sadolite

The federal reserve's only responsibility is to control the amount of currency in circulation to control inflation based on wealth created. It is the federal reserve that tells the treasury it can print more money. The federal reserve is 100% responsible for all worthless dollars printed. The federal reserve is 100% responsible for inflation. And spare me the supply and demand argument for some isolated commodity.  Also the question I asked is not answered. How many more trillions of  worthless dollars can be added to the already 31 trillion before the whole house of cards comes falling down? You must have an approximate figure because you don't think it is an issue right now. Also why should I pay taxes if the govt can just spend money it doesn't have? It just creates money out of thin air. I cant do that. I dont recall allowing the govt to sell unrepayable  debt.

Why should I pay taxes if the govt can just print worthless money out of thin air? The current total to date is 31 trillion worthless dollars printed and not one penny is being allocated to reduce it. How many more trillions can the govt print before the entire house of cards comes falling down? Everyone at the federal reserve should be executed.

Looking to govt to solve this issue would be the first step into abject failure and even more poverty. But then again isn't that the plan, equal suffering.

America and the rest of the world aint far behind. Tyranny for all is the future.  In America you have to explain why you think performing irreversible hormone treatments and sex change operations on 6 year old  children is bad.

After having heard every BS story imaginable about Tucker Carlson being fired/leaving on his own/mutually agreeing to cut ties with Fox news, who the fuck knows. 

There is one thing that stands out to me. A so called news show hires an anchor under contract. That being said they cant just fire Tucker Carlson willy nilly. Promoting a narrative is not grounds for breach of contract. If that were true every news anchor in the world would be fired. There is a way for Fox News to silence "uncontrollable opposition"  like Tucker Carlson. They can cancel his show and still honor their contract by continuing to pay him. You may ask how does that silence him? Well if there is a non compete clause in his contract he cant be employed by any other news media outlet until his contract ends. This pretty much shuts him up until after the 2024 elections. He may be able to do some podcasts or cameo appearances on small time BS outlets with tiny audiences but that's about it. Given all available BS misinformation, lies and garbage  available at the moment this is my take on it. The fact that Tucker Carlson appears that he could care less about his show getting canceled. It  kind of indicates he's laughing all the way to the bank to get paid to do nothing for who knows how many years to come. I should would like to read his employment contract. If this whole thing doesn't prove to you that all the news networks take their political narrative marching orders from the same people nothing will. Who in their right mind fires the most watched biggest cash cow in all of the news media. Who does that? That defies all logic on every possible level.

It seems to me you  have a solution to your problems, you just refuse to listen to or acknowledge the solution.  Kinda like complaining you cant get meat a vegan buffet.

That's a two way street. Also who decides what is bigoted and just plain stupid and retarded. Me saying a man cant get pregnant makes me a bigoted transphobic. I say it stupid and retarded to even suggest it.

War mongering Biden. Cant attack other countries unless the sitting President says so. The US  Govt is the international community.

In other political news. I don't know if this is true or not because I don't believe anything the news media reports. But time will most certainly prove its authenticity.

"A Washington Post report claims that the DNC has resolved not to hold primary debates — a move that has drawn the ire of leftists such as former Ohio state senator Nina Turner, who decries the decision as “undemocratic.” By denying Kennedy and Williamson the opportunity to articulate their ideas in a public forum, the Democratic Party risks appearing overtly self-serving and dismissive of democratic norms. Furthermore, engaging in open debates could afford Biden the opportunity to address substantive criticisms and demonstrate his policy accomplishments.
By deciding against holding primary debates, the DNC is effectively silencing dissenting voices and perpetuating the status quo. This move hampers the exchange of ideas and stifles the democratic process, which is fundamental to the American political system. The absence of debates also prevents voters from making informed decisions, as they are denied the opportunity to hear alternative perspectives and evaluate candidates based on their performance in a public forum. This decision is eerily reminiscent of the 2016 Democratic primaries, where the DNC was accused of favoring Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders, limiting the number of debates, and scheduling them during less-viewed time slots.
The decision not to hold primary debates can be seen as an act of voter suppression and censorship, as it effectively denies voters the chance to hear from candidates other than the incumbent. By excluding challengers like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Marianne Williamson from the public discourse, the DNC is attempting to control the narrative and maintain its grip on power. This move also serves to protect the party establishment and prevent any potential disruptions to their preferred candidate’s path to the nomination. In doing so, the DNC is undermining the democratic process and disempowering voters, as they are left with little choice but to accept the party’s anointed candidate."

Hey I am just repeating what I am lectured to accept. You are just shooting the messenger. You aren't actually saying men cant get pregnant are you? That's  transphobic hate speech.

If space aliens visited the earth for the first time and watched TV they would think half the population wants to get a sex change operation.

"Reducing the chance of being assassinated is not even in the top 50 considerations when picking a VP."    Source?

It appears men are better at being women than women are. The results prove it. Now that men can get pregnant what purpose exactly do woman serve? 

We live in a time where personal accountability doesn't exist. Everyone is a victim. Look on the bright side though, nothing will ever be your own damn fault. But on the down side, your life will be an endless disappointment because you will rely on everyone else to bail you out of everything.  Which of course they wont.

I'm an ideologue? You are the poster child for the word ideologue.

Its a sad day the anyone looks to any news organization to validate their world view. It isn't the job of any "so called" news organization to influence world views.  You are not watching news if what you are watching is influencing your world view.

No you are saying it. I never said any such thing. "Opinions are like asses everyone has one"

No, you both offered worthless words, just sayin. I have plenty of that spoken to me. Never learned a thing from them.

Even if morality was objective, the human species is incapable of adhering to 100 % agreed upon objective  morals. Kind of a moot argument in my opinion. Your behavior is rewarded accordingly whether you want to believe it or not.

Pretending to be something you are not, that's up to you. Society playing along, that's up to each individual. End of debate.

thanks

Although I am not a user of Twitter, I hear a lot about some kind of blue check mark that costs $8.00. What does one get for their $8.00 blue check mark or what does it mean?

I've seen what the highly educated and lawyers  have done to this country. I am done with their leadership. Lets let the electricians, plumbers, carpenters, mechanics and farmers have a go at it. They couldn't possibly do any worse.

I should believe what you say? Why would I ? All you do is insult people and call them morons. Just like politicians and  govt does. Your words, just like theirs are worthless and will lead to nothing but waste, fraud and corruption. Always has always will. In my 60 years of living, my critical thinking has taught me that political ideologs, politicians and govts words are empty BS lies. Nothing ever gets solved, not ever. Same shit different day. You are on your own, no one is coming to save you.

I don't believe anything anyone says , even you. You are no better than Trump in my view, you are both full of political BS.

Repent for what? Not having my head shoved up someone else's political ideological  BS ass?

You seem to be mired in worthless politics that does nothing.

Well you haven't said anything that would change my perception of govt. I stand by my last post.

I would say the US govt is the greatest threat to the world. Not the people of the country, the Govt. I would go as far to say all govts are the greatest threat to the world. People just generally want to be left the fuck alone and live their lives in all countries. All bad things come from govts not everyday run of the mill people ruled by them. Power over people breeds evil.

So it seems our govt is made up of nutters and pedophiles.

"Elon Musk is destroying Twitter and it’s stock price" So what, Bud Light is doing the same.  Corporations are no longer beholden to stock investors, invest at your own risk.

"You forgot to mention Trump is white", zing!! LOL

"SCJ Scalia said so" So one guy out of 300 million is the final word. Didn't know that. So in the future some other guy says the opposite that will be the final word?

"Thinking that everybody can be a billionaire or part of any other economic successful minority is a fallacy " I never said that.

"capitalism doesn't allow that" so fill us in on what does allow you to become a billionaire 

Everyone is a victim. You most definitely will never be a billionaire. You cant even imagine being one.

Based on your response it is unlikely you will ever achieve  a six figure income let alone a million or a billion. You already threw in  the towel.

The constitution says who ever in power says it says. The constitution is a subjective list of suggestions, the words really have no meaning.

"2A doesn’t say the government can’t ban certain kinds of guns." Where does it say it can. The constitution was written to limit the govts power not the rights of the people. "The Tenth Amendment reminds the national government that the people and the states retain every authority that is not otherwise mentioned in the Constitution." No where is it mentioned in the constitution that the federal govt can arbitrary ban any gun it thinks is scary. Never mind, the constitution is a collection of subjective suggestions that can be followed or ignored. The words don't really mean what they say.

2nd amendment,  all arguments are moot. Don't buy a gun if you don't want one . You are more likely to be killed by your own govt or  a anti gun protester than a law abiding citizen with a gun.

You will be back, you don't just quit DART. 

You are right I am wrong, everything made from crude will be made from something else.

" I fear change " adhom BS. The facts speak for themselves. You just ignore them. If only there was a way to make everything you own that was made from crude oil instantly disappear. 

"Good old trial and error as it were" Which is why it should never be used to justify govt policy that affects hundreds of millions of lives. I am so sick of science and govt being given a pass when they say "Well it was the best information we had at the time" Screw that BS. If you are going to tell everyone the sky is falling based on that and nothing even remotely happens, you need to rot in prison.

I deal in facts not pie in the sky imaginary things.

Greata speaks for science.

I will repeat "Quite frankly, if we run out of oil, your worries about the climate, ICE's  and  EV's are trivial compared to a future without crude oil."  Your eyes glaze over and talk about horses and buggies.

"Scientists convey what data they have at hand." Maybe its time science get out of the dooms day prediction business as they have been wrong 100% of the time. 

Don't mess up your credit. Otherwise I have no advice given to me at your age that would apply today. You are on your own, do what works for you and no one else.

What makes you think crude oil is not a renewable resource or that we have even scratched the surface of available crude oil that already exists on the planet? Govt actively prevents looking for more. When I was in my 20's I was told ,in no uncertain terms  by the greatest scientific minds to ever exist  that the world would be out of oil in 40 years. Well here I am 60 years old and no shortage of oil. Where is all this oil coming from? Every non organic thing on this earth that is not made of wood or steel is made of crude oil. Quite frankly, if we run out of oil, your worries about the climate, ICE's  and  EV's are trivial compared to a future without crude oil.

Eh, I am not required to have a smart phone. I do have one though. It is practical and useful and serves my needs. An EV will never be affordable or practical let alone serve my needs. But I will be forced to have one in the future and will have to mortgage my house to buy the type of EV that would even come close to serving my needs. 

"Do you ever consider the future, in respect of those who will exist in the future."

Ya, sure I do. But I also consider the practicality and plausibility of changes that are going to be shoved down peoples throats that will have no say in the matter.

That doesn't really answer the question of whether or not EV's can exist without being subsidized by govt. Internal combustion engines can be scaled to any size also.

2 predictions. This witch hunt will never make it to trial and Trump will be your President in 2024. You heard it here first.