Total posts: 5,875
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
Let's be factual and constant.
Thank you. Let's be.
3RU7AL will say what a woman does with her body is a matter of privacy when it comes to abortion, but suddenly and inexplicably, it isn't a matter of privacy when it comes to drug addiction.
Or that the concept of privacy can apply to a woman, but not to a country.
How do you argue with someone whose argument encompasses both A and not A? And he is totally blind to the contradiction?
Created:
Posted in:
Bertrand Russell was a 4 times married liberal pacifist who had to concede he was wrong about his opposition to fighting Hitler in WWII. Some thinker. Is it any wonder then that he irrationally concluded that God would be "offended" by those who doubt His existence?
Russell, like Pythagoras and Plato before him, believed that there existed a realm of truth that, unlike the messy contingencies of the everyday world of sense-experience, was immutable and eternal.
This realm was accessible only to reason, and knowledge of it, once attained, was not tentative or corrigible but certain and irrefutable. Logic, for Russell, was the means by which one gained access to this realm, and thus the pursuit of logic was, for him, the highest and noblest enterprise life had to offer.
Faith, it seems, was not alien to Russell.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@mustardness
Just as I thought, you aren't any kind of authority on women, medicene, or science. Who gave you the authority to speak for them? Or decide when a human is a person? Or tell me what to do?
Who are you? Just some poor spelling antifa on the net.
Away with you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@David
Wow. You're still adding members? No response on the Ram ringer charge?
Here is another funny thing Virt. In post one you list Ram as a member of the group. But you invite him in post 2. He only accepts in post 3. Are your posts chronological?
I think blamonkey is a decent guy, I hope he doesn't get used by the "club".
Created:
Posted in:
What people reject is the idea of a Creator who demands morality from His creation. Rather than struggle against a guilty conscience, some people reject the idea of God altogether.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Really? Are pedos a big thing in Hollywood?Hollywood is for the pervs and the pedos.
Created:
Posted in:
It used to be Nokia, then it was the blackberry, then Motorola, then Samsung, now Iphones. It's all fad. Followers mindlessly doing what their peers are doing. What will it be in 5 years?
What causes this lemming behavior in people? What is the need to be like everyone else and have what they have?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
That is correct. You aren't unrighteous because you're an atheist. Only one person is righteous, and every one else who gains righteousness gets it from Him through imputation. Even Christians. Atheists are unrighteous because they don't know, and deny, the only one who is righteous.
Created:
Ask him if he believes that theists live their lives governed by delusion and superstition,...
Of course I believe that. I fail to see how an atheist can see theism as anything other than a delusion and superstition
However that doesn't mean I consider individual theists to be deluded or superstitious
i think theists are mistaken - I don't think they are idiots.
White man speak with forked tongue. My goodness you are dishonest!
Created:
my question was post (1) - "Did Jesus even predict that he would be dead for three days"?
Yes He did.
does JESUS say he will be dead for three days, you clown?
Insulting people will not make you correct. Sure Jesus did.
I have said this is the gospel writer telling us what Jesus meant by - destroying a temple and rebuilding it - and not jesus himself
Jesus wrote none of the bible homer. ALL of it is the gospel writer telling us what Jesus said and meant. Buy a clue.
The people recording the story all think Jesus was talking about His body, so do all the writers of the epistles.
With so many saints against you,
No. it is just the one gospel writer named John who is telling us this. Name one and prove it.
Ok. Matthew, Mark, Luke, Peter, Paul, Timothy, and Titus all tell us this too.
I have not ranted.
Shouting in all caps, bolding and underlining, and insulting people is ranting homer.
It is only my opinion
Then you are a clown and a fool for insulting people because they disagree with what you concede is only your opinion.
Nothing "vulgar" about what I write
vulgar
/ˈvʌlɡə/
adjective
- 1.lacking sophistication or good taste.synonyms:tasteless, gross, crass, unrefined, tawdry,
2. coarse and rude.
synonyms:
rude, indecent, indelicate, offensive, distasteful, obnoxious
Almost everything you write is vulgar. You are a vulgar person.
...they see only one clown. Only one fool.
And who would that be?
Ask the posters. Already the mod has warned you. Keep going unchanged and he will have no choice but to ban you. If that what you want, go ahead.
I can and do beat you without calling you a clown or a fool. I don't have to. You are vulgar because you have to be.
Created:
Ask him if he believes that theists live their lives governed by delusion and superstition,...And I wasn't sure if keith was being serious.
EtrnlVw said nothing about the atheist's state of mind. Ole slick just wanted to add that in. Serious or not, he believes it.
Created:
Posted in:
A state where women are divided based on beauty. At the age of 12, ugly girls are sent to cook, clean, and a few sent to make babies. Beautiful girls are reserved for the sexual pleasure of men.
Girls will be allotted to men based on the merit of men. The least beautiful of the beautiful girls will be awarded to lower class men on a lottery system.
At the age of 35, all women will be relegated to cooking and cleaning, with termination at age 85. Except for the top men, all men will be terminated at the age of 65.
Beautiful women will have a life of ease. Everything will be provided for them. Their only obligation will be to service the men they have been awarded to. Refusal will not be an option.
Men will be divided on the bases of intelligence. Stupid men will do manual labor. Smart men will become leaders. No voting or democracy. Position, status, and careers will be awarded soon after birth and are unchangeable.
There will be no marriage. Schools will segregated by gender. Murder, rape, assault, fraud, and theft will be punishable by death for anyone above the age of 16, except for the most beautiful women. They will be relegated to sexual pleasure for middle management men.
That would be a Utopian state.
Created:
Posted in:
A state where women are divided based on beauty. At the age of 12, ugly girls are sent to cook, clean, and a few sent to make babies. Beautiful girls are reserved for the sexual pleasure of men.
Girls will be allotted to men based on the merit of men. The least beautiful of the beautiful girls will be awarded to lower class men on a lottery system.
At the age of 35, all women will be relegated to cooking and cleaning, with termination at age 85. Except for the top men, all men will be terminated at the age of 65.
Beautiful women will have a life of ease. Everything will be provided for them. Their only obligation will be to service the men they have been awarded to. Refusal will not be an option.
Men will be divided on the bases of intelligence. Stupid men will do manual labor. Smart men will become leaders. No voting or democracy. Position, status, and careers will be awarded soon after birth and are unchangeable.
There will be no marriage. Schools will segregated by gender. Murder, rape, assault, fraud, and theft will be punishable by death for anyone above the age of 16, except for the most beautiful women. They will be relegated to sexual pleasure for middle management men.
That would be a Utopian state.
Created:
Can the expression of controversial political ideas threaten another's safety?
No.
Why or why not?
Because the expression of controversial political ideas is a 1st amendment right.
This is a serious question.
I believe you are serious, but the question isn't.
Created:
Well as you might know, I have a huge heart for atheists and that has always been my motivation for sharing in these forums.
I'd say Disgused has a huge heart for theists which is his 'motivation for sharing in these forums'.
OK so far, we'll overlook you streeeetching the meaning of "sharing"....
This...
It pains him that theists live their lives governed by delusion and superstition,...
Here is where you prove the old saying...
Conservatives think liberals are stupid
Liberals think Conservatives are evil.
The definition of being governed by delusion and superstition is the behavior of bully, (and you in this post).
Created:
It's temp. But how many think bully will come back changed?
Notice willows', hari's and goldy's account have been unlocked.
Vagabond, bully's original account, is also active.
Created:
what have I changed, you clown?
Well, for one you've tried to change me into a clown. You try that because your argument is loony. That is why you feel you have to do it. Calling people clowns only makes you look like an idiot.
...these are not Jesus' words are they you absolute fool.
The question is to what Jesus was talking about. His meaning. The people recording the story all think Jesus was talking about His body, so do all the writers of the epistles.
With so many saints against you, and no logic supporting you, you have no choice but to rant out, calling people fools and clowns. All of it is just your opinion.
As people read your vulgar rants, they see only one clown. Only one fool.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@keithprosser
Wow Keith. Another person pegging you dead to rights.I see you're another one of those useless people who rely on semantics to make a point.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
Yes you have.
You had to to advance your loony argument.
Created:
Does anyone here think it is a coincidence that all 4 trolls from DDO have gotten banned here?
Or that few are surprised, and many predicted?
If you disagree, DDO is still there. Willows and the moron hari are still there spamming a dead board. Join them. There are absolutely no rules or moderation. Be there and be happy.
Created:
How literate would you think a person was who professed to find nothing worthy about "War and Peace"?
How literate would you think a person was who professed to find nothing worthy about Shakespeare?
Or the Taj Mahal? Or the Moon Landings? Or Beethoven?
Can you imagine a person who questioned the refreshing quality of water and dismissed the billions claiming to be refreshed by it?
Would you debate or dismiss him?
Created:
Posted in:
Both Psalm 14:1 and Psalm 53:1 read, “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God.’”
Some take these verses to mean that atheists are stupid, i.e., lacking intelligence. However, that is not the only meaning of the Hebrew word translated “fool.” In this text, the Hebrew word is nabal, which often refers to an impious person who has no perception of ethical or religious truth.
The meaning of the text is not “unintelligent people do not believe in God.” Rather, the meaning of the text is “sinful people do not believe in God.” In other words, it is a wicked thing to deny God, and a denial of God is often accompanied by a wicked lifestyle.
The verse goes on to list some other characteristics of the irreligious: “They are corrupt; their deeds are vile; / there is no one who does good.” Psalm 14 is a study on the universal depravity of mankind.
Many atheists are very intelligent. It is not intelligence, or a lack thereof, that leads a person to reject belief in God. It is a lack of righteousness that leads a person to reject belief in God.
Many people do not object to the idea of a Creator, as long as that Creator minds His own business and leaves them alone. What people reject is the idea of a Creator who demands morality from His creation. Rather than struggle against a guilty conscience, some people reject the idea of God altogether. Psalm 14:1 calls this type of person a “fool.”
Created:
Posted in:
Both Psalm 14:1 and Psalm 53:1 read, “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God.’”
Some take these verses to mean that atheists are stupid, i.e., lacking intelligence. However, that is not the only meaning of the Hebrew word translated “fool.” In this text, the Hebrew word is nabal, which often refers to an impious person who has no perception of ethical or religious truth.
The meaning of the text is not “unintelligent people do not believe in God.” Rather, the meaning of the text is “sinful people do not believe in God.” In other words, it is a wicked thing to deny God, and a denial of God is often accompanied by a wicked lifestyle.
The verse goes on to list some other characteristics of the irreligious: “They are corrupt; their deeds are vile; / there is no one who does good.” Psalm 14 is a study on the universal depravity of mankind.
Many atheists are very intelligent. It is not intelligence, or a lack thereof, that leads a person to reject belief in God. It is a lack of righteousness that leads a person to reject belief in God.
Many people do not object to the idea of a Creator, as long as that Creator minds His own business and leaves them alone. What people reject is the idea of a Creator who demands morality from His creation. Rather than struggle against a guilty conscience, some people reject the idea of God altogether. Psalm 14:1 calls this type of person a “fool.”
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Wylted
Now we know.....such as growing up in a predominantly black neighborhood and school
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FaustianJustice
I would like to expose the liberal thinking hidden in this post. Observe
So let them in and then deny them jobs?
If that happened in the first place, they wouldn't keep coming.
That was my point. But liberals never think of that.
Supply and demand is always at play.
So?
Some one is supplying jobs. Some one is paying under the table.
How do you know? This smells a lot like "Occupy Stupidity", a conspiracy theory that the rich are out to get us.
Some one is giving people motivation to come here.
Yeah. Liberals.
Its really easy to harp on sanctuary cities when Perdue and Tyson pretty much have established their own bank to settle up with illegals on pay day.
Cities have many more people than banks. Again, this smells a lot like "Occupy Stupidity", a conspiracy theory that the rich are out to get us.
ICE literally cuts deals with certain ag suppliers to take only a percentage of their labor force on any given raid.
How do you know this? And if you are correct, why are you against the law being enforced?
Its almost like people are trying to keep the price of food unrealistically low, for some reason. Hm.
So, the majority of citizens who want illegal immigration stopped, don't like low food prices? But the omnibenevolent government is fighting to keep them fed? Against the evil banks and evil ICE?
You think Americans would starve without immigration. You love immigration, but still condemn the rich whom you say bring them in. You want no borders, and no ICE, but I bet you still want the big govt to collect our money to support all the illegals that will pour over the invisible border.
Gentle Reader, can you smell the liberal stink running throughout this post posing as reason?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@linate
If Canada wanted, yes!
If Americans were pouring into Canada being less educated, with a culture of poverty and crime, sucking up their resources, yes!
But you aren't thinking. The situation is different between the US and Canada. Do you think we're simply advocating walls because there is a border there? Does it not occur to you that we are addressing the particular situation between Mexico and America?
If you do then how can you say something as stupid as, "by your logic canada should build a wall to keep out americans"? Are Americans flooding into Canada? Are they illegally staying? Are they taxing the Canadian health system? Going on welfare in Canada? Do Americans have a 3rd world culture different from Canada?
Please, if you will not think, don't post to me. Yeesh.
Created:
Posted in:
Yes.mexicans coming here are criminals?
actually, they commit less crime than most americans
So many answers.
1. So we should add criminals because the ones we have are worse? This is a brain dead argument.
2. Lie, when you say "most Americans", you are including the millions of illegal criminals already let in by liberals.
3. So what? Any crime should disqualify them. Any.
the wall makes sense?
Yes. Perfect sense.
if we really wanted to stop them from stealing jobs, we'd enforce the rules about not hiring immigrants.
So let them in and then deny them jobs? How about not letting them in, in the first place? Makes too much sense eh? I bet you want the govt to give free money to all those illegals who can't work.
Is thinking really so hard for liberals?
Created:
Lol.Your ignorance offends me.
Created:
-->
@keithprosser
He was downright stupid. Why could he not see what Churchill clearly saw? Why was he so wrong about the nature of Hitler?....perhaps he was not wrong to risk anything to avoid it.
Because liberals see what they want to see. Rather than reality about Hitler, Chamberlain saw his own PC nonsense. Imagine if there was no Churchill at that moment?
At the same time, the moron liberals in France were squabbling over nonsense about how war was evil. And when Hitler came, they folded like the idiots they were.
Similar things are unfolding now here. As a herd of criminal peasants descend upon us, liberals are babbling about nonsense. Thank God for Churchi....sorry, ....I mean Trump.
Created:
Posted in:
Never surrender your hopes and dreams to the fateful limitations others have placed on their own lives.
-Anthon St. Maarten
Created:
-->
@keithprosser
The British would have lost a war that began in 1937 or 1938
Untrue. Hitler, from his own dairies knew that before 1940, Germany was not ready for England. Worse, liberal Chamberlain did nothing when Poland was attacked, and refused to take the needed preparation measures to save Finland though Churchill warned him over and over.
Chamberlain did not get a bad rap. He himself admitted he had been wrong in all that he believed. He was a liberal, we could have told him that. This is one of the many instances in history where we see concrete, real, evidence that liberalism doesn't work in the real world, and conservatism did.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Plisken
I hope you don't feel bound to conversation.
No. I was not speaking to you when you barged into my thread. And I have no clue why you keep posting to me when it should be obvious to you that your cry for attention is not welcome.
No need to block you. I'll just place you in the obsessive ignore bin.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@mustardness
You aren't any kind of authority on women, medicene, or science. Who gave you the authority to speak for them? Or decide when a human is a person? Or tell me what to do?
Away with you.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Plisken
I will consider doing what you want "in the future". But don't hold your breadth.
You are grossly overestimating how much I care about you or your opinion. Now, please excuse me, I have to watch some grass grow
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Plisken
Surely, a sincere apology is something you would want me to understand.
Not really. I don't care that much. You can understand anything you want.
I told you. I am a polite person. When I meet people who seem disoriented and confused, as you do, I am extra polite. Perhaps it comes from my experience that people like you, who barge into threads as if someone addressed them, are usually aggressive and unstable. So being very polite is a way not to set them off.What exactly are you apologizing for?
I don't shy away from fights, but I'd rather fight over something of consequence. Hence the apology. Not for anything, but just to keep the nice man who has stumbled into my thread from going postal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Plisken
Sorry, an old habit of being polite to people who seem to be confused. Carry on.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Castin
Probably never works out because many people don't want the truth. They lie and obfuscate, substituting their agenda for truth. No amount of co-operative brain-storming will overcome a dishonest "searcher".The best way to get to the truth is by co-operative brain-storming in the forums not adversorial debate. Its just pity it never works out!
But you probably know this already don't you?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Plisken
You answered with an "I" as if I had spoken to you. This is a public forum, but I addressed skep. Surely you know the reason we are able to specify who our posts are directed to?
Anyway. Thanks?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SkepticalOne
Lol.
I make a post showing you dodge questions, and you respond by asking more questions!
I don't mind dodging. I know you must dodge or admit you can't answer, but you liberals expect all your questions answered even as you dodge the questions of others.
You also have exceptions to rights. You know you do. You live like you do. If your position was not hypocritical, you would not need to be dishonest.
This is a drive-by because you run everytime. Answer a few questions then, as I suggested. Let's see if your staunch support for "rights" without exception stands up.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Since you don't seem to be able to get a hint, I'm going to put you on ignore.
I hope you find peace one day where you no longer need to be obnoxious to someone who doesn't want you're selling. Buh-Bye!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@MagicAintReal
We were never in a debate. I keep asking you if you're confused. Maybe I should ask if you're awake.
I don't feed trolls. Shoo.
Created: