Instigator / Pro
8
1309
rating
280
debates
40.36%
won
Topic
#3971

Vaccines cause autism

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
0
9
Better sources
2
6
Better legibility
3
3
Better conduct
3
2

After 3 votes and with 12 points ahead, the winner is...

Sir.Lancelot
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
One month
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
20
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Description

Almost everyone has autism these days. My guess is its because of vaccines. The government injects reptile blood in us to make us stupid and autistic.

Round 1
Pro
#1
The debate is about the fact that vaccines cause autism.

My opponent disagrees with this fact.

Let us begin our case with exposing vaccination for what it really is.

Premise 1:
Unwanted penetration of body is rape.

Premise 2:
Vaccination is unwanted penetration of body.

Conclusion:
Vaccination is rape.

Now that we have seen that vaccination is rape, let us examine the causation of autism by vaccines.

Premise 1:
Rape causes autism.

Premise 2:
Vaccination is rape.

Conclusion:
Vaccination causes autism.

Since vaccination is done by vaccines, it follows that vaccines cause autism.

Thus, the resolution is proven correct by Pro's master logic.

I have to say, I am very smart.

I dont like to brag, but I am so much better than you guys.

Like, you cant even touch me.

I am the best.

I am not bragging. I am merely stating facts.

I am in the whole other league of debating.

I could debate 20 opponents at the same time using just one hand, while masturbating with the other hand.

I could fry your arguments in 15 seconds.

Go ahead now, dont be afraid. Present us your arguments.
Con
#2
Pro's argument is more of a desperate attempt at being funny. 

Edgy HumorHumor that is made up of intentionally offensive ironic jokes that are told/posted for the shock value and/or the facetiousness of the subject.

Definitions:
Rape- Unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person.

Vaccination- The act or practice of vaccinating; inoculation with vaccine.

BOP:
Since Pro is making the claim that vaccines cause autism, it is therefore the requirement that they provide proof to back up said assertion. 

Fallacious Arguments:
  1. Appeal To Definition.
  2. Reductio Ad Absurdum.
                    https://www.dictionary.com 
Round 2
Pro
#3
Con did not present proof that vaccination isnt rape.

If Con surrenders and doesnt want to argue, I dont blame him.

I have presented the proper definition of rape.

If Con thinks that unwanted penetration of body is fine, one must wonder what kind of a person Con is.

In any case, I hope Con gives us proof in the following rounds.
Con
#4
I laid out the definitions which clearly explain rape and vaccinations aren’t the same. 

Pro either has to find a way to prove that they are and explain how vaccines cause autism, or give up. 


Round 3
Pro
#5
My definitions say that vaccination is rape, and rape causes autism.

This is an undeniable fact.

Unwanted penetration of body is rape.

Maybe Con is into unwanted penetrations?

In any case, Con loses.

We shouldnt take seriously these Con's claims where he wants to change the definition of rape to suit his needs.
Con
#6
Most topic diversions are characteristic of a projection of some sort. 

  1. Most vaccinations are administered via injections through the arm with no sexual intent proceeding it.
  2. You have yet to establish proof that vaccines cause autism. 
Your time is almost up, Pro.
Round 4
Pro
#7
In round 1, Pro proved that unwanted penetration of body is rape.

I had high hopes that Con will present an argument, however, that did not happen.

Maybe it will happen in the next round.

Go ahead, Con. Tell us why unwanted penetration of body isnt rape.
Con
#8
 
Round 5
Pro
#9
It seems that Con has become unresponsive.

It is odd that someone would want to change the definition of rape.

So far Con has not explained to us why unwanted penetration is good for someone.

"Its not really rape" - Con says.

You know that unwanted penetration is wrong.

You just choose to pretend like you dont know.

You cant penetrate a person like that.

What if someone penetrated you against your will?

Its rape.
Con
#10
I have to applaud Pro for keeping up this act for so long. 

This is a mediocre character performance. It takes serious dedication to use the same schtick for months and not get anywhere.

I have little faith that your trolling gets better.