oromagi's avatar

oromagi

*Moderator*

A member since

8
10
11

Total posts: 8,696

Posted in:
Duchamp's Fountain should be exhibited in the bathroom
Is philosophy always 'art, though?
There's an argument to be made but I was suggesting that Plato's creative narrative biography of Socrates is unquestionably an example of art that Socrates would have ruled out from his ideal city-state.   No Plato's Republic would be permitted in Plato's Republic.

Created:
2
Posted in:
Duchamp's Fountain should be exhibited in the bathroom
-->
@Lemming
Well, I vaguely recall Plato disliking art, as he felt it 'wasn't useful to what he saw as an ideal society, in his book, The Republic.
Yes, Socrates actually argued against the utility of the book you read his argument in.

Hitler, didn't like some modern art, as he thought it fostered degeneracy or something.
Hitler was a nasty little idiot who blew up his country and got everybody who ever knew him killed.  Why would anybody on earth give a single shit what Hitler thinks about anything?

Here's a debate I lost on the subject.
Created:
3
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
-->
@sadolite
-->@oromagi
I am not a Republican and take great offense to my name even being associated with any political party. You are only as good as its worst most corrupt pedophile.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the new Republican perspective on the Republican Party.

prove the rule of law exists ,

I see you completely ignore my example of why it no longer exists
Because readers will be more readily convinced by your ignorance then any counter I could make.  The rule of law does not require the absence of crime.

Specifics please:

The current QAnon audit in Maricopa County is not a lawful enterprise. 

Republican Judges in AZ have already ruled that nothing the Cyber Ninja recount announces is legally binding.

As I already explained, Federal law requires states to hold on to ballots for 22 months. As Republican Governor Doug Ducey points out, he has overseen three independent audits, the last one complete Feb 23rd, and found no irregularities.  The AZ GOP voted to censure their own Republican Governor for stating that simple fact out loud.   When some Arizona Senators turned those ballots over to a bunch of random ad-hoc private companies-for-hire by Republicans, the State of Arizona illegally lost custody of those Maricopa County ballots and can no longer verify their authenticity.   The main firm Cyber Ninjas has no auditing experience at all and is run by the main guy who invented all the Hugo Chavez/ Dominion conspiracy theories in November.  Not just not objective, but actually the most wildly biased person you could possibly select for the job.   The correct processes for audits in the State of Arizona were not followed and both ballots and voting machines have spent weeks out of sight from any bipartisan oversight or even official oversight.  By breaking a whole bunch of laws designed to guarantee that AZ elections are free and fair, Republicans have ensured that the Maricopa County ballots can't ever be audited again.

Both of your (very biased) sources blame Maricopa County Democrats while failing to tell you that Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (the main body objecting) is overwhelmingly Republican.  On May 17, the board held a hearing and sent Fann a twelve-page letter to dispute her allegations of wrongdoing by county officials. Republican board chairman Jack Sellers stated that the allegations were actually due to the incompetence of the auditors and accused Fann of an "attempt at legitimatizing a grift disguised as an audit."  Several of the Republican State Senators who voted in favor of the audit have withdrawn their support and now complain that the whole charade makes Republicans "look like idiots."  The very, very Republican Arizona Republic had denounced the audit as ridiculous.

Congress and the US Dept of Justice have already launched investigations.

Consider that:

  • All prior legal audits took 2-3 days to recount the votes.  Cyber Ninjas has been monkeying around these ballots for 78 days and expects to continue for months.   Why does this extra-legal recount take 36 times longer than a normal legal recount?  What are they up to?
  • Republican candidates whose names were on the ballot have been spotted counting ballots.  Even in Venezuela, that shit wouldn't fly.
  • Since only black and blue ink is allowed on the ballots, legal auditors have never allowed counters to have black or blue pens.  But these counters had black and blue pens in their hands for weeks before newspapers reported that violation and forced them to stop.
  • Voting system data has been illegally taken out of state as far afield as a remote cabin in Montana.  Cyber Ninjas calls the cabin their "lab" and refuses to say what they were up to.
  • Cyber Ninjas refuses to set a deadline or discuss their process or discuss who is doing the counting.  The whole audit is just a black box.
  • Multiple  Cyber Ninja employees have quit and filed multiple sexual harassment complaints.
  • Auditors accused Maricopa County of deleting the voter database via a Trump press release.  Cyber Ninjas later admitted that the database wasn't deleted, they just lacked the technical expertise to know how to find .dbf.  What's interesting is that they are reporting to Donald Trump before talking to Maricopa County, the owner of the ballots they are auditing.
  • The cost so far is estimated at $6-10 million but the Republican party has only ponied up $150,000 so far.  It is not clear who is paying Cyber Ninjas for their operating expenses and of course, Cyber Ninjas isn't saying much.  They clearly hope to bill the county at the end of this but Maricopa has made it clear that they will sue the AZ Republican Party for expenses- which means Republicans are going to be that much shorter of funds for 2022 races thanks to Donald's personal vanity project.
  • What the fuck? 

The Epoch Times?  Really?  You trust Chinese cultists to give you the news over local newspapers?

This isn't even a government audit.  This is just one guy, a state Senator Trump guy name Doug Mastriano.  Mastriano says he left the Jan 6th insurrection after things got violent but video has emerged proving that he stood and watched police get beaten.  Anyway, Doug has written to 3 counties saying he wants to take illegal ownership of their ballots, Arizona style and those 3 counties (2 have Republicans majorities) have written back questioning Doug's legal right to take their ballots.  That's where it stands.  Doug's going to have to get some kind legal authority first and again, if he break the chain of custody like Arizona did, all he will accomplish is a waste of taxpayer money.

All of which has pay-fors.   Taxes.   That's how Democrats do things.  And that money is actually going to everyone unlike Republican's unpaid for friend and family bailouts.

Republicans cost us $16 Trillion in 2020, cut taxes for themselves and their wealthy friends, crashed the economy and now have the disgusting  lack of character to criticize the Democrats who have to figure out how to pay for their flagrancy.  Trump's actually  charging his Secret Service Agents rent.  What a grifter.  What a con.

Created:
3
Posted in:
Duchamp's Fountain should be exhibited in the bathroom
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
-->@oromagi
What is wrong with the idea that the fountain matches your subjective definition of art but not other people's?
nothing
Created:
1
Posted in:
Duchamp's Fountain should be exhibited in the bathroom
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
By specifying "my consideration" I indicated subjectivity, as in resulting from or pertaining to personal mindsets or experience, arising from perceptive mental conditions within the brain and not necessarily or directly from external stimuli.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
-->
@sadolite
-->@oromagi
Yes yes yes "the law" Since when did the rule of law mean anything? The law says you cant enter the country illegally , yet there are over 20 million people who entered this country illegally living here. The law is as worthless as two tits on a hog. The law is what ever asshole who can ignore , manipulate or not enforce the law says it is. 
Ladies and Gentlemen, the new Republican perspective on law and order.

Why are politicians blocking access to requested documents and info why are politicians refusing to even allow an audit?
specifics, please.

Since when did wasting millions of tax dollars ever become an issue? 
Since Democrats returned to power.

Created:
2
Posted in:
Proof that jews only care about their own freedom
-->@oromagi
By making them aware of the egregore that controls their minds. 
EGREGORE is "an occult concept representing a distinct non-physical entity that arises from a collective group of people. Historically, the concept referred to angelic beings, or watchers, and the specific rituals and practices associated with them, namely within Enochian traditions."

Your plan to "free" the Jews is to release them from the magical, evil, spirit that controls them.  

  • Would you call that spirit YHWH?
  • Is cyanide gas still your preferred method of release or do you recommend some more expedient measure?

Created:
2
Posted in:
Duchamp's Fountain should be exhibited in the bathroom
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
(Also, I don't know enough about Bugattis to say whether or not I would consider them art.)
Are you are suggesting there exist objective criteria for what can and cannot be considered art and you simply don't have enough information to determine whether a Bugatti fits that objective criteria?
No.  If I was suggesting that I would have said " I don't know enough about Bugattis to say whether or not Bugattis are art."  
Created:
1
Posted in:
Proof that jews only care about their own freedom
-->
@Wylted
Sure, Arbeit macht frei, right?
Created:
2
Posted in:
Proof that jews only care about their own freedom
-->
@Wylted
->@oromagi
Jews hate freedom accept [sic] for their own. In the video when hews [sic] were asked to say "free Palestine " they all refuse.
I'm not going to click on something called bitch Ute, I have nothing but respect for Native Americans.  So I don't have any context here but it seems your argument is:

P1: Any persons who don't believe that all people must be free necessarily "hate freedom"
P2: Some Jews on one videotape don't believe that some Palestinians should be free.
C1: Therefore all Jews hate freedom

Every part of this argument is fucked up.  

  • Loving or hating freedom is irrelevant.  The question is whether someone respects other people's human right to liberty.
    • All civil rights come with some limitation.  Your right to free movement ends at my nose for example.  Your right to free expression does not include shouting fire in a movie theater.
      • Many people are incarcerated because they pose a substantial threat to the freedom of others.
        • Senator Mark Kelly probably doesn't believe that his wife's assassin, Jared Lee Loughner ought to be free because he's quite violent and mentally ill.
          • One cannot fairly conclude that Sen. Kelly therefore hates freedom.
  • Jews and Palestinians have a famously violent history and may well harbor irrational biases toward another.  Such biases ought not be the only benchmark by which we evaluate respect for civil rights.
    • Your irrational bias towards Jews is well established.  Shall we likewise conclude that you must hate freedom?


Created:
1
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
-->
@sadolite
Which of course cant be proved because all the evidence has already been destroyed
By law, presidential ballots are retained for 22 months.  In all the swing states, they have been counted at least three times with the same result. We can keep counting them over and over if that's what Republicans would like but it won't change the outcome and since each count costs taxpayers millions of dollars, its only fair that Republicans foot the bill.
Created:
2
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
Ashli Babbitt is Republican Orwellian doublethink in a nutshell.  Republicans can see the context- its all captured on video- Republican Congressman fleeing down the staircase, Republican insurrections howling for their blood, smashing glass, giving chase.  Hell, even the cops are probably Republicans- most cops are.  Its reasonable to presume that everybody in the video is a Republican who voted for Trump in November, some of whom have been instructed by their government (Trump is the head of State) to halt the election's confirmation, while others have been instructed by their government to follow the  Constitution and others still have been instructed by their government to protect the Congress.  The whole pantomime is insane, illustrative of what happens to mobs that follow people instead of principles.  There is no principle at stake here just people following orders from the same schizophrenic source.  Today, calling Babbitt a martyr serves Trump's purpose.  Perhaps tomorrow, when Trump discovers that Babbitt had a girlfriend (I don't he has figured that out yet), Gosar will be made the hero and Babbitt the enemy.  The truth is entirely subject to the will of Trump and Republicans must tune in to Tucker Carlson to find out what they must believe tomorrow.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
-->
@Wylted
@oromagi
Oromagi

Election frayd never happened. It is impossible for elections to be wrong
Another lie.  You can't link to one instance where I say this.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Duchamp's Fountain should be exhibited in the bathroom
-->
@Intelligence_06
Duchamp's "Fountain" is basically an urinal with words written on it. Using 'utilitarianism, we could find that this artwork, if valued relatively objectively, brings LESS value than the average urinal since it is no different than the average urinal, but you aren't allowed to urinate in it because you are in a museum's exhibition section and not its bathrooms.
But if you are applying utilitarian arguments to art, then you have missed the point of art entirely.  If you valued the Mona Lisa objectively it is rancid grease on old cloth stretched between rotting bits of wood.

The things that make something admirable is not about how you look at it, but how you use it. I see no reason why it wouldn't be used as an urinal, it is built for that purpose. The fact I can't use it makes me admire it less.
So Gal Gadot can't be beautiful until you fuck her.....that's your argument?

This is different with classical artwork, where you have no intended use other than to look at it for Mona Lisa and other sculptures.
Why?  Why is classical art held to a different standard?  Where's the cutoff point between classical and non-classical and what criteria are you using?

Of course, it could be categorized as a "sculpture", but it is a sculpture that could be used as an urinal and peeing on it doesn't make it less artistic:
Which, if we aren't segregating art, should also apply to the Mona Lisa.  You should try it.

Cleaning is required for every public restroom whatsoever! Even if there are morons who will just pee on the side and not the way you are expected to pee, even janitors could do the restoration works necessary to keep this piece artistic and useful.
If the artist decides ahead of time how he wants his audience to react and works to create the desired effect then he has failed as an artist and his work is not art, it is pornography.  Star Wars is art because Lucas was just rendering what was in his head, he didn't much care how it would be received.  Star Wars: The Force Awakens is pornography because it only cares how it is perceived and rather than expressing some new viewpoint about Lucas' galaxy only does what it calculates as best to be accepted as Star Wars-like and  make a lot of money.

Fountain is art because Duchamp was mocking his audience who admired realism over expression.  Even today the museum art that most captivates the children and other novices is the hyper-real stuff- sculptures that look lifelike, paintings that look like photos.  Duchamp is expressing his contempt for the slaves to realism and their lack of engagement with God via the artist. 

The only problem is that this is a urinal. However, on that gender-neutral bathrooms exist, this would be something.  Oh, you can't use it? Great, is it an urinal anymore? It certainly could be used as one, just not here. No matter what, this artpiece could be given a useful purpose and yet it is locked behind glass bars. I don't like that. I want it to be placed in bathrooms, where everyone can not only see it, but use it.
You don't like it because you assume you have all the information you need to render judgement by simply viewing it, without any consideration of context, format, irony, audience, artist, God, medium, critique, controversy, etc, etc, etc.  Why would you make that assumption?

Artpieces have been commercialized over the past century. Bugatti make art that are cars, and you wouldn't just not drive it because it is intended to be driven.
Really?  So you'd just leave a Bugatti parked in the street like any other car?  You'd take a Bugatti on daily traffic-jammed commutes like any other car?  (Also, I don't know enough about Bugattis to say whether or not I would consider them art.)

The same. The fountain urinal is intended to be urinated on, and not to be locked behind glass. Unleash its full potentials.  Change my mind.
Duchamp is having a laugh at your expense.  I don't think Duchamp would want to change your mind or want me or anybody else to change it.  You are his target.  Let's respect the artist's intention.


Created:
4
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
Created:
2
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
@Wylted
They got away with it cause of Mail In Ballots
I wouldn't call it getting away anything but agree that when elections are free fair and convenient, Republicans consistently lose

and RINOS stationed across the nation.
stationed?  A conspiracy of RINOs?

I don't know what evidence supports "stationing" but I agree that the Republicans who fled the Party after Trump's ascension represented the intellectual and moral core of the party.  

Won’t be happening in 2024
Well, we can see that plenty of states are seeking corrupt curtailments of voting wherever possible but history suggests the harder corrupt politicians try to suppress the vote, the more popular voting becomes.  Trump was counting on the lowest turnout ever and ended up forcing the largest turnout ever.  Ultimately, the Republicans are going to have to write a platform- some kind of plan for the future and set of values they're willing to stand by (in public as well as anonymous forumes).  I just can't see Republicans regaining power without having some kind of positive vision of the future to promote.  Right now they're a fucking death cult shaking in the shadow of a mad king.

Created:
2
Posted in:
Proof that jews only care about their own freedom
-->
@Wylted
@oromagi
That really has nothing to do with why jews hate freedom. Please respond to the argument instead of using character attacks
what argument is that?
Created:
1
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
MAN ARRESTED in WIFE's MURDER now ACCUSED of VOTING for TRUMP in her NAME
Barry Morphew was charged with forgery and offenses relating to mail ballots.

A Colorado man arrested this month for allegedly murdering his missing wife has also been accused of voting for former President Donald Trump in her name.

Barry Morphew, 53, was charged with felony forgery and offenses relating to mail ballots, a misdemeanor, according to court records filed Thursday.

He was previously arrested on May 5 on charges of first-degree murder after deliberation, tampering with physical evidence and an attempt to influence a public servant, according to court documents, in connection with the disappearance of his wife, Suzanne Morphew, over a year ago.

Suzanne Morphew, 49, who shared two daughters with her husband, disappeared on May 10, 2020, near the small mountain town of Salida, in Chaffee County. She has yet to be found.

So when the Chaffee County Clerk's Office received a voter ballot in the mail for the missing person in October, the county clerk reported the alleged voter fraud to authorities, according to an arrest warrant affidavit.

The ballot did not have the required signature, but was allegedly signed by Barry Morphew on the witness' signature line on Oct. 15, according to the affidavit.

The Chaffee County sheriff seized the ballot and its envelope as evidence, and Barry Morphew's own ballot and envelope were seized in March as well during a months long investigation, according to the affidavit.

During an interview with FBI agents in April, Barry Morphew allegedly confessed to submitting his wife's ballot, according to the affidavit.

"Just because I wanted Trump to win," he allegedly said, per a transcript of the conversation included in the affidavit. "I just thought, give him another vote."

"I figured all these other guys are cheating," he allegedly said, adding that his wife "was going to vote for Trump anyway," according to the affidavit.

He allegedly told the FBI agents he didn't realize it was illegal to submit someone else's voter ballot. "I didn't know you couldn't do that for your spouse," he allegedly said, according to the affidavit.

Barry Morphew is being held in the Chaffee County Detention Facility without bond in the murder case. He is next scheduled to appear in court on May 27. His attorneys are state public defenders, who do not comment on criminal cases.

No other arrests are expected in connection with the disappearance of Suzanne Morphew, authorities said. The arrest affidavit for the murder charge is sealed, and prosecutors have not revealed a suspected cause of death.

Created:
2
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
PORTER TOWNSHIP, Ohio (WCMH) — A Porter Township trustee has admitted to voting twice — once as himself and once as his deceased father — in last November’s election.
According to a plea agreement, Edward D. Snodgrass is scheduled to enter a guilty plea next month to a charge of Falsification, for which he will spend three days in county jail and pay a $500 fine and court costs.
Snodgrass, a Republican, admitted to signing his father’s name, H. Edward Snodgrass, to his absentee ballot and sending it in, then later voting himself.
Snodgrass told NBC News that he made an error while trying to take care of his dying father, who he said requested the ballot, saying his father was suffering from advanced Parkinson’s disease and a broken arm at the time the ballot arrived. He added he had already been “signing for him.”
“It was there with a pile of other paperwork,” Snodgrass told NBC News. “I was sleep-deprived and not thinking clearly. But I’m not going to run away from it.”
He added he was trying to “execute a dying man’s wishes.”
Snodgrass was initially charged with Illegal Voting.
As of Tuesday, June 22, Snodgrass’ name remains listed on the Porter Township website as a township trustee.

Created:
2
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
CRIPPLE CREEK • Jan Wilson of Woodland Park was found guilty in Teller County Combined Court Wednesday of voting twice in the April primary election.
In the State of Colorado vs. Janis M. Cummer, Teller County Clerk & Recorder Krystal Brown cited Wilson with the misdemeanor offense in May after discovering that she had submitted two ballots. Wilson was arraigned in July and the case went to court Feb. 10.

Wilson, 74, also known by her married name of Janis Cummer, was cited with the misdemeanor offense in May after Teller County Clerk & Recorder Krystal Brown discovered she had submitted two ballots. She pleaded not guilty in July, records show.
During a one-day bench trial Feb. 10 in Cripple Creek, Teller County Court Judge Theresa Kilgore found Wilson guilty of voting twice and fined her $500 plus court costs.
In Colorado’s all-mail ballot election, Wilson received a first ballot but then changed her party affiliation and received a second ballot. “She voted twice, and turned them both in,” Brown said, in a report to the Teller County Board of Commissioners at its Feb. 11 meeting. “The woman felt she had done nothing wrong, that it was a mistake to turn in two ballots.”
Brown caught the double vote the night of the election. “The Duo machine captures the signatures,” Brown said, adding that she halted the vote count to correct the error. “It was time-consuming for the staff.”
In her report, Brown highlighted the divisive nature of the 2020 election. “I think it’s important to talk about this in this place and time,” she said. “We don’t take this lightly, just so everyone knows. Last year the vote was extremely important so we want to make sure people vote only once.”
After the meeting, Brown said she felt the law should be stronger when it comes to handing out fines, or other repercussions such as voter fraud.
Teller County uses the Dominion Voting Systems, which have been targeted by some supporters of former President Donald Trump in his claims of voter fraud around the nation.

Since the election of Joe Biden to the presidency in November, Trump’s supporters, including Republican politicians, have questioned the results, claiming Dominion Voting Systems were fraudulent.
“We used Dominion machines in 2016 when Trump won,” Brown said, implying that there were no questions about the results at the time. “It’s sad.”
Since the November election, Dominion has sued Trump’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, seeking $1.3 billion in damages due to his false claims of voter fraud.
In the case in Teller County, Wilson is a Woodland Park citizen who serves a member of the Downtown Development Authority and Keep Woodland Park Beautiful. She is well-known for her volunteer work around the city.
“The case is ridiculous,” Wilson told The Courier. “You can’t vote two ballots because the second one doesn’t count. It was just a mistake.”
Wilson acknowledges that she did change her party affiliation. “I did it for one reason, so I could support Erik (Stone) and Dan (Williams) for county commissioner,” she said, referring to the Republican candidates for Teller County commissioner, who each won a seat on the board. “It was a mistake to submit two ballots, and I didn’t even give it a thought.”
Wilson added, “If they want to make a big deal out of it, OK,” she said of her conviction.
Wilson was not represented by an attorney and said she does not plan to appeal the judgement.
“Do you think I’m going to pay an attorney $5,000 for a mistake?” she said.


Created:
2
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
Incumbent Congressman Steve Watkins (R-KS), co-chair of Trump's re-election campaign in Kansas lost his Republican primary after it was discovered that he didn't actually live in Kansas' 2nd District and was using a UPS store for his legal address. Both of Watkins' legal residences are in Alaska.   Watkins confessed to illegally voting in local  elections and never actually living in Kansas as part of diversion agreement to avoid prosecution.  Watkin's father was later determined to have illegally contributed $800,000 to Watkin's PAC.  In spite of felony charges, Watkin's still got the Trump vote in the primary, about a third of Republicans.
Created:
2
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
Man admits to voter fraud in casting dead mother’s ballot
April 30, 2021


MEDIA, Pa. (AP) — A Pennsylvania man who illegally voted for Donald Trump on behalf of his long-dead mother in last year’s presidential election was sentenced Friday to five years of probation.
Bruce Bartman, 70, of Marple, pleaded guilty Friday to two counts of perjury and one count of unlawful voting. Besides his probation term, he will not be allowed to vote in an election for four years and is no longer eligible to serve on a jury.
Bartman apologized for his actions, telling the judge “I was isolated last year in lockdown. I listened to too much propaganda and made a stupid mistake.”
Bartman voted in place of his dead mother, authorities have said, and he also registered his mother-in-law, who died in 2019, to vote but did not obtain an absentee ballot for her.
Prosecutors have said Bartman used the driver’s license number for his mother, who died more than a decade ago, to register her to vote, obtain a mail-in ballot, return that ballot and fraudulently vote in her name.

Created:
2
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
-->
@Wylted
Jonathan Meade West, Sr., of Hayes, was charged with a felony for attempting to cast two ballots in the 2020 general election. West first voted absentee at the Gloucester County Voter Register's office. He then returned four days later and tried to cast a second ballot. He was stopped from casting a second ballot when the election worker checked his information using a back-up to the VERIS (Virginia Election Registration Information System) system since it was not working that day. He was convicted of an amended misdemeanor charge of obtaining services under false pretense after attempting to vote twice. West, a self-described "unabashed conservative," was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 12 months, fined $500, and ordered to pay $96 in court costs.

Created:
2
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
-->
@Wylted
Democrats have stated that there is no way any inaccuracies in the election happened.
This is a lie. All honest evaluations of the election agree with Attorney General William Barr's assessment "that his department has “not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

The overwhelming majority of proven cases of election fraud favored Trump.

Yet it is open knowledge Fulton county establishment double counted Biden votes.
This is also a lie.  At least one overscan of absentee ballots resulted in double-scans of 200 ballots.  NONE of the double ballots were counted in the recount.  That is what recounts are for. 

Both lies are contradicted by the link you provided.  Why would you read a source and then decide to tell a lie that contradicts that source while also citing that source as evidence? 

Did you just read the headline and decide you had enough information to make a claim? 

Did someone on Facebook just give you a link and told you what to believe it meant and you went with it?

Did you know you were lying and just hoped that most people would just believe your lie without reading your source?
Created:
3
Posted in:
Election fraud proven in fulton county
SOME BALLOTS INITIALLY DOUBLE-COUNTED in FULTON before RECOUNT
A duplicate write-in vote for singer Kanye West was a big clue that some absentee ballots had been counted twice in Fulton County.

Digital ballot images made public under Georgia’s new voting law show nearly 200 ballots — including one for West — that election officials initially scanned two times last fall before a recount. There’s no indication any vote for president was counted more than once in official results.

The discovery of identical ballots provides evidence to back up allegations of problems in the presidential election, but on a relatively small scale that had no bearing on the final certified count.  A group of voters seeking to prove the election was fraudulent say double-counting is just the beginning of what they hope to find.

Supporters of Republican Donald Trump have been searching for signs of fraud since his 12,000-vote loss to Democrat Joe Biden in Georgia. But two recounts confirmed Biden’s victory, and the courts have rejected lawsuits that sought to overturn the results.

Double-counted ballots were discovered by voters suing Fulton in an effort to persuade a judge to allow them to conduct an in-depth inspection of 147,000 absentee ballots. The judge ruled against the plaintiffs last month, but the case survived with new claims filed against the county’s five election board members.

“If we’re finding this in Fulton County, we’re probably going to find it throughout the state. The question is, why did it happen?” said David Cross, an investment manager working with the plaintiffs. “The simple fact that it happened and we found it here means that it probably occurred elsewhere.”

Election observers and organizations say it’s unlikely that double-counting occurred often or in large numbers.

The ballots counted twice would have given Biden 31 extra votes. After a recount, official results reflected that Trump gained a total of 121 absentee votes in Fulton. Biden won the county with 73% of 524,000 votes cast.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution also verified the duplicate ballots in ballot images obtained under the Georgia Open Records Act and posted online.

The overall number of ballots counted in Georgia generally matched the number of voters who checked in at polling places or returned absentee ballots.   Manual and machine recounts found similar totals for each candidate.

“It’s Fulton failing to follow proper election protocols again,” said Carter Jones, an independent monitor of Fulton’s elections who found sloppy practices but no fraud. “Fulton is so poor at managing the actual process that if they had actually tried to rig the election, they would have bungled it and we would have found out.”

Jones said it’s possible that an election worker lost track of which absentee ballots had already been scanned in the initial count and then ran them through the machine again.

Jones, hired by the State Election Board to observe Fulton’s elections after last year’s primary, recommended that the county change absentee ballot processing during the recount and runoff, boxing up absentee ballots for storage as soon as they were scanned. The county followed his advice, reducing the chance that ballots would be counted twice.

The most obvious example of duplicates in the initial count occurred in a batch of 99 ballots first scanned the morning of Oct. 28, then scanned again about an hour later, with the second batch tallied in exact reverse order from the first. Those batches had 58 votes for Biden, 39 for Trump, one for Libertarian Jo Jorgensen and one for West.

Part or all of another batch of 98 ballots appeared to be scanned a second time within minutes on election night. Biden received 55 votes in the first of those batches and 56 in the second batch. Many of the ballots appeared to be identical.

“It’s something that should never happen,” said Mark Lindeman, acting co-director for Verified Voting, an election integrity organization focused on voting technology. “I’m not trying to make excuses for a blunder, but under really difficult circumstances, people do things that are inexplicable, and that seems to be the case here.”

Lindeman said he couldn’t recall another example of ballots being scanned twice anywhere in the country. He suggested stronger ballot tracking practices, with ballots divided into batches with unique identifying labels and cover sheets. Some jurisdictions imprint serial numbers on absentee ballots as they’re scanned for use during audits.

Fulton election officials declined to comment while the court case seeking a ballot inspection is pending.

County Commission Chairman Robb Pitts said allegations of widespread fraud are based on the “big lie” that the presidential election was illegitimate.

“Allegations of intentional wrongdoing or fraud remain untrue and baseless,” Pitts said. “The big lie is a dangerous conspiracy theory falsely claiming that tens of thousands of votes in Fulton County — and millions nationwide — were fraudulent, not that there’s the possibility of small-scale human error.”

The secretary of state’s office has been investigating Fulton’s elections management and could eventually bring a case for consideration before the State Election Board, which has the power to issue fines or refer allegations to the attorney general’s office.

Georgia’s voting law, Senate Bill 202, also gives the state board authority to replace county election boards and install an appointed administrator.
Other Georgia counties made larger vote-counting errors than Fulton’s during the initial tally.

Election workers in three counties discovered a total of more than 3,300 new votes stored on memory cards that hadn’t been loaded into election computers. A different issue in Floyd County led to 2,600 ballots going unscanned. Those ballots were included in the recount and in Georgia’s official certified results.

What’s next

Election skeptics plan to continue scrutinizing ballot images outside of court, looking for irregularities in Fulton County and other jurisdictions where a majority of voters supported Joe Biden. They’ll also continue pressing their case in court in an attempt to obtain higher-resolution images and an in-person inspection.

Attorneys for Fulton have said the case is meritless and will ask for its dismissal.


Created:
3
Posted in:
War Books
Not ranked- just ten favs in 3 categories

NON-FICTION

Tuchman's "The Guns of August"
Foote's "The Civil War: A Narrative Vols. 1-3"
Keegan's "The Face of Battle"
Keegan's "The Second World War"
Bowden's "Black Hawk Down"
Terkel's "The Good War"
Caesar's "The Gallic War"
Churchill's "The Second World War" Vols. 1-6
McCullough's "1776"
Connell's "Son of the Morning Star: Custer and the Little Big Horn"

FICTION 

Shaara's "The Killer Angels"
Mailer's "The Naked and the Dead"
Jones' "The Thin Red Line"
Hemmingway's "For Whom the Bell Tolls"
Homer's "The Iliad"
O'Brien's "The Things They Carried"
O' Brian's "Master and Commander" 
Mahfouz's "Three Novels of Ancient Egypt"
Shakespeare's "Henry V"
Cooper's "The Last of the Mohicans"

SCI-FI/FANTASY

Tolkien's "The Return of the King"
Heinlein's "Starship Troopers"
Haldeman's "Forever War"
Clancy's "Red Storm Rising"
Donaldson's "The Illearth War"
Brin's "Startide Rising"
Brook's "The Sword of Shannara"
Vonnegut's "Slaughterhouse 5"
Card's "Ender's Game"
Zelazny's "The Chronicles of Amber"




Created:
0
Posted in:
War Books
yes
Created:
0
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
-->
@Wylted
Also show me the evidence the photos of politicians cowering is fake. 
Created:
2
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
-->
@Wylted
@oromagi
I claimed there were old people obeying partitions within the group.  Please point me to where that was refuted
I think I know what you are talking about- those videos taken by CNN of the first protesters entering the rotunda in the first minutes of the breach before those CNN cameramen had to flee for safety.

Like this:

but a minute later it looked like this:


then this:



Three hours later it took a phalanx of police reinforcements to clear out all those insurrectionists you claim were abiding the law in one picture for one minute after overrunning police lines, disobeying police orders, smashing in windows, and trespassing their way to the rotunda but before they looked like this:


If we define elderly as 70+ I see no evidence of anybody close to that age here in the first waves.

Damage done in the rotunda included  graffiti, broken doors and shattered glass,  the  toxic residue from tear gas, pepper spray and fire extinguishers left on statues, murals, historic benches and shutters.  A memorial placard of the late civil rights activist John Lewis was destroyed by the rioters.  Two bronze light fixtures designed by 19th-century American architect Frederick Law Olmsted were broken and a blood-like substance defaced a 19th-century marble bust of President Zachary Taylor.


Created:
2
Posted in:
Governor Desantis of florida signs bill to teach students "communism is evil"
I'm old enough to remember when Reagan would argue that Feds and States should butt out of education and let local school boards, teachers, and parents determine how best to teach students.  I didn't agree with Reagan then and don't now but can't help but note how this old Republican principle, like all other Republican principles, has been cast aside for just another demagogue.

NO ARRESTS MADE AFTER PROTESTORS BLOCK TRAFFIC on I-75 amid CUBAN PROTESTS
by Chris Redfearn
  12:53 PM EDT, Thu July 15, 2021
 
FORT MYERS, Fla. – Dozens of people supporting anti-government protests in Cuba took control of Interstate 75 in Southwest Florida Tuesday night. Florida Highway Patrol had to divert traffic off of the interstate for nearly an hour, but no one was arrested or cited despite Governor Desantis’ new “anti-riot” law.
The law states that if people “willfully obstruct the free, convenient, and normal use of a public street, highway or road” they can be cited for a traffic violation or arrested.

“Just think about it…you’re driving home from work and all of a sudden you have people out there shutting down a highway,” said Desantis in a Tuesday afternoon speech. “We worked hard to make sure that didn’t happen in Florida. If they start to do that there needs to be swift penalties and that’s something that just cannot happen.”

Just minutes later that did happen. Protesters in Miami shut down a freeway there for hours Tuesday evening before the same thing happened near Fort Myers.

Governor Desantis has been an advocate for the anti-government protesters in Cuba since they began. Voting records indicate that many Cuban Americans in Florida did indeed vote for him which is leading some to question whether law enforcement and lawmakers may be going soft on the recent demonstrations for political reasons.
Republicans stopped being for the principled application of law and order some time ago.  In the age of Trump, laws are for non-Republicans.
Created:
1
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
-->
@Wylted
@oromagi
Wow you guys are brainwashed. You think politicians were literal threats to the elderly people who I saw videos of literally obeying the capital partitions and forming lines while taking the same tourist like photos of capital displays.   I wish I can share photos here so you can see the senior citizen qtards obeying partitions which bbn politicians who send people off to war,cowered. 
You don't have to share photos.  I provided a 40 minute document of the event using the rioters own videos of the event as evidence.  Every claim you make here was refuted by that evidence in the OP.

Created:
2
Posted in:
The end of the nation-state
-->
@rbelivb
@oromagi
You skipped a lot of my direct questions but I think I have some sense of your subject now- a kind of utopian global anarchy.  Are you promoting a specific ism or just keeping it super vague?
Libertarianism
Thank you.  That does help to clarify although I find libertarianism is a highly fungible term.
in what way?
I have in mind concepts like "meritocracy" or "general intelligence"....
I think I have it now- the way IQ is more about upholding establishment bias regarding admirable thought than any honest assessment of wit, imagination, memory, or intellect.  I agree such biases uphold the current paradigm whether or not that paradigm can be called nation state.
Unity seems to be the trick and I agree that borders and militaries are obstacles to that unity but I don't buy that societies survive long or well without some government. 
It seems that your main contention
I have no real thesis here- more like I am trying to parse yours.

is that I do not directly identify these tendencies toward unification with classical liberal texts. In fact, the classical liberal position was much more ambivalent - it is characterised essentially by a kind of hypocrisy, in the sense of a tension between its implicit and its explicit tenets.
Well, ideals can be ambivalent  but it is not  hypocrisy that makes an ideal so.   All ists fail to live up to their isms.  Let's recall that:

"In the United States, libertarian was popularized by the individualist anarchist Benjamin Tucker around the late 1870s and early 1880s.  Libertarianism as a synonym for liberalism was popularized in May 1955 by writer Dean Russell, a colleague of Leonard Read and a classical liberal himself. Russell justified the choice of the term as follows:
Many of us call ourselves "liberals." And it is true that the word "liberal" once described persons who respected the individual and feared the use of mass compulsions. But the leftists have now corrupted that once-proud term to identify themselves and their program of more government ownership of property and more controls over persons. As a result, those of us who believe in freedom must explain that when we call ourselves liberals, we mean liberals in the uncorrupted classical sense. At best, this is awkward and subject to misunderstanding. Here is a suggestion: Let those of us who love liberty trade-mark and reserve for our own use the good and honorable word "libertarian."
Subsequently, a growing number of Americans with classical liberal beliefs began to describe themselves as libertarians. One person responsible for popularizing the term libertarian in this sense was Murray Rothbard, who started publishing libertarian works in the 1960s.  Rothbard described this modern use of the words overtly as a "capture" from his enemies, writing that "for the first time in my memory, we, 'our side,' had captured a crucial word from the enemy. 'Libertarians' had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over".

In the 1970s, Robert Nozick was responsible for popularizing this usage of the term in academic and philosophical circles outside the United States, especially with the publication of Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974), a response to social liberal John Rawls's A Theory of Justice (1971).  In the book, Nozick proposed a minimal state on the grounds that it was an inevitable phenomenon which could arise without violating individual rights."
Given its frequent re-alignments, I think I could successfully argue that Libertarianism is far more ambivalent a concept than Liberalism.  That Nozick guy sounds pretty close to what you are talking abut.

My main contention is that nationality and ethnicity are closely intertwined concepts, and that is what I mean by the fact that the idea of a nation-state built on a foundation of universality and blindness to race, is contradictory and abstract.
All ists fail to live up to their isms.  

Hence, Lincoln's inaugural address: " A majority held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people.  We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature."

Hence, King: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

No wise man supposes that just believing in the ism makes it true.  Take Libertarianism, for example.  The most famous American Libertarian ever is Ron Paul but he's a long, long way from breaking up those paradigms of race and gender of which you speak:

"Many articles in [Ron Paul's} newsletters contained statements that were criticized as racist or homophobic. These statements include, "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."  An October 1992 article said, "even in my little town of Lake Jackson, Texas, I've urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense... for the animals are coming."  Another newsletter suggested that black activists who wanted to rename New York City in honor of Martin Luther King Jr. should instead rename it "Welfaria," "Zooville," "Rapetown," "Dirtburg," or "Lazyopolis."  An article titled "The Pink House" said "I miss the closet. Homosexuals, not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them to hide their activities."  Another newsletter asserted that HIV-positive homosexuals "enjoy the pity and attention that comes with being sick" and approved of the slogan "Sodomy=Death."

A number of the newsletters criticized civil rights movement activist Martin Luther King Jr., calling him a pedophile and "lying socialist satyr".  These articles told readers that Paul had voted against the Martin Luther King Jr. Day federal public holiday, saying "Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer, Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."
But you wouldn't say Ron Paul's racism makes your notion of Libertarianism less valid, would you?  Is Christianity ambivalent because Christians fail to live up to the Sermon on the Mount?  No.

Judge the ism by the wisdom of its content, not by the failures of its adherents.
Created:
1
Posted in:
Proof that jews only care about their own freedom
We get it, you hate Jews.
Created:
5
Posted in:
Why whites should ruthlessly murder their own felines
-->
@Wylted
This reads like a cut & paste from Stormfront followed by a find and replace with "cats."
Created:
4
Posted in:
Governor Desantis of florida signs bill to teach students "communism is evil"
I'm old enough to remember when Reagan would argue that Feds and States should butt out of education and let local school boards, teachers, and parents determine how best to teach students.  I didn't agree with Reagan then and don't now but can't help but note how this old Republican principle, like all other Republican principles, has been cast aside for just another demagogue.
Created:
0
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
@oromagi
10,000 characters is 3 pages.  We have learned the hard way that 3 pages is generally too much to expect Republicans to handle but Democrats happily consume 3 pages worth of information many times each day.  This is also why we use big words around Republicans.
Big words are all fun and games until you don’t have enough food


People with the intellect to handle 3 pages worth of information know I've already answered this question in this forum.
People that have no life or are self-centered narcissists use 3 pages to answer a question that has a 2 or 3 word answer lol
Where reason fails, TL;DR is one popular Republican retreat.

Case in point, Ashli Babbitt's focus on the reports of Trump's Attorney Lin Wood.  She spent Jan 4th retweeting a bunch Lin Wood's accusations that John Roberts, Pelosi, and Rod Rosenstein were guilty of child rape and murder.  Just before assaulting the Capitol, Babbitt retweeted Wood's checklist citing that Roberts, Pence, and Rosenstein must resign and be arrested before certification.  Clearly, this is Babbitt's checklist as well, the cause that she died pursuing.

What would Babbitt make, then, of Wood's testimony this week, wherein he denies that he had an role in Michigan election claims?  Wood now denies that he had read any documents relevant to the case, including any of the 1,100 subpoenas claiming election fraud.  Ashli Babbitt was literally taking her marching orders from this guy on the Jan 6th, confident in his assertions that the election was stolen.  Now Trump's lawyer says TL;DR,  he never really looked into it and pretends to be surprised his name was even on the lawsuit.  All of Trump's lawyers are doing the same.  Sidney Powell argued in March that no rational person would believe Trump's election claims- that the whole thing was theater.  If the Republican Party really wants to lynch somebody for perpetuating fraud and lies over the 2020 Election, Trump's 9 lawyers are the correct place to start.
Created:
2
Posted in:
BSH1 MEMORIAL PROFiLE PiC PiCK of the WEEK No. 28: LiBERTé, éGALiTé, FRATERNiTé
C’était le meilleur des temps, c’était le pire des temps ; c’était l’âge de la sagesse, c’était l’âge de la folie ; c’était l’époque de la foi, c’était l’époque de l’incrédulité ; c’était la saison de la Lumière ; c’était la saison de l’Obscurité ; c’était le printemps de l’espoir, c’était l’heure du désespoir ; nous avions tout devant nous, nous n’avions rien devant nous ; nous devions tous aller directement au Ciel, nous devions tous prendre l’autre chemin ; bref, l’époque était tellement différente de celle que vous vivons aujourd’hui que quelquesunes des plus tapageuses autorités ne parlaient d’elles, que ce fut en bien ou en mal, qu’au superlatif.

-Charles DIckens
Created:
0
Posted in:
The end of the nation-state
-->
@rbelivb
You skipped a lot of my direct questions but I think I have some sense of your subject now- a kind of utopian global anarchy.  Are you promoting a specific ism or just keeping it super vague?

-->@oromagi
Competence precedes the nation-state necessarily.  Merit precedes the nation-state necessarily.  There were  noble kings and competent generals long before the Treaty of Westphalia.
Nobles or generals may have been seen as superior, or even had certain training as part of their position, but this is different from the modern concept of competence.
in what way?

The Declaration of Independence asserts that nations may be formed artificially- that all government really just exists  by the consent of the governed and that dissatisfied people may dissolve all prior allegiance to kings and countries and choose instead to pledge our lives, honor, and fortunes to one another.
Regardless of what is asserted in liberal documents, any arbitrary mass of people today cannot simply dissolve and form new countries or nations at will, by force of assertion.  On what territory would they do so, and by whose authority?
And yet America unquestionably did just that.  

These documents and the American people's expansive allegiance to all comers so inclined
Are you implying that the US has open borders?
not at all.

If we define NATION as "a cultural-political community that has become conscious of its autonomy, unity and particular interests,"  then its seems that nationalism has no particular dependency on borders or militaries.  

As a species, humans already possess the necessary autonomy and shared particular interests (survival as a species, most prominently).  Unity seems to be the trick and I agree that borders and militaries are obstacles to that unity but I don't buy that societies survive long or well without some government.   I think unity is possible if and when the shared interests of mankind are manifest to all humanity.  I won't surprise anybody by preferring a liberal democracy as the best form of government for any society, including any global government for a Nation of Man.

Created:
2
Posted in:
BSH1 MEMORIAL PROFiLE PiC PiCK of the WEEK No. 28: LiBERTé, éGALiTé, FRATERNiTé

The Death Of Roland
CLXXXIX
Roland feeleth his death is near, His brain is oozing by either ear. For his peers he prayed - God keep them well; Invoked the angel Gabriel. That none reproach him, his horn he clasped; His other hand Durindana grasped; Then, far as quarrel from crossbow sent, Across the march of Spain he went, Where, on a mound, two trees between, Four flights of marble steps were seen; Backward he fell, on the field to lie; And he swooned anon, for the end was nigh.
CXC
High were the mountains and high the trees, Bright shone the marble terraces; On the green grass Roland hath swooned away. A Saracen spied him where he lay: Stretched with the rest he had feigned him dead, His face and body with blood bespread. To his feet he sprang, and in haste he hied, He was fair and strong and of courage tried, In pride and wrath he was overbold, And on Roland, body and arms, laid hold. "The nephew of Karl is overthrown! To Araby bear I this sword, mine own." He stooped to grasp it, but as he drew, Roland returned to his sense anew.
CXCI
He saw the Saracen seize his sword; His eyes he oped, and he spake one word "Thou art not one of our band, I trow," And he clutched the horn he would ne'er forego; On the golden crest he smote him full, Shattering steel and bone and skull, Forth from his head his eyes he beat, And cast him lifeless before his feet. "Miscreant, makest thou then so free, As, right or wrong, to lay hold on me? Who hears it will deem thee a madman born; Behold the mouth of mine ivory horn Broken for thee, and the gems and gold Around its rim to earth are rolled."
CXCII
Roland feeleth his eyesight reft, Yet he stands erect with what strength is left; From his bloodless cheek is the hue dispelled, But his Durindana all bare he held. In front a dark brown rock arose He smote upon it ten grievous blows. Grated the steel as it struck the flint, Yet it brake not, nor bore its edge one dint. "Mary, Mother, be thou mine aid! Ah, Durindana, my ill - starred blade, I may no longer thy guardian be! What fields of battle I won with thee! What realms and regions 'twas ours to gain, Now the lordship of Carlemaine! Never shalt thou possessor know Who would turn from face of mortal foe; A gallant vassal so long thee bore, Such as France the free shall know no more."
CXCIII
He smote anew on the marble stair. It grated, but breach nor notch was there. When Roland found that it would not break, Thus began he his plaint to make. "Ah, Durindana, how fair and bright Thou sparklest, flaming against the light! When Karl in Maurienne valley lay, God sent his angel from heaven to say 'This sword shall a valorous captain's be,' And he girt it, the gentle king, on me. With it I vanquished Poitou and Maine, Provence I conquered and Aquitaine; I conquered Normandy the free, Anjou, and the marches of Brittany; Romagna I won, and Lombardy, Bavaria, Flanders from side to side, And Burgundy, and Poland wide; Constantinople affiance vowed, And the Saxon soil to his bidding bowed; Scotia, and Wales, and Ireland's plain, Of England made he his own domain. What might, regions I won of old, For the hoary - headed Karl to hold! But there presses on me a grievous pain, Lest thou in heathen hands remain. O God our Father, keep France from stain!"
CXCIV
His strokes once more on the brown rock fell, And the steel was bent past words to tell; Yet it brake not, nor was notched the grain, Erect it leaped to the sky again. When he failed at the last to break his blade, His lamentation he inly made. "Oh, fair and holy, my peerless sword, What relics lie in thy pommel stored! Tooth of Saint Peter, Saint Basil's blood, Hair of Saint Denis beside them strewed, Fragment of holy Mary's vest. 'Twere shame that thou with the heathen rest; Thee should the hand of a Christian serve One who would never in battle swerve. What regions won I with thee of yore, The empire now of Karl the hoar! Rich and mighty is he therefore.'
CXCV
That death was on him he knew full well; Down from his head to his heart it fell; On the grass beneath a pine - tree's shade, With face to earth, his form he laid, Beneath him placed he his horn and sword, And turned his face to the heathen horde. Thus hath he done the sooth to show, That Karl and his warriors all may know, That the gentle count a conqueror died. Mea Culpa full oft he cried; And, for all his sins, unto God above, In sign of penance, he raised his glove.
CXCVI
Roland feeleth his hour at hand; On a knoll he lies towards the Spanish land. With one hand beats he upon his breast: "In thy sight, O God, be my sins confessed. From my hour of birth, both the great and small, Down to this day, I repent of all." As his glove he raises to God on high, Angels of heaven descend him nigh.
CXCVII
Beneath a pine was his resting - place, To the land of Spain hath he turned his face, On his memory rose full many a thought Of the lands he won and the fields he fought; Of his gentle France, of his kin and line; Of his nursing father, King Karl benign; He may not the tear and sob control, Nor yet forgets he his parting soul. To God's compassion he makes his cry: "O Father true, who canst not lie, Who didst Lazarus raise unto life agen, And Daniel shield in the lions' den; Shield my soul from its peril, due For the sins I sinned my lifetime through." He did his right - hand glove uplift Saint Gabriel took from his hand the gift; Then drooped his head upon his breast, And with clasped hands he went to rest. God from on high sent down to him One of his angel Cherubim Saint Michael of Peril of the sea, Saint Gabriel in company From heaven they came for that soul of price, And they bore it with them to Paradise.

Created:
0
Posted in:
BSH1 MEMORIAL PROFiLE PiC PiCK of the WEEK No. 28: LiBERTé, éGALiTé, FRATERNiTé

So Long Marianne

Come over to the window, my little darling,
I'd like to try to read your palm.
I used to think I was some kind of Gypsy boy
before I let you take me home.

Now so long, Marianne, it's time that we began
to laugh and cry and cry and laugh about it all again.

Well you know that I love to live with you,
but you make me forget so very much.
I forget to pray for the angels
and then the angels forget to pray for us.

Now so long, Marianne, it's time that we began
to laugh and cry and cry and laugh about it all again.

We met when we were almost young
deep in the green lilac park.
You held on to me like I was a crucifix,
as we went kneeling through the dark.

Now so long, Marianne, it's time that we began
to laugh and cry and cry and laugh about it all again.

Your letters they all say that you're beside me now.
Then why do I feel alone?
I'm standing on a ledge and your fine spider web
is fastening my ankle to a stone.

Now so long, Marianne, it's time that we began
to laugh and cry and cry and laugh about it all again.

For now I need your hidden love.
I'm cold as a new razor blade.
You left when I told you I was curious,
I never said that I was brave.

Now so long, Marianne, it's time that we began
to laugh and cry and cry and laugh about it all again.

Oh, you are really such a pretty one.
I see you've gone and changed your name again.
And just when I climbed this whole mountainside,
to wash my eyelids in the rain!

Now so long, Marianne, it's time that we began
to laugh and cry and cry and laugh about it all again.

-Leonard Cohen




Created:
0
Posted in:
BSH1 MEMORIAL PROFiLE PiC PiCK of the WEEK No. 28: LiBERTé, éGALiTé, FRATERNiTé
Liberté

Sur mes cahiers d’écolier
Sur mon pupitre et les arbres
Sur le sable sur la neige
J’écris ton nom

Sur toutes les pages lues
Sur toutes les pages blanches
Pierre sang papier ou cendre
J’écris ton nom

Sur les images dorées
Sur les armes des guerriers
Sur la couronne des rois
J’écris ton nom

Sur la jungle et le désert
Sur les nids sur les genêts
Sur l’écho de mon enfance
J’écris ton nom

Sur les merveilles des nuits
Sur le pain blanc des journées
Sur les saisons fiancées
J’écris ton nom

Sur tous mes chiffons d’azur
Sur l’étang soleil moisi
Sur le lac lune vivante
J’écris ton nom

Sur les champs sur l’horizon
Sur les ailes des oiseaux
Et sur le moulin des ombres
J’écris ton nom

Sur chaque bouffée d’aurore
Sur la mer sur les bateaux
Sur la montagne démente
J’écris ton nom

Sur la mousse des nuages
Sur les sueurs de l’orage
Sur la pluie épaisse et fade
J’écris ton nom

Sur les formes scintillantes
Sur les cloches des couleurs
Sur la vérité physique
J’écris ton nom

Sur les sentiers éveillés
Sur les routes déployées
Sur les places qui débordent
J’écris ton nom

Sur la lampe qui s’allume
Sur la lampe qui s’éteint
Sur mes maisons réunies
J’écris ton nom

Sur le fruit coupé en deux
Du miroir et de ma chambre
Sur mon lit coquille vide
J’écris ton nom

Sur mon chien gourmand et tendre
Sur ses oreilles dressées
Sur sa patte maladroite
J’écris ton nom

Sur le tremplin de ma porte
Sur les objets familiers
Sur le flot du feu béni
J’écris ton nom

Sur toute chair accordée
Sur le front de mes amis
Sur chaque main qui se tend
J’écris ton nom

Sur la vitre des surprises
Sur les lèvres attentives
Bien au-dessus du silence
J’écris ton nom

Sur mes refuges détruits
Sur mes phares écroulés
Sur les murs de mon ennui
J’écris ton nom

Sur l’absence sans désir
Sur la solitude nue
Sur les marches de la mort
J’écris ton nom

Sur la santé revenue
Sur le risque disparu
Sur l’espoir sans souvenir
J’écris ton nom

Et par le pouvoir d’un mot
Je recommence ma vie
Je suis né pour te connaître
Pour te nommer

Liberté.

-Paul Eluard
Created:
0
Posted in:
BSH1 MEMORIAL PROFiLE PiC PiCK of the WEEK No. 28: LiBERTé, éGALiTé, FRATERNiTé
Demain, dès l'aube

Demain, dès l’aube, à l’heure où blanchit la campagne,
Je partirai. Vois-tu, je sais que tu m’attends.
J’irai par la forêt, j’irai par la montagne.
Je ne puis demeurer loin de toi plus longtemps.

Je marcherai les yeux fixés sur mes pensées,
Sans rien voir au dehors, sans entendre aucun bruit,
Seul, inconnu, le dos courbé, les mains croisées,
Triste, et le jour pour moi sera comme la nuit.

Je ne regarderai ni l’or du soir qui tombe,
Ni les voiles au loin descendant vers Harfleur,
Et quand j’arriverai, je mettrai sur ta tombe
Un bouquet de houx vert et de bruyère en fleur.

-Victor Hugo
Created:
0
Posted in:
BSH1 MEMORIAL PROFiLE PiC PiCK of the WEEK No. 28: LiBERTé, éGALiTé, FRATERNiTé

Billy Rose was a low rider, Billy Rose was a night fighter
Billy Rose knew trouble like the sound of his own name
Busted on a drunken charge
Driving someone else's car
The local midnight sheriff's claim to fame
In an Arizona jail there are some who tell the tale how
Billy fought the sergeant for some milk that he demanded
Knowing they'd remain the boss
Knowing he would pay the cost
They saw he was severely reprimanded
In the blackest cell on "A" Block
He hanged himself at dawn
With a note stuck to the bunk head
Don't mess with me, just take me home
Come and lay, help us lay
Young Billy down
Luna was a Mexican the law called an alien
For coming across the border with a baby and a wife
Though the clothes upon his back were wet
Still he thought that he could get
Some money and things to start a life
It hadn't been too very long when it seemed like everything went wrong
They didn't even have the time to find themselves a home
This foreigner, a brown-skin male
Thrown into a Texas jail
It left the wife and baby quite alone
He eased the pain inside him
With a needle in his arm
But the dope just crucified him
He died to no one's great alarm
Come and lay, help us lay
Young Luna down
And we're gonna raze, raze the prisons
To the ground
Kilowatt was an aging con of 65 who stood a chance to stay alive
And leave the joint and walk the streets again
As the time he was to leave drew near
He suffered all the joy and fear
Of leaving 35 years in the pen
And on the day of his release he was approached by the police
Who took him to the warden walking slowly by his side
The warden said "You won't remain here
But it seems a state retainer
Claims another 10 years of your life."
He stepped out in the Texas sunlight
The cops all stood around
Old Kilowatt ran 50 yards
Then threw himself down on the ground
They might as well just have laid
The old man down
And we're gonna raze, raze the prisons
To the ground
Help us raze, raze the prisons
To the ground

-Joan Baez

Created:
0
Posted in:
BSH1 MEMORIAL PROFiLE PiC PiCK of the WEEK No. 28: LiBERTé, éGALiTé, FRATERNiTé
Allons enfants de la Patrie
Le jour de gloire est arrivé!
Contre nous de la tyrannie
L’étendard sanglant est levé
L’étendard sanglant est levé
Entendez-vous dans les campagnes
Mugir ces féroces soldats?
Ils viennent jusque dans vos bras
Égorger nos fils, nos compagnes!

Aux armes, citoyens
Formez vos bataillons
Marchons, marchons!
Qu’un sang impur
Abreuve nos sillons!

Created:
0
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
-->
@Wylted
Do you think babbit was a legitimate threat to those politicians?
Yes.  A 14 year veteran who had penetrated between 6 and 10 police lines, who had disobeyed literally hundreds of lawful orders from police to halt, smashing glass and busting down doors, who leapt into the 4 foot high sidelight with a backpack full of unknowns.  She had tweeted hours before that Vice President Mike Pence and Chief Justice John Roberts were traitors and just one cop stood between her and the rooms where those men were hiding with their families alongside much of Congress.  Nobody had searched that backpack, for all that last cop knew, this athletic woman was a suicide bomber,  just feet away from her target.

She was certainly a far more legit threat than George Floyd, or Eric Garner, or Breonna Taylor and her targets were of vital US interest.  If you take the politics out of it, Ashli Babbitt would have been shot dead by 20 cops less than 50 feet across the Capitol lawn.

No good cop had any choice in that situation.  Anybody who says otherwise is blinded by political loyalties.

Honestly nobody was.
Nearly five months after the January 6 Capitol riot, at least 17 police officers remain out of work due to injuries sustained during the attack.

At least 10 Capitol Police officers were out with injuries as of Thursday, according to a source on Capitol Hill and at the police union, while as of Friday, seven members of the D.C. Metropolitan Police force remained in a "less than full duty status" due to the events of the riot, a police spokesperson said. 

In total, more than 150 officers were injured in the attack: 86 Capitol Police officers reported injuries, the sources said, along with 65 members of the Metropolitan Police Department, Chief Robert Contee testified in January. Contee also said that even more D.C. police officers sustained injuries they "did not even bother to report," including scratches, bruises and eyes burned from chemical spray. 

Violence that day left officers with head wounds, cracked ribs and smashed spinal disks, according to Capitol Police Labor Committee Chairman Gus Papathanasiou. Court documents in the federal criminal investigation describe a number of alleged assaults that sent officers to the hospital. 

One Metropolitan Police officer, identified in court documents only as "A.W." said he was pulled into the crowd, kicked, hit with poles and stomped on by several individuals. He emerged from the crowd bleeding from his head, with a laceration that required two staples to close.

Riot defendant and former Green Beret Jeffrey McKellop allegedly assaulted four officers, shoving a flagpole into an officer's face and then throwing it like a "spear," causing a laceration near the officer's left eye, prosecutors said. McKellop has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

Officer Mike Fanone, a D.C. Metropolitan police officer, penned a letter in May about his ongoing trauma after he was pulled into a crowd, beaten and repeatedly Tased on January 6. Prosecutors have said that as a result of being attacked in the crowd, Fanone lost consciousness and was subsequently hospitalized for his injuries.

"Since then I have struggled with many aspects of that day. As the physical injuries gradually subsided," Fanone wrote, "in crept the psychological trauma."
A congressional source told CBS News, "Keep in mind that PTSD experienced by officers as a result can be reported as injuries after the fact so the number could go up."

It was boomer q tards who honestly would have just shouted at them.
In 2018 alone, boomer Qtards were charged with making death threats against politicians, multiple cases of bomb-making, breaking into the Canadian Prime Minister's home, making an armed blockade across the hoover dam, attempting to arrest Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Bill de Blasio, killing Gambino Crime Family Boss Francesco Cali, destroying the  Chapel of the Holy Hill in Sedona, AZ, multiple child kidnappings, and intentionally derailing a freight train in attempt to crash it into the hospital ship, Mercy.  If BLM  had a criminal record like QAnon, Republicans would have suspended the Constitution long ago.

You know politicians used to actually just talk to people instead of retardedly putting on masks and cowering at upset crowds of largely law abiding citizens.
Like I said, Gosar won't even shake hands with cops who saved his ass.  Here's Joe Biden comforting the families of the Miami building collapse.


Jared and Ivanka Trump live in the same tiny town of Surfside, just three buildings down the beach from the collapse, but no Trump has made an public appearance there.
Created:
2
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
The moral of the story is that Police suck unless they are protecting elite oligarchs in DC. Then and ONLY then they are not systemic racist murderers.
Folks reading Greyparrot's posts here and elsewhere should know that Greyparrot has requested special  protection by the Mods from me.  That is, while Greyparrot is free to make his reply to anything I say with all the insight of a Tourette's episode, always in the company of his little pack of all white, alt-right, one-liner-sixty-niners, he only does so because I am constrained from replying. Travelling in bands is the tell-tale of thugs.  Such is the behavior on non-debaters who lack confidence in the words they are saying, who fear ever being called upon to defend the lies they consistently promote.  We don't have to wonder if GP stands behind any of the shit he talks- his lack of confidence tells  us everything we need to know.

Created:
2
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
 why are the Feds covering up his name.
People who have read up on this topic already know that the cop in question was a Federal employee but did not report to the executive branch.  The White House doesn't have this guy's name.

This officer reports to Senate Majority Leader and the Speaker of the House but any Congressperson who gives a shit about the police that protect them also know this guy's name.  You should ask yourself why so many Republican Senators and Reps are keeping that information from Trump (if indeed they are, I've already said I'm skeptical on that point.  I think you are just falling for another one of Trump's sideshows).  Also, any Fox reporters who work at the Capitol already know who this guy is- why is Fox News playing this game on Trump's behalf?
Created:
1
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
-->
@ILikePie5
 No one has the time nor wants to take the effort to read 10,000 character posts.
10,000 characters is 3 pages.  We have learned the hard way that 3 pages is generally too much to expect Republicans to handle but Democrats happily consume 3 pages worth of information many times each day.  This is also why we use big words around Republicans.

Once again, what was the name of the officer who shot Ashli Babitt and why are the Feds covering up his name.
People with the intellect to handle 3 pages worth of information know I've already answered this question in this forum.


Created:
1
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?

We ALREADY KNOW WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT
Trump and his sycophants are trying to turn the slain rioter into a martyr—an attempt to obscure their own responsibility for the January 6 insurrection.

Matt Ford for The New Republic

Ashli Babbitt should be alive right now. A Capitol Police officer shot and killed the 35-year-old woman on January 6 outside the House chamber as she and other pro-Trump rioters besieged it. Babbitt was one of five people who died during or shortly after the insurrection, along with three other Trump supporters and Officer Brian Sicknick. Two other officers died by suicide in the weeks that followed.

Among those seven deaths, former President Donald Trump and other MAGA adherents have taken a particular interest in Babbitt. He sent out a tweet-like statement last week that simply read, “Who shot Ashli Babbitt?” Then he suggested at a rally on Wednesday that the unidentified officer’s actions weren’t justified. “The person that shot Ashli Babbitt—boom, right through the head,” he told the crowd. “Just, boom. There was no reason for that. And why isn’t that person being opened up, and why isn’t that being studied? They’ve already written it off. They said that case is closed. If that were the opposite, that case would be going on for years and years, and it would not be pretty.” His allies have followed suit: Earlier this week, Arizona Congressman Paul Gosar published a press release titled, “Who killed Ashli Babbitt?”

The rush to turn Babbitt into a martyr is part of a broader effort among conservatives and Trump loyalists to rewrite the history of January 6—to recast it as a peaceful protest with a few bad apples, rather than a mob of thousands who overwhelmed law enforcement and rampaged through the halls of Congress. But “Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” is actually a pretty easy question to answer: She was killed by the people who keep asking the question.

Before she joined an effort to overturn American democracy through violence, Babbitt led a fairly normal life. A New York Times profile earlier this year reported that she had served in the Air Force for 14 years, which included tours of duty in Afghanistan and Iraq. After returning to civilian life, she worked as a security official at a nuclear power plant in Maryland and then joined a pool-supply company with her family in San Diego.

At the same time, Babbitt found herself drawn to the pro-Trump zealotry and toxic conspiricism that dominates right-wing internet discourse. The Times reported that her Twitter feed railed against California’s leaders on issues ranging from immigration to pandemic restrictions. She shared tweets and messages indicating that she supported the QAnon moment, whose adherents fantasize about a military-led coup that results in the mass execution of Democratic politicians and prominent liberals. “Nothing will stop us … they can try and try and try but the storm is here and it is descending upon DC in less than 24 hours … dark to light!” she posted on Twitter one day before her death, referencing QAnon slogans.

The Washington Post’s Aaron Blake noted that many conservative media figures, ranging from Lou Dobbs to Dan Bongino, viewed Babbitt’s death as tragic but not necessarily scandalous. He found that things only began to change after a Times columnist noted that Babbitt was a regular viewer of Tucker Carlson’s show, which often indulges in falsehoods and conspiracy theories. Carlson defensively complained about the column on one of his February broadcasts. “But what kind of country is it where nobody says, ‘Well, wait, that’s kind of sad’?” he told viewers. “They shot an unarmed woman. Is that really a death-penalty offense?”
Some far-right figures and white nationalists began comparing Babbitt to George Floyd and other high-profile victims of police killings, perhaps to try to replicate the activism and political energy unleashed by those deaths, or perhaps merely to mock those tragedies. Others have tried to own the libs by wondering why Democrats aren’t raising more questions about this particular police shooting. “If the Democrats and Crooked Media are ignoring the ONLY shooting in the Capitol on Jan. 6th, there must be something wrong with it,” Rudy Giuliani wrote on Twitter on Wednesday.

In recent weeks, Carlson’s commentary on Babbitt has become increasingly surreal. The Fox News host played clips from an NBC interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin where the NBC reporter asks if he ordered the assassination of Alexei Navalny, a prominent opposition figure. Putin responds by asking who ordered the “assassination” of “the woman who walked into the Congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman?” Most people would probably see this flimsy deflection for what it was, but in Carlson’s ever-bewildered eyes, Putin’s remark was somehow a reasonable response and a fair question. “Who did shoot Ashli Babbitt, and why don’t we know?” he asked. “Are anonymous federal agents now allowed to kill unarmed women who protest the regime? That’s OK now? No, it’s not OK. It’ll never be OK.” He also recently interviewed Aaron Babbitt, Ashli’s widower, who is suing the Capitol Police to reveal the officer’s identity. “I never expected to lose my wife to political violence,” Babbitt told Carlson.

The attempt to make Babbitt a martyr only really gathered steam once Democrats moved to establish a body to investigate January 6. Republicans took two complementary approaches to the potential political damage that further scrutiny of the day could bring. Some argued that it was time for the country to move on, claiming Democrats were politicizing a tragedy and turning it into a partisan cudgel. Others tried rewriting events in their favor: disputing that it amounted to an “insurrection,” comparing their attack to a tourist visit, and generally painting the participants in more sympathetic terms.

Taken together, Republicans are externally downplaying January 6 while internally rewriting the history of that dark day. They want Democrats and the left to stop talking about it; they want Trump supporters to talk about it more. Some conservative figures have tried to muddy the waters even further, falsely claiming that antifa was responsible for the violence or, more bizarrely, that the FBI somehow organized the riot. Obfuscating the causes and actors behind episodes of political violence is an all-too-familiar strategy for those who sympathize with its goals.

The problem for conservatives, however, is twofold. First, Babbitt’s death is fairly well documented. At least one riot participant captured footage of the shooting while standing mere feet away from Babbitt. Snippets of the final moments of the encounter can be seen on a bodycam worn by other officers who had just arrived behind the rioters. They show an angry mob trying to break through doors and barricades set up outside the Speaker’s Lobby, which allows access into the House chamber itself and where some members of Congress had taken refuge. Officers, their guns raised, shouted multiple warnings to stop, but Babbitt tried to climb through a window toward them.

An officer then fired a single shot, and Babbitt fell to the ground. In April, the U.S. attorney’s office for the District of Columbia announced that it wouldn’t press charges against the officer for his actions. “Specifically, the investigation revealed no evidence to establish that, at the time the officer fired a single shot at Ms. Babbitt, the officer did not reasonably believe that it was necessary to do so in self-defense or in defense of the Members of Congress and others evacuating the House Chamber,” the office said in a statement. In other words, it would have been almost impossible to convince a jury that the officer was wrong to think that a violent mob storming the Capitol posed an immediate threat to him or to the lawmakers he was protecting.

The second problem for those asking “Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” is more fundamental: Human beings do not have the memory of a goldfish. People remember that Trump and his allies spent months lying about the election results, falsely claiming that it was stolen from him, and telling his supporters to take action. People also remember that Trump summoned his supporters to the National Mall on January 6, told them the country was in peril, and urged them to march up Capitol Hill to express their anger. If Trump had just conceded the election before January 6, would Babbitt have boarded a plane to Washington to support him? If right-wing media figures hadn’t echoed Trump’s lies, would she have been anywhere near the Capitol on that fateful day?

If Trump and his allies really want to know who is responsible for Babbitt’s death and the deaths of others on January 6, they need only look in a mirror. Hunting for a scapegoat on the Capitol Police force is a misguided way to smother any embers of guilt that burn in their hearts. Their reckless revisionism could also have more tragic consequences down the road. The greatest danger with turning Babbitt into a martyr is that it risks creating more of her: people who are willing to fight and even die for hollow, corrupt lies.

Created:
1
Posted in:
WHO KILLED ASHLI BABBITT?
For example, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced that the United States Department of Justice is going to be using its authorities to challenge the onslaught of state laws undermining voting rights in old and new ways. The focus will be on dismantling racially discriminatory laws like the recent challenged to Georgia’s vicious anti voting law.

The Department of Justice will do so with the Voting Rights Division that at my request is doubling its size and enforcement staff. Civil rights groups and other organizations have announced their plans to stay vigilant and challenge these odious laws in the courts. In Texas, for example, Republican led state legislature wants to allow partisan poll watchers to intimidate voters and impartial poll workers.

They want voters to dive further, and be able to be in a position where they wonder who’s watching them, and intimidate them. To wait longer to vote, to drive a hell of a lot… Excuse me… A long way to get to vote. They want to make it so hard and inconvenient that they hope people don’t vote at all. That’s what this is about.

This year alone, 17 states have enacted, not just proposed but enacted, 28 new laws to make it harder for Americans to vote. Not to mention, it gets this nearly 400 additional bills Republican members of the state legislatures are trying to pass. The 21st Century Jim Crow assault is real, it’s unrelenting, and we’re going to challenge it vigorously.

While this broad assault against voting rights is not unprecedented, it is taking on new and literally pernicious forms. It’s no longer just about who gets to vote or making it easier for eligible voters to vote. It’s about who gets to count the vote, who gets to count whether or not your vote counted at all.

It’s about moving from independent election administrators who worked for the people, to polarized state legislatures and partisan actors who work for political parties. To me, this is simple, this is election subversion. It’s the most dangerous threat to voting in the integrity of free and fair elections in our history. Never before have we decided who gets to count, count, what votes count.

Some state legislators want to make it harder for you to vote. And if you vote, they want to be able to tell you your vote doesn’t count for any reason they make up. They want the ability to reject the final count and ignore the will of the people if their preferred candidate loses.

They’re trying, not only targeting people of color, they’re targeting voters of all races and backgrounds. With a simple target, who did not vote for them? That’s the target. It’s unconscionable. I mean, really, I it’s hard to declare just how critical this is. It’s simply unconscionable. We’ve got to shore up our election system and address the threats of election of subversion, not just from abroad, which I spent time with Putin talking about, but from home.

We must ask those who represent us at the federal, state and local levels, “Will you deny the will of the people? Will you ignore their voices?” We have to ask, “Are you on the side of truth or lies, fact or fiction, justice or injustice. Democracy or Autocracy?” That’s what it’s coming down to.

Which is bringing me to perhaps the most important thing we have to do. We have to forge a coalition of Americans of every background and political party, the advocates, the students, the faith leaders, the labor leaders, the business executives to raise the urgency of this moment. Because as much as people know they’re screwing around with the election process. I don’t think that most people think this is about who gets to count what vote counts. Literally, not figuratively.

You vote for certain electors to vote for somebody for president. A State legislature comes along, under their proposal, and they said, “No, we don’t like those electors, we’re going to appoint other electors who are going to vote for the other guy or other woman.”

Because here’s the deal, in 2020 democracy was put to a test. First by the pandemic, then by a desperate attempt to deny the reality of the results of the election. And then, via violent and deadly insurrection on the Capitol, the Citadel of our democracy.

I’ve been around a long time in public life. I thought I’d seen it all, or most of it all, but I never thought I’d see that for real. And in spite of what you see on television and you saw it, you have Senators saying it was just a day at the Capitol, just people visiting the Capitol.

Folks, we met the test. Because of the extraordinary courage of election officials, many of them Republicans, our court system and those brave Capitol police officers, because of them democracy held.

Look how close it came, I mean for real, how close it came. We’re going to face another test in 2022, a new wave of unprecedented voter suppression and raw and sustained election subversion. We have to prepare now.

As I’ve said time and again, no matter what you can never stop the American people from voting. They will decide, and the power must always be with the people. That’s why just like we did in 2020, we have to prepare for 2022. We’ll engage in an all out effort to educate voters about the changing laws, register them to vote and then get them vote out.

We’ll encourage people to run for office themselves at every level, we’ll be asking my Republican friends in Congress and states and cities and counties to stand up for God’s sake and help prevent this concerted effort to undermine our elections and the sacred right to vote.

Have you no shame? Whether it’s stopping foreign interference in our elections, or the spread of disinformation from within, we have to work together. Vice President Harris and I, we’re making it clear that there’s real peril in making raw power, rather than the idea of liberty, the centerpiece of the common life.

The founders understood this. The women of Seneca Falls understood this. The brave heroic foot soldiers of the Civil Rights Movement understood this. So must we. This isn’t about Democrats or Republicans, it’s literally about who we are as Americans. It’s that basic.

It’s about the kind of country we want today, a kind of country we want for our children and grandchildren tomorrow. And quite frankly, the whole world is watching.

Folks, I’m not being sentimental. I’m not preaching to you. I’m just giving it to you straight, as I promised I would always do. Lay things out on the line and honor your trust with trust. So hear me clearly, there’s an unfolding assault taking place in America today, an attempt to suppress and subvert the right to vote in fair and free elections. An assault on democracy, an assault on liberty, an assault on who we are, who we are as Americans.

For make no mistake, bullies and merchants of fear, peddlers of lies are threatening the very foundation of our country. It gives me no pleasure to say this. I never thought in my entire career I’d ever have to say it. But I swore an oath to you, to God to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. That’s an oath that forms a sacred trust to defend America against all threats, both foreign and domestic.

The assault on free and fair elections is just such a threat, literally. I’ve said it before. We’re facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War. That’s not hyperbole, since the Civil War. The Confederates back then never breached the Capitol as insurrectionist did on January the sixth.

I’m not saying this to alarm you, I’m saying this because you should be alarmed. I’m also saying this, there’s good news. It doesn’t have to be this way. It doesn’t have to be, for real. We have the means, we just need the will. The will to save and strengthen our democracy.

We did it in 2020. The battle for the soul of America. In that battle the people voted, democracy prevailed, our Constitution held. We have to do it again.

My fellow Americans, it requires fair mindedness, devotion to justice, as corny as it sounds, love of country. It requires us to unite in common purpose to declare here and now, We the People will never give up. We will not give in. We will overcome. We will do it together.

Guaranteeing the right to vote. Ensuring that every vote is counted has always been the most patriotic thing we can do. Just remember, our late friend John Lewis said, “Freedom is not a state, it’s an act. Freedom is not a state, it’s an act.” And we must act and we will act, for our cause is just, our vision is clear, and our hearts are full. For We the People, for our democracy, for America itself, we must act. God bless you all and may God protect our troops and all those who stand to watch over our democracy. But act! We’ve got to act! Thank you.




Created:
1