zedvictor4

Undeniably.

There is a western trend to not breed in accordance with prime physical and biological fecundity.

Therefore it is reasonable to suggest that outcomes might also display diminished attributes.

Not my sort of thing.

Preferred him in Blackadder.

Yes, undeniably language and vocabulary developed in accordance with human demography.

I was simply suggesting that in terms of sequentiality, the word GOD was probably derived from the Germanic GUDAN, via the Angles.

Interestingly, the Latin DEUS is also derived from Proto-Indo-European, meaning shining or celestial.

Which suggests that Deism is probably rooted in celestial adulation and wonder.

The monkey became human, or the tail became human?

Nonetheless that would be magic too.

A theory suggests that species evolution is an extended process.

I think that the second bit of the first bit, is self explanatory

You addressed it with a monkey's tail/tale.

Nonetheless:

Re the first bit of the first bit.

Ejaculate,

Job done for now,

Then roll over and sleep.

Jizz extraction and absorption methodology may vary.

Here's something that struck me.

Why a P rather than a B in absorption?

And time erases memories.

But unfortunately idiots can still look and listen, and convert data into nonsense.

I bet, you're not as orange.

I would suggest that conditioning is a well established, progressive thing.

As is being conditioned.

People eventually fall into place.

I would suggest that in the main, ability is inherent, so an alternative strategy will probably only result in cosmetic changes to the social system.

Which isn't to say that some people wouldn't achieve a better result, with improved conditioning techniques.

Nonetheless:

It's interesting that you refer to kids as kids, rather than as people.

Freudian slip, me thinks.

Sorted.

@FLRW.

What am I missing here?

@Mall.

I have asked for a third party advice.

"Sexual deviations".

I would suggest that procreational drive explains all deviations.

I currently prefer to run with the idea of evolved systems and processes.

Rather than a click of the Magician's fingers.

Endocrinal systems I suppose.

Inherent, independent chemical data systems.

Quite profound really.

Hmmmm.

The origin of the word God is the Germanic or Proto-Germanic word Gudan.

Meaning a divine spirit or being.

Not surprising, as English is derived from the Angles who were a Germanic tribe that settled Britain sometime after the Roman conquest.

GOD principle basically, adopts theistic/deistic ideas, to imply an intentional cause and purpose to everything.

Simulation theory is currently gaining  popularity, and is certainly worth considering as a potential GOD principle candidate.

A fun question for you.

Is something that is not yet known, a fact?

Conspiracy theory.

Now there's another thing

Sorry.

A bit too satirical for you perhaps.

So, the basis of "sexuality" is procreational drive.

How one recreationally satisfies their procreational drive is largely irrelevant as far as I am concerned.

Who someone might cohabit with, or the colour of their wallpaper, or their chosen breed of dog is simply relative to trend rather than to sexual satisfaction per se.

In my opinion.

I just thought that the stats were interesting.

An average blokes procreational drive demands that over their lifetime, they ejaculate 8700 times and produce 14 gallons of ejaculate. 

The fulfilment of  inbuilt instructions that we have no conscious control over.

Makes one wonder.

Well Raymond.

I suppose that with regard to popular deism/theism, I would be regarded as atheist.

Though with regards to a general view of the Universe and it's existence, I run with the idea of a GOD principle.

Which certainly doesn't infer the existence of a magical bloke as the primary creator.

But Of course, I cannot discount anything.

So I am open minded about the whole issue, and as such cannot commit to the concept of belief as being evidence of anything.

I simply regard the bases of popular deism/theism as naive analogies or naive hypotheses.

The trouble with the magic man hypothesis, is that it is fraught with silliness.

Sort of like a naff fantasy film.

A.I.A.I.

Alternatively Intelligent Artificial  Insemination.

So,

Playtime.

No justification necessary.

As if.

Average male, 8700 ejaculations, 14 gallons of juice.

Will out.

Yes.

Actually, my head and feet and all of the bits in between could be regarded as British.

And I just checked to see if you had provided a profile.

So you're sort of up there with FLRW and Ebuc, in terms of American parts.

I'm basing this upon your retired status.

Does the question require punctuation?

However.

If belief is proof, what is the necessity of either proof or belief.

Nice to metaphorically see a new face Raymond.

Which metaphorical corner of the globe do you hail from?

6. He capitulated in 1945, and shot himself in, in the Fuhrerbunker.

Ignoring works perfectly.

If it doesn't, then one is clearly not ignoring

Whether or not Trolls desist is neither here or there.

That's up to them.

Though personally, I find trolls and responding to trolls, very entertaining.

Sort of, part and parcel of the medium.

So.

 

Offered a choice of three.

1. Biden.

2 Trump.

3. Sensible Guy.

How many Americans, do you think,  would vote Sensible Guy?

A zygote is diploid.

A woman is 30Trillionoid.

I spy a distinction.

I think that Trump is currently the greater narcissist.

Putin currently suffers the greater paranoia and is somewhat more megalomaniacal.

Which isn't to say, that given the opportunity, Trump would not be the same as Putin,

Trump is clearly the greater orange and the more radically bouffant.

Though in this respect, I would suggest that given the opportunity, Putin would not be the same as Trump.

And we currently have a King with prostate woes and a little Indian guy.

So, given the opportunity........?

Yes I did and I enjoyed what I heard.

Though I have not been sufficiently, inspired to revisit. 

Which is probably more to do with an age related memory thing.

Have a nice day.

I thought that we had finished.

Nonetheless.

As I have stated all along,

My answer is,

Not necessarily.

Because I am indifferent.

Neither Pro,

Nor Anti,

Abortion.

You see, semantics, is a consequence of language and vocabulary, which we can both utilise.

So even though Pro-Abortion and and Anti-Abortion do tend to have an association and meaning, greater than my indifference.

Semantics gives you the opportunity to insist otherwise.

Please clarify.

Like I said then.

Though for sure, one can compose a thesis, that is credible.

But this would not alter the ongoing status of the ongoing hypothesis.

Beekayism.

Deism is a simplistic hypothesis.

Always stimulates interest though.

In my opinion.

The Doc obviously came later.

Peoples taste in music is often relative.

Mine is eclectic.

Hating a dead person is a tad pointless.

Give me an example.

OK.

Always nice to trade ideas with you.

Makes you wonder who or what programmed the endocrine system.

Not if the surgeon  is competent.

What's up Doc?

What things?

There are innumerable events that we might regard as things.

Some of them we might have a level of control over.

Most we will not.

Because I do not support the choices made by first degree murderers.

Oi!

Weirdo.

Stop hassling,

Canadians.

Ultimately.

Do you think it matters who does or doesn't reproduce?

Or do you think that certain types produce the best brains?

Proof of one aspect of human nature.

The requirements of the super-smart get ever more challenging.

Whereas button pushers are ten a penny.

And hangers on are a million a penny.

We will either need to genetically engineer the future smart, or hand over the reins to another intelligence.

With regards to Lagos as mentioned above.

Just millions and millions of young people of no real practical value, other that self-maintenance.

Soldiers perhaps, because I know that you like that sort of inference.

I still like listening to Rush and Alanis Morissette.

Such is my age.

Art sometimes presents strangely.

Meaning is often personal.

Anarchy might occur briefly, before order is resumed.

But there is no guarantee that a new order will be any better than the old one.

I would suggest that anarchy is largely the result of too much testosterone and the dominant stupid gene.

All points true, within their own contexts.

What we need is a GOD.

So that we can ask them if we are performing correctly in accordance with universal evolutionary principles and required outcomes.

Saw the first of a short series of documentaries yesterday evening, about Nigeria.

Episode 1. focussing on Lagos.

It was  difficult not to come to the conclusion that species evolution is just a chaotic consequence of the universal evolutionary process.

Do we need 8 billion people in order to fulfil our universal purpose?

Do we have a purpose?

Did transgenderism just morph out of the miasma of material chaos?

Firstly, let me stress that I do not believe.

Things are either known or not known.

Some things need to follow a set procedure.

Some things do not.

Judgemental correctness is a separate issue.

To be Pro-choice but to not allow choice, is perhaps contradictory.

Bearing in mind though, that such situations are constrained by society and it's rules.

So being pro-choice but not necessarily pro-abortion is a perfectly reasonable position.

No, I do not support the choices made by first degree murderers.

Definitely.

Sad to say.

But it would be better all round, if said defendant were to succumb to the effects of natural causes.

Maybe the next candidate would be a tad more sensible.

It would be even nicer if we lived in a sensible world.

No chance of that.

Can you imagine trying to simultaneously educate the all children of the World, with the same sensible curriculum.

Whilst simultaneously attempting to re-educate all their stupid parents.

Never going to happen is it?

Nice doggie.

Ebuc's bark is worse than his bite.

Is it a Patterdale Terrier?