zedvictor4

Narcissists have a tendency to only love one thing.

Well, a creator is special and not bound by the same rules, is an easy answer but impossible to prove.

And of course the same old response to, prove that a GOD exists, is, prove that a GOD doesn't exist.

Though for me, the onus falls entirely upon the theist to prove their case, based upon the current limitations of human understanding.

Because based upon the limitations of current understanding there is no known existent GOD...Just a theoretical GOD.

A theoretical GOD with an accompanying thesis, which to say the least is a tad mystical and mythical.

And to be fair, mystical and mythical in line with 2000 year old thinking.

The nature of humanity and it's societies quite demonstrably throws up charismatic leaders...Look no further than the current crop.

So Jesus and Muhammad, though historically significant and somewhat special amongst the masses, are nonetheless only human and as fallible as every other human individual.

To be continued........

Money is potentially a limitless invention.

MAGA MORONS are programmed to vote for Trump.

So in fairness, it's not really their fault.

Hopefully the U.S. still has a balanced populous, containing significant quantities of otherwise programmed, including moderators.

Moderates have a tendency to decide free and fair elections.

The electoral circus will be just that.

And the Presidential voting system will be as convoluted as ever.

The vehicle is communicating with the onboard computer.

And the onboard computer is trying to fix the problem.

Don't overthink...Will cause further stress.

Jizz will out.

It's a force of nature.

Just another indicator of the Yin and Yang of the human condition.

Stupid Clever.

Yep. Always a second hand car for me.

As long as the mileage isn't ridiculously high.

I would agree.

Certain words expressed with a certain intonation, have acquired a certain meaning.

Undoubtedly.

What created the creator.

You did question how something could come into existence from nothingness.

If we make a no creation necessary rule, for a creator.

Then why shouldn't that rule apply to everything?

GODS send holy books.

Can you prove that Holy books weren't in fact written by men?

And what is the difference between a prophet and a charlatan...The answer being, what we are either compelled to believe or choose to believe.

I am an atheist,

Though evolutionary progression and material development undoubtedly occur, which in itself can be regarded as a GOD principle.

And  I also think that even though it wasn't necessarily necessary to invent a magical humanesque cause, it was probably an inevitability.

People advocate for death penalties.

And then blame it upon a fictional character.

Homosexual behaviour is one of many role play scenarios that result in orgasm and temporary sexual satisfaction.

And then carry on with other stuff, or roll over and go to sleep.

Christianity is one of many established data programmes, based upon a pseudo creation hypothesis and a charismatic charlatan.

Humans are easily programmed with such misinformation.

It's what is referred to as human gullibility.

One downside of the onboard computer.

Though it must be said, that a significant upside is the development of intellectual societies, thereby allowing material evolution to flourish.

Non-sense begets nuclear weapons as it were.

So a nuclear holocaust might be regarded as hell.

But we would know who to blame wouldn't we?

Ass hole is a depression in which one finds Donkeys.

Whereas arsehole is a waste extrusion port.

Sweet Caroline. Status Quo.

The majority of older people are kept alive surgically and medicinally.

And youngsters are oppressed by social and financial expectations.

Trying to shut the stable door with punishments, doesn't address the causes of your perceived problem.

Well, I suggested that a minority chose to be exhibitionists, and a majority were still repressed by old style conditioning.

I would further suggest that over-sexualisation is merely an assumption, that contrasts with ideas of under-sexualisation or normal-sexualisation.

How one adorns one's body with clothing is a separate issue, and not necessarily an indicator of levels of sexualisation. But perhaps more of an indicator of where we are at in terms of social development.

Though as I also previously questioned, who or what sets the criteria and therefore the standards for sexualisation.

I would finally suggest that as ever, the repressed are the ones who always try to set and maintain criteria and standards, whereas the progressives are the ones who challenge old style thinking.

Though If you think about it logically, developing an indifferent attitude towards the human body and it's functionality, is perhaps more likely to result in  a desexualised way of thinking...Whereas sexual repression only perpetuates emotional and physical angst.

Yep, the points you make are relevant.

And the here and now is relevant to how things actually are, and how things could be in the future.

I'm continuously suggesting that selective breeding is the way forwards for humanity.

Though I also continuously suggest that humanity could be superseded by an alternative intelligence.

Nonetheless, here and now there are 8.1 billion people split between 195 countries, with varying levels of technological and social development.

So I don't see a global agreement on selective breeding and social homogeneity happening any time soon.

Spot on.

Though perhaps species development is actually working towards such a position.

It's just that here and now, we are condemned to the here and now.

No.

I would suggest that relative to ideological and  cultural development, attitudes towards sexuality have always varied.

So let me ask you a question.

Would you agree that relative to ideological and cultural development, a proportion of the human race is sexually repressed?

If you think about it logically, the developed concepts of nakedness and embarrassment, relative to sexual functionality are a tad unnecessary.

Though, one must always temper such statements by adding that everything that occurs within a Universe may or may not be necessary.

Logically the AI bot,

Would conclude,

Hungry Bear,

Tasty morsel.

It never surprises me these days that your posts always contain subliminal references to "Butts" and abbreviated "Anal Intercourse Bottoms".

And don't even mention Grizzly Bears and child minding.

Good day Bruce.

Real life problems may have unpredictable outcomes, or may have predictable outcomes.

However, neither is a certainty, because we cannot see into the future.

Whereas the hypothetical trolley problem, is simply that.

So my solution to the trolley problem is:

X = 5 + 1 - 1x

Did you see that coming?

You keep saying "The World".

By which, I assume you are referring to the entirety of the human race.

Therefore if only one human was not over-sexualised, then you statement would be incorrect.

 

Nonetheless how does one calculate a scale of human over-sexualisation?

Or more importantly, who is qualified to calculate scales of human over-sexualisation?

And who considers themselves to be qualified to judge someone else's attitude towards sexuality?

The answer being, the sexually over-repressed, with a background steeped in repressive ideology and social repression....Which of course is no qualification at all.

But rather an under-qualification.

The simple fact is, that times and attitudes are slowly changing... And "the World's" attitude towards sexuality will be it's own judge.

So how does one actually observe the phenomenon?

Of course, their is a huge difference between chastisement and physical abuse.

Theory is either theory or not.

So if it is not theoretical, then it is not weird.

What about coincidence?

Why should similar particles not behave similarly.

Or does the Universe contain only two electrons.

Far too hypothetical and unrealistic to be a real problem.

I  answered this question.

Nonetheless I will rephrase if you like.

No, the majority of the human race is not over-sexualized.

The majority of the human race remains sexually repressed, due to how the majority of the human race is conditioned.

You are responding to the actions of a few narcissists and exhibishionists who seek to glorify a supposedly liberal media with their antics.

As I suggested, a truly liberal person would not need to perform in this way.

In my opinion. 

The Christian hypothesis is consistently weak and shallow.

Such is my character.

In my opinion

Your character feels the necessity to consistently promote the weak and shallow Christian hypothesis.

Such is the inconsistency of formative and ongoing data transfer.

In all seriousness.

A. I don't believe.

B. The World?

Nope the Global community is largely still sexually repressed by formative conditioning.

I would suggest, that if the whole of society was conditioned to be totally open about bodies and their natural functions, then there wouldn't be an issue.

The problem is  in the minds of the repressed.

Yep.

That's the argument.

But one could argue that it wasn't your parents fault.

Nonetheless if you've lived a life of pain, I sympathise.

I fortunately have not suffered any unendurable pain, the worst being a sciatic infection about 15 years ago, that lasted for about a week.

Didn't stop me working though.

Left and right are different labels applied to hominid organisms that think in the same way.

Data is typical , though sometimes assessed and concluded upon differently.

Relative to this post, a Republican is a hominid organism that resides within what is definitionally regarded as a Republic.

Similarly a Democrat is a hominid organism that resides within what is definitionally regarded as a Democratic society.

So put the two together within the global region known as the United States of America, and what you end up with are approximately 350 million Democratic Republicans.

All acquiring and assessing similar data in exactly the same way, though outputting variable conclusions.

Now.

Can you explain how a trolley that will kill 5, can be diverted to only kill one.

One would assume that a trolley that will kill five, if diverted, would therefore miss all 5.

Can you explain the logistics, perhaps with an accompanying diagram.

I suppose that if the trolley has dodgy wheels and has a tendency to swerve randomly.

Though under these circumstances I can't see how one could predict fatalities with such certainty and accuracy.

Perhaps the trolley problem is just another load of philosophical bunkum.

Something not quite right with this statement.

Because the more clothing one wears the less revealing it becomes.

Nonetheless, what you are saying is that in certain societies, attitudes to recreational sex have become more liberal and open.

Of which, you seem to be quite knowledgeable.

Funny how the more sexually repressed, have a tendency to be the more knowledgeable.

Which can only be due to very high levels of relevant data input, challenging formatively acquired data input.

Me...I adore female buttocks areas in tight clothing.

Pert ones though.

Not old flabby saggy ones.

As for scatology.

I learned something new today.

Thanks for imparting some of your extensive sexual knowledge.

Go on...Just get stuck in...You know you want to.

Perhaps avoid the scat.

Hey, I'm just scatologically repressed.

I am not Christian,

Because I wasn't programmed to be so.

So, some bloke in a stupid outfit splashed water on my head when I was two months old...So what.

God almighty!

Jesus fucki*g christ!

LOL.

64% are clearly not grateful for their parents efforts.

Which in some respects is very acceptable...LOL.

Do we need a World of vainglorious, superficial, relatively useless, social media narcissistic individuals.

Of course, when 64% of the population die out over the next few years, there will be plenty of opportunity to import less selfish stock from the big breeder nations.

Depending upon where one lives of course, women seem to be doing OK.

You seem to be reflecting upon an old patriarchal view of society...Where female autonomy, harms masculinity.

Some bacteria gives you the sh*ts...Most doesn't.

On this occasion you were unlucky.

There are certainly ways to avoid risk though.

Uncontaminated meat is fine as part of a balanced diet.

Viruses, such as Norovirus are somewhat different.

Norovirus is prevalent in the UK at the moment.

Q. When is a Libertarian not an anarchist.

A. When a Libertarian says so.

Otherwise a person conforms to a social structure governed by a collective Law.

Not necessarily.

Which isn't necessarily to suggest that data processing and manipulative organic structures were designed by a designer per se.

Though there seems to be a certain inevitability to the processes that gave rise to said structures. 

And Napoleon B said a lot and then fucked up.

Hmmmm

Sexbots seem sort of outdated already.

All we need is a tiny orgasm implant...LOL.

Hmmmm.

Well reality is what it is.

We just don't know what it is.

Other than what we think we know.

Quantum mechanics is fun.

But a lot of theory.

And relative to something from nothing 

Was Schwinger, swinging it to good effect.

And the simply applied strong electric field?

Is something.

As are pairs of particles playing hide and seek.

As are 5billion creator programmers.

All that women need these days is the chance to lick each other senseless and a sperm bank.

If social media is to be believed.

A controlled breeding programme is perhaps a long way off, but will perhaps be the way forwards.

Recreational satisfaction comes with a variety of options...Relative to acquired sexual angst of course.

Though, orgasm achieved... Roll over and go to sleep.

So do we really need someone snoring, farting and oozing next to us?

GOD principle sound.

Floaty about bloke, not so.

Christian ideas are what they are.

There are other ideas.

We await the return of omni floaty bloke.

It's possible that the mass deposits a sort of afterlife remnant of purposeful matter.

Though on the other hand........

So where do the simply applied strong electric field and Schwinger effect come from.

Yep.

Gone cold and dry here too, thanks to North Easterlies.

Though not so cold...Hovering around zero overnight.

Bit more heating and burn a few more logs.

Extra layers of clothes and always wear my fleecy hat this time of year.

Some snow next week maybe.

I live on the side of a big hill...The road has a 20% gradient in places, so sometimes gets a bit dodgy.

Rarely lasts long though.

As long as the Gulf Stream stays where it is.

Hope that you enjoyed the beer and some good company.

Regards to you and yours.

This universe may be  the current  reincarnation, in an infinite/finite sequence of universal reincarnations.

Why?

Think about it, within an historical context.

Rather than as a current day exercise in labelling and separatism.

For instance, back in the day the ancestors of Jews, Palestinians and Christians were all one and the same.

And then along came clever folk with stupid ideas...Things haven't changed much have they?

Of course, if we go back far enough, we are all one and the same.

My primary label is Earthling.

What's yours?

I can generally agree with that.

Perfection arises from difficulties.

Though human necessity is the necessity of humans and not necessarily the necessity of material and intelligent evolution.

Quantum manipulation...Who knows.

Maybe something somewhere else, has already got this sussed..