zedvictor4

The evolution of the human species was, and is ongoing.

I was simply pointing out that human nature dictates that everyone discriminates.

It's a survival strategy.

"White supremacy" is a bit of a misnomer used for dramatic effect.

Q. Are people off all skin tones and appearances, likely to make discriminatory assessments based upon perception relative to established ideas.

A. Undoubtedly.

Hmmmmmm.

If I had known then what I know now.

I would have taken up shuffle dancing.

Regards to Yourself,  Mrs Stephen and the Kids.

There are some very sexy Chinese ladies.

Why would you hate them?

As I tried to point out.

A negative is the assumed opposite of an assumed positive.

As such "proof" is not relevant.

We have the capability to be able reproduce without the need for male female copulation.

So no problem.

Population 8.1 billion and counting.

And variable methods of recreational sex have been a regular thing for millennia.

The re- homogenization of the human species won't be an overnight thing.

Far too much clever stupid to overcome first.

Such as Middle Eastern religious tosh and nationalism.

To name but two.

Satan is just made up shit.

And Jesus was perhaps an itinerant carpenter.

And Christian is one of those dumbass religious clubs.

In my opinion.

Always check out the Parents.

If the Mum's a nag and the Dad's henpecked,

Think on.

Normal is as normal does.

Acceptability is as acceptability is perceived.

And though the necessity of sexual release is normal it is often deemed unacceptable by the ideologically repressed.

Is ideological repression normal.

Normal is as normal does.

Clever stupid gene.

Just pointing out that internal systems function independently of the mind.

Proving a negative?

For me, a cute female backside is positively curved.

Whereas a big fat woman gets a negative response.

Just call me old fashioned.

So we fondle an object whilst focussing our optical sensors upon it.

Then what?

We convert signals into a simulated internal image and then label said object in accordance with a collectively established idea.

Similar with lemon flavour.

Did you know that taste is actually created in the brain and not inside the mouth.

Same with smell.

Aromas and smells are created in the brain. Externally, smells are not present.

Crazy but true.

Certainly.

Within the context of the internal management and assessment of incoming data signals..

This is how we proceed.

With a Lemon.

Whereas negative and GOD, are entirely abstract concepts.

The device now links us to the matrix.

No priests required.

Are you sure you don't mean Texas County, Missouri.

Plato, population central.

I do not believe anything, I'm an independent thinker.

Thank you.

Well, smart is smart.

And stupid is stupid.

Relative to circumstance.

The clever/stupid gene is within all of us.

So some smart need to avoid the streets.

And the street smart mustn't do anything stupid.

Yes, because we call it a lemon.

In so much as it's a simulated image, to which we apply a label.

I know someone who's been there.

Well, they think they've been there.

And I think that they've been there .

Well, I think that I know them.

In fact, I only strongly assume that the simulations I experience are representative of an external reality.

That's about as good as it gets.

Where is Plato?

Religion was a naive response to ignorance.

Still is I suppose.

Superman was always an obvious contender.

Precisely.

Just like we call a banana a banana.

But how do we know that a banana isn't actually a lemon.

How does one know what is actually positive, and therefore it's opposite.

If we actually knew, then we could prove both.

You must be joiking.

Stupid people have always needed smart people to tell them what to do.

Is it worth the effort?

Hmmmmmmmm.

I wouldn't say extreme.

I think that we are about  to elect a Labour government and oust the Conservatives, though I don't see a whole lot of difference between them. So I feel no need to vote.

There are certainly Nationalist rumblings in continental Europe, as there always are. But there is also Russia to focus minds.

Checks and balances.

And despite all those guns, I think that USA is still a reasonably sensible place.

Longer term, I foresee problems with the sustainability of a largely useless global population...But that's another issue, that hopefully won't affect me.

I would suggest that A.I.  will perhaps become the big player.

Or E.T. of course.

Are you sure that they are actual women.

And not pre-ops.

Is that hairdo really charismatic?

I think that it's more a case of mass stupidity.

From time to time, humans enjoy a bit of mass stupidity.

Inbuilt checks and balances maybe.

Sort of, two steps forwards and one step back,

As it were.

Thing is,

When you have a feature debate between two old men,

The producers and the audience just want daftness.

Sensible, isn't entertaining.

For sure, the low IQ majority have ovine tendencies.

Woof Woof.

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

Clever stupid gene

Therefore overthink

Therefore

Satanism

Christianity

And all sorts of other nonsense.

Whereas

Masturbation 

Is a real time necessity.

Sluts are best for blow jobs.

Saliva has anti-septic properties.

You never know what's lurking beneath in the crack of doom.

Wouldn't you agree Doc?

Fantasy island.

Pre-nub or pre-nup?

You choose.

Did you know, that sitting for prolonged periods is extremely detrimental to your health.

We act without thinking.

Seemingly

Thinking...

Consciously processing data.

When adequately trained,

Seemingly becomes a simultaneous process.

Though I'm not sure that it's possible to do something before the relevant data has been processed.

The rapidity of the processing  system is such that action and reaction are virtually simultaneous.

Subconscious output is unknown, though conscious output is typically decided upon.

The question is, are conscious decisions always stimulated by subconscious effects.

Why do we make decisions?

Or more appropriately...Why do we decide to decide?

TV debates are cheap entertainment.

Perhaps the U.S. education system really is that bad.

But I doubt it.

Feeding the hens and tending the crops.

You're as clever as me then.

Great minds think similarly.

Have a nice day.

Or you could do something more useful.

I expect that most people lie about their IQ score.

Do you think that intelligence is genetically predetermined?

Or do you think that intelligence can be increased by home schooling?

Nonetheless, clever people can still do stupid things.

Like taking an army to Russia in the winter.

A reasonably cohesive society needs a reasonable cohesive ideology.

And a reasonably intellectual and progressive society needs to nurture and develop the best brains.

And I expect that most teachers are less retarded than a lot of parents are.

True. 

At best, biblical compilations amount to a regional mythology.

And true also, most theists never question the veracity of the data.

They just accept what they were told.

Just turning up occasionally to sing a few songs and mutter a few prayers.

But hey, if that's what makes them feel good...That's holy.

The data matrix is there to be accessed.

How many do you intend to marry?

So, precisely  when were "scriptures" compiled and by whom?

How can you ensure the veracity of the data.

And how can you vouch for the honesty of the compiler/s.

Those big brewing conglomerates for example.

Have one for me.

Mines a nice crisp independently brewed IPA.

I think that the general consensus amongst vegans, is that eating meat should be illegal.

I doubt your vegan sincerity.

So if you want to fuck a pig just do it quietly and in private.

Out of sight is out of mind as someone said.

Certainly wouldn't need to bother with the vasectomy.