oromagi

Mike Hughes (1956 – February 22, 2020), popularly known as "Mad" Mike Hughes, was an American limousine driver, daredevil, and flat Earth conspiracy theorist known for flying in self-built rockets.  He died on February 22, 2020, while filming a stunt for an upcoming Science Channel television series.

Hughes lived in Apple Valley, California.  In 2002 he set a Guinness world record with a 103-foot (31 m) jump in a Lincoln Town Car stretch limousine.  Hughes stated during an interview with the Associated Press in 2018 that he had plans to run for governor of California.

According to the Associated Press, Hughes built his first crewed rocket on January 30, 2014, and flew 1,374 feet (419 m) in just over one minute over Winkelman, Arizona. According to CBC News, Hughes collapsed after the landing and it took him three days to recover. Hughes stated that the injuries suffered from the flight put him in a walker for two weeks.  There was no video of Hughes entering the rocket and there were doubts that he was in it when it launched.

In 2016 Hughes launched a failed fundraising attempt for a rocket that earned $310.   After professing his belief in a flat Earth later that year, Hughes gained support within the flat-Earth community. His post-flat-Earth fundraising campaign made its $7,875 goal. He had said he intended to make multiple rocket journeys, culminating in a flight to outer space, where he believed he would be able to take a picture of the entire Earth as a flat disc.  He claimed in November 2017 that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) had given him verbal permission more than a year prior to launch his rocket, pending approval from the Federal Aviation Administration.   However, a BLM spokesman said its local field office had no record of speaking to Hughes at the time. According to the BLM, after seeing some news articles about the planned launch, a BLM representative reached out to Hughes with concerns. The rocket launch was originally scheduled for the weekend of November 25, 2017; Hughes then rescheduled for December 2, 2017, blaming ongoing difficulties in obtaining permissions.  Hughes moved his launch pad 4 miles (6.4 km) so that he could take off and land on private property; however, the BLM maintained he still needed to fill out permits. Hughes defiantly stated the dispute would not stop him flying: "I'm a daredevil. I'm not much for authority or rules."

The untested initial rocket was intended to reach a speed of 500 miles per hour (800 km/h); further rocket trips, which were to be launched from a balloon 20 miles (32 km) up, were intended to reach above the atmosphere into outer space. Hughes acknowledged there were risks, telling the Associated Press: "It's scary as hell. But none of us are getting out of this world alive."  A fundraising campaign to cover the costs of the delay raised around $100 of its $10,000 goal. On February 3, 2018, Hughes live-streamed another attempted launch, but the rocket steam release malfunctioned and the launch was aborted.

A successful launch on March 24, 2018, resulted in his reaching a height of 1,875 feet (572 m) and a hard landing in the Mojave Desert.  The steam-powered rocket launched at a sharp angle to avoid falling back to Earth on public land, and landed about 1,500 feet (460 m) away from the launch point. Hughes' team reported a maximum speed of 350 mph (563 km/h). Hughes reported no serious injury from the landing

Hughes planned to again launch himself in a rocket on August 10, 2019, however, mechanical troubles postponed the launch. The following weekend, the launch was again postponed and Hughes was treated for heat exhaustion.

On February 22, 2020, Hughes (at the age of 64) was confirmed dead following the crash-landing of a self-built rocket he was piloting. During launch, the rocket’s parachute, which was designed for landing, appeared to deploy early and detach from the craft.  The launch event was being filmed for the Science Channel television series Homemade Astronauts, in which Hughes was to star.

Following Hughes' death, a public relations representative stated "We used flat Earth as a PR stunt... Flat Earth allowed us to get so much publicity that we kept going! I know he didn’t believe in flat Earth and it was a schtick."

Every time some atheist trots out the tired "prayer experiment", I can't help but doubt it as I know no real scientist could be that stupid.

To help you see the abject stupidity of prayer experiments, let's do one now.

The only thing more unpredictable than the weather is the ingenuity of men.

• Bloomberg has always demonstrated a sort of "Damn the Torpedoes" outlook
  
• Case in point- expanding term limits.  No ethical public servant changes a law and then stands first in line to benefit from the law's change.
  
• Changing party affiliation from democrat=>republican=>independent=>democratic for strategic reasons independent of any ideological shift. (That is, who cares what party members think, party membership is a only a means to an end).
  
• In 2009, in the throws of the Great Recession, Bloomberg reported financial gains of more than $4.5 billion- more than any other person in the world that year while he was mayor of the city where the crisis began, where hundred year old corporations were imploding.  Bloomberg's financial services (somehow) profited off that crisis while nearly all the other financial institutions under his wing suffered.   Somewhere in that dynamic, a damning (and potentially just) criminal charge ought to be easily discovered. 
  

 I don't believe the OP is arguing that protestants are stupid

Transgenders certainly should not be leaders in the church.

--> @oromagi

Reply

I think you fail to realize that the transgender in the OP is the pastor of a church.

--> @oromagi

Reply

Whatever source you are drawing from is giving you bad information.

There is nothing sexual about the holy kiss, deacons do it at every liturgy, and it is a common greeting in many countries.

Monks and nuns do not get married. That is practically what defines a monastic.

This perverse interpretation you have can only come from unfamiliarity with our liturgical practices.

A transgender could not be a priest. Any bishop who would knowingly ordain a transgender priest would likely not last long as a bishop.

We are not supposed to hate transgenders. However, it would be a lie for us to say that their belief is psychologically sound.

The church allows sinners in, of course, who is perfect? Eventually, this transgender will have to come to terms with the fact that their delusion is a hindrance in their spiritual walk.

Can western, democratic society adopt the lead taken by Russia and ban organised religion?

--> @oromagi

Reply

Adelphopoiesis in no way is like marriage.

The church in no way condones same sex relations of the type you are implying.

And certainly, closer examination of the article you referenced concerning the trans man joining the church does not imply that the church condones sex changes.

This is the same delusional PC idea that homosexuality is somehow more virtuous.

Soon the PC lemmings will come in, and for half, I will be a pedophile, and for the other half, a homophone, but none will address the issues. And after they drown me out from sheer yelling, will consider they cancelling a "win".

--> @oromagi

Reply

If sex abuse is so rare in BSA, then how come the organization went bankrupt with all these accusations?  I mean, the Catholic church has them too, but they aren't bankrupt.

lol oro is really a genius

--> @ethang5

Reply

Do you know what percentage of Boy Scout scout masters are abusers?

Oromagi has decided to conveniently ignore the amount of thermal heat needed to completely melt the Antarctic ice sheets to satisfy the prediction of climate ALARMISTS - namely the prediction that the sheets will melt in 20 years.

The amount of thermal heat the sun would need to apply to do that in the very very short span of 20 years, (a politically expedient prediction as it is long enough timespan to keep pushing the narrative and short enough to scare the ignorant masses into hysteria) would most certainly roast the entire planet which did not have kilometers deep ice sheets. KFC extra crispy.

Oromagi is an alarmist apologist and probably brainwashed to trust political authority, not science and thermodynamic equations.

--> @oromagi

Reply

You fall into the same trap as all hysteria junkies.

Falsely correlating legal and illegal immigration.

Falsely correlating climate change and climate alarmism.

--> @oromagi

Reply

That some people concerned about the problem are inefficient at problem-solving does not serve as proof that the problem does not exist.

Fake concern over politically useful alarmism is of immense value to a politician. The same politicians inevitably fly back home to their 30000 KW/Hr oversized homes, laughing in cigar smoked filled rooms, personally feasting on the palpable CO2 while pondering the limits of the lack of agency and the lack of rational oversight from a willingly frightened populace suckling on the teat of corporate MSM with the slow, steady IV drip of political CNN propaganda satisfying the amygdala.

That some group of people is only responsible for one quarter of the problem does not serve as proof that the problem does not exist

Alarmist predictions should not exist. Especially ones used by politicians to gain wealth and power using fear to control the dumbasses.

The USA has zero methods to prevent China from becoming a 40% global emitter of CO2 by 2030.

--> @oromagi

Reply

 If GP does not trust his sources regarding climate change...

I don't trust alarmists. Especially political alarmists.

--> @oromagi

Reply

Who is the "they" that won't discuss nuclear power or China?

You, and Greta.

"Personally I am against nuclear power, but according to the IPCC [the United Nations Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change], it can be a small part of a very big new carbon free energy solution, especially in countries and areas that lack the possibility of a full scale renewable energy supply - even though it's extremely dangerous, expensive and time consuming. But let’s leave that debate until we start looking at the full picture."

Let's look at another source of heat the average person can fathom.

The Tsar Bomba was the largest test detonation of a thermonuclear device yielding 2.09 × 10^18 joules of energy.

Assuming we could somehow channel ALL that energy into the ice sheets, and knowing a steady melt would require 2.03X10^22 J per year to melt it in 20 years (this is additional energy added to the energy already applied currently from the sun)   

This would require 194260 Tsar Bomba detonations across the Antarctic ice sheets over 20 years.

9713 Tsar Bomba detonations per year, or alternatively,

27 Tsar Bomba detonations per day for 20 years. 

At that point, we should see a steady rise per year in sea levels of not a mere fraction of a millimeter, but 6.6 inches rise in sea level every year for 20 years.

If that amount of thermal energy was distributed evenly across the globe over 20 years, Sea levels would be the absolute LAST thing you would be worried about.

And yet, we are supposed to take alarmists seriously?

Imagine living inside of a running microwave. That is what the alarmists are suggesting with a 20-year elimination of Antarctic land ice, but want us to focus on sea levels instead of seared flesh...

<i><br></i>

"At Earth’s average distance from the Sun (about 150 million kilometers), the average intensity of solar energy reaching the top of the atmosphere directly facing the Sun is about 1,360 watts per square meter, according to measurements made by the most recent NASA satellite missions.... A microwave uses about 1000 watts."

"Since 2015 scientists have had a chance to look over the data and have had time to do a few follow-up studies and the results are clear.

It is agreed among scientists studying the situation that the Eastern area is gaining a lot of ice due to thousands of years of continued snowfall. However, measuring the size of that gain can be difficult at best. The major issues with Zwally’s study are that it used altimeter data from satellites, which is subject to systematic errors such as snowpack penetration and telling the difference between snow that is on the ground and snow that is still falling. Also, in order to calibrate their measurements, Zwally’s team bounced lasers of the Southern Ocean which may not have been reliable.'

'In a study published in 2017 scientists were able to combine information from satellite altimetry, gravimetry, and GPS to measure the ice balance in East Antarctica from 2003-2013 When looking at this data they were unable to confirm Zwally’s findings. This study concluded that gains in East Antarctica are smaller than losses in West Antarctica. In fact, the gains in East Antarctica were about a third of what Zwally’s study believed them to be.'

"We can clearly see that when these numbers are put together the continent is losing a lot of ice every year. Furthermore, the rate of loss is getting worse as time goes by."

"Zwally's... team agrees with the broader scientific community on the main issue: Antarctica is melting due to rising temperatures.

'Zwally said he hoped his study wouldn't detract from other research highlighting the scope and dangers of climate change.

"When our paper came out, I was very careful to emphasize that this is in no way contradictory to the findings of the IPCC report or conclusions that climate change is a serious problem that we need to do something about," he told Scientific American.

He also seemed aware some people would weaponize the study for political purposes.

"I know some of the climate deniers will jump on this, and say this means we don't have to worry as much as some people have been making out," he said. "It should not take away from the concern about climate warming."

--> @oromagi

You don't just eyeball values of solar joules and latent heat of ice. Anyone who lives in the north will tell you it can take quite a while for a mound of snowplowed ice to melt depending on how much ice there is in the mound, even in 70-degree weather.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/04/16/can-humans-melt-the-antarctic-icecap/

And then there’s the ice. We are supposedly melting the ice; the literature is filled with papers making this claim. These papers invariably whine about human activity warming the planet, but they never seem to get around to discussing how much energy is actually required, or how it gets to the ice. But do humans really generate enough energy to melt significant amounts of ice?

How much energy is needed to melt 1.32X10^6 Km3 of ice?

It takes 333.55X10^3 J to melt 1 kg of ice.

Doing the math, we see it takes 3.07X10^17 J to melt a cubic km of ice. This is our basic unit of heat energy for melting any large amount of ice in Antarctica, or anywhere else.

We have determined how much ice is involved in an 11-foot ocean rise: a volume of 1.32X10^6 Km3. To melt it, the ice must receive 1.32X10^6 Km3 X 3.07X10^17 J, or 4.05X10^23 J. This is true regardless of what process gets the heat to Antarctica. A steady melt would require 2.03X10^22 J per year to melt it in 20 years, or 8.1X10^21 J per year to melt it in 50 years.

We can argue until the cows come home about how that much heat can reach the glaciers. But for our nontechnical friends, it’s interesting to compare the energy requirement with how much energy humans produce. In other words, if humans set out to deliberately melt the Thwaites and Pine Island Glaciers in the Antarctic, could they even do it?

Well, let us see!

According to the US Energy Information Administration, in 2016 the world produced 84.412479 quadrillion (84.412479X10^15) BTU. That converts to 8.906X10^19 J, consisting of fossil fuel (the largest component), nuclear, and renewable. And if we used all of the world’s energy to do nothing but melt the ice, we could not do it in 20 years, or even in 50 years. We could do it in about 4,500 years.

That kind of heat to melt that much ice in 20 years would also require a significant increase in solar joules, one that would cause temperatures to rise far above 70 degrees F.

"The amount of solar energy reaching the surface of the planet is so vast that in one year it is about twice as much as will ever be obtained from all of the Earth's non-renewable resources of coal, oil, natural gas, and mined uranium combined,"

"In spite of the enormous transfers of energy into and from the Earth, it maintains a relatively constant temperature because, as a whole, there is little net gain or loss: Earth emits via atmospheric and terrestrial radiation (shifted to longer electromagnetic wavelengths) to space about the same amount of energy as it receives via insolation (all forms of electromagnetic radiation).

To quantify Earth's heat budget or heat balance, let the insolation received at the top of the atmosphere be 100 units (100 units = about 1,360 watts per square meter facing the sun), as shown in the accompanying illustration. Called the albedo of Earth, around 35 units are reflected back to space: 27 from the top of clouds, 2 from snow and ice-covered areas, and 6 by other parts of the atmosphere. The 65 remaining units are absorbed: 14 within the atmosphere and 51 by the Earth’s surface. These 51 units are radiated to space in the form of terrestrial radiation: 17 directly radiated to space and 34 absorbed by the atmosphere (19 through latent heat of condensation, 9 via convection and turbulence, and 6 directly absorbed). The 48 units absorbed by the atmosphere (34 units from terrestrial radiation and 14 from insolation) are finally radiated back to space. These 65 units (17 from the ground and 48 from the atmosphere) balance the 65 units absorbed from the sun in order to maintain zero net gain of energy by the Earth."

--> @oromagi

Reply

Right.

Our 15% still isn't worth a tick on a tit when it comes to global environmental engineering.

Americacentrism and Eurocentrism are still unjustifiably strong zeitgeists in academia.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/simonlack/2019/11/26/greta-go-to-china/#7f84180a5153

The conversation about climate change is overwhelmingly dominated by Chinese, Indian, and African apologists as clearly evidenced by the response above.

In fact, the UN seems to be just fine with calculating a predicted 35-40% contribution of global CO2 from China as emission rates inexorably rise in China while falling in America and the EU.

It's as though there is nothing we can do about it (because the truth that we really can't isn't something the public wants to hear from politicians)
Instead, it's the same old garbage from the same people with the usual suspects. That climate change is an existential threat, and only Americans have the power to do anything about it. Neither of which is true.