Total posts: 13,899
Shit happens.
Humans are well practiced at it.
I propose a Palestinian homeland in Southern Saudi Arabia.
I'm sure that they would be welcomed by the open and loving arms of Islam.
Wouldn't they?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Yep, I think that it's fair to assume that currency systems will evolve electronically.
Bitcoin is a nominal alternative, though still valued relative to the Dollar.
Which is sort of how the system has always worked. Isn't it?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
Well, I suspect that everything has evolved from matter.
And atheist in the true sense of the word.
Accepting the idea of a GOD principle, is just being open to ideas.
I just wonder how technology and the human mind are going to develop.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
Nice to see that you're back.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
It's certainly more media attention worthy.
Especially when there's a "porn star" in the mix.
Especially an attractive one named Stormy.
And an Orange Clown.
I think I've stated this before.
If you want a job as a Brain Surgeon, you need qualifications.
Whereas, if you want to be President of the USA, all you need is access to deep pockets.
Competence is irrelevant.
Have a nice day IWRA.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
I see.
So did Stormy also falsify her business records?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Ebuc is a very smart dude.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
Yep, it would/will be interesting to see how earn, pay and buy systems develop.
Though I would suggest that we are all enslaved by need and expectation.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Yep.
But what has sexual philandering got to do with falsifying business records?
By having extra-marital sex with a porn star, has a Federal law been broken?
And see how you found it necessary to include a line of sleazy titivation into your statement.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Some people like to draw attention to themselves,
They use various methods.
Including the creation seemingly traumatic problems.
Which isn't to say that human overthink isn't a condition of the human mind.
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Exactly.
So why the need to focus on a "porn star", other than to add a bit of sleaze for the viewing public?
Created:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Is it illegal for an adult male to consensually have sex with an consenting adult female?
What's the big deal other than media sleaze?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
@baggins
Evolution is a word that describes a process.
Species evolution was a theory put forwards by Charles Darwin.
Material evolution is the process of material change from beginning to end, and species evolution either is or is not a phase thereof.
Though I would suggest that, as material evolution is clearly demonstrable, then it is likely that species evolution is a reasonable proposition.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@3RU7AL
HaHa.
Sort of Catch 22.
Even if we're all connected to the data matrix via our personal devices or implants, something will need to weald absolute control over data content.
Otherwise there will just be a mish mash of mixed messages.
We need to seek advice from a Bee.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
The urge is derived from internal electro-chemical signals, a product of the endocrine system.
Are you concentrating to much on the socio-conceptuality of the issue. Wherein, you feel the need to justify a certain aspect of human behaviour.
I would suggest, a behaviour that despite concerted modern efforts, is still deeply rooted in archaic taboos.
And let me just stress, I care not who does what with who, in the bedroom or on the kitchen table.
As long as they are all consenting adults.
I have a liberal view of sexuality.
And perhaps a more conservative view of human biological systems..
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
I asked you the same...So?
Nonetheless.
Gender and either euphoria or dysphoria are two words that are put together to describe something.
As such they have an inherent quality.
Do they describe a derived condition?
Yes.
Is Gender dysphoria a congenital condition?
Depends upon how one chooses to interpret the word congenital.
Currently I'm uncertain.
If It was just a one sided phenomena, one might suggest that it was an inherent environmental issue. But it seems odd that it affects both genders.
So I'm still of the mind to suggest that it is a socio-psychological phenomena.
Which could be described as recently inherited, I suppose.
The Jury's well and truly out on this one.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
People are people and variously adopt conscious operating systems, to which they apply various labels.
Trust is based upon character judgement and labels are not necessarily indicative of either good or bad characteristics.
If uncertain, talk about the weather or fluffy kittens, and avoid mentioning religion.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Yes" is affirmative, and "is it?" is a question.
Please clarify.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Well I shouldn't need to lecture you on the Birds and the Bees.
But, the ejaculation of the male seed is what temporarily satisfies the urge.
Where that seed might end up, is anyone's guess.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
For sure.
There are 8.1 billion different world views, sharing similar ideas, that have not as yet become a cohesive whole.
Though I would suggest that before too long all electro-chemical data processing units will be connected to the expanding electronic data matrix.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Fresh cream and jam sponge.
Sounds like heaven.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
The mind develops.
And dysphoria becomes a state thereof.
Is euphoria an inherent issue?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Congrats Deb.
I would have baked a cake.
And I very much like your dictionary of alternative definition.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RaymondSheen
So.
Thoughts.
Evolution is one big process from beginning to end.
But is there a distinction to be made between development and a development?
And for sure, we can compartmentalise phases of the bigger picture.
Such as the basic development of matter, species development, industrial development or technological development.
Or the development of personal transport systems, wherein we see the donkey on the dirt track becomes the Toyota Hybrid on the highway.
The Toyota itself rolls off the production line, conforming to a set of instructions, to which extras might be added.
Though it could be said that from the Benz Patent Motorwagen to the Toyota Hybrid we witnessed the evolution of the motorcar.
Whereas the new born is a symbiosis of two sets of individual instructions, whereby it becomes a unique entity.
Hmmmmm, I know what you are thinking.
So let's add genetic engineering to the list of examples.
And evolution is a theory?
I am a complex amalgamation of fundamental particles.
Well, I think I am.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Faith is either based upon confidence or brainwashing.
Though outcomes are still uncertain.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RaymondSheen
It just struck me, that the "Future of Evolutionary Theory" is a self evident statement.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Attempting to rule out something that has never been ruled in, is an unnecessary exercise.
So unless you can unequivocally prove the existence of bigfoot or Allah...
If you can, then I also don't need to bother.
Created:
Posted in:
Never been there and never done that.
And I don't suppose that I will ever bother.
I spend enough time at DebateArt.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
You're confusing a social construct with an inherent function.
A homosexual has the same urge as every other male.
Homosexuality is simply one way of satisfying that urge.
Most people these days, rarely seek to procreate every time they desire sexual satisfaction.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
I doubt that the species Homo-sapiens was made to order.
Though it could possibly have been transferred from elsewhere.
But I doubt that too.
Which isn't to say that living matter wasn't transferred from elsewhere, deliberately or otherwise.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Isn't existence a tyranny that was imposed upon us?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
I bet you look gorgeous in shorts and flip flops.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
@RaymondSheen
Evolution is a word that describes a process.
I think that it's fair to say that 2024 years ago, J's Mom and Dad didn't ride into Bethlehem in a Toyota Hybrid.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
@RaymondSheen
@Raymond
Good stuff.
If you define science as knowledge.
I don't.
I define science as science.
One might define scientific outcomes as knowledge.
And if Dawkins makes a good living at it, then don't knock it.
He'll be able to survive into decrepitude without the need to scavenge on rubbish dumps.
Since when? Which time?
Whenever.
Though perhaps since the time when Og gazed at the sky, went Hmmmmmmmm, and realized that he/she had just had an idea.
A supreme intelligence without intelligence? A sentient non-being?
Whatever.
I'm currently running with purpose rather than chance.
Though it struck me earlier when I was replying to IlDiavolo,
Isn't any purpose, ultimately purposeless?
Though NOTHING is always an image that I find really difficult to simulate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IlDiavolo
You will probably remember that what you are suggesting, is not a hypothesis that I can disagree with.
Though I tend to look beyond the organic in terms of a greater intellectually and materially evolved super-energy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
What is the purpose of sexuality?
And why do we make such a song and dance about it?
Which isn't to suggest, that inherent data simulations cannot be modified over time.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RaymondSheen
I would suggest that GODS were an inevitable requirement of an evolving intellectual species.
And BK's crusty repository causes Mama Korea to chuckle.
Created:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
Slick evangelists love cash.
I'm guessing that Jesus probably loved fish sandwiches.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RaymondSheen
People now think science is true and the God concept is suspicious.
So, your response was another interesting read.
Form which I've extracted the above statement for consideration.
I would suggest that science will either come to a satisfactory conclusion or not.
And there are still plenty of contented deists with a penchant for eschewing science.
Which ideas? Theological or scientific.
And this question.
Well, both I suppose, if they lend themselves to the methodical scrutiny of a plausible/reasonable theory.
Do you think/ not think that theism/deism has always been a scientific theory of sorts?
A tad naive today perhaps, in light of what has been concluded since.
But nonetheless, a reasonable proposition at the time.
Which isn't to say that certain aspects of the GOD principle are not still reasonable.
A supreme intelligence for example.
Created:
Posted in:
Things maybe temporarily safe.
Just depends upon the duration of one's event.
And the limits of one's endurance.
Relative to everything else that might occur within the same timeframe.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Amber
We've established a new system of belief.
It's known as Gender Dysphoria.
You're done.We're done.
Eventually everything will be done.
On Earth,
As it will be in Heaven.
Created:
-->
@MAV99
A thing.
Is a data reference point within the simulation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Deb-8-a-bull
And that Cock of yours.
He's a tall strutting erect beauty,
With a gorgeous red head,
Vocally ejaculating,
With an exultant,
COCK-A-DOODLE-DOO.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Best.Korea.
Young person displaying typical social inadequacies and hormonal activity.
Has a tolerant family, who are prepared to administer to his current needs, on the general understanding that their child will eventually mature in accordance social norms and expectations.
All that jizz stained bed linen and underwear is taken for granted and duly dealt with.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RaymondSheen
You were slightly misrepresenting theoretical thinking and consequent study, by inaccurately pigeon holing with both the "ist" suffix and the word "believe".
1. Though for sure, there are lots of people who without methodical consideration, will blindly accept or reject ideas because they have been conditioned to do so.
We tend to refer to such people as believers.
2. Whereas people who are not prepared to blindly accept or reject ideas without necessary consideration should be referred to as sceptics.
3. And those who actually dedicate their time to the methodical study of such ideas should be regarded as scientists.
Here I am attempting to pigeon hole, somewhat more accurately.
Then there are those who gather together to bleat their distain at others who might seek to question the veracity of conditioned beliefs.
We might refer to these people as sheep.
This is a bit of a jibe.
But they do often gather in what is often referred to as a flock.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mall
Procreational drive is an inherent biological force..
LGBT are just social constructs built around it.
The message is the same, but roleplay can be modified to suit..
Created: