just wanted me to hush.
you validate information with research, not on a forum.
Stop deleting my replies if you are going to repost your comments. You validate research with questions. And SJW's get no respect.
Go do research and find out if you are right. If you are, come back and share it and we can talk about it. Until then you are just shamelessly spreading information which is very likely false.
No. I will do what I like, and reject your opinions as non-binding and worth less than a hill of beans. As I told you, when you get rid of the hypocrisy and hubris, you might get some respect. Till then, you will get treated like the fascist Karen you are.
I'm not a Jew. Your jackboots don't scare me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
So out of all of the responses - you ask me? LLOL! Wow I feel famous.
There is a word for it. Obsession.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@janesix
He cannot Jane. He is too invested in his materialistic worldview. He thinks that if he cannot perceive it, it cannot exist.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
You're one of those dweebs who make long goodbyes aren't you?
no, you just keep replying and lying so I respond to point out your lies. Stop responding with lies and we can end this.
I don't want to end anything. You first posted to me. I've been trained for people like you. You can't frustrate me, or scare me, or wear me down. I will entertain your stupidity for as long as you want.
You dodged every question I asked you hypocrite.
nope, just the ones that were unrelated since it is counter productive letting you side track a conversation.
Sure you did. I asked you if the link by death23 alleging the same thing I did was also a conspiracy theory. You ran like a thief.
Your silly liberal belief that you decide what's relevant and what questions should be asked will suffer with me.
we were discussing a specific topic. you brought up stuff that wasn't related to that topic. That has nothing to do with "liberal beliefs", just basic logic.
I decide for me what's relevant. I label my actions. Not you. You have no authority with me. Stop confusing fascism for logic.
Lol! I told you several times to take your fascism and go jump off a bridge. You mistook me for some Dweeb terrified of PC violations. I'm not that guy.
no, your are the guy who spreads misinformation and baseless rumors on the internet.
And you're the SJW that's gonna correct that?
When you get called out on it you cry about fascism and how anyone who asks you to back up your bullshit with actual facts is a fascist.
You didn't ask me to back up anything moron. You told me not to ask questions. That is fascist. Plus, I was not advancing a theory stupid, I was asking if it was true. Why would you need to ask me to back up something I had said I did not believe? I've asked you to stop being stupid. Perhaps you aren't being stupid deliberately.
You assumed I was spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories on the internet.
you have admitted that you were spreading shit that you have absolutely no supporting evidence for. I'm not assuming anything. you have admitted to it.
No sir. You're just you suffering from TDS and think you can intimidate me. You can't. What I admitted was that you are an idiot. I did admit that.
I was the one attempting to validate information. You just wanted me to hush.
validating information is done with research. not by spreading rumors on a forum.
Validating information is done with questions. I am not obligated to follow your wants snowflake, and your opinion is not fact. No matter your butthurt, I will not do what you want.
I understand that you are unfamiliar with the concept of actually researching things before you spread them, but it is something you should work on.
I may later, right now I'm working on you loser. Your silly little liberal policeman act will fail with me. You have zero integrity and zero authority. If you search, you might find you have a life somewhere. Go to it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Why are atheists always quoting the bible? Do they ever read anything else?
Stephen, it's obvious you're a sad person in a lot of pain. I really hope you find some peace. Your suffering is almost palpable.
Created:
You're one of those dweebs who make long goodbyes aren't you?
You dodged every question I asked you hypocrite.
your questions were mostly off topic and dumb. I answered the ones that were in any way relevant to this conversation.
Your silly liberal belief that you decide what's relevant and what questions should be asked will suffer with me. You couldn't answer my questions because you thought not responding would hide your hypocrisy. It didn't.
Lol! I told you several times to take your fascism and go jump off a bridge. You mistook me for some Dweeb terrified of PC violations. I'm not that guy.
I asked you why you were spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories on the internet. You responded by calling any attempt to validate information as fascism.
You assumed I was spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories on the internet. You assumed this because you are a partisan hack suffering from TDS. When I asked you if the link offered by Death23 was also spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories on the internet, you ran away.
I was the one attempting to validate information. You just wanted me to hush. That, my SJW friend, is fascism. I never allow leftest goons to intimidate me or shut me down.
Have you now found a point continuing this with me? You run nothing. No one has to do, believe, or abide by the dumb stuff you say. Your opinions about conspiracy theories are just that, your opinions.
When you lose the hypocrisy and hubris, I'll give you more respect. Till then, you know what you can do with your cancel culture. Hint: The sun doesn't shine there.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Tradesecret
You confessed ignorance however is not a hinderance from anyone else expressing an opinion.
- To Stephen
He thinks it should be.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
Isn’t God synonymous with the trinity? God is the amalgamation of the three, correct?
I don't know what you mean, but your comment was wrong. Each person in the trinity is not ⅓ God, with the 3 adding up to one. Each person in the trinity is fully God in Hinself., yet they make one God.
Don’t worry, there are far older religions with logical errors which are still around today.I assume you would agree with that. If so, why am I not surprised?
I don't agree with that. And you have not shown a logical error. The only thing you've shown so far is they you either don't know of what you speak, or you don't care if you lie. Either way you are less than logical.
With absolute power comes absolute responsibility.
Is that a truth you created?
God is omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient, correct?
And immutable and eternal.
When a tragedy happens all you need to tell yourself is, it’s part of God’s plan.
Why would I lie to myself when tragedy happens? Oh, ah, you want me to take on your half-baked beliefs. No thanks.
To be fair it doesn’t have to be a tragedy, yet it becomes meaningless all the same.
My. Life has meaning. It probably because I don't substitute my beliefs for reality. If you did that, you might find you life less meaningless.
If God exists, he would not care in the slightest.
Tell us more O great oracle of God.
Well I guess it depends.
On your magic 8 ball? How the tea leaves fell? The pain in your joints?
OT God was pretty troubled relative to the NT.
That probably made sense to you inside your head. But your comment was still wrong. Throw up a million tangents and you'll still be wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Nope. Jesus is dead.
History is littered with the dweebs who thought this.
He is alive Z-man. Alive and in charge.
Maybe Mr J, might get in touch.....Miracles happen don't they?
It wouldn't be a miracle, it would just be a kept promise.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Whoooooooooosh!!!
Don't bother looking up. It passed you by already.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Jesus didn't just "think" He was God. He IS God. As His resurrection attests. But notice that 2,000 years later, Jesus isn't on Amy Z-man forum yakking about you.
Hmm? We all have fixations, true. But some fixations are much less healthy than others.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Too vulnerable on the "atheist on religion board" charge to want to go near fixation, eh? I can't blame you.
Many fixations are normal. Most men are fixated on a certain part of the female anatomy. Most people are fixated on money, for example. But being fixated on trees? Is that not a little weird?
Not just liking trees, but being fixated on them, seeing yourself as a kind of tree. I think it a key to his mental issues.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Yeah. He does seem to have a tree fixation. Wonder how ties into his early childhood trauma that set his obsession and compulsion in motion?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
The Bible was and still is an ongoing mish mash of translation and reinterpretation.....
The bible isn't. And never was. Your opinion is not truth.
Who knows what was chiselled onto those first tablets of stone?
Many know. We know because of how the bible came to be. Which of course accounts for why the bible has been so persuasive to so many cultures and ethnicities over the years.
And Jesus wasn't GOD....Only a representative of GOD......
Jesus said He was God. And I hold Him as far more credible than you.
Worshipping Jesus as such is just the Christian way of doing things....Just like Catholics have their GOD proxy....Saves bothering GOD directly I suppose.
Catholics also believe Jesus is God. Perhaps you are confusing doctrines?
At least Syrian Jihadists worship the big fella.
Those who worship God must do so in spirit and truth. This is what God Himself says. So you can pick out any group you like and slap on them the label "worshipping the big fella", and it will carry no more weight than your uninformed opinion.
God is a person, not a concept, or a formula, or an algorithm. A person, as such, He is distinct, not interchangeable with others. But I do agree that you and Syrian Jihadists worship the same person.
You will say you worship no one, but we both know that is untrue.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Sorry, since you seem to think you can skip my questions and just keep expecting your questions to be answered, I need to alert you to a basic truth. If you don't answer my questions, don't bother asking me any of your own.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Indeed your own scriptures point to and highlight your own dirty hypocrisy.
Yet its the worst book ever written!
One would think, if atheists think the bible is so evil, they would cheer on a theist who went against it. But noooo. At those times the bible is the height of morality. Just let the theist start following it again, and the non-hypocritical atheist will immediately condemn him for following that most evil of books.
I have come to realize that the truest sign of the Antichrist is incoherency, not meanness.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
Do you conduct any introspection?
I didn't need to. This isn't guessing or based on feelings. This fact.
How am I ignorant in this regard?
Allow me to show you. You said...
God sacrificed himself to himself to save us from himself.
The father is not the son, who in turn is not the Holy Spirit, who in turn is not the Father. God did not "sacrificed himself to himself to save us from himself". The only people who say this are either dishonest people trying to take a shot at Christianity, or ignorants who actually are dense enough to think they have found a logical error after billions of people missed it for 2,000 years.
And God is not saving us from Himself. That is like a little child telling the parent they could just overlook that he's taking drugs and skip the correction and the problem would disappear. Either dishonest or ignorant.
Then you reached a psychological conclusion based on the stupidity you posted!
Seems like God has a psychological complex or it’s just bronze/Iron age peasants projecting their wishes onto a god figure.
My guess, based on years of experience with militant online atheists, is that you are not ignorant, you're dishonest. You know your comment is not a true representation of Christian doctrine, but you will throw away your integrity for a cheap shot at God. But I could be wrong.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Did I say anything about the three-fifths clause?
From Wikipedia...
In the slave societies of the Americas, a quadroon or quarteron was a person with one quarter African and three quarters European ancestry (or in Australia, one quarter aboriginal ancestry).
Similar classifications were octoroon for one-eighth black (Latin root octo-, means "eight") and hexadecaroon for one-sixteenth black.
America's answer to the question 'Who is black?" has long been that a black is any person with any known African black ancestry. This definition reflects the long experience with slavery and later with Jim Crow segregation. In the South it became known as the "one-drop rule,'' meaning that a single drop of "black blood" makes a person a black. It is also known as the "one black ancestor rule," some courts have called it the "traceable amount rule," and anthropologists call it the "hypo-descent rule," meaning that racially mixed persons are assigned the status of the subordinate group.
This definition emerged from the American South to become the nation's definition, generally accepted by whites and blacks. Blacks had no other choice. As we shall see, this American cultural definition of blacks is taken for granted as readily by judges, affirmative action officers, and black protesters as it is by Ku Klux Klansmen.
It should now be apparent that the definition of a black person as one with any trace at all of black African ancestry is inextricably woven into the history of the United States. It incorporates beliefs once used to justify slavery and later used to buttress the castelike Jim Crow system of segregation.
Developed in the South, the definition of "Negro" (now black) spread and became the nation's social and legal definition. Because blacks are defined according to the one-drop rule, they are a socially constructed category in which there is wide variation in racial traits and therefore not a race group in the scientific sense. However, because that category has a definite status position in the society it has become a self-conscious social group with an ethnic identity.
The one-drop rule has long been taken for granted throughout the United States by whites and blacks alike, and the federal courts have taken "judicial notice" of it as being a matter of common knowledge. State courts have generally upheld the one-drop rule, but some have limited the definition to one thirty-second or one-sixteenth or one-eighth black ancestry, or made other limited exceptions for persons with both Indian and black ancestry.
The judge in the Dredd Scott case referenced this "rule" from legal publications and past court judgements.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
You dodged every question I asked you hypocrite.
There is no point in continuing this with you.
Lol! I told you several times to take your fascism and go jump off a bridge. You mistook me for some Dweeb terrified of PC violations. I'm not that guy.
Go peddle your SJW shlock somewhere else.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
The atheist again quotes the bible as the touchstone of morality.
But at other times, it's the very penwork of Satan.
Go figure.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
Lol. We've seen it more recently right here in this Kingdom Castin. Remember this?
Related to the OP, Speedrace and I have made the decision to begin locking new threads created by already banned users. This is in accordance with the CoC as per the invented actions clause.
- Ragnar
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@janesix
Good catch! I thought of a post detailing how many different ways he has misspelled a single word, but decided it wouldn't be funny enough. The great thing is that he MUST stay in character after he's busted, but his compulsion forces him to keep posting. So he can be tossed repeatedly and he just has to keep coming back.
Until mods.
Until mods.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RoderickSpode
Yeah, he can't keep in the character 100%. When he gets excited, he slips.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Please stop being stupid. I did not say I believed it. I said I did not know if it was true, and I had no reason as yet to believe or deny it. How is it not true? I tell you I don't believe it and you use your magic 8-ball to find the truth?
I already explained this.
As have I. Why are you repeating stupidity?
It is an internet rumor with no evidence.
I noted that.
This is a very good reason to not believe it.
No one has said they believe it.
If it is a rumor on the internet and doesn't have any evidence, as rule, don't believe it.
Go and repeat that to someone who has not repeatedly told he does not believe it. That is what I mean by, "stop being stupid".
it is an internet rumor with no evidence. That is a very good reason not to believe it.
Which is why I said I didn't believe it genius.
Then why are you continuing to spread something that is very likely not true?
Spreading rumors is your deranged take. And also I have free speech, even when the fascist in you doesn't like it.
What happens on Jan 12th?
not totally sure what you are referring to. Biden has already been legally confirmed as the winner.
You and Biden were calling him " president-elect" and "winner" long before the states certified their results, so your mention of certification here is deceitful.
The Mueller report found no collusion with Russia.
no. it found they colluded with lots of russians. Just nothing criminal.
Collusion would be criminal for a president Cletus. And you charged a criminal act.
You just listed them shemp. The Mueller report found no collusion with Russia.
that is a lie.
The collusion found was in the democratic party and the fake Steele dossier.
The Senate quashed the bogus impeachment
they blocked it based on partisan grounds. How does that matter?
They quashed a partisan impeachment because there was no evidence of any criminality.
Biden is now listed in a criminal indictment in [Ukraine] (edited later)
lol no. but trump is. You remember when michael cohen went to jail and trump was listed as a co-conspirator they couldn't charge? That protection ends in january.
Untrue. Biden is listed right now.
I notice you stay away from Kavenaugh. Are you ashamed of your hypocrisy in that case?
I didn't spread conspiracies' about kavenaugh. I didn't answer it because it didn't make sense.
Did you think he was guilty?
Facts do not care about your feelings Karen.
true.
Then stop whining crocodile tears about conspiracy theories and repeating things I've told you are not true. I don't care about your feelings either.
I will treat your fake president-elect just as respectfully as you treated my President these last 4 years. Deal with it.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
...included, under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States. On the contrary, they were at that time [of America's founding] considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them.
... They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order ... and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.
— Dred Scott, 60 U.S. at 404–05
— Dred Scott, 60 U.S. at 407.
Created:
-->
@Death23
Your source referred to the phone call thing as "a completely unsubstantiated, bogus story". I think that's harsher than I would have put it lol.
The harshness doesn't bother me if the journalist is objective.
I mean, I at least remain open to the possibility that it could be true (even though I think it's unlikely to be true).
I am, but HB has a serious problem with being natural until information justifies belief or dismissal. In his due process free liberal world, anything remotely beneficial to democrats is a conspiracy theory that should not be spoken about.
Roberts is not the only jurist to have said improper and disparaging things about Trump, so this story is not as difficult to believe as the MSM will paint it. I would like to see the chief Justice deny the charge that he is the "John Roberts" on the Epstein pedo-jet.
Created:
Posted in:
On the 15th is was 9 threads on the first page of the religion board.
On the 19th is was 11 threads on the first page of the religion board.
Today, the 20th it is 13 threads on the first page of the religion board!
There are 25 threads per page. One is pinned.
Fully 52% of the threads on the religion board is by a single poster.
When and where have we seen this before?
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Please stop being stupid. I did not say I believed it. I said I did not know if it was true, and I had no reason as yet to believe or deny it.
you keep saying that, but that isn't true.
How is it not true? I tell you I don't believe it and you use your magic 8-ball to find the truth?
it is an internet rumor with no evidence. That is a very good reason not to believe it.
Which is why I said I didn't believe it genius.
You call it a conspiracy theory. But you aren't anyone's standard. I remember you said no one had said Hunter Biden had committed any crime, yet he was under federal investigation.
ok. and that investigation has yet to say that he has committed a crime. So i am correct. No one has said hunter has committed a crime.
If no one had said that, he would not be under investigation. The fact is, you don't know everything, and your bias is not fact. You were wrong.
You heard a thing that has no basis in reality as far as you know and you are proceeding to spread it.
Sorry Adolph, I live in a country that honors free speech.
lol you are spreading baseless rumors, not fighting for rights. Calm yourself.
You call it baseless. We don't know that yet, so we suspend belief till we get information. You wish to stifle my right to ask questions. I am resisting your fascism.
Shit like that is why so many people think there was fraud in the election, even though no one can find any evidence.
Like no one could find any crime Hunter Biden had done? Being obtuse to the evidence doesn't make it disappear.
there has been over 50 lawsuits...
Running away from the Hunter Biden case now?
now as well as investigations by multiple law enforcement agencies and virtually all cases were thrown out or withdrawn because there was no evidence. I am not making it disappear, it doesn't exist. Or if it does, no one has found it.
Sort of like how the Supreme Court found Africans to be only 1/16th a man?
It's the 20th of December and Biden is still not confirmed, maybe the issue is your eyesight and not the visibility of the evidence.
what? yes he has. The states have all certified their results and the electoral college has confirmed Joe Biden. what fantasy world do you live in that those things didn't happen?
What happens on Jan 12th?
You are pathetic. You spent the last 2 years spreading baseless conspiracy theories online about Trump, but all of a sudden, you have integrity?
what conspiracies did i spread exactly? I'm pretty sure most of the stuff I have said about trump has been confirmed.
Of course you do. Why do you think its called derangement?
I said he had contacts to russia he lied about, confirmed. I said he was corrupt and trying to use his office to personally profit, confirmed. I said he tried to get a foreign leader to spread misinformation about joe biden, confirmed. So what are these "conspiracy theories" I spread?
You just listed them shemp. The Mueller report found no collusion with Russia. The Senate quashed the bogus impeachment, and Biden is now listed in a criminal indictment in Ukraine.
And even if I had (which I did not), you think that excuses you spreading bullshit on the internet?
No, but it sure makes you not able to ooze up to me talking about spreading rumors and sticking to reality. Your hypocrisy stinks to high heaven.
I notice you stay away from Kavenaugh. Are you ashamed of your hypocrisy in that case?
Is the story in Death23's link spreading a conspiracy theory? Why not?
Facts do not care about your feelings Karen.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
I think original sin is an unjust doctrine.
I agree. But I agree also because the bible says it is untrue and unjust.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
How does the old saying go? God sacrificed himself to himself to save us from himself.Seems like God has a psychological complex or it’s just bronze/Iron age peasants projecting their wishes onto a god figure.
Or that you are ignorant of Christian doctrine and wish us to know you are ignorant. Either or.
Created:
Posted in:
I wouldn’t nuke Africa, as this is a painful way to die, but those who are being shot should have a say in the matter.
Would you ask whether they would like to be shot? Will you also have an answer if one of them asked you where your authority to shoot them comes from?
I don’t know a better way to get Africa free or relatively free of its suffering. I think trade could work to some extent.
Lol. If I posted my actual response here, I'd be justifiably banned.
When I lived in Africa, believe it or not, some white people actually suggested similar to the "non-suffering" Africans there! And were befuddled at their negative reaction.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Trying to debate with you about what the bible says would be silly, not only because you don't know what the bible says, but also because you think you do.
Created:
-->
@Death23
Thanks for the link D23, but was that supposed to be journalism? It was more like a hit piece. No wonder it said at the end of the article,
This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.
Your source, the Abrams Media Network was founded by Dan Abrams. He is also the Chief Legal Affairs Anchor for ABC News, served as the General Manager of MSNBC and most recently was the co-anchor of “Nightline” on ABC News.
I wish you had found a more object source. Here is an example of what I mean,
Though the author concedes there were many more posts which were receptive to what the rumour alleges, he sought out and printed only the negative reaction to Wood’s tweets!
Rather than telling us what the story is, the author's intent seems to be to attack Lin Wood. He fails to even mention where the story about the Supreme Court Staffer originates.
Here is the same story done without the over the top bias of the MSM and with a focus on the story instead of attacking a person.
I wonder if HB calls either of these 2 articles "spreading rumors"?
Created: