Instigator / Pro
12
1467
rating
3
debates
0.0%
won
Topic
#2115

Obama was a great president

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
24
Better sources
4
16
Better legibility
4
8
Better conduct
4
4

After 8 votes and with 40 points ahead, the winner is...

Dr.Franklin
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Twelve hours
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
52
1616
rating
32
debates
62.5%
won
Description

Obama was a great president in comparison to Trump.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Argument: Pro offered two examples of Obama's presidency in r1, Obamacare and the economy, but ofered no explanation why even these selected subjects were superior to other presidents. Con's rebuttal effectively dismantled both allegations, from which pro never attempted to salvage. Points to Con

Sources: Con's sources were superior to Pro, who offered no sources at all.

S&G: Tie

Conduct: Concession by Pro outweighs Con's one forfeited round. point to Con.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession and Forfeit

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Conduct to PRO for concession
Debate to CON for concession

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Pro concedes in Round 2. All votes should go to Con.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Argument & Sources: Dr. Franklin has listed several clear points where Obama isn't "Great", and Zlata did not respond to it in any way after. He even voluntarily forfeited in the 3rd round, leaving nothing of value after.
Sources: Con is the only one who used sources.

Conduct: Pro is the only one who is present for all, but that is not an FF for Con, and Pro implied that he conceded.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Concession, but Con forfeited more.