zedvictor4

Nope....It's all about instinctive sexual gratification and the utilisation of varying solutions and methodologies.

Attraction is attraction, and whatever floats ones boat is whatever floats ones boat.

You're "talking" diversions, to avoid the obvious contradictory and controversial issue I raised.

So a ninety year old man has sex with a girl, the day before her 16th birthday and also on her 16th birthday. (British age of consent).

Q. Why is one gender attraction, and the other age attraction.

A. Simply, because that is how society has chosen to discriminate.

The definition of gender has changed over the years... To suit human needs and aspirations relating to the gratification of reproductive urges, and the developing socially acceptable variations and methodologies thereof..

So give me an example of Logic without using using a narrative.

The trouble is, it's not actually a false comparison.

Being socially unacceptable doesn't actually make it a false comparison.

It is actually socially acceptable sexual discrimination.

The same  socially acceptable discrimination that was applied to LGBT until fairly recently.

I always think that this is an interesting contradiction, when people refer to LGBT.....Q.

What isn't questioning and queer about paedophilia, other that accepted social discrimination?

Interestingly....Logic is generally predicated on words, and the sequential application thereof.

So would that same strategy also apply to LGBT.....If kids get these feelings, then they can similarly "get help before it manifests"

I personally, have 43 levels of consciousness.

And Level 42 was a British Jazz Funk Combo, popular in the 1980's and 1990's.

Mark King could really thump that bass.

Not sure if this is helpful.

Does that include paedophilia then?

It would if you cared to think about it.

I feel that I must remind you, that in the ancient encyclopedica biblicae, the serpent is a penis metaphor....And the juicy fruit is another metaphor.

What exactly is "Q"?

Everything and nothing.

Exactly...But nothing is permanent....And things will inevitably change.

Mum and Dad  were of their generation, and just fine.

I agree in principle.

What use is capitalism in a "One World Society"?......  What use capitalism without competition and diversity?

Sorry I missed this thread.

Nice picture....Which gives me some confidence that we can assume that black holes may well exist.

Conservatives are for an inherited conservatism....A conservatism that doesn't necessarily want to keep pace with the demands and needs of a changing World, or cede power to a changing society......Conversely though, a  World and society Conservatives seem necessarily  intent on changing.

Something of a dilemma.

Clever people, just rebrand.....But old traditions die hard for some.

The pot calling the kettle black, as my old Mum used to say.

Burying one's head in the sand is another saying that springs to mind......Or perhaps....Having the luxury of being able to bury one's head in the sand, would be more appropriate.

Hmmmm.

I explained the contradiction in my previous post.

Did you fully read and evaluate that post?

One World is a controlled World and isn't One world, it's someone's controlled World...Wet dreaming, hardcore, hypocritical, oppressive, corrupt, pseudo-capitalists probably.

"One world" is a socialist utopian dream....Nothing more than a dream.....Of which, the manifestation, becomes a controlled nightmare.

4. Therefore we conclude all sorts of tall tales.

As ever, the GOD principle /concept is reasonable.

But relatively modern attributions, embellishments and rituals are unnecessary.

Though:

God is, therefore stuff is.... (Or in fact) Stuff is therefore a GOD is, becomes a post event, human contradiction.

@RatMan.

Clubs is clubs.

And bigots are as bigots do.

"And power corrupts....And absolute power corrupts absolutely". (J.E.E. Dalberg-Acton)

One can always join another club or start one's own.....Which is what happened back in the Old Middle East, a few thousand years ago.

This statement is only meaningful if one chooses to give it meaning.....Otherwise it is totally meaningless.

Interesting...Would you care to explain your alternative electricity supply?

The valid option Tarik is the availability and variability of words.....As I attempted to point out previously.....But you missed the point, maybe.

We all have different hobbies.

Yes.

You're missing the whole bigger picture, relating to "One World".

"One World Nation" is a utopian dream and  "Tariffs" are something of a huge contradiction of the utopian dream.

What you are alluding too is One controlled  World......Controlled by whom?

As such, nothing is being "solved".....Just power shifting.

Perhaps not Gods, Demons, Aliens or Fairies.

But maybe a pre-ordained evolutionary inevitability....(GOD principle)

Perhaps some species somewhere was always going to have to do the donkey work.

Well..... That's a very briefly condensed version of events relating to the bible tales....And even in context, not strictly true.

And in the wider context of the development of popular Abrahamic theism, also something of an exaggeration.

Nonetheless, at the end of the day....Belief is only what it is......And if that is what floats your boat Doc... Then enjoy the bread and drink the wine, sniff the incense and sing your heart out.

Well Donald never actually wore the clown suit.

And I hope that you're heavily armed for when the other backwoods boys, here you generator phutting.

It's all words Tarik.

So nihilism would widely be regarded as being negative.

Though...Nihilism if actually a correct deduction, would be positive.

And anyone assuming a nihilistic identity could be regarded as being positively negative, or negatively positive.

And as I regard "objective morality" as nothing more than a subjectively concluded supposition.... Then I would have to agree with a previous opinion, that your conflated assertions are a false dichotomy.

Nonetheless we both might or might not be expressing, either  a positively negative or negatively positive opinion.

Words words words.

Most peoples GODS, relate to the same unknown reason for everything.

And most theistic  systems have  accompanying folklore, fantasy and ritual.

It's the human condition...We worry about the unknown and develop coping strategies.

OK.

I think that I am saying something similar......Though I work both expansion and contraction into my hypothesis.

How many billions of years did it take for Organic Intelligence to develop?

And for how many years have we been developing  Alternative Intelligence?

A.I's got plenty of time yet.....And A.I. only requires one language to be able to understand all human languages.

And of what practical use will  anger and joy or eventually Mary be to an  A.I?

Does the RatMan block you too?

Or are you worrying about how warm and snug you might or might not be in the future.

@RatMan

To facilitate the perpetuation of the universal sequence.

I would suggest that the GOD principle, is the ultimate accumulation of all necessary knowledge.....As such, GOD initiates a process that will eventually create us (or something similar), and we are a part of the same process that will eventually recreate GOD....And so on, until such times, when the process fails and the sequence is broken.

Because it's your baby.

You are the one promoting  the objective morality or nihilism contention.

@RatMan

 Wouldn't a pure socialist utopia be fabulous?

Just won't work though, until we've genetically engineered out all our antisocial traits and got robots to do all our dirty work. 

Though thinking about it.......For the system to work, we would have to cede all social control to an Alternative Intelligence, because human hierarchy would be a thing of the past.

So who's going to be doing all the scurrying around in sweatshops when the Robots are wielding the stick?

I'm not sure if that sounds like a utopian or a dystopian future.

As I've said to you before.

Take your hypotheses and symbolism to an expert and see what they make of them.

They might be staggered.

It perfectly addresses your statement.

This discussion could run forever......Such is the axiomatic potential of philosophical word games.

If something can be proved, then it can...And if it can't, it cant....Nonetheless, if it hasn't, it hasn't....Though if it could be, it might be.

Firstly...Ebuc might or might not know things that we don't....Though they will probably just imply fermions and bosons and call you a sad egotist.

Secondly....Maybe you are just a sad egotist....Just joking.

Thirdly....The mind and body are a product of the mind and body.....You get out what you put in, as it were.

We are our own faults and our faults alone.....And only we can correct them....Your therapist just wants your cash.....And meds are either a short term solution or a long term nightmare.

The dominoes can fall either way.....Though your expectation might be that they can only fall one way....In front and behind, are your predetermined assumption.

Sad is as sad does.

So....."Wanna" unequivocally prove nihilism and objective morality and the basis thereof.

I'm aware of the simple concept of spirituality....What more is there to say.

Other than.....I do not require clues.

Any elaborations therein are just that.

@RatMan

Death is easy.

It's the thought of non-existence that's harder to come to terms with.

And  religion is usually a naive creation hypothesis,  with other fantasy add ons, such as heaven and eternal life, but only if you are good and say your prayers.

Ans it don't matter if you've spent your whole life tended to the needs of the sick and the poor, if you ain't done your praying, then you ain't gettin in buddy.

There might or might not be similar or dissimilar life elsewhere.....Probability is high, given the number of stars....Whether it be chance or a basic inevitability of material development.

We perhaps owe our dominance on this planet to an extinction event, that wiped out a previously dominant species.

Asteroids.......Chance or design?