Instigator / Pro
7
1500
rating
8
debates
68.75%
won
Topic
#4248

Jesus is God

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Better arguments
3
0
Better sources
2
2
Better legibility
1
1
Better conduct
1
1

After 1 vote and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...

DavidAZ
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
3
Time for argument
One week
Max argument characters
10,000
Voting period
One week
Point system
Multiple criterions
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
4
1500
rating
25
debates
42.0%
won
Description

This debate will be about whether Jesus Christ is GOD or not.

Only reference that can be used is the Bible.

If I need to change terms, please message me.

Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Better arguments
3 point(s)
Better sources
2 point(s)
Better legibility
1 point(s)
Better conduct
1 point(s)
Reason:

Right off the bat, using the Bible as the only source is a big advantage to PRO. I'm not sure why CON would agree to use it as a reliable source, it would be like PRO agreeing to use the Quran. CON sort of argues outside the scope of the debate using historical events, so I will just focus on the bits in the Bible.

Anyway, PRO doesn't argue for the Trinity and seems to be closer to the Nestorianism camp. This actually doesn't hold them back as much as I expected, and it keeps them from having to counter the usual criticisms of the Trinity. CON does not argue that the Bible contradicts itself and is unreliable, which would have bee their strongest opportunity given that some verses seem to support them and some their opponent. In the absence of such an argument, PRO's spirit explanation is the only thing that explains all the evidence given. Once PRO argues that Jesus has the spirit of God but is part human (though not in the conventional Trinitarian sense), CON has to address that. Unfortunately, all the evidence CON gives from that point on is consistent with PRO's view of Jesus. So CON would have had to show that Jesus doesn't have God's spirit at all or reframe the debate.

In short, PRO's argument explains CON's evidence. CON's argument does not explain PRO's evidence.