zedvictor4

For sure.

Though the Earth is a spheroid.

What would be the point of the Earth not being a spheroid?

Proof of what.

Belief is basically, acceptance without proof.

Conversion, de-conversion, reconversion or whatever version, is all........Make believe.

Uncanny.

Statistics are as statistics do.

Need I say more?

As for the bucket experiment.

I would completely disagree with your findings.

I think that Israel as decided it wants to get rid.

And who would want to have terrorist maniacs living in their back yard.

Don't forget what started this latest situation.

Of course, the situation has been ongoing for thousands of years.

Both as bad as one another.

Such is the human fondness for memories.

I support neither side.

And I am certainly not swayed by populist media and political agitators.

But what if you don't know their age?

Looks can be very deceptive.

My daughter is very youthful looking, and still gets asked for ID when purchasing alcohol.

She is 39.

What I'm saying is, we base such conclusions on perception rather than knowledge.

If you don't know if someone is under or over the age of 18, then it's impossible to conclude that they are either gross or not gross.

It maintains decrepit and useless people, who therefore waste resources.

it prevents natural wastage, and therefore also adds to unnecessary global overpopulation, depletion of resources and environmental damage.

Please note that I might also share other  more emotionally related opinions.

Though you did ask.

And so I presented you with two perfectly reasonable unemotional answers..

With a name like Oppenheimer, it took you a minute?

Damn, your slow Wylted.

My dog has an uncanny resemblance to Einstein don't you think?

See above.

And what about the rest of my questions?

Because relative to social and legal expectations, just about everyone with an attraction to young fecund females will have "paedophilic" responses to visual perceptions.

Depending upon where one lives of course, age of consent ranges from 11 years to 20 years.

Which shows really that paedophilia is a social concept rather than a sexual attraction.

I would suggest that sexuality as we refer to it today, is an innate procreational drive, modified by social pressure, over time.

And just for the record, I'm a bog standard British heterosexual male.

Who see's young fecund females walking up the high street in their tight leggings, and thinks accordingly.

And any bog standard heterosexual male who says that he thinks otherwise, is lying.

Defo.

U.S political infighting is simply a source of amusement.

As is the British version.

Off to work now.

Have a nice day.

FFS

Don't you just hate it when people talk in acronyms.

LOL

BFN.

GP.

Presumably the Entire Planet will remain.

And rather a lot of constructed debris.

Bearing in mind that 3500 is only 1476 years from now,

And Stonehenge and the Pyramids are estimated to be 4000 to 5000 years old.

Thailand is a good place to go for a fuck.

Or so I am told.

Just don't tweet that you don't like the Monarch,

Which isn't particularly difficult to not do,

Unless one is a fucking idiot.

Did you know that in Minnesota, it is illegal to wrestle a greased Pig?

Not sure if fucking one is allowed.

I'm guessing not.

Killjoy Minnesotans. 

Why does chocolate enslave children?

Though, it's only an intellectually stylised society  that acts upon irrational social concepts.

In so much as, what is the difference between a fecund female who has existed for 15 years and 364days,

And a fecund female who has existed for 16 years and one day.

Why is one gross and the other not?

Be honest.

When they walk up the HIgh Street in their tight leggings.

A. How do you differentiate lifespan, and therefore differentiate between the gross and the non-gross?

B. Do you really think that a fecund 15 years and 364 days female in tight leggings walking up the High Street, is gross?

Come on Big Boy.

What we have to do, is learn to act upon impulses, in relation to stylised and therefore legal social expectations.

Thankfully we are still currently able to think what we want to think.

If a Universal system became entropic, would it exist.

Assuming that the basis of the system is sub-atomic order,

Therefore, the basis of thermodynamics and energy.

Worth it for the soundtrack.

Though I would suggest, a childishly stylized version of certain  things, generated using computers for the benefit of humans, by humans.

Not really invested with alternative intelligence.

JR or Murphy.

Though there is a certain similarity.

Check out social media Amber.

Can you honestly say that everything that BK refers to in their comments, is not ever present.

This is the real World.

Grandma's version of things is the old fantasy, perhaps.

Which isn't to say that everything isn't up for discussion...Topical or otherwise.

BK's stimulating output, has certainly stimulated you.

Hello JoeBob.

Well I see that as a sort of truism.

Of course the win or loss is relative to the individual.

Which of course is relative to survival.

Though the bigger question is, does the Universe and the Earth therein, require 8 billion people.

Which is of course is a philosophical question relative to our ignorance.

And the conclusions reached might be either good, bad or don't know, relative to ones chosen angle on the subject.

What's yours?

Mine is don't know.

Though I would suggest that the Earth doesn't necessarily require millions of people being kept alive to deplete it's resources.

Nonetheless I am a firm advocate of the notion that everything that occurs within a Universe at any given moment, is naturally occurring.

Of course the silly thing is, that everything that occurs now, is based upon past events, as will be everything that occurs in the future.

A situation that sort of comes with an inbuilt futility.

Dodgy.

Dylan Thomas, if I'm not mistaken.

Always amazes me that millions of people put so much energy and emphasis into watching and discussing a handful of people doing daft stuff on a contrived field.

With a contrived leather sort of a ball object.

I suppose that it is one of many analogical necessities in a society that no longer depends upon hunter gathering.

Philately and numismatics are two other examples.

And ironically, hunting.

With comments like that,

You're turning into me.

Or a slightly more vitriolic version.

Hope that all is well  with you and yours, in Sunny Sarasota.

Mess is a human concept...Therefore natural.

You probably quite happily  live in a house filled with all the seemingly necessary gizmos and gadgets.

Most of which will one day end up in a messy hole in the ground.

Q. What is the real difference between the two lots of stuff?

A. Thoughts.

Without BK.

What would we talk about?

They are currently the life and soul of Debateart.

Low quality threads certainly result in the serious problem of hems coming unstitched.

Seriously.

Probably no GOD, BK.

So a hypothetical creator can be or do anything hypothetically.

Though original sin is basically a human sex hang up thing.

And stealing thy neighbours sheep is simply sheep rustling.

So would billions of people.

Sort of good and bad.

Essentially a landfill is a hole in the ground full of natural stuff.

In so much as, the human ability to create stuff from natural resources, is a natural process.

So.

Mrs Zed says I look like James Nesbitt.

Without the hair transplants.

Someone for you to research.

Yep.

Another philosophy suggests that human satisfaction, stimulates technological evolution and therefore advances material evolution.

And that "nature" is everything and therefore sacrificial.

Is that the GOD that raped Mary?

Does he lead by example?

32. Toast that lands buttered side down.

Though I suppose that wind and sunshine are reasonably renewable in the long term.

Whereas fossil fuels are not.

And any sort of energy production will inevitably raise environmental concerns.

It's a human problem, as it always is of course.

This is a truism.

Remove the data processing device and there's nothing to worry.

Assuming that the Universe is a closed system.

And assuming that the purpose of everything is is not to unclose the system.

Which I suppose is to assume that everything is purposeless.

Science changes it's mind regularly.

And has a few trillion years left in which to regularly do so.

Some might even suggest that space and time have infinite potential.

And therefore everything is closed but infinitely open, and infinitely potent.

No one understands everything GP.

Hmmmmm.

Is increasing intelligence a necessity?

If not, a reversal or stagnation is unimportant.

If so, I would suggest that it is likely that fewer and fewer will possess the capability to increase.

We are already a society of mostly users, rather than developers.

And then there is the inevitability of AI, probably.

Alternative Intelligence, let's say.

What is the purpose of knowledge?

Everything or none.

Science says, it doesn't know yet.

That's assuming, that it will be worked out eventually.

So who owns it?

Who lends it?

Everything that occurs with a universe at any given moment is naturally occurring.

Ultimately everything is either renewable or not.

Was this universe renewed from the previous one?

Reinterpreting history and the thoughts of 50 million anonymous persons is easy.

People were people, are people Trade.

Christian is just a largely ignored label.

Applying the  label doesn't change human behaviour overnight.

We are endowed with fight or flight data, to which we might add some form of conceptual ideology.

Though history tells us, that over the centuries since the time of Jesus, Christians have never been particularly keen on the turn the other cheek option.

So I would suggest that innate survival systems still take precedence over conceptual add-ons.

Though, what specifically is a Christian?

Do you mean someone unwittingly baptised, who never attends church, and has never read the bible.

Or some devout fundamentalist bible basher.

Of course, it might be suggested that the former is just as likely to be a more passive character than the latter.

For sure, as a part of a system of global control.

So as you haven't answered my previous question concerning the lender.

Answer me this...Who will call in the debt or seize U.S. assets?

But, have you ever tried not to think?

What about time?

Is EMRadiation (charged photos) universally omni-present.

Did you mean Photons?

That would be like saying that any concept held by a majority, influences State.

Which I suppose it does.

To a variable degree.