zedvictor4

Still cannot see the name Buffett without conjuring up images of people stood around a table holding paper plates and napkins, uncertain of what to do with the glass of wine.

Self deprecation and innate ability are two different issues.

As far as we don't actually know,

From unverifiable accounts.

His dad was an unmarried philanderer.

And J himself wasn't really a fan of heterosexuality.

So it's unlikely that he gave a toss either way on the subject of contractual heterosexual copulation between female infants and sweaty older men.

Passive agreement?

I would suggest that the human species is more likely to evolve to a state of asexuality, and/or a system of asexual reproduction. That it is to achieve a state of total passive agreement.

Nope. 

Originally, before the word  gender was repurposed for use in the war on penis vagina angst, gender simply identified that the binary species was a binary species.

Nope.

In terms of ongoing  human endurance, to be a living but enslaved human is far worse that being a non-existent ex-embryo.

Opposing opinions will be based on overthink.

Taylor who?

Swft did you say?

Will have to look him up.

At minimum.

Not really sure what that is asking.

Though, evidence may be a deliberate pack of lies. (Legal)

Or inaccurate and modified reinterpretations of inaccurate accounts of past events. (Biblical) 

Or theory, (Scientific)

As a rule parents are there just to teach the basics.

Wiping your backside and tying your shoe laces type stuff.

Though for sure, some dumb parents  will just provide you with flip flops.

Social education kicks in at around 4/5.

And for sure, social media teaches all kinds of inspirational stuff, like transsexualism and violent games.

If you're unlucky enough to born into a religious society, then unfortunately you will more likely than not, end up with a head full of unnecessary religious bullshit.

Which certainly proves, that on the whole, clever atheist astrophysicists, make the best parents.

I think that Japan was perhaps not keen on fallout and it's preceding events.

GOD bless America.

And did you mean Battotai?

Or Bukkake, which is the Japanese tradition of splashing with broth.

Sort of a baptism ritual.

"Rebel pride".

Is that a gathering of rainbow coloured  gay rebels?

Hasn't GOD created CCTV yet?

I thought that omnipresence was a metaphor for global surveillance.

A lot messier.

I was responding to the use of the phrase "de-convert".

Which sort of means, I don't want to be in your club anymore, even though I will still retain all the relevant data.

Convert or de-convert, neither increases nor decreases the veracity of the data.

Only concrete proof of an existent GOD, will verify GOD data.

Until there is concrete proof, there will only ever be made up data.

Converting or de-converting is just a whim relative to a made up religion.

Being steadfast relative to rigid conditioning, lessens the likelihood of whimsey.

Not quite sure what your last post meant.

But, knowledge is acquired and stored data.

Evidence is not necessarily factual.

And if one knew that GOD was an unequivocal fact, then belief would be surplus to requirements.

There's a huge difference between overthrowing a government and a few rednecks making a fuss.

For sure.

Though the Earth is a spheroid.

What would be the point of the Earth not being a spheroid?

Proof of what.

Belief is basically, acceptance without proof.

Conversion, de-conversion, reconversion or whatever version, is all........Make believe.

Uncanny.

Statistics are as statistics do.

Need I say more?

As for the bucket experiment.

I would completely disagree with your findings.

I think that Israel as decided it wants to get rid.

And who would want to have terrorist maniacs living in their back yard.

Don't forget what started this latest situation.

Of course, the situation has been ongoing for thousands of years.

Both as bad as one another.

Such is the human fondness for memories.

I support neither side.

And I am certainly not swayed by populist media and political agitators.

But what if you don't know their age?

Looks can be very deceptive.

My daughter is very youthful looking, and still gets asked for ID when purchasing alcohol.

She is 39.

What I'm saying is, we base such conclusions on perception rather than knowledge.

If you don't know if someone is under or over the age of 18, then it's impossible to conclude that they are either gross or not gross.

It maintains decrepit and useless people, who therefore waste resources.

it prevents natural wastage, and therefore also adds to unnecessary global overpopulation, depletion of resources and environmental damage.

Please note that I might also share other  more emotionally related opinions.

Though you did ask.

And so I presented you with two perfectly reasonable unemotional answers..

With a name like Oppenheimer, it took you a minute?

Damn, your slow Wylted.

My dog has an uncanny resemblance to Einstein don't you think?

See above.

And what about the rest of my questions?

Because relative to social and legal expectations, just about everyone with an attraction to young fecund females will have "paedophilic" responses to visual perceptions.

Depending upon where one lives of course, age of consent ranges from 11 years to 20 years.

Which shows really that paedophilia is a social concept rather than a sexual attraction.

I would suggest that sexuality as we refer to it today, is an innate procreational drive, modified by social pressure, over time.

And just for the record, I'm a bog standard British heterosexual male.

Who see's young fecund females walking up the high street in their tight leggings, and thinks accordingly.

And any bog standard heterosexual male who says that he thinks otherwise, is lying.

Defo.

U.S political infighting is simply a source of amusement.

As is the British version.

Off to work now.

Have a nice day.

FFS

Don't you just hate it when people talk in acronyms.

LOL

BFN.

GP.

Presumably the Entire Planet will remain.

And rather a lot of constructed debris.

Bearing in mind that 3500 is only 1476 years from now,

And Stonehenge and the Pyramids are estimated to be 4000 to 5000 years old.

Thailand is a good place to go for a fuck.

Or so I am told.

Just don't tweet that you don't like the Monarch,

Which isn't particularly difficult to not do,

Unless one is a fucking idiot.

Did you know that in Minnesota, it is illegal to wrestle a greased Pig?

Not sure if fucking one is allowed.

I'm guessing not.

Killjoy Minnesotans. 

Why does chocolate enslave children?

Though, it's only an intellectually stylised society  that acts upon irrational social concepts.

In so much as, what is the difference between a fecund female who has existed for 15 years and 364days,

And a fecund female who has existed for 16 years and one day.

Why is one gross and the other not?

Be honest.

When they walk up the HIgh Street in their tight leggings.

A. How do you differentiate lifespan, and therefore differentiate between the gross and the non-gross?

B. Do you really think that a fecund 15 years and 364 days female in tight leggings walking up the High Street, is gross?

Come on Big Boy.

What we have to do, is learn to act upon impulses, in relation to stylised and therefore legal social expectations.

Thankfully we are still currently able to think what we want to think.

If a Universal system became entropic, would it exist.

Assuming that the basis of the system is sub-atomic order,

Therefore, the basis of thermodynamics and energy.

Worth it for the soundtrack.

Though I would suggest, a childishly stylized version of certain  things, generated using computers for the benefit of humans, by humans.

Not really invested with alternative intelligence.

JR or Murphy.

Though there is a certain similarity.

Check out social media Amber.

Can you honestly say that everything that BK refers to in their comments, is not ever present.

This is the real World.

Grandma's version of things is the old fantasy, perhaps.

Which isn't to say that everything isn't up for discussion...Topical or otherwise.

BK's stimulating output, has certainly stimulated you.

Hello JoeBob.

Well I see that as a sort of truism.

Of course the win or loss is relative to the individual.

Which of course is relative to survival.

Though the bigger question is, does the Universe and the Earth therein, require 8 billion people.

Which is of course is a philosophical question relative to our ignorance.

And the conclusions reached might be either good, bad or don't know, relative to ones chosen angle on the subject.

What's yours?

Mine is don't know.

Though I would suggest that the Earth doesn't necessarily require millions of people being kept alive to deplete it's resources.

Nonetheless I am a firm advocate of the notion that everything that occurs within a Universe at any given moment, is naturally occurring.

Of course the silly thing is, that everything that occurs now, is based upon past events, as will be everything that occurs in the future.

A situation that sort of comes with an inbuilt futility.

Dodgy.

Dylan Thomas, if I'm not mistaken.

Always amazes me that millions of people put so much energy and emphasis into watching and discussing a handful of people doing daft stuff on a contrived field.

With a contrived leather sort of a ball object.

I suppose that it is one of many analogical necessities in a society that no longer depends upon hunter gathering.

Philately and numismatics are two other examples.

And ironically, hunting.

With comments like that,

You're turning into me.

Or a slightly more vitriolic version.

Hope that all is well  with you and yours, in Sunny Sarasota.

Mess is a human concept...Therefore natural.

You probably quite happily  live in a house filled with all the seemingly necessary gizmos and gadgets.

Most of which will one day end up in a messy hole in the ground.

Q. What is the real difference between the two lots of stuff?

A. Thoughts.

Without BK.

What would we talk about?

They are currently the life and soul of Debateart.

Low quality threads certainly result in the serious problem of hems coming unstitched.

Seriously.

Probably no GOD, BK.

So a hypothetical creator can be or do anything hypothetically.

Though original sin is basically a human sex hang up thing.

And stealing thy neighbours sheep is simply sheep rustling.

So would billions of people.

Sort of good and bad.

Essentially a landfill is a hole in the ground full of natural stuff.

In so much as, the human ability to create stuff from natural resources, is a natural process.

So.

Mrs Zed says I look like James Nesbitt.

Without the hair transplants.

Someone for you to research.

Yep.

Another philosophy suggests that human satisfaction, stimulates technological evolution and therefore advances material evolution.

And that "nature" is everything and therefore sacrificial.

Is that the GOD that raped Mary?

Does he lead by example?