Instigator / Con
4
1483
rating
327
debates
40.21%
won
Topic
#2608

Your proposal to the "race " problem.

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
3
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

MisterChris
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
4
Time for argument
Two days
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Pro
7
1762
rating
45
debates
88.89%
won
Description

Disclaimer : Regardless of the setup for voting win or lose, The aim of this interaction, Is for those that view it, Learn and or take away anything that will amount to any constructive value ultimately. So that counts as anything that'll cause one to reconsider an idea, Understand a subject better, Help build a greater wealth of knowledge getting closer to truth. When either of us has accomplished that with any individual here, That's who the victor of the debate becomes.

Please provide a proposed solution to "racism". What is your method, code, idea, formula, whatever, that will help replace or eliminate all "racism" so that everyone will receive the proper treatment not involving "racial" discrimination?

How would you work or have others work as proposed to improve "race relations"?

Now be it that it's a proposal, you can't prove your method will work. But you do have to prove it is the best method yet, possibly ever thought up.

If the deductive reasoning is there to stand tenable with your concept , I'll stand to concede that. If I am able to undermine what's said on the basis of invalid points, you can come back to try again in another challenge.

For questions , please comment /send a message.

***
Regarding this debate being reported...

Without knowing explicitly what prompted the report, I can guess it was either for hate speech or spam.

Hate speech:
Differing ideas are generally welcome here, even ones to which I highly disagree. There are of course limits, but this debate does not approach them.
A debate which might be insufferable enough to warrant intervention could be something like "Ethnicity X should all be hunted down and killed with machetes in Nation B."
Whereas while still bad, one which would be unlikely to warrant moderation intervention could be "Ethnicity X should be deported from Nation B."
The first example is specifically calling for extreme violence, the second while probably terrible, is not assured to outright cross that line.

Spam:
There is some small issue with repetitiveness, but this debate (or series thereof) are not comparable to the type of overtly repetitive nonsensical posts we delete. The author is engaging with his opponents based on their replies, making each one of these unique.

-Ragnar, DM
***

-->
@SirAnonymous

Well, thanks, but I'm not sure it's better per se actually. One thing that bothers me is I forgot to include that Mall said himself the solution must eliminate "all racism," but I'll just include that in R2. Plus, it is implied by my refutations and the language used anyways.

-->
@MisterChris

Yep, your constructive was better. Yours was more evidence based, whereas I took the lazier process of elimination approach.

-->
@Undefeatable

Frankly everyone here does it as a joke.

-->
@SirAnonymous

Ah, you'll have to let me know... I thought I was original ;-;

-->
@MisterChris

Your argument might be the same as the one I was thinking of.

-->
@Undefeatable

My argument is going to be a bad joke, so let's see if it works...

-->
@MisterChris

lol a top 5 debater accepting Mall's idea... overkill XD

The easiest way is to be rich, make a colorblind eyedrop, and drop it in everyone's eyes for "industrial purposes". That way people will not see race.

Peak "Libleft" libright.

Wait, I forgot shades, appearing black folks darker than white folks.

(grabs medical tweezers) Well, we have only one thing to do. (Pretends to pick both eyes out)

-->
@Sum1hugme

I think I've figured out a way around that clause.

-->
@Theweakeredge

Nah man, I think a Kritik approach would be a little too risky with that clause I quoted

-->
@Mall

If you give me at least five days per argument, I can do this debate.

I've actually come up with a pretty easy way to win this debate, but I don't think I'll actually have the time to do it. Maybe if there was more time to submit each argument I could.

-->
@seldiora

Yeah, your no doubt right, and that's kind of boring, so I probably won't be accepting this debate.

-->
@Theweakeredge

luckily, Mall isn't Whiteflame. Even if this was a policy debate, he will only ask questions one way or another and ask you to prove rather than refute your ideas. So you only have to propose some generic kind of reform or idea and say it will succeed, and Mall will fall.

-->
@Sum1hugme

Do you think I shall accept and kritik then prove?

-->
@Mall

"But you do have to prove it is the best method yet, possibly ever thought up."

I see you trying to bait an easy win lol