Animal testing should be banned.
All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.
With 3 votes and 2 points ahead, the winner is ...
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Category
- Politics
- Time for argument
- One week
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Rating mode
- Rated
- Characters per argument
- 10,000
To whoever joins this debate, best of luck. If the Con wants to try and either message me questions or comment questions for me, I will do my best to answer them, but I'm not making a guarantee due to my schedule. Lastly, before we start the debate, to structure the debate, I use a system like this
1. Main point.
A. Impacts to show what happens if we don't solve the main point.
B. Another impact if present.
I. Roman numerals to show sub impacts if applicable.
This little bit is a copy and paste, so all these points might not be in every debate I'm in.
As Con, I will give the first speech to Pro to establish a case since they have the burden of proof, as well as, they can set up a resolution framing they want. I'll challenge it if necessary, or establish a counter framework to debate. I want to limit Pro as little as possible through the description, the only rule being, no new args in the last speech.
This debate isn't. Not worthy of a vote
Riveting discussion
Did you quit the site?
wow. Much productive.