Instigator / Pro
4
1500
rating
3
debates
33.33%
won
Topic
#4533

Islam Vs Anything2

Status
Finished

The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.

Winner & statistics
Winner
4
4

After 6 votes and with the same amount of points on both sides...

It's a tie!
Parameters
Publication date
Last updated date
Type
Standard
Number of rounds
5
Time for argument
Two weeks
Max argument characters
30,000
Voting period
Six months
Point system
Winner selection
Voting system
Open
Contender / Con
4
1587
rating
182
debates
55.77%
won
Description

Resolution: Marriage Between Prophet (SAW) and Aisha (RA) was normal.
My stance: Pro
Opponent's stance: Con
BOF: Shared.
Rule No 1: No insult to my religion which is Islam and no insult to any person discussed in Debate, especially Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and mother Aisha (RA).
Rule No 2: No trolling
Rule No 3: Anything in comment section is not part of debate unless something to be discussed and both parties accept, example., want to skip a round etc.
Rule No 4: No forfeit (if inevitable because of uncontrollable circumstances, then if both parties agree should not affect debate). Intentional forfeit will cause automatic loss.
Rule No 5: Evidence must be credible, broken links and resources which do not have citation must cause the loss of resources points. Wikipedia have citation in the bottom, so if a Wikipedia link is attached and there is citation within that page, then it should be as credible as any other external resource.
Rule No 6: Anyone can accept defeat in the middle of debate.
Rule No 7: No vote Bomb
Rule No 8: One shall read the full argument and must not ignore it. Both my contender and voters as well.
Rule No 9: No favoritism, Biased voting.
Rule No 10: We must assume Islamic historical references are correct, and can use any mean to prove our resolution, including scientific facts as well.
Rule No 11: No personal attacks, just keep everything related to topic.
Rule NO 12: Everything I am saying and doing, for the sake of debate, must not be called predator.
Rule No 13: Everything Being discuss, is for the sake of debate only, not imposing on any culture or society. Laws and regulation made for any country is for them and has nothing to do with the debate. And I am not opposing them.
Rule No 14: The whole debate is only about this specific debate, not for all and at large. I am not suggesting it for any place and person as well.
Rule No 15: Make the debate relevant to the topic and good and nice one.
Rule No 16: I ask my opponent to present his or her opening argument. I will keep the first round very simple with little information without arguments.
Thanks a lot
looking forward to a good debate in SHA Allah.

-->
@Barney

.
Papertiger,

YOUR OUTRIGHT SICKENING QUOTE: "you are kidding me? i have proven she was not child, people of that time saw her adult. and precious puberty is reason for that."

When your desert sweaty imbecile Muhammed married Aisha she was only SIX YEARS OLD, whereas you forgot to say this FACT, then "allegedly" when your prophet consummated the marriage, she was NINE YEARS OLD to be able to SCREW her little body! Can you see your pathetic imbecile Muhammed climbing on top of a 9 YEAR OLD GIRL AND SCREWING HER MOUTH, ANUS AND VAGINA? HUH?

QUESTION: Relative to the FACTS shown above, would you allow your daughter to be in the same situation of marriage to a Muslim man when she is 9 YEARS OLD? YES?

RECENT "HAMAS LITTLE GIRL CHILD BRIDES" GROUP MARRIAGES TO MUSLIM MEN THAT IS OKAY TO YOUR WAY OF THINKING IN THE 21ST CENTURY, YOU SICKENING PUKEY MUSLIM FOOL!!!:
https://iranpoliticsclub.net/photos/muslim-child-brides/images/Muslim%20Child%20Brides%20Arab%20Group%20Wedding%20Hamas%20Palestine.jpg

.

-->
@prefix

No one is expected to vote perfectly from the start. There’s a learning curve to be sure.

-->
@prefix

-> “ Con did a better job on two points which Pro did not counter ( Child marriage traumatizes children. and
Aisha was enslaved)”

Again this vote falls short on analysis. Basically it would not be fair to the effort pro put in to treat this debate as a foregone conclusion.
While referencing one side of the debate, and suggesting there were no replies to the two contentions named, at least one contention put forward by the other side should be named. The “precious puberty” line of reasoning for example, and how con overcame it.

In order for a vote to stand, moderation should be under the impression you have some understanding of both sides (it need not be complete understanding, but some).

A decent layout for a vote would be a quick gist of how each side tried to argue, followed by why you believe one came ahead.

-->
@Barney

Thanx for the feedback. I did not intend to break policy. It was my error.

I have corrected and voted again in adherence to the policy.

That may not please everyone, but I along with 2 others have voted for Con, so it appears to be accurate.

-->
@prefix

https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#arguments

Arguments
Goes to the side that, within the context of the debate rounds, successfully affirms (vote pro) or negates (vote con) the resolution. Ties are possible, particularly with pre-agreed competing claims, but in most cases failing to affirm the resolution means pro loses by default.

Weighing entails analyzing the relative strength of one argument or set of arguments and their impacts against another argument or set of arguments. Weighing requires analyzing and situating arguments and counterarguments within the context of the debate as a whole.

-->
@Barney
@whiteflame

again vote bomb, take the voting privileges from that guy. repeated vote bomb. It shows, all my efforts was to fill the pages and no one want to fcking read it even.
what am i doing here then?
shall i call for self ban as well?
this is totally demotivating for me to do any further debates.

-->
@prefix

you are kidding me? i have proven she was not child, people of that time saw her adult. and precious puberty is reason for that.
con never proven any trauma for my case and also there was no enslavement as well because it was marriage. and she was engaged before.
general cases cant be used for this case. this is based on specific case.
how many times you are going to vote bomb?

-->
@Barney
@tigerlord

I was attempting to be sensitive to the beliefs of others.

It was not to be a vote on religious grounds.

Con did a better job on two points which Pro did not counter ( Child marriage traumatizes children. and
Aisha was enslaved)

I included the UN as a neutral third party support for my vote.i

If this was wrong, well .....In the words of Steve Martin......"EXCUSSSSSSE Me!"

-->
@prefix

While I wholly agree with you, your vote needs to be expanded with positive answers to two simple questions:
1. Did con make said argument about the UN?
2. What was pro’s attempted defense?

Additionally, your vote should contain a minimum of one contention from pro and how con countered it.

prefix
08.20.2023 10:20AM

#7
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner

1 point(s)
Reason:
If one is to avoid the argument of whose moral judgement is superior, and look instead to making a judgement based on a universal morality, one may turn to the United Nations.
The UN describes it thus "Child and forced marriage:[ is ] a violation of human rights"...https://www.ohchr.org/en/stories/2016/11/child-and-forced-marriage-violation-human-rights
[
The point goes to Con.

-->
@Barney

Can you respond toward vote bomb by prefix ?

-->
@whiteflame

another vote bomb, please address thanks

😔😔😔

-->
@FishChaser

Please review the voting policy:
https://info.debateart.com/terms-of-service/voting-policy#vote-removal

While your vote gets to the heart of the matter as you see it, it seemed to not give pro any chance to prove “normal” by any standard. Both debaters put a lot of work in, and while you don’t need to go down every rabbit hole, more analysis is needed if assigning points.

06.28.2023 06:30AM

#7
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner

1 point(s)
Reason:
Pro uses the word "normal" which could mean anything depending on the cultural context and then tries to warp biology to justify Mohammad fucking a 9 year old. Con points out that this is nonsense and points out that Mohammad had control of the narrative.

-->
@FishChaser

Don’t take it personal.
That whiny loser reports everyone’s votes.

-->
@Barney
@whiteflame

I cannot report anything physically, as you have made it be. I want to report fischaser's RFD.

Please attend, thank you.

-->
@FishChaser

Thanks for the vote!

-->
@Bella3sp

I do not shit on people, I do it in toilet, believe me LOL

-->
@tigerlord

No, I just think its funny you shit on someone, without mentioning them, but can't do the same in private messages.

-->
@Bella3sp

Is it crime to do? If I did mention then what is the big deal?

-->
@tigerlord

It's not completely about changing someones mind, but you complain when you can't even to the direct person.

If you don't want to go deep into it, don't complain in the comments about it. Simple.

Comment two:

That's why I deleted it. Funny you have no complaint but compare me to him..

-->
@Bella3sp

I was talking with rationalmadman, as he blocked me I can't tag him, simple

-->
@Bella3sp

If I prove it in private messages, would you change your mind? I guess probably not. I did for barney but no benefit. On the other hand your RFD was very long, I am already tired from that debate and wanted to have rest and give time to my family, that is why I did not want to go in deep with it.

I have no complaint toward you at all so far.

-->
@tigerlord

"But, the votes I call vote bomb, I can prove them here by discussing them in full detail. But I do not want to waste my time on that. Probably I will do debate on this topic again in near future."

If your not willing to discuss to the "fullest" in private messages, why exploit what you say in comments?
If your going to complain about my vote, why not complain to the person directly especially when you messaged them in the first place?

I can see getting busy but I don't think that's quite the case right now.

-->
@tigerlord

I have been nothing but honest towards you in our exchanges.

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas

"2+2=4!"

2+2 is not 24

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas

Would you wanna be a judge, BrotherD?
We can probably arrange for you to judge on the debate.

-->
@Slainte

.
Slainte,

YOUR MORE THAN STUPID QUOTE RELATIVE TO MUSLIM MEN MARRYING PREPUBESCENT GIRLS: “In reality those photos are not brides.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hamas-wedding-girls/
You are not helping the argument when you are posting propaganda”

What did you expect from the hell bound Muslim crowd to TRY and save embarrassment that the said photographs WERE NOT Muslim men marrying prepubescent young girls?!!! HELLO, anybody home today? Priceless stupidity on your part!

.
A QUOTE FROM THE LINK YOU GAVE ME IN TRYING TO HIDE THE OBVIOUS IN SAID MEN MARRYING PREPUBESCENT GIRLS SHOWN IN SAID IMAGES: “Although the photographs and video footage did originate with the July 2009 mass wedding event, and they do show pre-pubescent girls dressed in clothing resembling bridal garb holding hands with older men, the young girls in these pictures were not being married off to adult males; they were relatives of the brides and grooms (typically nieces and cousins ranging in age from three to eight years old) who were merely ancillary participants in the ceremony, performing a function similar to that of flower girls in western-style weddings.”

.
For your embarrassment, take note of the quote above explicitly stating the following to HIDE the facts of grown Muslim men marrying prepubescent young girls:

1. “Although the photographs and video footage did originate with the July 2009 mass wedding event,"

YES, the FACT of these men marrying prepubescent girls, DUH!

.
2. “and they do show pre-pubescent girls dressed in clothing resembling bridal garb holding hands with older men,”

YES, they do show prepubescent girls DRESSED IN CLOTHING RESEMBLING BRIDAL GARB, then WHY were they dressed in said “bridal garb” to begin with if they were NOT being married to Muslim men that are 4 TIMES BIGGER THAN THE GIRLS SHOWN? .... HELLO? 2+2=4!

.
3. “they were relatives of the brides and grooms (typically nieces and cousins ranging in age from three to eight years old)”

Really? Then where were the young MALE RELATIVES dressed up in holding hands with the grown men pictured that were 3 to 8 years old? How come they were all prepubescent GIRLS?!.... Get it fool?

.
4. “who were merely ancillary participants in the ceremony,”

Really? Then why were there ONLY ONE “ancillary” participant GIRL ONLY in holding hands with the GROWN MALE from all of a parents relatives? Again, where are the 3 to 8 year old dressed up boys??!! GET IT FOOL?

The preponderance of the evidence shown, is this was in INITIAL FACT a marriage of grown Muslim men to innocent prepubescent young girls to be able to FUCK THEM AS PEDOPHILES when the marriage ceremony was over in the name of Islam! I am truly sorry about your lack of intellect in being able to swallow said link in trying so hard to HIDE the aforementioned FACT that this was a sickening marriage!

TIGERLORD REFERRED TO 9 YEAR OLD GIRLS IN HIS DEBATE WHERE IT WAS OKAY FOR GROWN MUSLIM MEN TO MARRY THEM, DO THE SIMPLE MATH SLAINTE!

You are excused for being outright stupid in swallowing said link, therefore promiss the membership that you won’t be that gullible again relative to the topic at hand, okay? We thank you in advance.

.

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas

In reality those photos are not brides.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hamas-wedding-girls/

You are not helping the argument when you are posting propaganda.

-->
@Slainte
@BrotherD.Thomas

I have found a way to have judges for my debates, problem solved. And slainte, if I lose that means I have weakness in my knowledge, while Islam is perfect. So loosing is what from which you should learn.
But, the votes I call vote bomb, I can prove them here by discussing them in full detail. But I do not want to waste my time on that. Probably I will do debate on this topic again in near future.
Right now I wanted to spend this weekend with my family, let's see when I will do it again, though before that I need to familiarize with some people, I think are honest. And I can make them judges on my debates.

.
TIGERLORD, WHAT DIDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND IN "YOUR" FOLLOWING QUOTES WHERE "YOU" SAID THAT YOU WERE LEAVING THIS DEBATE FORUM?!

1. “There must be a way on this website site to avoid these kinds of things. If there is no way, "then I am going to leave it.”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54005

2. “This will be my last debate" if I have to face these kinds of people.”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54599

3. “How can I stand at a place" where dogs like thomas can get 1166 likes."
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54638

4. BARNEY ADDRESSING TIGERLORD WANTING TO LEAVE DEBATEART: “You are welcome to find a safe space debate site, where no disagreements are allowed."
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54650

5. “ … if someone is doing blasphemy against Allah and prophet, "Quran ordered us to leave that place."
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54651

6. “but i am leaving this place as its very biased."
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54833

7. “ …. i am going to destory these 2 last voters "and then delete my account after copying my debate.”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54836

8. “ …. and will report to head moderator. if nothing happens "i am off from this website.”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54848

.
TIGERLORD, aka "Paper Tiger," you are giving your sickening Islamic faith a bad name, as if it doesn't already have one, in remaining here WANTING ANOTHER DEBATE like you said in your post #291? LOL! When are you going to learn that YOU ARE A LOSER, not only in debates, but in swallowing the abhorred faith of ISLAM that allows Muslim men to MARRY AND FUCK LITTLE 9 YEAR OLD GIRLS TODAY AS OUTRIGHT PEDOPHILES as sickeningly shown in the links below!

https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEM0AFX
https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEM0AFY
https://www.imagebam.com/view/MEM0AX2

.

-->
@tigerlord

You will need to ask for judges that exercise full tabula rasa voting. And you may still lose. Can you handle a loss?

No matter how many times you come, I can defeat you. I can already see how hard you tried to make it tie, and for defeating you will embarrass yourself more.
But I never run from this, I can start another debate when I want and when it will be necessary with whomever I want and whenever I want. Though I have learned one thing, I should choose judges and only choose who are unbiased, and there will be not even single Muslims in it.
Now get rest and I know how much upset you guys are being helpless.
bye and plz do not disturb.

"Rule NO 12: Everything I am saying and doing, for the sake of debate, must not be called predator."

Now I understand why this was a rule.

-->
@Slainte

He’s long gone from the site by now.

-->
@tigerlord

I find the true value of a debate, is to read the votes. How was the message received? I did not agree with you at all, yet I still voted for you, because for me... the BOP is most important. Other voters will be more influenced by their own opinions, or see what I saw in a very different way. That is life. I have talked with people who voted against me, and thank them for the time they take to read my material, and give feedback. That is such a precious thing.

Enjoy the relationships, learn from the comments, and grow with it.

For any actual Muslims (as opposed to trolls impersonating Muslims to make Islam look bad), I’ve started a forum topic related to this debate:

Non-fallacious defenses of Muhammad?
https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/9532-non-fallacious-defenses-of-muhammad

-->
@BrotherD.Thomas

Thomas, Son of zina,

You ask me to refute your statements, then proceed to post Islamic texts which are against arguing and debating.

Which one is it? do you want me to stop arguing with me, or do you want me to refute you? pick a side its not that hard

i have already refuted you in a thread in the forums called "beauties of Islam" to which you were left speechless, and have still not responded to after ages.

the contents within #202 have already been refuted in that thread in the forums

.
TIGERLORD, WHY ARE YOU STILL HERE AS A LIAR IN FRONT OF YOUR CAMIL FUCKER ALLAH GOD?

What part of the following that YOU, I repeat, YOU STATED that you don't understand HYPOCRITE Muslim?!

1. “There must be a way on this website site to avoid these kinds of things. If there is no way, "then I am going to leave it.”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54005

2. “This will be my last debate" if I have to face these kinds of people.”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54599

3. “How can I stand at a place" where dogs like thomas can get 1166 likes."
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54638

4. BARNEY ADDRESSING TIGERLORD WANTING TO LEAVE DEBATEART: “You are welcome to find a safe space debate site, where no disagreements are allowed."
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54650

5. “ … if someone is doing blasphemy against Allah and prophet, "Quran ordered us to leave that place."
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54651

6. “but i am leaving this place as its very biased."
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54833

7. “ …. i am going to destory these 2 last voters "and then delete my account after copying my debate.”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54836

8. “ …. and will report to head moderator. if nothing happens "i am off from this website.”
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4533/comments/54848

TIGERLORD, NOW LEAVE LIKE YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING TO DO AS SHOWN ABOVE! When you leave, the removal of the "Camel Stench" will go with you because of your abhorred Islam religion directly allows CHILD MOLESTATION from babies to NINE YEAR OLD innocent girls!

GET THE FUCK OUT HERE!

.
.

________¶¶¶_______1¶______________________________
________1¶_1_____§_¶______________________________
_________¶__¶111¶__¶______________________________
__________¶_¶___¶__¶______________________________
_________¶¶1_¶¶¶¶¶¶_______________________________
________¶¶¶¶¶¶§¶¶¶¶_______________________________
_______¶¶¶¶¶§§¶__§¶_______________________________
______¶¶¶¶¶§11§__1¶§______________________________
_____¶¶¶§§§§111§§§¶§§_____________________________
____¶¶¶¶§§¶1§1§11111§¶¶___________________________
____¶¶¶1§§1¶¶§§¶¶1§§111§1¶________________________
___¶¶¶¶11111¶§¶¶__1§¶§1§¶¶¶_______________________
___¶¶¶11111111§¶¶____¶1¶1_________________________
___¶§¶11111111§1¶_________________________________
_____¶§§1111111§11¶_______________________________
_____¶111111111111§1§¶¶___________________________
_____¶1111111111111§§§§§§§§¶¶¶¶¶§___111___________
_____1§1111111111111111111111111§§§11§§§§§¶¶______
______¶1111111111111111§§§§11111111§§§111§§1§¶____
______¶¶111111§11111111111111111111111111111§¶¶___
_______¶§§1111§111111111111111111111111111111§¶___
________¶¶§1¶¶§111111111111111111111111111111§¶§__
_________¶111§¶111111111111111111111111111111¶§1__
_________¶111¶¶§111§§111111111§§1§11111§§§11¶¶¶___
_________¶1§¶_¶¶¶¶¶§§§§§§§§§§§¶¶¶§11111§§§§¶¶¶¶___
________¶§§¶___¶§¶____1§¶¶¶§1___¶§111§§§¶¶1¶_§¶___
_______¶§§¶____¶§¶_______________§11§§¶¶¶1§¶1¶¶___
_______¶§¶_____¶1§¶______________¶§1§¶___¶§§1§1___
_______¶§______¶¶¶§_______________¶§1¶_____¶§¶¶___
______¶¶________¶¶________________¶11¶_____¶¶¶¶___
_____¶§_________¶¶_______________¶§¶¶______¶¶¶¶¶__
____§1¶_________¶¶______________¶§¶________¶¶¶¶¶__
___1§¶¶________¶¶¶_____________¶1¶_________¶¶_¶___
__¶_1¶_________1§§___________¶§1¶_________¶§¶_____
______________¶__1__________¶__¶_________¶¶¶______

____________36936936936936936
____________36936936936936936
____________369369369369369369
___________36936936936936933693
__________3693693693693693693693
_________369369369369369369369369
_________3693693693693693693693699
________3693693693693693693693699369
_______36936939693693693693693693693693
_____3693693693693693693693693693693636936
___36936936936936936936936936936___369369369
__36936___369336936369369369369________36936
_36936___36936_369369336936936__¶¶__¶¶
36933___36936__36936___3693636_¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
693____36936__36936_____369363_¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
______36936__36936______369369__¶¶¶¶¶¶
_____36936___36936_______36936___¶¶¶¶
_____36936___36936________36936___¶¶
_____36936___36936_________36936___11,
______369____36936__________369___11,
______________369________________11,
_______________________________11,
_____________________________11,
___________________________11,
________________________¶¶¶_¶¶¶
_______________________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
_______________________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
________________________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
_________________________¶¶¶¶¶
__________________________¶¶¶
___________________________¶
______________________________11,
________________________________11,
__________________________________11,
___________________________________11,
___________________________________11,
__________________________________11,
_________________________________11,
_______________________________11,
___________________________¶¶__¶¶
__________________________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
__________________________¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
___________________________¶¶¶¶¶¶
____________________________ ¶¶¶
_____________________________ ¶
____________________________11,
__________________________11,
_________________________11,
___________________________11,
_____________________________11,
________________________________11,
__________________________________11,
______________369___________________11,
______369____36936__________369_____11,
_____36936___36936_________36936___11,
_____36936___36936________36936___11,
_____36936___36936_______36936___11,
______36936__36936______369369 _¶¶_¶¶
693____36936__36936_____369363 ¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
36933___36936__36936___3693636 ¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
_36936___36936_369369336936936 _¶¶¶¶¶
__36936___369336936369369369369 _¶¶¶__3696
___36936936936936936936936936936 _¶_336939
_____36936936936936936936936936936936936
_______369369396936936936936936693693
________36936936936936936936999369
_________36936936936936936933699
_________3693693693693693369369
__________36936936936936993693
___________369369369369333693
____________3693693693699369
____________369369369366936
____________36936936936693

-->
@Barney

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣠⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⡿⠋⠉⠉⠻⢿⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡿⠿⠿⠟⠛⠛⠻⢿⣿⣶⣄⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢈⣿⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣠⣤⣤⣤⣤⠀⠈⠻⣿⣇⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⡿⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⡿⠀⠀
⠀⠀⣀⣤⣼⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣿⣷⣄⠀
⢠⣾⠟⠋⠉⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣦⣀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣶⣶⠿⠋⠁⢹⣿⡇
⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⡟⢉⣿⠋⠉⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀
⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣤⣴⠿⠋⠀⠘⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⠏⠀
⢸⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⢶⣤⣤⣴⡶⠿⠛⠙⣿⣆⠀
⠈⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣽⣿⠀
⠀⠘⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣧⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣠⣴⡿⠇⠀
⠀⠀⠘⢿⣿⣦⣤⣴⡿⠻⠿⣷⣦⣤⣤⣤⣴⣾⣿⡿⠿⠿⠿⠟⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⢉⣉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

-->
@tigerlord

Best of luck finding your desired safe space, free from any disagreements.

-->
@Sir.Lancelot

i considered the RFD of best.korea the best one, if you consider his vote to be vote bomb, and barney's good one and bellas' as well, then i am out of here, any ways. though i would say honesty is best policy.
i got what is this place like.
i am done with it.
I think there is option to delete account.
all efforts in vain,
other debate you instigated, i will drop that as well.

A vote bomb would have to at least constitute a deliberation without reading the debate.

Best.Korea’s vote is a vote-bomb. The rest are not.

-->
@tigerlord

I don’t consider them vote-bombs on the basis that they don’t display any biases and have shown a reading of the debate.

In my opinion, they’re fair votes.

One more thing though, as Sir.lancelot himself considered the last two votes to be vote bomb, that is enough for me to confirm that they are. If you realize that is a big thing, and why he said that? It is because he wanted to win fair and square.
Any ways, his acknowledgment is a big deal for me.
Thanks, everyone.
On the other hand I am a bit rusty, otherwise on DDO every opponent was forfeiting maximum 3rd round, I should have not left any roam to let people even vote bomb.

i said have fun kids LOL