janesix

No I do not think God is stupid. 

The divine creator isn't stupid. I am too stupid to figure it all out.

The patterns are real. 

Not when the numbers come to me through intuition. Not when my clocks go backwards from 109 to 108. Someone is showing me the numbers. 

O never claimed anything was scientific in any way. This is the religion forum.

The diameter of the moon is 2160 miles. Another sacred number. The diameter of the sun is 864000 miles another sacred number.  You choose not to see it. Your problem, not mine.

Because the climate changes. All the time. Much longer than humans have been around.

The numbers are close, because they were designed that way. Miles and feet are what God wanted to use i suppose. Things move and change. The Earth was obviously originally designed to be 7920 miles in diameter. 

These sacred numbers are based on geometry.

Who is the geometer? God.

This is the religion forum, and I am using sacred numbers. 

Yes. I know that. Did you even pay attention to what I said?

Climate change is a fact. That humans had anything to do with it is an interpretation I disagree with. 

Hubris. 

I have no problem with facts. It's the interpretations of facts that I have problems with. 

This morning I had a home made mocha for my coffee. 

Just curious,and a little bored. I am making some macaroni salad,and a few other things later on. Maybe some deviled eggs. 

And where should I be looking?

That sounds reasonable.

Of course I might. When you get new information, you have to make adjustments to your beliefs. Do you believe everything you did 10 years ago? 

I'm not crazy. 

God created this universe,and I believe he did it through numbers and vibration.

Why do you believe that? Do you believe you create your own reality?

I didn't say it had anything to do with math or science. That is why it is posted under metaphysics, and not math or science. It is spirituality, or religion. Thus me postng this in the religion section here.

That's a possibility.

I agree. But I don't believe  that consensus equates to reality.

You have your calculator set to rad, you need to set it to degree.

God.

No, I didn't copy and paste from anywhere. I worked for hours for several days to figure this out. I DARE you to find this anywhere on the internet, except were I said the original tangents of 3.077 and .72 (and later, Carl mentioned the tangent 1.73 in a Red Ice Radio interview. I wrote this article over the past few days on HubPages, where I do a lot of refining and elaborating on what I am doing. You can find it there if you care to look. 

I have found 17 tangents now, in three groups. I am plotting them on a grid, and there is a pattern forming. I will add that to the article when I am finished,and anything else I happen to find. 

Why do you believe that?

I am wrong about my numbers? I don't think so. 

You keep repeating that he is liyng, which I have repeatedly ask for PROOF of, which you just gloss over. No proof?

Actually, I have checked, and came to the conclusion he was wrong about the code, which i already told you.

I'm not sure what you mean by self-contained.

Yes. Numbers considered to be sacred throughout history fall into a set of several tangents. Like the number 432 is tangent 3.077.and 108 is tangent -3.077. 

108 is sacred to many, especially Hindus, but not limited to them. 432 is found by Joseph Campbell to be the most important sacred number, and talks about it in his work. 144 has the tangent -.72, and is considered sacred to many. 

We are going around in circles ad it is getting old. Think what you want. I don't think he was/is a liar. 

Prove he was a fraudster, or admit you are wrong.

I SAID the code was wrong. THAT DOESNT make him a liar. You havent proven he is a LIAR, which is what the argument is about.

And he isn't wrong about everything.

Munck had some interesting insights about tangents and numbers, and that is what I am persuing.

“Faced with difficulties in applying fundamental theories to the observed Universe,” they wrote, some scientists argue that “if a theory is sufficiently elegant and explanatory, it need not be tested experimentally”.
First among the topics discussed was testability. For a scientific theory to be considered valid, scientists often require that there be an experiment that could, in principle, rule the theory out — or ‘falsify’ it, as the philosopher of science Karl Popper put it in the 1930s. In their article, Ellis and Silk pointed out that in certain areas, some theoretical physicists had strayed from this guiding principle — even arguing for it to be relaxed.
The duo cited string theory as the principal example. The theory replaces elementary particles with infinitesimally thin strings to reconcile the apparently incompatible theories that describe gravity and the quantum world. The strings are too tiny to detect using today’s technology — but some argue that string theory is worth pursuing whether or not experiments will ever be able to measure its effects, simply because it seems to be the ‘right’ solution to many quandaries.

Who is that, exactly?

And what proof do they have?

Neither has been "observed". 

Show it or admit you are wrong.

If Brian Green is found to be wrong about string theory, are you going to accuse him of fraud as well?

YOU are saying he was trying to "fool" people, I don't think he was. You haven't proven that at all. 

Show me a quark

Show me dark matter

Or it shows he believed in his work, and was convinced he was right. YOU don't know. You can't see inside the man's mind.

Yes, his "code" numbers are wrong, I checked them out on Google Earth. This has nothing to do with the tangents I mentioned in the OP. He is just the first I know to have started to discover the tangent pattern, and found the start of the pattern with tangents .3077 and .72. , and later, 1.73. 

Yes his "code" is wrong, but that doesn't make him a "fraudster" like you say, it just makes one piece of his work wrong. He believed he was getting his information from aliens. I think HE believed that. Being wrong doesn't make a person a liar. 

The spiritual energy I see the most is blue, sometimes bluish purple. It has a strange, but distinct smell to it, and organic smell. This is the "good" spiritual energy, the bad is shades of red, smells like a lit match that was put out, and feels like crap. My explaination it that this is prana, or the life force that is inherent in all living things. 

I have observed it many times. Both felt and seen. So have many others. 

Who, exactly? Do you have a source?

And you know he was a "fraudster", how?