Animal testing should be banned.

To whoever joins this debate, best of luck. If the Con wants to try and either message me questions or comment questions for me, I will do my best to answer them, but I'm not making a guarantee due to my schedule. Lastly, before we start the debate, to structure the debate, I use a system like this
1. Main point.
A. Impacts to show what happens if we don't solve the main point.
B. Another impact if present.
I. Roman numerals to show sub impacts if applicable.
This little bit is a copy and paste, so all these points might not be in every debate I'm in.

As Con, I will give the first speech to Pro to establish a case since they have the burden of proof, as well as, they can set up a resolution framing they want. I'll challenge it if necessary, or establish a counter framework to debate. I want to limit Pro as little as possible through the description, the only rule being, no new args in the last speech.