secularmerlin

You cannot, in all your marxism, take that away from me, 

he'd have generated a business plan to present to a bank, or the SBA, for a loan.

The glaring problem with that theory is that guns are not the number one weapon of use. Knives, for example, far exceed gun violence. Further, ban guns, knife use will increase, and further banning levels is a slippery slope until we're down to banning thumbs, which also can kill maliciously. Now you're talking mutilation as a legal response to thuggery. By your argument, the natural end-game is lombotomy, because there is the true source of thuggery, not the gun, nor any other tool used as weapon.

somebody else didn't have the idea,

Then why, pray tell, did we arrive at the billiard table of declaration that the universe was geocentric, a belief of laws of physics, applied to billiards, by the way, in antiquity, whereas, Galileo demonstrated it was not in the 17th century, but was placed under house arrest for his theory, and we held the theory of geocentrism until mid 19th century? Hmmm? Determinism failure, as I have previously argued without successful rebuttal.

Great! So all my needs are met. I get to do all the things I love doing. And you will be stuck doing the dirty work that I don't want to do. Maybe this isn't such a bad plan after all.

I argue that there is no determinism

I don't care about my reputation. What do I need that for? All my fulfillment comes from my pursuit of music and knowledge. I don't care what people say or think about me. And I'm still not going to pump any sewage. Now what?

What happens when no one wants to volunteer to pick up trash and clean up sewage? We can't pay anyone to do it so...

No, I don't want to. All my needs are met so I'm going to spend my time playing music and reading books. I'm not going to pump any sewage. What are you going to do about it?

Are you saying that you are to good to do that kind of work?

No.

In this analogy, you don't know the contents of your sandwich.  However, with jobs, people know what a job entails much more than they know whether or not a sandwich is poisoned so they pick the hard jobs to get paid the most.

If someone offers you $5 to eat one of your sandwiches, you have an incentive to make more sandwiches, feeding more people, and getting yourself rich in the process.

And what happens when no one wants to volunteer to pick up trash and clean up sewage? We can't pay anyone to do it so...

When I was a bachelor, the answer would be yes. I would let many tasks go undone for far too long. And there are many households where this is the case because nobody wants to do it. Are you suggesting these things get done in every household on a regular basis?

The best way to prevent crimes is to have the death penalty for all crimes by the most painful way possible and to advertise this so people are scared of doing crimes.

pay for the harm they caused to others.

I obviously succeeded in messing with your head when I said there is both cause and non-cause in the universe

So what happens when no one wants to do it?

So will prisoners be mooching off the government for their sentence?

I don't want prisons taking a single tax dollar because prisoners serve no benefit to society whatsoever under our current laws.  They are parasites to the government; they don't produce anything and prisoners just take without paying back to society.

Enslaving them is how they can pay their debt to society

It's unfair to the victims; it's unfair to the taxpayer, and prison labor is something that should exist.

I'm not advocating for mandatory vastectomies, although I want one for me personally.  I'm saying that mandatory vastectomies to save children from dying is less tyranical than mandatory childbirth to save children from dying.

I don't know how the sperm would be lost in every location.  It might disappear in a few locations, but definitely not all of them.  People that are worried about it can freeze their sperm in multiple sperm banks if they don't want all of their sperm to get lost.

I assume you have a solution worked out for when nobody wants to pump septic tanks.

Except "necessity" is not determined by your concept 

The minimum-wage is NOT a "living wage." It's a politically contrived interference in the labor market.

a State CANNOT be Capitalistic

Our current State is not Capitalist; our current State is quasi-communist.

Resources are never voluntarily given under capitalism.

This isn't even a little bit true.

Voluntary is not mutually exclusive from paid exchange.

professors in college can make more than small business owners

I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic but thanks.

- Says that nature can't be determined and predicted because blue moons happen sometimes

- Goes on to describe how blue moons can be predicted centuries in advance with basic grade school math

Again it's just atheists stealing the story of Jesus

Syllogisms make it very difficult to vaguely beat at the bush. 

For free will to exist - one electron. One molecule. One electric pulse, must not follow the natural rules of the universe, and must instead be affected by something that doesn’t itself follow any of the natural rules of the universe.

From whence comes that "logic?" Sorry, hot air to fill your wish balloon. keep blowing.

So, why does the universe not influence each entity in the same way such that our actions produced are identical to one another? 

That fails to answer the specific question 

The supplier of raw materials is a contracted supply chain,

Workers, ie, direct labor, i.e., the proletariate, do not fill any of those functions, they are indirect labor. 

Pay is paid by the payroll department,

This has resulted in useless jobs and unnecessary components of jobs being common place and also to a necessary amount of unemployed individuals. 

Seems its a hot button for you. Just sayin' 

For free will to exist - one electron. One molecule. One electric pulse, must not follow the natural rules of the universe, and must instead be affected by something that doesn’t itself follow any of the natural rules of the universe.

Even a god a ghost a fairy or an angel (EITHER) acts as the result of previous influence (OR) acts randomly

Physical or not.

Supernatural or natural.

It makes no difference.

Actions are (EITHER) influenced (OR) not-influenced

I offer you a prime rib sandwich, but you'll take the bozone baloney, thanks. Your choice. Or, blame the universe again. Sorry about the taste quality of your universe. I'll take my prime rib. 

Who designed the sandwich?

From whence came the raw materials,

Who developed the marketing plan

Who produced the sandwich?

Who is selling the sandwich? Who is coordinating payment? Who is guaranteeing the sandwich's satisfaction? Who will follow-up on the customer's reaction? 

Who is paying all those who contributed to the sandwich's design through payroll efforts? 

If you're bored by your job, 

Who designed the sandwich? 

Haven't I already told you that one? I have. Try it, yourself. Some things only come by personal proof. If you need better evidence, hire a lawyer. You pay one, they'll do anything, and you'll agree with their result because.... you paid for it.

He, and you, entirely miss the point. 

Since you doubt, you have already violated that process.

I know because it happens outside of physical experience, 

Personal revelation via prayer - complete thought process involving no physical attributes of sensory ability

. It is pure spiritual connect to the Divine.

Determinism =/= free will 

Random acts =/= free will

I am waiting for evidence. Go.

You have offered all but the most pertinent activity; the decision process, alone, once the review of all factors considered is complete, and which certainly has physical, measurable attributes, but the measure of those attributes does not include an exact measure of the processes' resulting action, else one would not be able to display a repeated experience-stimulation with a varied pattern of resulting action, which humans demonstrate all the time. And, the fact is, by those measurement techniques, the data collected, alone, does not indicate with any accuracy what decisive action will be rendered. The physical, organic process you outline simple does not include an outline of the decision made; that must wait for observation of  the individual's action. We can measure that thinking/decision processes are in play, but not the decision, itself.

Knowledge gained without experience. 

That's probably because I was answering a question as to why people need to be employed, not trying to justify employment.  

Well a claim might be challenged by another claim or it might not.  It seems obvious that challenging a claim is a matter of discretion.