Vaccines cause autism
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
After 3 votes and with 12 points ahead, the winner is...
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 5
- Time for argument
- Two weeks
- Max argument characters
- 30,000
- Voting period
- One month
- Point system
- Multiple criterions
- Voting system
- Open
Almost everyone has autism these days. My guess is its because of vaccines. The government injects reptile blood in us to make us stupid and autistic.
- Appeal To Definition.
- Reductio Ad Absurdum.
- Most vaccinations are administered via injections through the arm with no sexual intent proceeding it.
- You have yet to establish proof that vaccines cause autism.
Only Con used sources.
Pro argues that vaccines involve unwanted penetration, however something neither debater explores is consensual vaccination. This actually gives the point to Pro, Con lazily and arrogantly gives up the following Rounds with barely any response to Pro, even intentionally sending a blank Round.
This is why conduct is given to Pro, it was intentional disrespect with Round 5 having direct abuse given to Pro in a mocking manner.
The problem for Pro is that Pro never explores how rape causes autism, that link is never made. Con only provides us with the fact that rape and vaccination are not defined the same, which proves very little as a dog and a cat are still both animals and have breeds within them. Definitions differing would mean one cannot call kung fu a striking art if anything in it is grappling nor could one compare it to Karate as the definitions differ. That does not remotely follow.
Pro wins the rape comparison since Con fails again and again to point out that vaccination can be consensual and often is.
Pro does not ever explain how rape or vaccination cause autism, this is a fundamental flaw and how Con ends up winning.
Pro does a good job showing logically valid forms, with wholly unsound conclusions (as con is quick to point out via reminding us the definitions don't connect).
Con would have done better with some more jokes, but as I did not find pro's jokes to be funny, even weighing this as comedy I'll end up favoring con.
Arguments: The BoP was on PRO to show that vaccines cause autism. Even if his ludicrous argument that vaccination is rape was upheld, he still failed to prove that rape causes autism. CON correctly noted the BoP, which was all he needed to do.
Sources: CON used several sources for definitions, while PRO used none.
S/G: Acceptable from both sides.
Conduct: AFAIK, troll arguments are annoying, but not poor conduct.
Yeah, I will explain it to you immediatelly.
What is a guilt trap? I voted against you.
RM
Were you trying to guilt me into liking you?
For your information, I was born without the feeling of guilt. I cant feel guilt. If I do something wrong, I blame it on others.
Nice guilt trap tho. Would work on most people.
"it was intentional disrespect with Round 5 having direct abuse given to Pro in a mocking manner."
Direct abuse? I feel so abused. I am helpless.
Save me madman.
Yes, lets take your feelings into consideration.
You should really give up.
Yes, my goal should be to entertain you.
"My goal is not to entertain you, honey"
Good. Because you're not very successful at it.
My goal is not to entertain you, honey. Accept the defeat and stop crying.
At being consistently boring, yes.
I won this easily.
Are you old?
You're 100% triggered.
Dont worry too much Con. You will grow old and die alone.
It’s semi-difficult to treat this debate as a logical discussion but I welcome the challenge. We’re both playing roles when you think about it.:
1. You pretend to be funny.
2. I pretend to take you seriously.
No sleeping during the debate!!!
Zzzzzzzzzzz
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
"If Con thinks that unwanted penetration of body is fine, one must wonder what kind of a person Con is."
My best line so far.
You are confident, which is good. The world belongs to the confident. The confident always win when crossing the street.
I'm pretty confident in my chances regardless of those factors.
It is expected that voters will vote for you, which will make you great and definitely more attractive to women. Plus, you have a greater chance of going to heaven if you win this debate. So things are looking good for you.
Easy for you to lose.
🤪
This debate will last for at least two months. But yes, it will be easy for me.
This will be an easy victory.