Instigator / Pro
1617
rating
197
debates
55.58%
won
Topic
#6266
DART Policy Proposal: Lemming should become a moderator.
Status
Debating
Waiting for the next argument from the instigator.
Round will be automatically forfeited in:
00
DD
:
00
HH
:
00
MM
:
00
SS
Judges
David
92 debates /
180 votes
On stand by
Barney
53 debates /
1,389 votes
On stand by
whiteflame
27 debates /
212 votes
On stand by
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Judges
Contender / Con
1500
rating
8
debates
43.75%
won
Description
No information
Round 1
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 2
Not published yet
Not published yet
Round 3
Not published yet
Not published yet
thanks for the clarification, I will try my best!
The way I interpreted this debate resolution is that the burden of proof lies on Pro to show why Lemming should be a moderator and your burden is to show why he shouldn’t.
You are free to counter arguments and show why other people should be a mod over a Lemming, but that is outside your immediate burden.
You can, but arguing that several other people should also become mods doesn't technically contradict the resolution.
The Pro side doesn't require me to exclude anyone else, I only have to prove that Lemming should become a mod.
Is it ok if i debate for a range of other people not one specific person