Total topics: 4
I will start with myself.
Theme Song: P Money - Shook
Closest Fictional Character: Jaime Lannister
Exaggerated Overview:
A complex combination of ruthlessness and sentimentality, RM is known for his willingness to take almost anyone on and doesn't necessarily care too much about what people think of him despite being cocky.
Politically and religiously, RM represents a 'mystical' stance that incorporates pragmatism mixed with mercy and care in a strange concoction that he sees as morally justifable ruthlessness. This also sums up how he approaches debating in the formal arena. RM is less concerned with having the last word in conversation and more concerned with seeming witty enough or arguing well enough before letting things be.
Some find him intelligent, others find him cringey, no one truly knows what to make of him. He may have a soft core beneath a harsh exterior or may have a harder core beneath said softness.
Strengths:
- Extremely energetic and passionate
- Witty and cunning, unpredictable as an opponent
- Somewhat charismatic and quick to welcome newer members (even if it is done in a harsh way)
- Courageous, while some of his fights are easy he is also one of the only experienced members to not flinch too much from the opportunity to challenge a fellow 'Titan' of the site.
Weaknesses:
- Fragile Ego, even though he masks it at times he is sensitive to insults to his ability or self-worth, this can lead him to overreact
- Impulsivity is his fuel, when it goes well it goes brilliant but this also means that if he lacks the 'fire' to debate in the middle of a debate he finds it extremely difficult to keep it going. He debates as a passionate spar, not simply for the win at least not all the time.
- Chaotic nature puts people who prefer structure and monotony at extreme odds with him. There is probably not a single member that enjoys conformity and structure that is allied with RM.
- Bluntness, which he would call honesty, can cause significant abrasion with members and even be interpreted as direct insult at times. He works hard to avoid this but he isn't one to pussyfoot and never will be, at least not by nature.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
I have begun to realise that a niche of debates I am much more interested in that I first assumed and good at doing, are discussions of characters and such in fictional shows/series/movie-franchises.
It is very important that your offered debate topics inside this thread do not directly spoil something, if they do, please put in very clear formatted test 'SPOILER ALERT' above it.
This is primarily for offering series and general characters or scenes (that you hint at) and for people to DM/PM each other about it, or even directly challenge. This can be moved to TV or whatever section when the mods want but I am putting this in the DART section because I want people to see it and that subforum is barely viewed at all.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
DebateArt.com
I'll just say comedy is the most realistic aspect of human nature. People love to be sarcastic or to have been surrounded by sarcasm all the time. Whether it be friends, spouse, family or strangers, without a humor aspect of the conversation, nothing seems lively.
Even within the show business, whether it be a thriller or action movie or series, the whole production includes an effort to make the audience laugh once in a while. Because that's what draws people from inside. Some may just despise the whole concept of fantastic and impossible comedic act in comedy shows/series/sitcoms/movies but at the end of the day, no one loves a dull Tony Stark or a boring Suicide Squad or a serious Jesse Pinkman.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Show business
People have hyped Stranger Things to be a sound thriller/horror series. Watching the show made me feel like there's nothing special at all. There is that same old pattern in every season. Season 1 and 2 specifically made no sense, should have just been only one of them and then 3 as 2. I don't get the hype.
Created:
Updated:
Category:
Show business