Your proposal to the "race " problem.
All stages have been completed. The voting points distribution and the result are presented below.
With 1 vote and 3 points ahead, the winner is ...
- Publication date
- Last update date
- Time for argument
- Two days
- Voting system
- Open voting
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Four points
- Rating mode
- Characters per argument
Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.
Please provide a proposed solution to "racism". What is your method, code, idea, formula, whatever, that will help replace or eliminate all "racism" so that everyone will receive the proper treatment not involving "racial" discrimination?
How would you work or have others work as proposed to improve "race relations"?
Now be it that it's a proposal, you can't prove your method will work. But you do have to prove it is the best method yet, possibly ever thought up.
If the deductive reasoning is there to stand tenable with your concept , I'll stand to concede that. If I am able to undermine what's said on the basis of invalid points, you can come back to try again in another challenge.
For questions , please comment /send a message.
"Please provide a proposed solution to "racism". Now be it that it's a proposal, you can't prove your method will work.
But you do have to prove it is the best method yet, possibly ever thought up.
There's a word for why we're all probably at least a little bit racist, even if we really don't want to be: Implicit bias.
It's a term that describes what's happening when, despite our best intentions and without our awareness, racial stereotypes and assumptions creep into our minds and affect our actions.
It seeps into just about every aspect of life, including areas like criminal justice that can have deadly consequences. Thirty years of neurology and cognitive psychology studies show that it influences the way we see and treat others, even when we're absolutely determined to be, and believe we are being, fair and objective.
Implicit bias comes from the messages, attitudes, and stereotypes we pick up from the world we live in, and research over time and from different countries shows that it tends to line up with general social hierarchies.
Studies have shown that people have implicit biases that favor Germans over Turks (in Germany), Japanese over Koreans (in Japan), men over women (when it comes to career-related stereotypes), youth over elderly, and straight people over gay people.
In other words, you don't have a proposal. Knowing this before accepting the debate, why then accept something that you cannot take on the challenge of?
What is your method, code, idea, formula, whatever, that will help replace or eliminate all "racism"
How is this the only way when you haven't verified that I couldn't come up with a way?
Then the question is, why am I not "racist"?If I can be not "racist" and others can not be that, so much for human nature. Now what if that can be multiplied so much so that "racism" doesn't exist at all , what's the chance?I'm asking this because what you're saying about humanity is incongruent, doesn't mash up with this .
The proposal is to eliminate "racism" and not human life. What's your proposal to get rid of "racism" replacing it, replacing it with justice?
To replace "racism " with justice, we'd have to be here existing, living to bring about justice, improving a system of correct or proper treatment between "race relations".
The proposal to get rid of us is what you're saying. If hypothetically , some super advanced civilization resurrects us, restores, regenerates, revives us, we'll be back with "racism" still in existence. You need to propose something to solve "racism".
You know this how?I'm getting a claim here but no proof.
If you're wrong on your proposal, there would be no way to correct it. No way to even confirm it was the best proposal. Right now it's just a proposal but not an actual solution . Why ? The problem still exists. Now if we no longer exist, we can't verify that someone later came up with an actual way to eliminate "racism" alone. That is without implementing so much collateral damage. People aren't perfect as we make mistakes, make errors and can be wrong. This is your hypothesis I suppose but not a confirmation. In regards to collateral damage, young people, babies , people that aren't "racist" are eliminated.Why not try to extract what constitutes "non-racist" behavior to spread it all around?Make a homogeneous behavior of that.
- RECALL & EXTEND that CON himself said "Please provide a proposed solution to "racism". Now be it that it's a proposal, you can't prove your method will work." This renders any discussion over verifying it being the "best" inconsequential. It is not required to be verified after the fact. The solution is only required to be the best shot we have at ridding ourselves from racism.
- CON's logic is faulty at the fundamental level. There is no need for "verification of my solution" because it leaves no avenue for error. Without humanity, there is no racism because it is an exclusively human construct.
- CON commits special pleading by changing the timescale of the debate. In the debate description they specified PRO would be arguing that this is the "best method yet," and now they extend PRO's BoP unduly to include arguing that their method must be the best of all time.
- Behavior can not be homogenous, as humans are individuals, each with their own set of cognitive biases.
What have I done or said to prove I am "racist"?
What is cognitive bias?What does it have to do with "race"?
Part of the requirements. The remaining instructions are that you work and you have to be alive to work to solve this issue. You have to have others work and others have to be alive to work to solve this issue. We all are working on people relations .
- The win requirement was that PRO provide a solution to end racism. The solution does not have to fit with every word in your description, that is abusive and inconsistent with the rules of debate. "How would you work towards x" is not a win requirement, it is a question towards me that may or may not be relevant depending on the solution I chose.
- Furthermore, CON's argument is logically fallacious. PRO's solution does not indicate that people will be unable to physically achieve death through some action, for the same reason you do not argue that an alive person can not kill themselves because they are dead. One of the best candidates for human annihilation, for example, is the deliberate nuclear destruction of Earth.
You forgot the justice part. People have to exist with their lives intact for justice to exist in it. Not correct as you , you, you only made one requirement for yourself to avoid refutation.
This is an oxymoron. There's no such thing as a solved problem being once more again a problem. You're confusing a remedial temporary fix with a solution.
Why don't you think harder and come up with something that leaves all of us still breathing?
Think of a baby or child . You're saying they practice "racism". Prove that because I've never witnessed it. I've observed non- "racist " acts out of them and if that can be multiplied , why not?
The description called for improvement. How is that possible when we're all dead?
How do you know I am "racist"?I'm not and others are not so it is possible to live with the non-existence of "racism".
How does this improve "race " relations as the description states?
We don't know it's the best beforehand.
It's not a solution . It's a proposal to one. Why ? It hasn't been proven that it will work. In fact , the proposal is not suggesting to get rid of "racism" but just "races". But you believe everyone is "racist" including those you don't personally know, babies just born or unborn. Everybody is "racist". A claim but no proof.So your "racist". What are some of the "racist" things you've done so far today?
After we're dead , you can't verify if someone would have came up with an idea to solve the "race" problem with us all still breathing. Your proposal creates an unfalsifiable, untestable arena. If you truly think life is worth holding on to and want to work to improve things, you'd come up with a proposal that leaves room open to possibly better proposals
Best yet , best of all time, there's no difference to me. Whichever you feel comfortable in phrasing.
Individuals getting on a bus are doing the same thing that is getting on a bus. People drive cars so this is all homogeneous behavior.Please specify further when making the statement you made.
So the definition of a "racist" is to be human.Is "cognitive bias" another phrase for "racist"?Is that what you're saying?
Not every word of the description should be cooperated with. Says who? In other words, some of description can be ignored for the sake of what? Help me out. Would the challenge be harder if you did not chop it up?....This is how you move the goal post by cherry picking the description. You either be honest and consistent going by all what the description has laid out. That's what consistency is. YOU want to be consistent, you go with all of what the description is asking.
- Not every word of the description needs to be "cooperated with" because not every word is a rule or win condition. Most of it is superfluous.
- I am not "cherry-picking" the description, you are taking non-win conditions and trying to forcibly impose them on me. That is dishonest.
Are you saying you propose that people work to kill themselves, children , babies and all?
In other words , you have no rebuttal. Plus justice is the opposite of "racism". Improving a society purging the "race" issue would manifest justice.
A permanent solution to what?
Why do you think these different organizations exist? These groups like NAACP or "black lives matter", propose to deal with the "race" problem . In a fighting, empowerment, non,-defeatist like fashion to enhance life , not to take it away.
So somebody not being "racist" at the moment isn't being "racist" at that moment. You have to prove that a moment will come that all people will be "racist" . Many people will never have a moment of doing certain things that are wrong like murder. The wrongdoing of being "racist" is no different.
So the same result, no change in it makes it no better or improvement to "race" relations which doesn't fix the "race" problem.