zedvictor4

Yep. I agree.

Contentment is internal.

Though a truly content person ceases to consider that which is not necessarily achievable.

Love is an overused word, that can be used to accompany any positive response to a stimulus.....Unless you are playing tennis of course.

Exactly Stephen.

Definition is.

But definition is arrived at.

Arriving at any decision demands the input, process and output of data....Even reading a dictionary.

You only know what is written in a dictionary because you are able to internally process the written data.

Therefore irrespective of content, all output is personal, and so by definition all output is subjective. 

I haven't exploded yet.

And I'm not a conspiracy theorist.

To be honest Stephen.

GOD/GODS are all made up anyway.

And conditioned intolerance and violence are a fact of life.

Old Osama and the family didn't even get chance to put their pants on.

And some Muslims stereotype Other Arabianists.

And some Other Arabianists stereotype Muslims.

And all the Muslims that I know, just want to chat about the same things that I want to chat about.

News is propaganda, so what do you expect?

Absolute truth....LOL.

Wouldn't the World be boring if everyone was honest?

One mans patriot is another mans tyrant.

So, thank goodness for democracy and a constitution.

After all, a good republican should also be a good democrat.

A republican that isn't also a democrat, therefore aspires to tyranny.

And democrats that aren't democrats, aren't democrats.

The lasting image from the last election is the old guy in the parking lot, his head streaked with sweat and dye.

The orange guy is largely forgotten now.

On reflection, quite a few.

I'm a little surprised that you don't.

Though conditioning creates limits for us all.

On the other hand....Not wishing or trying to understand would be indicative of conditioned intolerance.

Nonetheless,  more than any other label, I prefer realist, and therefore accept conditioned intolerance for what it is.

Do you accept the validity of alternative points of view?

I do.

So wherefrom did you originate?

Are you avoiding the question?

This is what you stated.

I never say "britian" Doc.

You tell me.

You're the one separating objectivity from basic function and process.

Anyway it's refreshing....You that is.

And we're only here to argue.

Agreement is nice, but not as entertaining.

So where do you originate from, as your English is too good. 

Conditionees are.

That said though, conditionees aren't necessarily right.

Who is to say what is actually right or wrong.......A fantasy guy?.....A charlatan?

Conditioned morality is just that.

And "she" is either conditioned or not.

Maybe so.

Theirs or there's?

Though a separate external  process was your proposition.

Such is your limit then?

It's a well known phenomena...Little guys need big trucks and big guns.

Big guys are already packing and don't need a psychological extension.

And Trolls live in Scandinavia.

What does it matter?

And really, being in the top10, should be and intelligence based achievement.

My position is relative to my intelligent allocation of available time.....Or more importantly not wasting it.

Bye.....Must dash....More important matters to attend to.

Wylted obviously has nothing better to do.

Trade.

A bit of nouveau passive aggression there.

And theists are logical?

Did you hear me snigger?

People will always kill people....Guns or not....That's not the argument....You're just stating the obvious in defence of the obvious.

Boys with big guns, because they're too embarrassed by the size of their dicks to masturbate in public....LOL.

Just don your cammo Boys and go find a nook in the backwoods.....Leisure shooting as it were.

And Girls....Get a dildo....Less dangerous, cheaper and ultimately more fun.

Make love, not war...As someone once said.

What everything really.

9 emissions of worthless bollocks, of self-contained worth.

Such are your limitations then.

And so similarly and  notwithstanding variability of output, how do logic and reason differ from any other internal data management process?

Good answer.

Which one is second greatest Doc?

I think that the Greeks invented Democracy a few thousand years before.

And just about every other claim you made is inaccurate.

So you're biased.

So you should be.

@RatMan.

Blatancy is no guarantee of anything.

Bullshit is usually blatant.

So what would a President preside over?

Other than the glory of their own Presidency.

TopMan is the one with their finger over the on/off button.

Manipulated by a 2000 year old  Arabian ideology.....Without choice......Basic tenet, different club etiquette.

Same old, same old.

Such is the predictability of the human computer.

Head filled with nonsense as my dear old Dad would say.

To be fair though...It's got to be full of something....Hunter gathering  and day to day survival has long since ceased to be our main preoccupation.

Though I expect that even back then, we used to give the Sun, Moon and Stars the occasional nod.

And then, some several thousand or so, years later...... Lo and Behold...... Some guy meets this GOD bloke up a mountain.....You just couldn't make it up, could you?

So where's this GOD "Being" then?

Christians don't seem to know.

Though these days, some Arabianists try and to play down the "Being" thing.

Here today and gone tomorrow....All knowledge dissipated in an instant.....Most probably....Though I would happily be proved wrong.

But I bet you can't.

You constantly say these things.

But never back it up with an explanation.

So:

Where specifically does your objectivity emanate from?

I agree with Both of you.

We have very varying tastes.

What "sucks" for some, hits the spot for others.

Orangemanbad  fuckery.

That's an Irish condition.

That spread from the Low Countries.

To the U.S.

A bit like a virus.

I guess.

Yep, a good song and tune, that will always stimulate a positive internal reaction if done reasonably well.

Essentially:

A bloke competing against women?

Or a bloke that thinks it's a women competing against blokes?....Or vice versa?

Saw a picture, and the receding hair line, makes them look like a bloke.

If this is the inevitable way forwards for human evolution. Wouldn't it perhaps be sensible and fairer to introduce two new trans-categories.

And presumably there's an awful lot of hormone therapy a play here....So how does this sit with doping rules?

Well stated.

You seem pretty adept at stringing words together, to me.

Regards.

How dumb is this hypothetical dumb ass?

So do you teach your kid that to get the light to work it's no good pressing the light switch, because the bulb might malfunction and you might also have a heart attack, and you might not know what the light switch is for anyway?

Some might suggest that it is logical to assume, that when one presses the light switch the light will work.....Any complications that may arise, are usually duly dealt with, even by "Dumb Asses".

There is certainly no necessary logical connection to be made between switching on a light and the possibility of a heart attack.

To be honest, I don't think that intelligence renders healthy people that stupid.

I would suggest that irrational fears such as your light switch example, are clinical  classified as Anxiety Disorder.

Indoctrination and therefore materialism is what it is to be human.

The internal acquisition, storage and utilisation of data.

Though it is reasonable say that theism begets atheism....It's not really chicken and egg stuff.

Definitively one can separate objective and subjective reasoning.

But one assumes that they are both internal function and process. (Data in, data out).

But Tarik says that, his source of objectivity  is separate from internal function and process....(External and nowhere specific).

So how does Tarik acquire and utilise such data, without sensory perception and conscious analysis.....(Internal process).

People forget that they are Earthlings.

And each generation grows to fear change.

But things keep changing.

A tad vague perhaps.

Some might refer to such obscure objectivity as an assumption.....Or subjective.

Care to expand on this theory?

A healthy lifestyle and desired body shape is an assumption based upon an acquired and established social expectancy.

Though, overweight generally,  is too much in and not enough out...And will generally lead to problems in later life. (Generally)

And people who strive to be fit and slender, generally are....But this is also no guarantee of long term success....Striving can create it's own problems.

Also, one tends to find that people who live long and healthy lives, are usually sensible, predisposed, and a little bit lucky. (Tendency)

Though we tend not to consider longevity until it's too late to make improvements to lifestyle anyway.

Nevertheless, life expectancy has increased  greatly over the past 100 years or so, largely due to medical and surgical advancements. Though we tend to take this for granted,

And you might get run over by a bus tomorrow.

So where is your source of objectivity?

Was probably wondering how to get the wrapper off the meaty treat.

The  Devil is transgender and has lot's of mates.

I read that in an old book, so it must be true.

That's ok .

But just watch out for Gators then, when you're relaxing  by the water.