zedvictor4

Relative to conditioning, abortion is a more or less emotive subject.

And relative to conditioning, we apply our own data constructs and collective data constructs to the subject, all of which are subjective.

No one is right and no one is wrong, because there is no greater authority to judge.

So, we must abide by our collective laws until such times when laws might change.

And if we find that our individual needs are unfulfilled, we must continue to lobby for change in respect of our own emotions.

I would suggest that everything is true within its own context.

Comparatively speaking we can dispute anything.

Though some things are obviously more clear-cut than others.

As for things, transgenderism clearly is one, but is clearly not clear-cut in terms of factual data. As yet.

I currently see transgenderism as a modern socio-psychological development, and a separate issue to previously well documented developmental anomalies.

Though evidence shows us how it can and will affect human physiology.

And evolution shows us how small changes will eventually result in long term species modification.

Maybe this was always in GODDO's plan.

Some propose downloading consciousness to a device.

But seems like a prison transfer to me.

Though by then, mine will have shut down and it's housing will have been recycled. 

Yep, quite correct.

J was the son of Mary and a smooth-talking Semite not named Joe.

Clearly J took after his real dad.

He's still smooth-talking people into doing silly things, some two thousand years after his death.

Apparently, it was smooth-talking that got him into trouble and brought about his early demise.

Well, that's how I interpret things.

Well, therein lies a separate discussion.

In so much as I'm not certain if dystopia is antonymous with utopia.

So for sure, I would not describe the human social world as utopic.

But neither would I say that losing an election will result in a dystopic society.

One might expect disappointment.

But when the losing group refuses to accept defeat and attempts to incite civil unrest.

Then one could then perhaps rightly envisage a dystopic outcome.

As for putting up signs saying trespassers will be shot.

Well, I have no knowledge of Federal or State trespass laws.

Though I am aware of the U.S.A 's dystopic gun laws.

But therein lies a separate discussion.

Let's be honest.

If they had stayed at home, sleepy Joe would have become President.

As it was, sleepy Joe became President.

There's a certain futility embedded in there somewhere.

And what the heck "Gotcha Mr. Authority apologist" means I do not know.

And I suspect that all rape victims would rather have been at home.

Though I doubt that most if not all rape victims did not set out to cause civil unrest for no good reason other than the ramblings of a mad miffed Orange Man.

And authority is a necessity of State.

Otherwise, there would be no authority.

And all sorts of people will do all sorts of things for no good reason other than having the freedom to do whatever they can think of next.

And wouldn't that be fun.

Reality is as good a guess as it gets.

Though we can only experience that which we assume is reality from within.

And values, observations and denial and all.

Are nothing more that electro-chemical data, sent to self.

Absolutely amazing 

It's true though.

Should have stayed at home.

Wouldn't have got shot.

Dumbass thought that Trump was the Orange God.

Where or what is the land of force?

Whose behaviour have I excused.

And freedom is a hot potato.

Earwax is essential.

Too much isn't.

Everything is thought.

Even everything that might not be thought, is thought.

Cosmological scenarios are nothing more than thoughts.

Therefore, everything that is contained within, is applicable only to everything that is contained within.

There is currently no way of escaping our internal prison.

EbuccubE................. May you always find contentment within.

Should have stayed at home.

Wouldn't have got shot.

Dumbass thought that Trump was the Orange God.

With his sidekick, boot polish head man.

For sure everything is determined by brain.

Even everything that might not be determined by brain, has to be determined by brain.

And for sure also, purpose and value or value and purpose, necessitate the same internal scrutiny.

Worthlessness and evil also.

In fact, everything is a seemingly instantaneous assumption.

Even your own assumption of yourself.

True.

As a data processing exercise, we can find a way of attributing purpose to all things.

Though I was initially referring to a Universal outcome.

Questioning if material evolution has any greater purpose, other than material evolution.

Stuff is terminatable.

Even Orange Clowns.

And then there was the old guy in the parking lot with boot polish on his head.

Amazing times.

When's the film coming out.

I propose Robert Duvall for the role of boot polish head man.

Do you think that everything has a purpose, or not?

If you see purpose, then all material development is likely to be consistent with that purpose

If you see no purpose, then nothing that you refer to above actually matters.

In terms of data input, data assessment and the formulation of data for output, everything is relative. (Understanding)

So, if you mention Murphy's Law in our discourse, I will respond.

In this case, questioning if A.I. is likely to be subject to Murphy's Law, when making comparative assessments relative to cosmological scenarios.

And Murphy's Law basically defines pessimism, and vice versa. An inbuilt expectancy that things will go wrong, rather than an inbuilt expectancy that things will go as planned.

So, I questioned if A.I. was likely to be consistently optimistic in its approach to cosmological/evolutionary progress, relative to how intellect affects material development and therefore how intellect might also affect cosmological scenarios.

Also, neither Murphy's Law, pessimism nor optimism have any relevance to the prospect of eternity, other than as intellectual data assessment concerning the prospect of eternity.

Whereby collectively, cosmological scenarios are not determined by what will be, but by what we think might be. 

And all thought is relative to the device, whether that be organic or other.

Further, fear of the unknown is a human condition consistent with the principle of Murphy's Law.

Wherein we will predict pessimistically, relative to our fear of the unknown.

All of which comes under the relative umbrella of electro-chemical data management.

I was addressing Murphy's Law relative to possible future cosmological developments, in which A.I. might play a key role.

Pessimism might or might not be a human failing, so A.I. might be the necessary next evolutionary/cosmological phase, in terms of intellectual development.

Whereby fear of the unknown does not stymie progress.

Like putting money on the collection plate or giving a tenth of your crops away to fat bishops and portly priests.

All in the name of J, his Dad, the other one and salvation. Hallelujah.

And of course, convert and you're still dishing out to the old virgin and associated child molesters.

A travelling show.

Bang on Deb

In your own distinctive way.

I expect there was also a hairy woman and a dwarf.

And an apostle on stilts.

True, as in things rarely change for the average Joe.

Though I think that the final acts of Trumps reign, are worthy of secondary consideration.

Especially the way his acolytes were so easily incited.

Love is a fantasy version of an electro-chemical reaction we apply to a base necessity.

You should still care.

Because if you forget.

The Orangeman cometh.

Good morning Trade.

Though perhaps it's goodnight over there.

And warm too.

I would suggest that The Universe is unified without human philosophical interference.

I would further suggest that philosophy is an over-complicating exercise in explaining what we already know.

In that sense GOD and Trinity is therefore an over-complicated explanation for what we already know.

Well, Murphy's Law is a human adage. 

Will alternative intelligences adopt our propensity for pessimism based on fear of the unknown?

For sure, as far as I am concerned we are in agreement.

But as I stated, the word has already been hijacked, repurposed and reconsigned to the lexicon.

How's that for language fascism.

Must have been something you ate.

You talking to me gunslinger.

Yep, it's all a story.

Rapid energetic fractional decline to a point of rapid energetic re-initiation.

Is the moment of exchange reliant upon a GOD principle?

Could the system fail?

Indeed you don't.

Ear wax, always a big issue.

It's what is known as capitalism.

Create a shortage and inflate the price.

It's all good for business.

And "gas" or hydrocarbon vehicle fuel, or petrol and diesel as we might say over here, is a temporary human luxury.

So expect to pay the going rate.

Or get a bike and stay local.

And then maybe travel further afield as you get fitter.

Or revert to the horse.

Though horse ownership doesn't come cheap these days.

And there's bound to be an oat shortage.

#55.

How?

Because the U.S. does not have a sensible approach to the public acquisition and ownership of lethal weaponry.

You've just got to live with it gunslinger.

What ya doing Deb?

Is it fun?

If you don't ignore me and I don't ignore you, ad infinitum.

Then nothing is won, and nothing is lost.

But If I eventually fail to reply it is probably because I have better things to do.

Well done Joe.

Unions are just political organisations that manipulate workers for political reasons.

And for sure, if you're genuinely sick you're genuinely sick.

Though over here in the UK being off sick is currently a metaphor for Christmas shopping.

Well, the world just spins around and around relative to its Cosmic situation

And we've made it to about 8 billion, despite the inevitability of death.

So, an abortion or two is not currently such a problem in that respect

Unless you read a lot more into the whole material evolution thing.

But of course, there is more than one hypothesis available.

Well, is five days up,

And did they make it.

I'm on the edge of my seat.

Gender used to be the same as sex, until someone hijacked the dictionary.

People are always hijacking the dictionary though.

As far as I am concerned, I am of a binary species and so are you.

And for sure, social evolution and therefore species evolution is what it is and will become what it will become.

Trinity is just theistic gobbledegook.

Or, are you're saying that three GODS created the Universe.

In the beginning GODS created the heavens and the Earth.

Ah, someone missed the S off in translation.

I see.

Do you know which one created which bit, and who witnessed who's bit?

Does it say in the BOOK?

If a GOD created something, then it could not also witness the act.

For that, a GOD would have needed a witness.

The above statement (#156) was a tad silly.

Admirable devotion to biblical mythology, but a tad silly.

Such was the disparity imposed by natural hierarchy, intellectual imbalance and consequent lack of knowledge.

Notwithstanding that the majority of a serf's short life was taken up with basic survival.

Even so, the serf was still a necessary part of the social system.

Well, other species are not homo sapiens.

And I did say that hermaphroditism does occur.

I was simply pointing out that the modern buzz word "non-binary" is an inappropriate compound.

As the human species is a binary species, where procreation relies upon the fusion of male and female gametes.

Removing an unwanted lump of organic tissue.

Non-binary is an inappropriate compound.

We are a binary species.

Which is not to say that hermaphroditism doesn't occur.

And asexuality is a life choice.

Like atheist or apolitical.

Or abanana.

Never heard of him.

Hmmm.

I think you know exactly what I am referring to.

You're welcome to anarchy Mr A.

I'll stick with what I've got.

Poly thinks that men aren't qualified to talk about women.

Even though we've known each other forever* and are fully aware of each other's anatomical differences.

Nonetheless, genetic diversity necessitates binary reproductive systems.

One could easily assume that it was designed that way.

And Adam and Eve just rolls of the tongue better than Eve and Adam.

Presumably when GODDO was developing its binary species concept, it was necessary to give equal consideration to both.

Take 26 million people and programme them with a consistent data set and you end up with North Korea.

Aberrations will occur and will be removed, and this will be regarded as necessary.

In this respect, the North Korean system of population management is fascinating for the outside observer.

Don't we witness this to a certain degree in China?

With the suppression of ethnic individuality.

And also, to a degree isn't free will a misnomer wherever we live?

Don't we all submit to a system of population control, however liberal our systems might seem in comparison to NK?