1561
rating
205
debates
54.63%
won
Topic
#6266
DART Policy Proposal: Lemming should become a moderator.
Status
Finished
The debate is finished. The distribution of the voting points and the winner are presented below.
Winner & statistics
After 3 votes and with 3 points ahead, the winner is...
Sir.Lancelot
Judges

David
92 debates /
186 votes
Voted

Barney
53 debates /
1,410 votes
Voted

whiteflame
27 debates /
217 votes
Voted
Parameters
- Publication date
- Last updated date
- Type
- Standard
- Number of rounds
- 3
- Time for argument
- Three days
- Max argument characters
- 10,000
- Voting period
- One week
- Point system
- Winner selection
- Voting system
- Judges
1500
rating
19
debates
50.0%
won
Description
No information
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
That's easy enough. Conceded.
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Concession
Criterion
Pro
Tie
Con
Points
Winner
1 point(s)
Reason:
Concession.
sorry I miscalculated time and wrongly forfeited the argument. I do have it ready now. Can we please make it a two round debate?
Sorry just one question: Can there be only a specific amount of mods?
thanks for the clarification, I will try my best!
The way I interpreted this debate resolution is that the burden of proof lies on Pro to show why Lemming should be a moderator and your burden is to show why he shouldn’t.
You are free to counter arguments and show why other people should be a mod over a Lemming, but that is outside your immediate burden.
You can, but arguing that several other people should also become mods doesn't technically contradict the resolution.
The Pro side doesn't require me to exclude anyone else, I only have to prove that Lemming should become a mod.
Is it ok if i debate for a range of other people not one specific person