I personally am a President Trump fan. It wasn't always that way and I used to be a "Never Trumper." I'm a one-issue voter. I vote Pro-Life and that was my one question about Trump, was he pro-Life? Now that he has been in office for most of his first term I can happily say President Trump is not only pro-Life, but he is arguably the most Pro-Life president we have ever had. Now if he would only stop his crazy tweeting and kowtowing to dictators!
I'm about as Pro-Life as you can be and even I would concede that the fetus is part of the mother's body. I think Pro will have an uphill battle on this one. I think I'll grab some popcorn.
How much Good is Good enough? That seems to be the critical question in this debate.
President Trump has done some good things and some and bad things. I think the burden will be on Pro to show enough convincing arguments that his good outweighs his bad.
Respectfully, I don't see why a debater's bio should be brought up in the debate? A good debater can argue for or against their own biases and do it well, so why should their bio be of any relevance?
Respectfully, I don't see why a debate's bio should be brought up in the debate? A good debater can argue for or against their own biases and do it well, so why should their bio be of any relevance?
I was thinking about doing a song battle with songs that make you laugh, but opted to go with happy music. It might be too hard to come up with 5 songs that make you laugh.
We are under an incredible storm alert. I had to finish quickly and post the argument before my computer went down. I made a small error in the first argument. I said I am arguing on three fronts, I meant to say four fronts. Sorry about that.
Sorry for taking so long o post the first argument. I've had a couple of personal things in my life come up. But rest assured I will have something posted by the deadline!
Would you mind if I used your "Song Battle" theme for a Debate? I'm think the opposite of your Sad emotional battle. Songs that make you happy or laugh?
Again it doesn't matter to me. Let me know as soon as you can what you want to do. In the meantime, I'm preparing a rebuttal to your first argument, just in case you decline my offer.
Oops, looks like I missed out. I'm curious to see how the Pro side presents their arguments (since this would have been my position had I accepted quick enough.)
Evolution may have some scientific fact to support it, but it's still a theory and a theory is not conclusively factual.
Great debate so far! Both sides are doing well!
I personally am a President Trump fan. It wasn't always that way and I used to be a "Never Trumper." I'm a one-issue voter. I vote Pro-Life and that was my one question about Trump, was he pro-Life? Now that he has been in office for most of his first term I can happily say President Trump is not only pro-Life, but he is arguably the most Pro-Life president we have ever had. Now if he would only stop his crazy tweeting and kowtowing to dictators!
That's a fair point.
I'm about as Pro-Life as you can be and even I would concede that the fetus is part of the mother's body. I think Pro will have an uphill battle on this one. I think I'll grab some popcorn.
How much Good is Good enough? That seems to be the critical question in this debate.
President Trump has done some good things and some and bad things. I think the burden will be on Pro to show enough convincing arguments that his good outweighs his bad.
One could argue it's micro-evolution, which is an accepted point in Creationism.
Did Pro concede the debate in Round 4? I would like to cast a vote but I want to understand more clearly why Pro forfeited in round 4.
"Prior to the Luther, there were not "Protestant" churches-- there was one Church, and this one Church compiled the Canon of the Bible"
This would make a great debate topic!
Congrats on your win! And thanks for your advice.
I'm enjoying the debate so far. Both sides have made excellent points in the first argument.
Respectfully, I don't see why a debater's bio should be brought up in the debate? A good debater can argue for or against their own biases and do it well, so why should their bio be of any relevance?
Oops, sorry about that.
Respectfully, I don't see why a debate's bio should be brought up in the debate? A good debater can argue for or against their own biases and do it well, so why should their bio be of any relevance?
Interesting. This is the first I've heard that Creationism began with the Big Bang Theory. Curious to see how this pans out in the debate.
Thanks for taking the time to vote on this debate!
Yes, I would appreciate any advice you would kindly give.
I did just finish my final argument. Thanks for the debate! Good luck!
Okay understood.
Thanks! Feel free to give me any advice. I know my spelling in the first argument is not great
Okay, thanks. Yeah, I'm a newbie here, lol!
I did, however, make some arguments in the Constructive round. Is that okay?
Sounds good.
I was thinking about doing a song battle with songs that make you laugh, but opted to go with happy music. It might be too hard to come up with 5 songs that make you laugh.
Thanks for your input!
We are under an incredible storm alert. I had to finish quickly and post the argument before my computer went down. I made a small error in the first argument. I said I am arguing on three fronts, I meant to say four fronts. Sorry about that.
Yeah that's no problem.
LOL, just realized it was tie :-)
BTW, am I the only old fart on DebateArt?
Sorry for taking so long o post the first argument. I've had a couple of personal things in my life come up. But rest assured I will have something posted by the deadline!
Thanks for your vote!
Thanks for the debate! Good luck!
Made a mistake in my first song, Bob Marley is not singing Don't Worry Be Happy, it's Bobby McFerrin. I guess I lose Round One :-)
I accept! Good luck friend!
Thanks!
Thanks for your vote!
Would you mind if I used your "Song Battle" theme for a Debate? I'm think the opposite of your Sad emotional battle. Songs that make you happy or laugh?
I would debate you on the earth is less than 15,000 years old. Just curious why the hard 15000 number?
It's a mistake to not allow Bible verses in the arguments. The Bible predominately argues for the round earth. Just an FYI.
Thanks for your vote!
Good point! I appreciate your input!
I'll be happy to place a vote once my second debate is finalized.
Thanks for your vote!
Thanks! You too! Should be fun!
I accept!
Again it doesn't matter to me. Let me know as soon as you can what you want to do. In the meantime, I'm preparing a rebuttal to your first argument, just in case you decline my offer.
I would not be against forfeiting this debate and restarting it with more arguments. You could send me an invite and I would accept.
Thanks for your vote.
Yeah, the 2 Rounds definitely caught my eye. Should be a fun one!
Let's do it! Although I'm not sure what I'm debating on exactly, lol.
Good luck folks. I'm going to get my popcorn, lol!
Oops, looks like I missed out. I'm curious to see how the Pro side presents their arguments (since this would have been my position had I accepted quick enough.)