zedvictor4

Jewellery.

Now, there's an example of unnecessary overthink.

But hey, unnecessary overthink is seemingly necessary.

This atheist simply has no idea how the universe came about.

Within that context, the compilation of the biblical mythology is a very recent man made construct.

Constructed by men who simply had no idea how the universe came about.

In fact they had very little idea what constituted a universe.

Why on earth would I believe and devote effort to, such a naive hypothesis?

When an Omni-one eventually  returns from their universal travels, we will then be reasonably certain of an advanced  intelligence.

In the meantime, belief is a futile exercise.

Overthink.

So a 99.98 chance of not dying from a contagious infection.

More chance of falling out of the canoe and drowning.

And so, in a uterus  somewhere are a couple of fused gametes.

Only UDog would come up with this radical hypothesis.

Overthink.

I would suggest that everything is normal and natural relative to a purposeful or purposeless material sequence.

And typically a bunch of blokes arguing the toss over a hypothetical zygote.

Give the kid something to eat FFS.

Not sure it's actually possible to do more than one bit of data assessment at a time.

Perhaps several separate bits, quickly.

I think that BK underestimates the human computer somewhat.

Yep, sinless conception other wise known as A.I.

Nope, not a robot,

Artificial Insemination.

Which isn't to outright diss the idea that GODDO is actually A.I.

Nope, not a pipette full of sperm,

An Alternative Intelligence.

But of course as it is GODDO,

Sin is out of the question anyway.

GODDO takes absolutely no pleasure whatsoever in the implanting of a holographic  zygote into a  young ladies Volvo.

Yep you heard me correctly, J was a hologram from start to finish

That's right, A.I.H.A.I.

Artificially Inseminated Holographic Alternative Intelligence.

You see, GODDO was actually quite clever.

But with a sense of humour.

Making daft old Moses lug those tablets of stone about.

GODDO and Gabrielle were pissing themselves, LOL.

If you were wondering,

Gabrielle was GODDO''s fave holographic transvestite Angel, by the way.

Gooday Cobber.

Jesus was born approximately nine months after she got screwed by the charmer with the big dick.

And daft Joe fell for the God story hook line and sinker.

And daft Joe's have been falling for it ever since.

True.

We can only work with available data.

And I'm guessing that arrogance is simply a derivation of a defensive response.

I would suggest that baptism is simply a social club ritual, usually backed up, or preceded by, a  more extensive period of brain washing.

Which to be fair is how all social systems are established and maintained.

Systems we variously refer to as religious, political, racial, cultural etc. etc.

Probably based upon an age old familiarity and safety in numbers thing.

Common sense?

Just sleazy thoughts relative to the age old human penis vagina angst thing.

Which isn't to say that such behaviour hasn't evolved into a working system.

 Wherein we are compelled to overrule the base reality of biological processes and function.

Which to our astonishment, often leads to a breakdown in the system.

Not sure if that equates to common sense.

Or just another consequence of human overthink.

Next...Men will be having their dicks removed and referring to themselves as Penelope.

When all that they actually need do is masturbate once or twice a day.

Common sense indeed.

I blame the breakdown in the hunter gatherer system.

That, or something in the water.

HUMANS ARE BRILLIANT.

The dog is not too keen on being chauffeured, but Mrs Zed reported that he did not throw up on this occasion.

Nor did he do so on today's return journey.

He's improving.

I opted for a chauffeur driven return.

I much prefer Mrs Zed to drive, and Mrs Zed prefers to drive.

Win Win.

No charity involved.

It's a journey I like to do at least once a year.

So is this thread about the paedophilia concept.

Or more so, seedy men taking advantage of girls or boys who are below a legally specified age.

I expect that seedy women are rarely considered.

Paedophilia is essentially a socio-legal response to a contrived moral judgement.

Realistically humans can breed once they become fertile.

I wonder how many times per day age of consent laws are ignored.

Fishing rod.

Firstly need to invent a hook.

What if two twelve year olds mutually consented?

As I've stated repeatedly.

Pro-choice is not necessarily pro-abortion.

And homosexuality is two blokes getting it on.

Male, female or other?

You must be joiking.

There are only two genders.

There are genuine aberrations.

There is overthink.

And then there is surgical and medical intervention.

And maybe something in the water.

No problem, I paced it well.

 6.25 hours with a quick refreshment stop in Tenbury wells.

And two or three pit stops in various gateways.

Potatoes are good, easy to grow and store well.

It was a good ride.

Hybrid particles.

Good reference.

Good.

Have a pint for me.

We're up in Evesham until Wednesday visiting the daughters.

The youngest's (37th) Birthday bar-b-que Saturday so a few chilled beers for me too.

I'm cycling there Saturday morning...92 miles.

Mrs Zed is driving, with the dog.

All the best to you and yours.

My assumption is that all popular Middle Eastern religions invented at a similar time, are all founded upon the same notion of GOD.

Would this be a wildly incorrect assumption?

Obviously rituals vary accordingly, as the religions that I allude to became antagonistic societies that sought to control people and resources.

The bible has not been proven to be either completely factual or completely fictitious.

So it's reasonable to hypothesise both options.

Therefore, it's neither correct nor incorrect to assert that it either is or isn't completely fictitious or completely factual.

Busy few days ahead, so I will get back to Joscha.

And yes I have come to the quite simple conclusion that the development of matter and the proliferation of data is what it's all about.

But of course it might all be about nothing other than the re-initiation of a recurring sequence of events. Which would seem to have no greater purpose or meaning other than itself.

Sort of an ego trip.

Have a good weekend.

I will be back Wednesday. 

See above.

Tate and Tommy

Tommy and Tate.

Blah Blah Blah.

The centre is defined by people who generally go Hmmmmmmm maybe this, maybe not.

The left and the right, don't generally go Hmmmmmmmm.

Not sure what you mean.

Do you mean a previous extinct intelligence or an existing one?

Though I would suggest that all new data has evolved from old data.

Therefore I see no reason why all data should not be a crucial element of the global data matrix, and presumably a future universal data matrix.

Nonetheless, I would further suggest that in terms of data evolution, now is always at the cutting edge, whether that be here or elsewhere.

Ok.

I'm just trying to understand the benefit of Bitcoin, other than it's novelty value.

Who or what controls Bitcoin?

Further:

If today I purchase 10 units of a commodity priced at $68 or one Bitcoin.

And tomorrow I purchase the same 10 units of a commodity, now valued $78.

What would the new price be in Bitcoin?

In simple terms.

Space and time are potentials that allow for event and duration.

Matter is the big question.

Potential exists no matter what.

Spacetime is overthink.

Receiving you loud and clear Stephen.

So who would currently get to vote and where?

I prefer the centre.

And Andrew Tate is one of those not particularly handsome guys, who nonetheless is able to inspire a sycophantic following of numbskulls.

They turn up from time to time and eventually die.

And the Universe steadily plods on.

So perhaps metaphorically predicting the age of a new intelligence.

Now, I can certainly run with that idea.

And so, will the value of Bitcoin relative to the Dollar never increase or decrease?

So, let me ask a specific question.

Even though I'm sure you fully understood the question I was asking.

Can you prove the GOD, on which the Christian Faith is founded.

We make distinctions.

A sincere hypothesis is respectfully not regarded as a work of fiction.

So conversely, a work of fiction is respectfully not regarded as a sincere hypothesis.

Though for sure,  if we are being cynical we can interchange words and meaning.

I sincerely regard the popular Middle Eastern GOD hypotheses as naive, and therefore inevitably fictitious.

Though the Bible is a genuine collection of ideas and recollections, put together in myth form.

The Bible is what it is.

Meaning, the end of the world or the end of humanity?

What I'm suggesting is that in the main, transgenderism is a socio-psychological trend inspired by overthinking.

Children would not dream of transgenderism if they were not inspired to do so.

And I'm not certain if psychopathy cannot also inspired by overthink.

Which isn't to suggest that a very small percentage of a population do not inherit physiological aberrations.

I'm not sure where I said that "idleness is the mother of all evil".

Overthinking could inspire both idleness and industry.

And evil is a concept relative to the concept of goodness.

When I ask you to prove GOD, you know exactly what I'm asking.

From my point of view, the popular Middle Eastern GOD hypotheses were just as fictitious as the carrot hypothesis.

And the bible is a mythical narrative, based around a fictitious hypothesis.

The bottom line is that neither of us can prove our respective fictitious hypothesis.

Yep.

So Bitcoin is subject to all the same rules as any other currency?

Therefore, what is the current value of Bitcion in U.S. Dollars?

Not Dead Experiences.

It's likely that what we experience during such stressful physiological situations, is likely to be experience based.

That is to say we are likely to imagine fantasy scenarios relative to information stored within our onboard database.

Under less stressful circumstances we tend to regard internal fantasy imaging as dreams.

If there is an afterlife we will not know until we have died.

Residual energy, perhaps in a data format.

Maybe.

Though would/could we actually know, without an elaborate onboard flesh computer.

Maybe.

Matrices and all that.

I tend to edge my bets.

And I want to know the answer to the big question.

Right or wrong are not really the issue.

NO.

I hypothesise that Carrots  are the dominant intellectual species on another planet.

Can you prove that this is an inaccurate hypothesis?

So, you unequivocally prove GOD.

And then I will have no doubts.

You're correct.

We were/are taught to conform to social systems.

Is technology changing systems?

 

It's already teaching us that we can change gender.

Yep.

As a kid I was was never allowed to be faddy, and always taught to be grateful for food on the table.

Eat to live, rather than live to eat.