zedvictor4

So we fondle an object whilst focussing our optical sensors upon it.

Then what?

We convert signals into a simulated internal image and then label said object in accordance with a collectively established idea.

Similar with lemon flavour.

Did you know that taste is actually created in the brain and not inside the mouth.

Same with smell.

Aromas and smells are created in the brain. Externally, smells are not present.

Crazy but true.

Certainly.

Within the context of the internal management and assessment of incoming data signals..

This is how we proceed.

With a Lemon.

Whereas negative and GOD, are entirely abstract concepts.

The device now links us to the matrix.

No priests required.

Are you sure you don't mean Texas County, Missouri.

Plato, population central.

I do not believe anything, I'm an independent thinker.

Thank you.

Well, smart is smart.

And stupid is stupid.

Relative to circumstance.

The clever/stupid gene is within all of us.

So some smart need to avoid the streets.

And the street smart mustn't do anything stupid.

Yes, because we call it a lemon.

In so much as it's a simulated image, to which we apply a label.

I know someone who's been there.

Well, they think they've been there.

And I think that they've been there .

Well, I think that I know them.

In fact, I only strongly assume that the simulations I experience are representative of an external reality.

That's about as good as it gets.

Where is Plato?

Religion was a naive response to ignorance.

Still is I suppose.

Superman was always an obvious contender.

Precisely.

Just like we call a banana a banana.

But how do we know that a banana isn't actually a lemon.

How does one know what is actually positive, and therefore it's opposite.

If we actually knew, then we could prove both.

You must be joiking.

Stupid people have always needed smart people to tell them what to do.

Is it worth the effort?

Hmmmmmmmm.

I wouldn't say extreme.

I think that we are about  to elect a Labour government and oust the Conservatives, though I don't see a whole lot of difference between them. So I feel no need to vote.

There are certainly Nationalist rumblings in continental Europe, as there always are. But there is also Russia to focus minds.

Checks and balances.

And despite all those guns, I think that USA is still a reasonably sensible place.

Longer term, I foresee problems with the sustainability of a largely useless global population...But that's another issue, that hopefully won't affect me.

I would suggest that A.I.  will perhaps become the big player.

Or E.T. of course.

Are you sure that they are actual women.

And not pre-ops.

Is that hairdo really charismatic?

I think that it's more a case of mass stupidity.

From time to time, humans enjoy a bit of mass stupidity.

Inbuilt checks and balances maybe.

Sort of, two steps forwards and one step back,

As it were.

Thing is,

When you have a feature debate between two old men,

The producers and the audience just want daftness.

Sensible, isn't entertaining.

For sure, the low IQ majority have ovine tendencies.

Woof Woof.

Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.

Clever stupid gene

Therefore overthink

Therefore

Satanism

Christianity

And all sorts of other nonsense.

Whereas

Masturbation 

Is a real time necessity.

Sluts are best for blow jobs.

Saliva has anti-septic properties.

You never know what's lurking beneath in the crack of doom.

Wouldn't you agree Doc?

Fantasy island.

Pre-nub or pre-nup?

You choose.

Did you know, that sitting for prolonged periods is extremely detrimental to your health.

We act without thinking.

Seemingly

Thinking...

Consciously processing data.

When adequately trained,

Seemingly becomes a simultaneous process.

Though I'm not sure that it's possible to do something before the relevant data has been processed.

The rapidity of the processing  system is such that action and reaction are virtually simultaneous.

Subconscious output is unknown, though conscious output is typically decided upon.

The question is, are conscious decisions always stimulated by subconscious effects.

Why do we make decisions?

Or more appropriately...Why do we decide to decide?

TV debates are cheap entertainment.

Perhaps the U.S. education system really is that bad.

But I doubt it.

Feeding the hens and tending the crops.

You're as clever as me then.

Great minds think similarly.

Have a nice day.

Or you could do something more useful.

I expect that most people lie about their IQ score.

Do you think that intelligence is genetically predetermined?

Or do you think that intelligence can be increased by home schooling?

Nonetheless, clever people can still do stupid things.

Like taking an army to Russia in the winter.

A reasonably cohesive society needs a reasonable cohesive ideology.

And a reasonably intellectual and progressive society needs to nurture and develop the best brains.

And I expect that most teachers are less retarded than a lot of parents are.

True. 

At best, biblical compilations amount to a regional mythology.

And true also, most theists never question the veracity of the data.

They just accept what they were told.

Just turning up occasionally to sing a few songs and mutter a few prayers.

But hey, if that's what makes them feel good...That's holy.

The data matrix is there to be accessed.

How many do you intend to marry?

So, precisely  when were "scriptures" compiled and by whom?

How can you ensure the veracity of the data.

And how can you vouch for the honesty of the compiler/s.

Those big brewing conglomerates for example.

Have one for me.

Mines a nice crisp independently brewed IPA.

I think that the general consensus amongst vegans, is that eating meat should be illegal.

I doubt your vegan sincerity.

So if you want to fuck a pig just do it quietly and in private.

Out of sight is out of mind as someone said.

Certainly wouldn't need to bother with the vasectomy.

Here's another.

Sure-footed and open-minded.

I never vote Stephen, though our current  bloke knows a good bet when he sees one. LOL.

Doesn't matter who gets in...Six months down the line and Messer's Hislop and Merton, will be ripping them to shreds on a Friday evening.

It's all entertainment.

Call me a conspiracy theorist if you like, but I'm of the opinion that until you topple those who are really pulling the strings, then the system is never going to change.

I always have a problem with the idea of 2D.

Don't get me wrong.

I both understand and appreciate the concept and effects of "pollution".

As a debater, I was simply putting forward a perfectly logical and alternative suggestion, that in terms of material evolution, the manipulation of matter and consequent biproducts, is as natural a process as the formation of coal or crude oil for example.

Keeping the place looking nice and tidy by hiding stuff out of sight and mind is just an extension of the thinking process, but not necessarily necessary in terms of achieving evolutionary goals...Of course, that's assuming that evolutionary goals are necessary and have a greater meaning and purpose.

Modern humans are surrounded by the products of material manipulation...Necessary and unpolluting in their functionality, yet polluting in their constructional biproducts and also in their breakdown and loss of usefulness...Double standards perhaps.

If we want to read the page Ebuc, we have to accept the consequences of the page...Otherwise it's back to a short life hunter gathering and sleeping in trees.

Good morning Steven.

Tarik had a similar style to Mall.

Though I suppose it's fair to say that we all have a particular style.

Flat Earth theorists would perhaps suggest that the sun does actually come and go.

Though I'm currently content with the idea that the Earth is rotating.

Maybe I'm the nutter.

Yep I thought that the whole idea thing was, that Stan was the personification of evil and Ged was the personification of righteousness.

Not sure about Alan.

In a techno-controlled World, does it really matter where a techno-addicted society lives?

Red hat, blue hat, does it make a lot of difference?

Pollution is a thinking persons concept.

Extracting and converting base matter and  thereby producing bi-products, either is or isn't a necessary process.

Nonetheless it's what thinking person is seemingly compelled to do.

Therefore, prolific persons = prolific bi-products.

You either will or will not extract meaning from my narratives.

It's simply a data assessment and choice thing.

Same for me of course.

For me, holiness is word describing an abstract concept, which relative to their conditioning, some observers will convert  into an emotive response.

From my point of view, the biblical narrative does not induce an emotive response.

So I've just spoken on what I know.

Thing is:

Violence and revenge are real time events, regardless of past events.